Talk:Mouser (The Super Mario Bros. Super Show!)

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Revision as of 08:19, December 30, 2017 by Archivist Toadette (talk | contribs) (→‎Re-Merge this back to Mouser)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Um, why is this guy categorized under royalty? He was a servant of King Koopa, yes, but he had no royal title. -- Booster

NM, I realized that he's royalty in the comic "A Mouser in the Houser". -- Booster

Mouser's accent is German (possibly Austrian), not French. --The Iconoclast (talk) 05:39, 5 December 2012 (EST)

Re-Merge this back to Mouser[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

merge 8-0
We don't have an article for King Koopa's cartoon appearance, it's covered under the main Bowser article. Nor do Tryclyde or the specific Koopa Troopa in the higher ranks of the Koopa Pack. Why is this any different? This is literally the only page, aside from Klump and Krusha that I can think of to have a separate article for the cartoon appearance. Given the game version was lacking in the "personality" department, that makes this especially pointless, as unlike, say, Morton Koopa Jr., there isn't a huge disparity with opposite personalities. The game counterpart was never specified to even be a species. Yes, Doki Doki Panikku had three differently-colored Mousers while Super Mario Bros. had two and all later versions had one shared palette for all Mousers, but that doesn't make this article any more relevant. This is just a video game boss with a hard-to-define central-to-western European accent. The most striking difference here is that he has a flesh-colored muzzle instead of a grey one, but again, Koopa was at a far worse disparity. Also I'd like to point out that the Nintendo Comics System version is sufficiently covered nowhere, and I seem to recall it once was at some point. I think this very problem may have led to it disappearing.
Proposer: Doc von Schmeltwick (talk)
Deadline: November 15, 2017, 23:59 (GMT)

Support[edit]

  1. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk)
  2. LinkTheLefty (talk) This is such a strange outlier compared to all the other character depictions that manage to remain in the same article (DiC's Koopalings would've made a little more sense). Per proposal.
  3. Mario Kart DS Fan (talk)FINALLY YES YES YES!!!!!! PER EVERYONE!!!!!!!!
  4. Waluigi Time (talk) Per all.
  5. SmokedChili (talk) How was this even split in the first place? Per all.
  6. Alex95 (talk) - Per all.
  7. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
  8. Baby Luigi (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose[edit]

Comment[edit]

@SmokedChili It was split due to some proposal-less conversation from way back in 2007 based off of how Klump and Krusha's cartoon versions have different articles (I'll deal with that later; they too should not, as manuals treat those specific enemies as their own characters), and somehow was never changed back until now. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2017 (EST)

Would this proposal be relevant here, by any chance? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 11:38, 5 November 2017 (EST)
I'd say it is. I'm surprised this wasn't re-merged by default after that. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 16:23, 5 November 2017 (EST)