49,836
edits
Template talk:Stub: Difference between revisions
→Merge {{tem|sectionstub}} contents with {{tem|stub}}
(→Merge {{tem|sectionstub}} contents with {{tem|stub}}: A detail added.) |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
I am proposing here instead of at {{tem|sectionstub}} because I thought it would be neater that way. Anyways, I had a discussion over at [[Template talk:Sectionstub]] about merging {{tem|stub}} with {{tem|sectionstub}} and came up with [[User:Wildgoosespeeder/Stub/sandbox]] that is being used on [[:File:Glide64 2.png]] for testing. It would also be better to remember and keep track of one less template. Seems kind of redundant to have two. Essentially, I want to match our other templates, such as {{tem|construction}}, {{tem|rewrite}}, and {{tem|rewrite-expand}}, in terms of function (<code>section=yes</code>). I am not totally against doing the opposite, like towards {{tem|rewrite}} for example ({{tem|sectionrewrite}}). I am looking for some consistency with our templates. I didn't know that {{tem|sectionstub}} existed because I was using {{tem|stub}} all this time. | I am proposing here instead of at {{tem|sectionstub}} because I thought it would be neater that way. Anyways, I had a discussion over at [[Template talk:Sectionstub]] about merging {{tem|stub}} with {{tem|sectionstub}} and came up with [[User:Wildgoosespeeder/Stub/sandbox]] that is being used on [[:File:Glide64 2.png]] for testing. It would also be better to remember and keep track of one less template. Seems kind of redundant to have two. Essentially, I want to match our other templates, such as {{tem|construction}}, {{tem|rewrite}}, and {{tem|rewrite-expand}}, in terms of function (<code>section=yes</code>). I am not totally against doing the opposite, like towards {{tem|rewrite}} for example ({{tem|sectionrewrite}}). I am looking for some consistency with our templates. I didn't know that {{tem|sectionstub}} existed because I was using {{tem|stub}} all this time. | ||
There were concerns about [[:Category:Section Stubs]] and [[:Category:Stubs]]. That was already addressed before concerns were raised:<br> | There were concerns about [[:Category:Section Stubs]] and [[:Category:Stubs]] being combined into one category. That was already addressed before concerns were raised:<br> | ||
<code><nowiki><includeonly>[[Category:{{#if: {{{section|}}}|Section}} Stubs]]</includeonly></nowiki></code> | <code><nowiki><includeonly>[[Category:{{#if: {{{section|}}}|Section}} Stubs]]</includeonly></nowiki></code><br> | ||
The two categories will remain intact. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Wildgoosespeeder}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Wildgoosespeeder}}<br> | ||