MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rainbow Road

Support

 * 1) It is a great article with hardly any mistakes, a lot of images, no redlinks, etc.

Oppose

 * 1) Tense, grammar, spelling issues, and an overload of images.
 * 2) Information is not enough for some sections. Needs a severe fix...
 * 3) Sigh, I should have been the one nominating this to be featured. But, it's not ready yet. A lot of information is missing at vital spots and I'm not done adding course descriptions for all Rainbow Roads yet.
 * 4) I've spotted an area where there is missing information. Per all.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) - Per all above. Failed.
 * 7) It is just- b o r i n g, in my word.

Comments
KS3: Once again, you've forgotten about FASTAT.


 * And you've forgotten to sign your comment.
 * Well, so have you.

KS3!! Did you already forget the proposal that passed about having no more than three articles nominated by each user? You still have at least three articles still nominated from before that proposal passed! This nomination must be deleted. Sorry, but you have to follow the rules, dude. I'll delete it tomorrow. And please, stop fighting about petty things like signing comments. >.>
 * What do you mean? I counted them and there were 3 that didn't fail. (And in the proposal it said that Unfeature ones don't count).
 * The limit is three articles. Did you include this nomination to the 3 that didn't fail?
 * You currently have nine articles nominated at the same time – Featured Articles/N/Rainbow Road, Featured Articles/N/Koopa Paratroopa, Featured Articles/N1/Donkey Kong Country, Featured Articles/N1/Nintendo GameCube, Featured Articles/N1/World 5 (New Super Mario Bros.), Featured Articles/N/Pinna Park, Featured Articles/N1/Mario Party 6, Featured Articles/N1/Luigi Circuit, and Featured Articles/N2/Princess Peach.


 * Eight of them were nominated before the proposal passed. One was nominated after it passed. That one is this one: Rainbow Road. The deal was that you could't nominate any more articles until your number of nominations had dropped down to two or less.


 * Like, 7 of those failed. Do you see the N1. That means failed. So, he can keep the nomination. He just needs to do the whole failing thing instead of just moving the page. 23:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * How come I can still edit it? Besides, no signature policy, please.
 * Ugh, why on earth are they still in the pending nominations space, then? Looks like I have work to do tonight... Sorry, my mistake. But seriously, someone should alert an active sysop when something like that goes unnoticed...
 * Don't worry Blocky. I'll due it myself, I've got nutthin 2 do.


 * Thank you. I'll protect the pages when you're done. :D
 * I'm doing the incredibly and stupidly boring process of moving them to the Failed section too. :O


 * Lacks any form of references. Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances." Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed.
 * Also, what is this insane rule of "only three articles per person may be nominated"? Clearly, there is an overbearing concept of ownership going on here. It doesn't matter who nominated it, and if anyone argues that it takes credit from the contributing editors, then may I remind these objectors of the fact that it is most important to create something great than to be praised for it? - NARCE 03:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What shall we ever do with this nomination? I mean, it has only been a month and all, but it is not looking to well. Also the nominator has been banned, so should this be failed?

New Super Mario: Saying that the article is "boring" is not a valid reason. Stuff like that are subjective.