Talk:Tanooki Mario

Shouldn't this be merged with Tanooki Suit since it has the same topic?
 * Well, Tanooki Suit is to Tanooki Mario like Cape Feather is to Cape Mario, right? I don't think it should be merged. 06:41, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
 * For each Mario form there are two articles, one for the transformation and one for the power-up used. As Time Q said, it shouldn't be merged. --Xeze 11:19, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Yep, is the same thing and I think make a redirection from Tanooki Mario to Tanooki Suit.


 * But for almost every transformation, there is also an article on the power-up if there is one. --Grandy02 15:26, 20 November 2008 (EST)

They should be merged emmidiately!! User:ppi80/sig
 * Why so? I don't think so. 16:33, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Per Time Q. - Paperphailurethemariomonster99
 * Agree, it shouldn't be merged. One article is for the power-up, the other one for the transformation. The same goes for Super Leaf/Raccoon Mario, Wing Cap/Wing Mario, Boo Mushroom/Boo Mario and so on. Hasn't that been made clear already? Why are those merging templates there again? --Grandy02 14:50, 14 March 2009 (EDT)

Merge Tanooki Mario to Tanooki Suit
I read them and they say pretty much the same thing so I propose we merge them together.

Proposer: Deadline: 11 February 2010

Merge them

 * 1) Per proposal.

Don't Merge them

 * 1) No. One's an item, another's a form. That's enough reason to keep them separate.
 * 2) - If we merged this, we'd have to follow suit and do the same with all the other power-ups and their corresponding forms. The current standard is fine. If you feel otherwise, I would recommend taking this proposal to the Proposals page, is it affects far too many articles.
 * 3) Like what the users said about the other abilities, ones a form, ones a character. We have Metal Mario split into character and form, and they are working better than before. They don't need to be merged!!!