Talk:Mushroom

I think the picture at the top should be in Super Mushroom, because it's actually a super mushroom. Also this page should cover more about mushrooms in general, instead of just items in the RPGs that are called only mushrooms.

Merge M&L series mushrooms together
MERGE ON MAIN ARTICLE 1-5-0

As stated above, I propose to merge Mushroom, Super Mushroom (just M&L info), Ultra Mushroom, and Max Mushroom (just M&L info) into a seperate page or on the main mushroom page. We already have the Nuts ajoined, so we should also ajoin these stated above together to get rid of the small articles they are.

Proposer: Deadline: 11 February 2010, 17:00

Merge Mushrooms together on a Seperate article
 * 1) - Good idea. It gets rid of stubs and it will join more of the mushroom family together.

Merge Mushrooms together on main Mushroom article
 * 1) - Per all I said above and the logic of how the other sections would have to be seperated and cause the mess.
 * 2) We did it with the Nuts article and we will be doing it with the Syrup page, so we need to be consistent. Here is the syrup talk page: syrup talk
 * 3) - Per the shell that reflects the wavelength light of red and consistency.
 * 4) - Per all: consistency and streamlined navigation are always to be striven for.
 * 5) Consistency!

Leave Mushrooms as is

Comments I want to know how you could name the page for the mushrooms that appear in the Mario & Luigi series in case this proposal succeeds, please.
 * Well, possibly Mushroom (Mario & Luigi) or any similar name. Don't worry, that is not the only name I thought of.
 * "Mushroom (Mario & Luigi series)" perhaps? You need to decide on the name before the proposal passes so the voters know exactly what we'll be getting. - 23:35, 30 January 2010 (EST)
 * Yeah, that is a better name, so if my side wins, than we will call it what Walkazo said. Also, just in case like the syrups, the page won't be a sentence or two long, as you can see by the fact of the paragraghs they are right now.
 * You see, Red Shell 68066vr, the Nuts article needs to be expanded, the syrups do to! The mushroom info is not to little, so it can be a seperate article! The Nuts are a seperate page BTW, just that there was no other nuts. Do you see what I'm trying to say? Also, Nuts and Syrups only appeared in two games, Mushrooms all three! Do you understand what I'm saying? - Baby Mario Bloops
 * Regardless of that, he (or she?) has a point. A strong one in fact. Consistency is just as important as expanding articles, if not more important. - 17:19, 4 February 2010 (EST)
 * Now what makes you say that putting it on another page say that it won't be consistent? Just because RS ####vr (sorry, got lazy) said that it will be consistent doesn't mean it won't be either way. Leaving them alone as seperate articles will break the consistenty, though.

I assume that is why he/she didn't vote to "leave them alone". - 17:32, 4 February 2010 (EST)

Consistency is important. When we look in the syrup page, for example, we see all the syrups names and all of this stuff. When we look in the Mushroom article, however, we see that there is barely/no information on the mushroom items! It's on a separate article!

The Mushroom article has more info, yes, but wouldn't hurt to expand more. Besides, placing all the Mushrooms in another article will probably create a stub since they look exactly like mushrooms, except that they restore different amounts of HP.

(Separate is spelled like this, FYI. Sorry for being a spelling nut. :


 * STOP USING THE SYRUP PAGE AS A REFERENCE!!!! We need to expand it like the Nuts page. Also, like above, Mushrooms won't be a stub as a seperate article because they been in all the games!!! (3 games, Nuts/syrups - 2 games) Personally, I think it would be more consistent if it was seperate because it would help users find it easier instead of looking throughout the Mushroom Page. And, we bring it to this page, lot of stuff is going to be added that could have been a complete non-stub article!!!! Please, everyone, get that in your head if you don't already!

Err... calm down. The opposers do have valid reasons to oppose after all. They are correct, splitting it into a separate page for the M&L series isn't very consistent. We would also have to create an article for, and so on for consistency.-- 19:45, 5 February 2010 (EST)
 * I'm not angry at all. Also, that is a very good valid point, but also we have articles that have stuff that is seperated that the other stuff should be seperated too for consistentity but isn't.

Split Mushroom (Super Mario RPG info) into Mushroom and Mushroom (status effect)
SPLIT 6-0

I tried deleting the notice in the Super Mario RPG section but Knife reverted the change, so I decided to create this proposal. As Knife says, it explains its status effect too. It simply can't do it. So I propose that we split them.

Proposer: Deadline: 20 February 2010, 20:00

Split them
 * 1) per proposal
 * 2) - Per proposal
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) - They aren't the same, then they shouldn't be under the same header name...
 * 5) - Per all.
 * 6) Per all.

Keep Joined

Comments

Merge SMRPG Mushrooms onto one page....
MERGE 0-3-0

Yes, another Mushroom one, like we don't have enough, but, for the consistent info, we should have Mushroom (SMRPG info), Bad Mushroom, Mid Mushroom, and Max Mushroom merged together. Just like the Mushroom one I did above, and the Syrup one, they are too small to be better off and since we already merged one thing, we need to be consistent.

Proposer: Deadline: 25 February 2010, 20:00

Merge SMRPG Mushrooms onto a seperate Page

Merge SMRPG Mushrooms onto main Mushroom Page
 * 1) - Many reasons: Proposal maker, consistent, etc etc etc...
 * 2) Max Mushroom is a stub now.
 * 3) - Seeing as the M&L Mushrooms have all been merged, the only consistent thing to do would be to merge Bad Mushroom, Mid Mushroom, and Max Mushroom into the SMRPG section of the Mushroom page as well. Saving space, scrapping stubs and speeding up navigation are also pluses.

