Talk:Underwhere Road

Add topic
Active discussions

Ugh. I can't remember the group name of the three hags in this level...does anyone else? -LinkIII

The Ancient Sisters of the Underwhere. Their names are Hagnes, Hagitha and Hagra. (I think) Lemmy Koopa Fan 16:51, 15 February 2010 (EST)

2 BossesEdit

It ins't the only chapter with 2 bosses, 5-4 and 8-4 also have two bosses. --PaperStriker 13:27, 8 November 2007 (EST)

2 BossesEdit

Yes, but those are chapter bosses, so they don't count (no pun intended). However, 8-2 has two mini-bosses, which is what they are talking about. If you didn't understand why I wrote no pun intended, it's because I put but those are chapter bosses, so they don't count. which is a pun because the 8-4 chapter boss is Count Bleck, who is sometimes known as just count.:)M&L Beware my fury! 15:56, 28 January 2012 (EST)

Strange RoomEdit

I was going through the room where there's a bunch of "stairs" leading up to Dorguy the Second in 3D, and I saw a pipe. It lead to a large room with absolutely nothing in it, but I figured it must be significant to something, but no matter how hard I looked, I couldn't find anything. Does anyone else know what this room is for? Lemmy Koopa Fan 16:51, 15 February 2010 (EST)

Maybe you need to flip or use Tippi to locate a hidden thing!YoshiTron  23:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Rewrite?Edit

I don't really think that the rewrite request is necessary. Only one person has seemingly complained so far, so they threw {{Rewrite}} on the page. I'd like to ask that more opinions are added on the matter on this talk page. This isn't a Talk Page Proposal, or anything; I feel that a TPP for such a matter would be a waste of time. I don't find the article to need a rewrite, and I can understand it perfectly fine. Although that is just my opinion, I feel that this needs discussion. · SMB (Talk) · 00:44, 5 April 2010 (EDT)

I'd place it back if I were you. The grammar is pretty messy. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
I gave the article a bit of a rewrite just now. Does the tag need to be put back, or is it better? If not, I'd be happy to make more changes if any need to be made. · SMB (Talk) · 20:21, 5 April 2010 (EDT)
It's all good now. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Awesome, glad I could help. :D · SMB (Talk) · 21:22, 5 April 2010 (EDT)
Huh? The rewrite thingy is back, but the content of this article has nothing that needs to be changed. Wonder why? There was only one mistake and I fixed it, but if that one mistake was the reason for the template, then why put the template up?M&L Beware my fury! 16:01, 28 January 2012 (EST)