Category talk:RPG characters

Necessity
Is this category really necessary? I mean, I just find it a bit odd that we have a category for a specific genre's characters when we don't have such a thing for the other genres (fighting, platform, racing, sports, etc.) All the articles that are in here already have a place in other, more specific categories, so it's not like this category's really doing much...
 * 100% agreed.
 * I agree as well. -- 18:08, 4 August 2013 (EDT)
 * If the human characters from the Tennis/Golf don't get their special category, or if Waluigi/Toadette/Others don't get a category of spin-off exclusives, neither should RPG characters receive a category. 19:33, 4 August 2013 (EDT)
 * Per all, this category is redundant. I'd be happy to help with removing the links. GBAToad (talk) 20:02, 4 August 2013 (EDT)
 * I agree too, Start a TPP if you want.-- 20:56, 4 August 2013 (EDT)

Delete Category: RPG Characters
As I've said above, there's really no reason for this category to be. It's inconsistent categorize a certain genre's characters and not do the same for the other genres. Besides, this category isn't really necessary in the first place; all the articles in this category are already situated in more specific categories, such as Category:Mario & Luigi Series Characters, so it's not like RPG Characters is being used for articles that don't have a place elsewhere. Bottom line, this category should be deleted.

Proposer: Deadline: August 19, 2013, 23:59 GMT

Delete

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) Per all the comments above.
 * 3) Per proposal.
 * 4) Pointless and inconsistent. Per all.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Obviously. Per all.
 * 7) Well, duh, why do we need duplicates?
 * 8) It's unnecessary to keep a meaningless category, while it's pages are already covered in other specific categories. As we can see there are already six subcategories, and this category is really unneeded. In other word: Per proposal
 * 9) Per all and my comment above
 * 10) Per all
 * 11) Per all.
 * 12) Per all.
 * 13) Per all.