Leave SMRPG Mushrooms as seperate Pages

Comments Just noting, you spelled separate wrong again (seperate)

Merge PM Mushrooms together
KEEP SPLIT 0-0-4

You already know what I'm about to say, but those who don't know: I plan to merge the PM mushrooms (Mushroom (PM info), Super Shroom, Ultra Shroom, and Slow Shroom) together to help with consistency that is going on, delete small pages, blah blah blah, you get the point. Please more votes this time.

Proposer: Deadline: 14 March 2010, 2:00

Merge PM Mushrooms onto a Separate Page

Merge PM Mushrooms onto main Mushroom Page

Leave PM Mushrooms as separate Pages
 * 1) The Paper Mario mushrooms are a lot more unique and major than the M&L and SMRPG mushrooms.
 * 2) I know it's still early to vote. But, the pages are not that short, have plentiful info that should never be merged, and per above with the uniqueness of the articles. I only did this in favor of KS3 since he didn't make a proposal himself...
 * 3) - Unlike in M&L and SMRPG, the PM Mushrooms can be used in recipes, which makes Super Shrooms and Ultra Shrooms more unique than if they just restored different amounts of HP. Slow Shroom is even more different than regular Mushrooms, and shouldn't even be considered for a merge.
 * 4) Okay, what the hell. Slow shrooms don't restore health, and there are a lot of shrooms in Paper Mario. And they can be used in recipes. Per Walkazo.

Comments The pages could work just staying alone, may be better to merge it here, or to merge onto one single page. I don't know, and I want to see what people's opinion's are.
 * - KS3, not to be at all mean, I'm just saying this for reference next time. When your wondering if a proposal should be made, and you think that someone else is going to make it, then just make it if the person hasn't yet. It will save some confusion for some users...

Types of Mushrooms
Shouldn't Bee Mushroom, Boo Mushroom, and Rock Mushroom also be in the Types of Mushrooms section?? They are mushrooms too...
 * The section is missing tons of mushrooms. I say we just scrap the section.


 * I agree, we already have the mushroom template anyway at the bottom.--


 * They should at least be listed somewhere in the article, perhaps also indicating the game (or media) of origin. Culex 11:40, 10 April 2010 (EDT)


 * Well, you should blame it all on me. I added that section, and I thought about just adding the "Major Mushrooms." You're right, we should screw this.


 * People, go here. 17:39, 27 April 2010 (EDT) (Even though I hate EDT and it is supposed to be GMT)

Move Super Mushroom information to Super Mushroom
SPLIT 4-0

Yeah, I was the idiot who added all the Super Mushroom information to the Mushroom article. Anyway, this article is supposed to be dealing with types of Mushrooms, but I somehow screwed up and added the Super Mushroom information in this article. I say we move it to the Super Mushroom article, since it should specifically deal with Super Mushrooms. It's basically the same issue I had with Egg and Yoshi Egg.

Proposer: Deadline: 4 May 2010, 24:00

Support
 * 1) Why should I oppose my own proposal?
 * 2) eriFnOigiuLybaB reP.
 * 3) Per all. And go here
 * 4) Different Names. Different Article needed.

Oppose

Comments

Move Mega Mushroom info, Poison Mushroom info, etc. to their respective articles
AGREED ON WITHOUT PROPOSAL

I noticed that a lot of mushrooms are missing from the Types of Mushrooms section, and there is a proposal undergoing that wants to move the Super Mushroom info to the Super Mushroom article, so we should move the rest of the mushrooms too (except for the RPG Mushrooms).

Proposer: Deadline: May 8 2010, 23:59

Support
 * 1) Per myself

Oppose

Comments This doesn't need a proposal. All information stated in those small sections are already mentioned in their respective articles and we can just delete them if you think they're so much of a hassle. This is also coming from the guy who created that section in the first place, so yeah.
 * Okay. 22:40, 2 May 2010 (EDT)

Your proposal ends in a question, which isn't really a proposition. I'm not really sure what you want to even do with this. -- 23:22, 1 May 2010 (EDT)

First Apperance
I think it first appeared in Super Mario Bros (1985)


 * I remember that it first appeared in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the 7 stars. The mushroom you might be thinking about is this one. 00:13, 15 May 2010 (EDT)

But that is still a mushroom and they have the exact same picture.
 * Well, please look above at the TPPs. 14:27, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Artwork
So, apparently this article has a long proposal history. I haven't thoroughly checked all of them yet, I just assume that the info on this page got split from a larger article about Mushrooms at one point. So nowadays, this article is about the Mushroom item found in the RPGs, right? If that's the case, we cannot use the Mushroom artwork from New Super Mario Bros. Wii's Super Mushroom on this page, since that's a completely unrelated item. We need to use artwork from the RPGs here instead. My question is: Does Bowser's Inside Story have official Mushroom artwork that can go on the page? Or any other recent RPG for that matter? - 08:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

No... But it has a sprite.

???
AHEM! Where is the mushrooms from the Party Series? I just can't believe they aren't listed anywhere! How totally wrong!!! 09:19, 6 November 2011 (EST)