Talk:Gulpits' Rocks

SoS: i just played that part and they dont deal the same, the big ones do 2 more


 * Your original edit said the small ones do 5 damage and the large ones do 5 damage. What are the correct amounts?  Also, is this name official? --


 * Oh sorry bout that it was 5 and 7, its official, because when you attack 'em (yes, attack 'em) it says Gulpit Rocks


 * Okay. Does it say "Gulpit Rocks" or "Gulpit's Rocks?" --


 * Dont exactly remember, almost sure it was Gulpit's

Well if you could check sometime that would be really helpful. --


 * ok, I will as soon as i can

OK, i checked its "Gulpits' Rocks" but i think it said that because i was fighting against two gulpits so should it be changed or not?


 * Yes. Gulpits' Rocks makes more sense, as there is more than one Gulpit in Mario's world. =) --

Merge
Should we just merge this page with Gulpit? -

I would say so. It's a stub and you won't find one without the other. It makes sense.

Merge with Gulpits
MERGE 6-0

I think they would be better off in the Gulpit article cause they are an attack of the Gulpit anyway. The situation is kinda similar to merging the Bellyache Buldges to Gobblgut. (Correct me if I'm wrong on that).

Proposer: Deadline: July 4, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per me and the comments above.
 * 2) Snifits and snifit bullets don't have separate articles, why should gulpits and gulpit rocks?
 * 3) The first thing I thought of when I saw this on the proposal page was Isn't this like the Snufit ball thing. Need I say more.
 * 4) I'm totally for this. I agree with what is said above as well. It's like merging lava bubbles and podoboos (and yes I just went to go find a merging chat page that ended in victory.) It makes complete sense. Yay for more space!
 * 5) Much like merging Snufit Ball to Snufit. Per all.
 * 6) - Consistency demands that either we merge this or we recreate Snufit Ball aggressively... I say merge, for the reasons stated above.