MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Toad

Support

 * 1) It is a well written article.
 * 2) It is a well written article with lots of information in many sections and many good quality pictures.
 * 1) It is a well written article with lots of information in many sections and many good quality pictures.
 * 1) It is a well written article with lots of information in many sections and many good quality pictures.
 * 1) It is a well written article with lots of information in many sections and many good quality pictures.
 * 1) It is a well written article with lots of information in many sections and many good quality pictures.

Oppose
2. WAY too many 1-liners in other sections. Seriously, he's not THAT important in comics.
 * 1) The comics have a scarily impressive amount of info but the stuff immiediatly after them are only one-liners.
 * 2) Even if the comics section is scarily impressive, there are too many little one-liners cleverly stuck where they look like parts of bigger sections...
 * 3) Lots of screenshots in comics section, per all.
 * 4) 1. The comic section has WAY too much stuff.

Comments
I actually think the amount of info in some sections is WAY too much, mainly the comics and Mario & Sonic 2012

The comic sections tend to vary for Toad's importance and in some of them, Toad tends to be the starring character (eg. Kingdom Enquirer). I agree that the Mario & Sonic 2012 information is rather long, and I'll work on shortening that. Some one-liners that are proclaimed actually are a part of information for spin-off game series including the Mario Kart installments which one-liners are to be expected.

I shortened the Mario & Sonic 2012 game information as well added some missing game information. Is there any other issues that are left to be addressed in the article? I am somewhat confused as to whether or not the comic information is too much as there are claims saying that more information is better especially when Toad has the main lead in the story. The article seems fine to me; however, I do wonder if anything is missing in it that other FA articles do have.