MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario

Support

 * 1) 155KB and no red links.

Oppose

 * 1) If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the rules for nomination. See also: Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario
 * 2) I agree. Having a rewrite or construction template on the page is against the nomination rules. Also, I spotted a red link. Per Alex95.
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time.
 * 5) Article size has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the article. If that were the case, Yoshi would be candidate for a featured article but as it is currently, it is a cesspool of bad and flowery, biased writing. The article still has a construction tag and a rewrite template on the top of the page, and it irks me that you didn't give a crap about the rules, which explicitly forbid nominating articles with those tags up (which have their own stories to tell that I won't go over, but are there for a reason). Read the guidelines first before you make nominations that fail on the very first and clear rule.
 * 6) Per all. Length does not always guarantee good writing.