MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Culex

Remove Featured Article Status

 * 1) I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy?
 * 2) This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).
 * 3) There just aren't enough pictures in this article. Maybe 3-4 pictures!

Keep Featured Article Status

 * 1) Length doesn't always matter. We have shorter articles than this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
 * 2) Per Tails.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
DasiyLuigi
 * 1) The images are fine, if more added the article would start looking incredibly cluttered.
 * 2) There are a reasonable amount of images in this article.
 * 3) I honestly think the number of images is pretty good, there are only 4-5 images which seems like a reasonable amount.

Comments
No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more.

I just got rid of it, on my own. 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)

Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)

The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Ok, then
 * While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. Vommack (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain. 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly. 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT)