MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario (series)

Support

 * 1) - It is written with unopinonated words and correct grammar, with great organization. It goes to great depth for each list entry, but broad enough to not become too wordy. The only section right now that could use improvement (but sufficient nonetheless) is the movies section, which I plan to start working on. Images for each entry, properly referenced sources, etc. all follow the guidelines for an FA.

Oppose

 * 1) Some of the images are disorganized, lots of dates are missing and certainly more scores can be added. Minor things, but I'm picky.
 * 2) It is missing some games in the series, including NSMBW.
 * 3) Where are the comics? It's not complete.
 * 4) This was nominated before, we said no, now we say that again.

MATEOELBACAN

 * 1) -- Opposing just because it's been nominated before is not a legitimate reason.
 * 2) --per Garlic Man
 * 3) Per the man of garlic.

Comments
@Reversinator: Can you clarify on what you mean in your oppose? After looking through the article again, it looks like every game has the first release date. By "scores", do you mean reviews? I'd say anything outside of IGN and GameSpot wouldn't be reliable enough, and some games' reviews just don't exist on those sites. I also don't understand how the images are disorganized.


 * I think he meant the images at the beginning of the page, which does look like a mess to me.