User talk:Super Mario Bros.

Welcome, SMB, I'm :D

Overturning a Proposal
The original proposal said you could not completely overturn a proposal for sixty days, which means passed proposals can be partially changed immediately as needed. For example, if the current FI/Calendar proposal passes, FIs will replace the Calendar on the main page. That means there could not immediately be a proposal about replacing FIs with the Calendar. However, there could immediately be a proposal about re-adding a Calendar section to the Main Page, as it builds off the original proposal but does not completely overturn the decision. Basically, within 60 days, you can't have a proposal that would return things to the way they were before the original proposal. Does that help? --

Stub Proposal
I had to remove your Stub Proposal, sorry. It wasn't specific enough - merging stubs has to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. For example, you could try making a Proposal just about the DiC trilogy you used as your example, and then once that passes (and is enacted) or fails, then you can move on to another group of stubs. Again, I'm sorry about all this. - 23:34, 6 April 2009 (EDT)

Another Proposal Header
Wow, three Proposal-themed headers in a row - you're on a roll! (When I first joined all I did was proposal stuff too!) Anyway, sorry for being so brutal about the Majority Proposal, but in academics you gotta defend your ideas with tooth and nail, and I never make exceptions. Still, you fixed it up well, and I am glad you made me one of the Proposers. I'm also happy you finalized the numbers, since I was still up in the air about the amount of votes needed for a clear lead, and about how long the proposal should be extended for. I'm really busy these days too (actually, my parent's anniversary is coming up as well), so I couldn't find the time to sit down and finalize anything. Still, you might try making drafts of your proposals and whatnot before posting (and always remember to preview at least once to catch anything you've missed), to avoid these sort of mishaps in the future. (I preview things multiple times, but I'm obsessive.) - 23:30, 7 April 2009 (EDT)


 * One more thing: if/when the proposal passes, let me add the new rule. I already wrote it up and have it saved on my computer. I also penned - well, typed, but that's not how the expression goes - a comment to put on the Proposal Talk Page to elaborate on the rule and give examples for future reference. Seeing as the policy is a little elaborate, I wanted to make sure the rule will be 100% clear on what it means. - 21:09, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Just a question
But is related to you?

Part 1
Yeah, my proposal was off; 60 days is too long. But, it got things going in the right direction. Just one question: Some months are longer than others. How are you defining "a month"? I think it should be just 30 days to avoid confusion.

Part 2
28; it's four weeks.

OK
I see you're pretty new to the wiki and you're already getting up there. Nice job! Talk to me anytime.

My WikiBirthday
Mid-November; there's stuff on my page in the "Stuff I do on the Wiki" and "Countdowns to..." sections.

My Page
You can copy anything from my page; hit view source to see how it's coded and then copy, paste, and edit it.

P.S.: What state are you in? I'm in California, near San Francisco. We have nice weather today.

Hi, I'm Ninja Yoshi.I've been asking users this question as part of a poll/graph.Do you classify yourself as not being active enough or a big junk food eater?

THanks! :)

Character Battle
Ok, you can add it to the Fun Stuff Section, youll get a reminder with teh date of the next issue :)
 * I know youll do great, and the proposal doesnt matter

Proposal
Haha, I was well aware it was a joke proposal. I was only opposing it because the last joke proposal that went in place, I supported. (I was trying to show that I'm all for jokes, in other words. :P) But, I wasn't the one that removed your proposal. That was. And he only did that because joke proposals are kinda outlawed. 22:49, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I had joined right after the time of the Pie Proposal, I believe, so I'm not real clear on the details. But, yes, I do believe a few users left because of it, somehow. And Rudnicki is a very horrid troll on the MarioWiki forums. He was banned for flaming, being sexist, racist, and a pervert. However, he has some groupies (for lack of a better term), that have a vendetta against me. So, ALL of my accounts on the internet were hacked on the 26th and 27th. S/he used my account on the forums to ban and delete over 600 accounts, and nearly nuke the forums all together. Porplemontage returned late last night and reset the server though, fixing the whole thing. 23:06, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 * You're very welcome! 23:16, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I'm not sure. I'll go add that rule. 23:25, 28 April 2009 (EDT)

I'm fairly certain that this is a rule somewhere, because I was told a similar thing once; but proposals about making a certain rank of users' vote more valuable is not allowed. All users have equal opinions, and the whole point of having proposals is for it to be a community decision; not for it to be voted upon, passed, then eventually vetoed by a Bureaucrat who disagrees with the idea. 18:56, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

Re: Stooby
Yeah, that guy is a total moron. Even if I lost my password, or got hacked, I wouldn't create a sock on the wiki. 17:18, 2 May 2009 (EDT)

Re:Patrollerhood
Thank you for the complement.

Personal Image Limit
You have exceeded the limit of personal images you are allowed to have. You are only allowed to have four personal images. Please be mindful in the future to only upload four. For more information see Personal images. Yoshario'''
 * Adding to what Yoshario said, please tag the Personal Images you no longer want with . If you want to keep your personal images, you can externally link them from a site such as PhotoBucket, Imageshack, or Picoodle. If you don't reply within 3 days, I will have to take matters into my own hands and delete some of your PIs until you have only four. Thanks and keep contributing.  17:57, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
 * If your images are for the shroom, then you should put it in the Fun Stuff section of the shroom, as tucayo said. Right now, they don't appear to be linked to any page except your userspace. Yoshario''' [[Image:Yoshi_wearing_mario's hat.jpg|30px]]
 * Okay. It seems that the Fun Stuff section didn't even come out yet, so I think you should contact Tucayo about this. Yoshario''' [[Image:Yoshi_wearing_mario's hat.jpg|30px]]
 * No problem :) Yoshario''' [[Image:Yoshi_wearing_mario's hat.jpg|30px]]

I heard you need help, what can i do for you?
 * Nice job on the FN!! Good i won :) (otherway you would have been fired :P) J/K. Blue SHells are my nemesis... though i still love them

Can't Think of a Title
Great job on the comic! Hopefully, you're planning to continue those, it was awesome!

On another note, I'm sorry to say I (and probably many others) say most of your proposals are sort of useless (no offense). Please think about if the proposal might actually go through before you post it.

Sig Proposal
I took a look at it, and overall, I like it. However, I would like to make one suggestion (which I mentioned on the Proposal in a comment): limiting sigs to Userspace only is rather extreme, so perhaps they should merely be banned from MarioWiki and Help pages, but not article talk pages. For one thing, we don't want to quash individuality outright; and, most of the time, sigs are fine, so why ruin it for them just because of a few irritants? Most article talk pages don't get long enough for the sigs to cause problems, and those that do generally are ridiculously long articles that old computers can't deal with anyway. Also, it'll be impossible to go around and replace all the personalized sigs currently on talk pages with, and the uninformed will get confused by that and keep signing with their sigs (or the handy-dandy ~ code, which I'll admit, I'll miss using on talk pages myself), and it'll just be a big mess. So, seeing as my name's on the proposal (I thank you for crediting me, by the way), I'd appreciate it if you'd make this change. - 23:45, 20 May 2009 (EDT)