6,758
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina (edit)
Revision as of 12:20, January 11, 2024
, 4 months agoSparks moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N/Rabbid Rosalina to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina: Nomination ended.
Camwoodstock (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Sparks moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N/Rabbid Rosalina to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina: Nomination ended.) Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[Rabbid Rosalina]]=== | ===[[Rabbid Rosalina]]=== | ||
{{ | {{Fa-archive | ||
|nominated=16:55, 1 January 2024 (EDT) | |nominated=16:55, 1 January 2024 (EDT) | ||
|passed=12:19, 4 January 2024 (EDT) | |passed=12:19, 4 January 2024 (EDT) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Just looked through the article and it looks to be in great shape. | #{{User|Killer Moth}} Just looked through the article and it looks to be in great shape. | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} With the thing we brought up in comments addressed, we think this is in perfect shape--to briefly summarize, the article's length is perfect, going in-depth into the details while still leaving some things that already have dedicated articles simple and concise, and we appreciate the absence of flowery language and keeping things informative and not informal, and now that the gallery's been split, it doesn't stick out anywhere ''near'' as much length-wise relative to the article itself. This and Edge could practically be the gold standard for the various other Rabbid articles, if you ask us, so they should absolutely be featured. | #{{User|Camwoodstock}} With the thing we brought up in comments addressed, we think this is in perfect shape--to briefly summarize, the article's length is perfect, going in-depth into the details while still leaving some things that already have dedicated articles simple and concise, and we appreciate the absence of flowery language and keeping things informative and not informal, and now that the gallery's been split, it doesn't stick out anywhere ''near'' as much length-wise relative to the article itself. This and Edge could practically be the gold standard for the various other Rabbid articles, if you ask us, so they should absolutely be featured. | ||
#{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} The article looks great, it reads well, and it has very good length. I wholeheartedly agree with Camwoodstock. By the way, thank you to Sparks for working on this article so much! You did a great job! | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||