MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Tabuu

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
< MarioWiki:Featured articles‎ | Unfeature
Revision as of 17:16, May 16, 2018 by Archivist Toadette (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search


Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.

Tabuu became unfeatured at 10:52, 22 April 2011.

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. Reversinator (talk) First, let me say something; this article is big. The thing is, this article is too big. I mean, this article is as big as Bowser Jr.'s article, and Tabuu has only appeared in one game! A large chunk of the parargraphs don't even mention Tabuu, and the whole article is pretty much just the entire plot of Adventure Mode. In other words, it really needs to be trimmed down to only show what Tabuu does.
  2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Major clean up is required for this article. Also, it's written more like a story than something that is supposed to give information. I suggest we cut down all the flowery adjectives/adverbs and make it sound more like an encyclopedia than a story.
  3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Look, I cannot read through this article in one sitting. Some sections are utterly littered with walls and walls of text. Also, when I read an article on Tabuu, I expect it to be a dry summary of his history like in an encyclopedia, not a colorful story. Besides, there are two rewrite tags. Everything is in the past tense. The other rewrite tag is probably pertaining to the style of the article's writing. Unless we get more images, more dry information, and most things in present tense, this article is not the best I've seen.
  4. Mario Fan 123 (talk) Per all. We need to work a lot on this article.
  5. Catboy41 (talk) There's a rewrite template.
  6. New Super Mario (talk) Per all.

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]


@Mario Fan:My point is that the article has a large amount of unnecessary information, and would really benefit from a trimmed article. Reversinator (talk)

Well, it just needs a cleanup. You guys always say "we are going to unfeature it because we are too lazy to make a cleanup". Why don't you stop talking and begin doing things? No offense, but that's the sad truth. --Mario Fan 123 (talk)
If an article has an improvement template, then it can't be a featured article. Also, I suck at cleanup. If I bring attention to the need of cleanup, then someone else will do it. Also also, are you seriously callling me lazy? Just because I said this needed to be rewrited? Reversinator (talk)
@Mario Fan: People who vote for an article to be unfeatured are not responsible for fixing the article's problems. If the condition of the article is important to you and if you're complaining about the fact that others aren't taking initiative, (I don't care about this article one way or the other), it is up to you to take the initiative to fix it. Mario4Ever (talk)