Paper Mario
Support
- MarioMario456 (talk) 155KB and no red links.
Oppose
- Alex95 (talk) If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the rules for nomination. See also: MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario
- Owencrazyboy9 (talk) I agree. Having a rewrite or construction template on the page is against the nomination rules. Also, I spotted a red link. Per Alex95.
- Luigi 64DD (talk) Per all.
- Yoshi876 (talk) The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Article size has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the article. If that were the case, Yoshi would be candidate for a featured article but as it is currently, it is a cesspool of bad and flowery, biased writing. The article still has a construction tag and a rewrite template on the top of the page, and it irks me that you didn't give a crap about the rules, which explicitly forbid nominating articles with those tags up (which have their own stories to tell that I won't go over, but are there for a reason). Read the guidelines first before you make nominations that fail on the very first and clear rule.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per all. Length does not always guarantee good writing.