MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Ashley and Red

Support

 * 1) My artcile (and of Red) looks good. I didn't see any issues.

Comments
I am OK with your opposes....But, exceot the size, the article looks good to you all?

The article has several obvious problems;
 * The introduction is a single clunky block of text. While most of the information is relevant, stuff like Ashley's age and "backstory" is not material that needs to be mentioned in the intro and could be spun off in their own section or integrated in the rest of the article. Chopped it down to a size I think is decent.
 * The WW Touched section is extremely short, lacking several details about the stage's "storyline".
 * The G&W section barely describes the Ashley minigame.
 * Hokey writing in spots ("Red clearly survives whatever perils Ashley puts him under," lol, what?).

You can probably push the article over the minimum recommended 9.000 bytes by expanding the lacking sections --Glowsquid (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2014 (EST)
 * OK, I fixed these things except of:


 * Beggining if the Article: Looks good in this way, and I don't kniw what put :P
 * Game & Wario's section: I don't have Wii U, and never okayed the game.
 * Anyone who played Game & Wario wanna help?
 * What it looks now??

Pinkie Pie, why are you so damn obsessed about much less bytes this article has under 9000? Even Glowsquid said its only the recommended amount. My god. If the article has about 8999 bytes, adding the FA template would actually make it exceed 9000 bytes. Do you understand how ridiculous it is translating this guideline to a rule????
 * Thanks, Baby Luigi. You are the number one
 * Baby Weegee, number not one.

I've also remedied whatever grammar mistakes I could catch, so I may as well put my vote in. If it's not FA quality, I can help get it there.
 * I might have a look into this article some time.
 * That sounds good to me.Thank you two. And Baby Luigi isn't number one, I am #1
 * Uh...Glowquid...what is wrong?

There's some stuff I want to touch up in the personality and G&W sections, but nothing particularly galling. I'll remove my oppose. --Glowsquid (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2014 (EST)
 * Woohooo Thanks!!!