User talk:Editorguy117

stuff

RE: PLEASE HYPNOTISE ME
Maybe later, I'm on vacation right now. If it is urgent I can send you some VHS tapes with some swirly swirls and that should do the trick until I get back. The box set is only 14 payments of $59.95 + S&H :) 21:56, 29 March 2016 (EDT)

Re. Fawfulthegreat64
No we don't really know each other because I am from Australia and he's from America and a few more reasons. Fawful's Minion 12:40, 20 April 2016 (EDT)

Reminder
Hello. Your reversion here of Henry Tucayo Clay's removal of a talk page comment was poorly considered. You should not have reverted the edit using such an open question as a summary. Henry Tucayo Clay is an Administrator, which means that there must have been a conscious and justified reason for removing that comment. If you have a question about the removal of that comment, you should have posed it on Henry Tucayo Clay's talk page. Not reverting the edit with an uninformed edit summary.

12:23, 26 July 2016 (EDT)
 * I think Henry Tucayo Clay can speak for himself. If he felt it was an issue he can let me know on his own.Editorguy117 (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2016 (EDT)


 * Exactly what YK said. Next time think a little before doing something like that. -- 15:39, 26 July 2016 (EDT)


 * Hi Henery Tucayo Clay. I was unsure if Mario wiki followed most wiki conventions, removal of talk messages is generally "in bad form" or so I was told. I'm from Zelda Wiki, in the past I thought that it was okay to move around talk messages as one would a facebook wall. I removed talk messages from my own profile just to tidy it up, and that and almost got in trouble http://zeldawiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Editorguy117&action=history. According to Tony from that wiki, It's generally against wiki rules. Now Zelda Wiki is a different site, so seeing as talk messages can be removed here, it's clear the policies are different and I was mistaken. So going from being allowed to remove talk messages, to not being allowed to remove talk messages, to being allowed to move talk messages is a bit jarring for me. I understand the policy for Mario Wiki now however, sorry for that error.Editorguy117 (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2016 (EDT)
 * Talk messages cannot be removed neither here nor in ZeldaWiki. What I did was to remove an insulting message on the talk page of a bureaucrat. -- 19:35, 11 August 2016 (EDT)
 * Alright I understand now, and apologize. I hope you can understand my confusion. I now see that in certain exceptions (such as flaming) talk messages can be removed.Editorguy117 (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2016 (EDT)

Warning
You know what? I hadn't seen your little reply to YoshiKong, another Administrator of the site. -- 19:38, 11 August 2016 (EDT)
 * I get you are both mad at me, and I'm sorry if offended both of you. I feel (I'm just expressing my opinion here, I hope that isn't against the rules) there's a bit of bias going on in this warning issued on me. I was not telling an admin what to do by saying "I think Henry Tucayo Clay can speak for himself. If he felt it was an issue he can let me know on his own". I have done no further actions regarding that mentioned incident since, all I have done since that incident is talk. I'd hope that talking isn't against the rules either. I'm not telling an admin what to do, I am listening to you guys and have obeyed both of you since the incident. I apologized, and will not undo an edit from you guys again. But me saying "I think Henry Tucayo Clay can speak for himself. If he felt it was an issue he can let me know on his own" is just an opinion, bending it to appear like it's breaking a rule seems like there was bias behind it. I'm just expressing my opinion as a person to another person.


 * Furthermore, I was unaware that YoshiKong was an administrator, and seeing that I can understand why he left that message on my wall. At first I thought he was a standard user who was budding into a conflict that didn't involve him, as such I got defensive and wanted to state my opinion. But knowing that he's an administrator, I can see why he left the message, as it's his job as admin to be involved in all conflicts. So with this, I realise that his comment was fair. Believe it or not, we see eye to eye on this conflict now that I understand. The only thing that concerns me right now, is whether opinions are allowed to be spoken or not on Mario Wiki. As I'm afraid that even opinions such as "I think Henry Tucayo Clay can speak for himself. If he felt it was an issue he can let me know on his own" can result in bans. Or any dissenting opinion for that matter can be bent to mismatch a rule. I truly hope that is not the case.


 * I'm not trying to defy your authority. I would just like clarify if this policy still stands: |"In general, sysops are not imbued with any special authority and are equal to everyone else in terms of editorial responsibility. Staff members' votes and opinions are given equal weight to regular users in proposals, FA nominations, or any other democratic process or informal discussion." This would mean that opinions (as long as not explicitly offensive), are fair game correct? In this case my response to YoshiKong would fall under an opinion in informal discussion. Would bending an opinion into a rule breach (interpreting "I think Henry Tucayo Clay can speak for himself. If he felt it was an issue he can let me know on his own" as "telling an admin what to do despite just being told not to do so") go against that policy? I'm concerned about what I'm allowed to say and not allowed to say on Mario Wiki after seeing this.


 * Once again, no ill wishes. I hope we can get along as we edit together in the future. Thanks for taking the time to read my message, please let me know when you get the chance. Editorguy117 (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2016 (EDT)
 * Your comment was undermining admin authority, and not knowing he's an admin doesn't exempt you from anything. You can drop your whole "opinions are not allowed" act as your comment was plainly telling YoshiKong to stay out of it. Stop this discussion, move on, and we'll get along just fine. -- 21:54, 15 August 2016 (EDT)