MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wario Land II

Wario Land II became a featured article at 18:54, 12 January 2010

Support

 * 1) - I hereby nominate the article about "Wario Land II" for FA status. It has been a long way, and Grandy02 and I put a lot of work and effort into this project. The block of text that used to cover the article was split into different sections, paragraphs were expanded, information was added, tables were made and more images were posted. This article has vastly improved, if you compare how it looked before. I believe that this article is ready now, and it is worthy of its subject.
 * 2) - Per Edo. My congratulations, a superb article.
 * 3) Per Tucayo.
 * 4) Per Edo.
 * 5) - per everybody. Great work here.
 * 6) - Wow…this article is perfect to be a FA now...Per All, Excellent Article.
 * 7) - PEr Edo.
 * 8) - Per Edo. Fantastic article!
 * 9) Per all. Heck yeah! I would like to commend Edofenrir and Grandy02 for the great work (and maybe some other users, but..)! Keep it up, guys!
 * 10) Per all. That article is spectacular! Great job to everyone who worked on it.
 * 11) Looks perfect! It has a lot of information, a lot of images and a lot of quality. Good work Edofenrir and Grandy02.
 * 12) - Since more than one month ago I wanted to nominate this article but you won me Edofenrir. I love the content of the article and I love the game.
 * 13) - Need I say more? And thanks for mentioning me. :)

Comments
It already got enough supports in that short time? o_O Wow. Thank you all very much, guys. :3 -

I don't wanna be the killjoy (looks like you did great work indeed) but could you also add a "Critical Reception" section? This would improve the article even further.
 * Sounds hard, Game Boy games have gotten little coverage by online reviewers, and magazines from the time might be hard to get a hand on. -
 * Perhaps you can try RetroMags for magazine reviews, or GameSpot and/or IGN for online ones... I will try to get some info. --

Time Q: I added the section you demanded. I hope it looks ok that way. If not, please adjust it so it fits into our standards. Again, thank you, Cobold, for finding those review pages. -
 * Cool, thanks!

Aren't sigs allowed in the comments section?


 * Uh, it just says "The following is NOT allowed, three tildes (four tildes). Didn't say anything about it being allowed in the comments section.
 * The word "page" is mentioned several times, so that means the No-Signature Policy applies to the whole page, which includes the comment section. Regardless of that, let's not resort to make in-page-exceptions. This will likely cause more confusion than it adds comfort. -