Talk:Princess Daisy/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Should the game appearances and playable-character roles sections be consolidated?  That might make more sense. -[[User:Stumpers|Stumpers]]

<gallery>

Image:DaisyMP8Official.png|Pic 2

</gallery>

Hey, I agree with Fixup here. In the Mario Kart: Double Dash!! game manual it say that "Daisy is so cute she has become something of an Idol"...I think that counts as beautiful. Also, while I doubt that she will be in Brawl (unfortunatly in my opion) I think there is a good chance that she will appear in the Next Smash Bros. game. Not that it matters...just a thought. [[User:Imperialscouts]]

==Has Daisy really been confirmed for...==

Until they fix it, this will be an uncomplete article.  

::I don't have the game, so of course I can't play it! {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}

That's not my problem you are not in the list.

Three things to tell ya:

{{User:Coincollector/sig}}

OK I understood ya, i don't have the game either, but if you have, and you saw that Daisy appears in that game, your info is acceptable, you can write that. Now, I want to know, where did you find that pics, eh? {{User:Coincollector/sig}}

:Er, ripped from a ROM, maybe? {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}

:OK, no need to flame and argue about this! If you felt this needed to be put on the article, why didn't you do it yourself? Just put the dang Images on the page. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}

:You have REALLY got to start signing your comments on these talk pages. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} Oh, and good job on the article.

== Main Quote ==

== Has Daisy really been confirmed to appear in someway in SSBB? ==

Eh, yes she has. In an official video a sticker of her was shown. I doubt any more characters are going to be confirmed, but she'll make more appearances in the game than that.. BTW Don't forget to leave your name. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]

Well I guess we have to wait untill the games is release. [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 15:53, 2 February 2008 (EST)

== Fake Image ==

::I don't doubt what the guide says. I just think that this is a very controversial subject and should be treated as such. It's the same with information from Smash Bros. trophies, which already called Waluigi Wario's "possible" brother or made false statements about Daisy's first spin-off appearance. We should definitely have this in the article. It's very interesting. BUT also accept that this is not a black or white subject. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:30, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

:Ok, let me say this first. Daisy's bio in Melee was correct. The Mario Golf they were speaking of was NES Open Tournament Golf. The problem was that it was MArio Golf in Japan, but NES Open in America. This trivia was removed forever ago due to this conclusion. Also, past guides may have had mistakes, but you should remember that this was also years ago, and that this was before they become the official Nintendo walkthroughs.[[User:ForeverDaisy09|ForeverDaisy09]]

:::Cobold is right on one matter unarguably: we should specifically say which source made that claim.  I actually find it very irritating that our "proof/sources" are things that only the original writer remembers, only to have people scramble around trying to figure out where a claim came from, and then all of a sudden, it's like, "Oh, here it is." It would take 2 minutes for the writer to put in a source.  So let's do it right with this part: put in a source, whether or not we want to call this canon.  Oh, one more point: don't put too much emphasis on the seal.  It does not mean Nintendo says something is "right", it simply means they find the guide as a whole acceptable... if that.  For all we know, the process could simply be like the ESRB's process, based on trust.  Look where that got them. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:38, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

:What I said Nintendo feels towards the guides can't be disagreed with for it is fact. You can't assume there is another possibility when the only reasoning points to Nintendo accepting all information from a guide as truth. Also... I don't have a problem with showing a source, I just originally said when the possibility was brought up that we could post imagery on the talk page. Pft, shoot. I could get sources for a lot of the information on this page, but when I'm the only one that is sensibly working on it for unreasonably long periods of time without anyone else contributing more than weird information, I never feel the need. In this case, sure. For all we know, Nintendo has made these guides official, there is nothing more to it. Assuming the ESRB or the writer's of the guide added something to their personal favor is speculative and unneeded. About the mistakes made in past guides, so what? Everyone knows there are rare typos in games, and there are odd translation errors in manuals, but they are still accepted by Nintendo. If something interferes with a fact, like mentioned about the stars first appearance, it was so minor a mistake, the creators could have made it. You see far more fatal plot-holes than that in the game than in guides. Sorry, I'm rambling. You get what I'm saying. Point is we can get the source. [[User:ForeverDaisy09|ForeverDaisy09]]

Daisy wan't in Mario is missing. I have the game now. The lady in the museum booth is a girl who is based off Peach more then anything. Even using Peach's SMW sprite complete with the blonde hair only difference being the blue dress. The museum artifact were stolen by Koopas and she asked Luigi to get them back. The lady appears in every level and is never named but it definately not Daisy. I think it would go better in Peach's bio since it is her SMW sprite.-Shadowexe

:Or as a separate article under the name Information Booth Attendant.  I remember removing the faked image earlier -- someone was tricked by a trickster on the internet who posted a recolored image of the attendant. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 20:47, 9 August 2008 (EDT)