MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time

Support

 * 1) Well written, lots of images.
 * 2) The article looks great now with a nice table with all the Sprites and the Story section with no Beta Images and new ones uploaded by FF65 and me, so now this can be a FA!
 * 3) – Well-written and lots of images.  Nice job.
 * 4) Well, I think it's in top shape now and if any errors are present, they will too minor (as I read the entire story and fixed up whatever I can)

Oppose

 * 1)  The article is horribly written in the story section. That part might look fine to you, but I see a bunch of grammar/spelling errors.
 * 2) The images set in the enemy list looks rather a collage than a decent gallery (some of them are animated and some are bad quality). This has the same problem that Bowser's Inside Story article had before.

Removal of Opposes
Coincollector
 * 1) Sprites are around the same size and look much better.
 * 2) Per FF65.
 * 3) Sprites are better quality and none of them are animated.

LeftyGreenMario


 * 1) Never said where the article was horribly written. It looks fine to me.
 * 2) It was NOT fine, but I fixed up the mistakes. Well, LyftyGreenMario also helped me catch some trickier grammar errors, such as "so" and prepositions. Any stick-out errors are fixed and so her vote is now considered not valid.

Comments
Well, we could add images of the enemies in the tables for consistency, just like Superstar Saga.
 * I had some pics in for a while, but it didn't look very good so I decided to get rid of them.
 * Um... couldn't the images have been put in more uh... neatly? To be honest... I think it looks terrible and I regret nominating it now! Shrowser and Elder Princess Shroob look especially terrible...

@MATEOELBACAN: It doesn't matter whether it's minor or not, in order to become featured, an article has to do everything right, including minor things. It can still become an FA later after it's been fixed, not the other way round. -
 * Okay, Understood.

I fixed some of the images up, but we need a picture of the Hammer Broz., EPS, and Shrowser, without a nasty background. Also, maybe a better sprite of Kamek and Princess Shroob(that aren't animated gifs).
 * In addition, I was seeing the history section and I saw that many images were of the beta game, I believe that would have to go in its respective article and the images of the final game here.

@Fawfulfury65: Uh, print screen, crop it, and save it as inanimate png? Right now, I'm too lazy (even though it's like, the easiest thing ever)
 * Huh? How do I do that?


 * Uh, never mind. I'll do it. But for your information, I bet every keyboard has a "Print Screen" button, just above the "insert" key
 * That button doesn't do anything for me...


 * Well, did you paste it? It's basically copying and pasta the screen. But anyway, no stress. I already replaced some images. Now, will someone please rip these boss sprites? We need them! And it shouldn't be a hassle. One sprite is not too difficult.

Ok, removed vote. I will abstain until the proper images are implemented in the sections of the bestiary.

No changed the beta images ._.? = Oppose...
 * What images are beta? I think they're all from the final version.
 * There are almost 4 beta images in the Story Section., you can recognize them because the heart and japanese button ._....
 * I found two beta images and replaced them. I don't know what the other ones are.

Shrowser's sprite is not right. He is glowing and has purple eyes, but this is just regular Bowser. BTW, where did you find that sprite of Elder Princess Shroob?
 * Found it here. There are no Shrowser sprites anywhere, and that was the closest one.

The article looks a lot better now...but these beta images must be taken away...
 * Which ones are beta??? I replaced the two that I found...
 * Wait...I'll erase the beta ones, and then try to find better ones of the final version...
 * I erased them and uploaded 2 new...but looks a little missplaced and maybe we'll need another images =/...
 * Actually, I think it looks fine, but I didn't read the article...
 * Why are you voting, then? Also, if there are grammar errors, then it shouldn't be featured.
 * Well, I'm just assuming. I can't be right, you see.
 * Still, you shouldn't vote on a nomination if you have no idea how good the article is.
 * Well, I was so glad I was wrong! I checked and there was so much stuff to be fixed!! Sorry for being such a stubborn thing. Now I have a reason to vote.