Template talk:WarioWareChar

Just to Make it Clear
While Waluigi has appeared in WarioWare games, he is not confirmed to be an employee.Waluigi Freak 99 14:32, 16 February 2007 (EST)

I agree, a brief appearance does not an employee make. -- Sir Grodus

Delete this template
This is a template meant to round up fourteen individuals into one convenient-to-navigate area. From the surface, there doesn't seem to be much that's wrong here. After all, there are plenty of templates with fewer entries, such as Template:Octoombas. However, this template is not for a specific species, but rather, it's for a group of people that all work for the same organization. Again, it's not necessarily like this is without precedence; Template:Subspacearmy serves a similar function. I do not want this template to be deleted for its small amount of entries, nor for the way that it has been organized; simply put, I find this template unnecessary. In any of the nav. templates based on WarioWare games, there is always a section for the main characters. The characters that are listed in this section? These are the employees of WarioWare, Inc. As you may have realized, this template is also for the employees of WarioWare, Inc. Am I the only one that finds it redundant to have multiple templates essentially repeating the same information? It's understandable that between WarioWare: Twisted! and WarioWare: Touched!, some characters will reappear, and thus, it's our duty to place them in the appropriate nav. templates, but is it really necessary to have an entire template solely for these reappearing characters?

Proposer: Deadline: August 31, 2013, 23:59 GMT

Delete

 * 1) Per my unnecessarily wordy proposal.
 * 2) Per proposal.
 * 3) Per Proposal, and all.

No Delete

 * 1) We have a template for all the baby characters and there are only 11 of them. I find there is nothing wrong with this template.
 * 2) Per Tails

Comments
@Tails777: As I explicitly said, the number of entries in this template was irrelevant as to why I wanted to deleted it. I made a point of saying this numerous times. I even specifically mentioned a template with fewer entries than this one. Thus, your vote really doesn't make sense.