1,136
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina (edit)
Revision as of 10:31, January 5, 2024
, 5 months agono edit summary
Tag: Mobile edit |
Camwoodstock (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Shoey}} | #{{User|Shoey}} | ||
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Just looked through the article and it looks to be in great shape. | #{{User|Killer Moth}} Just looked through the article and it looks to be in great shape. | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} With the thing we brought up in comments addressed, we think this is in perfect shape--to briefly summarize, the article's length is perfect, going in-depth into the details while still leaving some things that already have dedicated articles simple and concise, and we appreciate the absence of flowery language and keeping things informative and not informal, and now that the gallery's been split, it doesn't stick out anywhere ''near'' as much length-wise relative to the article itself. This and Edge could practically be the gold standard for the various other Rabbid articles, if you ask us, so they should absolutely be featured. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
::The wording on the [[MarioWiki:Galleries#Splitting galleries|writing guidelines]] are, admittedly, unclear; it just says it's "''a concern once it '''exceeds 60,000 bytes''' [...], although it may be '''less depending on collective user discretion'''''"; we feel it might be a little long for the article's sake, but to be fair--it is currently trying to be a comprehensive gallery for Rabbid Rosalina, so we do understand why it's that long; it's not egregiously so, is what we're getting at.<br>Of course, whether or not we incur "collective user discretion" is for others to decide, not just us; though, personally, we feel the Rabbid Rosalina gallery should be split, since otherwise the article is a rather nice length, and the gallery just happens to take up a rather large amount of it. Edge can also probably have their gallery truncated and split as well for much the same reasons, though at least their article is a tad bit longer, and hey, Edge's gallery sure didn't prevent that article from getting featured. Depending on how hard you want to lean into the 60k requirement, it might not be all ''that'' necessary, but seeing as these guidelines are so loose, we figured it's worth asking. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 22:42, January 4, 2024 (EST) | ::The wording on the [[MarioWiki:Galleries#Splitting galleries|writing guidelines]] are, admittedly, unclear; it just says it's "''a concern once it '''exceeds 60,000 bytes''' [...], although it may be '''less depending on collective user discretion'''''"; we feel it might be a little long for the article's sake, but to be fair--it is currently trying to be a comprehensive gallery for Rabbid Rosalina, so we do understand why it's that long; it's not egregiously so, is what we're getting at.<br>Of course, whether or not we incur "collective user discretion" is for others to decide, not just us; though, personally, we feel the Rabbid Rosalina gallery should be split, since otherwise the article is a rather nice length, and the gallery just happens to take up a rather large amount of it. Edge can also probably have their gallery truncated and split as well for much the same reasons, though at least their article is a tad bit longer, and hey, Edge's gallery sure didn't prevent that article from getting featured. Depending on how hard you want to lean into the 60k requirement, it might not be all ''that'' necessary, but seeing as these guidelines are so loose, we figured it's worth asking. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 22:42, January 4, 2024 (EST) | ||
:::I already made a gallery page for Rabbid Rosalina before reading this. Doing the same for Edge wouldn't hurt, would it? {{User:Sparks/sig}} 22:59, January 4, 2024 (EDT) | :::I already made a gallery page for Rabbid Rosalina before reading this. Doing the same for Edge wouldn't hurt, would it? {{User:Sparks/sig}} 22:59, January 4, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::::It wouldn't hurt, we don't think--if people heavily disagree with splitting the galleries for whatever reason (again, the ''exact'' policies are a little ambiguous on purpose to keep them flexible, so we're hesitant to say anything more specific than it is), they can just be re-merged again, after all. ;P {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 09:31, January 5, 2024 (EST) | |||