User talk:92.23.120.66

Writing Standards
Greetings! I've noticed you making various edits on Paper Mario-related articles, such as Shadow Sirens. However, I must tell you that you've been writing far too flowery. According to wiki rule, one must write in a simple, easy-to-understand syntax, and not as though they're attempting to write an epic. Thank you, and have a nice day. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2017 (EDT)

Must be some IP confusion, I haven't edited the Shadow Sirens article. 92.23.120.66 10:53, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
 * I believe he was referring to your edit on Ms. Mowz, which contained a lot of flowery writing. Please read Good writing for more information. -- 11:07, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

My edit to Ms Mowz contained no such flowery writing and significantly improved the article in several respects. It's likely that due to confusion with another IP the editor is being overzealous and not checking for consistency. Regardless, if another editor would like to highlight what he believes to be examples then he can bring them up in discussion. 92.23.120.66 11:10, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

I'm taking the time to read through the edits made by another to the Shadow Sirens page, and my suspicions prove correct. Although I wouldn't describe much of what that user added to the article as "flowery" at all, there's a lot of irrelevant detail added that doesn't develop the article. It bears no resemblance to the sole edit made by myself to Ms. Mowz's page.

I understand that IP confusion occurs, and skim reading and editing when trying to clearup happens and is forgiveable. 92.23.120.66 11:22, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
 * Regardless, you are edit warring, which will lead to a ban if it keeps up. Please discuss this with the other users involved. 11:26, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

An offer for a discussion has been extended in the edit notes of the page. No more edits or revertions have occurred within the following 24 minutes or so - I'll keep an eye on the page, and will assume the issue is resolved if neither a discussion nor another reversion occur. 92.23.120.66 11:35, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

Grubba
The rewrite template is mostly there for getting rid of flowery writing. I don't really see this with your edit, hence why I reverted it. 14:15, 11 September 2017 (EDT)

At first I thought you simply meant you undid my removal of the tag, which is okay. However on review you undid my entire edit, which I have since reverted given the improvement in writing standards and accuracy it brought to the article. No flowery language present, the text is plain and entirely in line with the game's contents. 92.23.120.66 11:00, 17 September 2017 (EDT)
 * Listen, no one wants to read all of that frill, it just makes people disinterested if they have to read through dramatic flair to get to the relevant information. "Eventually, Grubba's research bore fruit." That is a figure of speech, and as such has no place on here. "Affable Texan mannerisms." Just making something a bit more difficult for the masses to understand, nothing more. And resemblance to a Stone Spike? Minorly in that they're blue spikes, but should Kolorado's Wife be noted to look like Mad Koopa because they're both pinkish-orange-skinned Troopas? I don't think so. Good writing is straight to the point, and more importantly, easy for the masses to read. Thank you for your time. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2017 (EDT)
 * In terms of writing for MarioWiki, less is more, and if you can describe the same subject using less words, it's better for our readers and for our purpose. I also suggest you read this to get a better idea on what writing should be like on MarioWiki. Your revision is something I didn't find palatable, so I went ahead and rewrote this myself. 14:41, 17 September 2017 (EDT)