Talk:Adventure Mode: The Subspace Emissary

CPU in Subspace Emissary Mode? That sounds new.
From the article in question: "In single player, teams are still available. However, the second character is a CPU, and if the main character is defeated, the player takes control of the second player, until it, too, is defeated."

I knew about single-player controlled teams, but the second character can be a Computer Player (CPU)? That's news to me; I thought the other selected characters were merely extra lives, which are different from a computer-controlled player. The instruction manual and GameFAQS don't seem to corroborate this. Can you elucidate upon this claim, please, if you can? I know I've pressed every button on the controller during character selection and during gameplay in one-player mode, and certainly haven't seen any evidence about the above statement being true.
 * It's a lie.
 * Huh. Well, that lie's still on the article's page as of April 12 9:54PM GMT.

more info
Do you think that we should include information on the actual levels of each stage, rather than just the cut scene. for example: The Glacial Peak. I added information on the level so that it would be more of an article than a movie summary. The smash wiki has some info we could use. glacial peak

Character Snapshots
I hope you won't mind that I/we put in the snapshot's each character had in the Subspace emissary.

From Plumber690

Merge to Super Smash Bros. Brawl
This article is clearly a mode of Super Smash Bros. Brawl and I see no reason to allow it to stay as a separate article. The general rule of thumb has been to keep story related information on the game article itself. What makes this an exception? Despite the fact that this article has been around for a long time, I cannot seem to find any consensus to separate this article from the game's article.

NOTE: Article size is not a legitimate reason to keep these separate. We have articles much longer than Super Smash Bros. Brawl and we shouldn't make exceptions based simply on article size.

Proposer: Deadline: 27 April, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) – My reasons are covered above.
 * 2) Per him! Seriously, this is a proposal so, per that, too!

Comments
@Knife: I'm not being sarcastic... Did I miss some conversation somewhere about not placing new TPPs on the list of TPPs on Proposals? If there's not a reason why you don't want them there, then I volunteer to list them on the proposals page. 07:27, 15 April 2011 (EDT)