Talk:Master (title)

Ooh ooh! Can you make another paragraph describing Krusha's rise to power at the bottom of the article? -- Son of Suns

I'll try, as I mentioned, I only have vague remembrance, but I think it has something to do with Krusha becoming super intelligent; I'll do some research. -- Sir Grodus

Cool. Thanks for your help! -- Son of Suns
 * I think the episode was called "Speed" nice job SG.

Thanks, thats about all I could find. Too bad they took almost all the episodes off YouTube. -- Sir Grodus

May I ask where the term "Master" in this context originated? It certainly wasn't in any Donkey Kong game I've played. -- CM August

DKC3, it has KAOS called "Master" several times, as well as in the manual for it. Now that I think about, it just seems to be a term of respect, like "Lord Bowser", with no other significance or meaning. -- Sir Grodus 18:47, 16 November 2007 (EST)

Perhaps we could note in the article that the title is conjectural, and cite the source of the name.--CM August 19:32, 16 November 2007 (EST)

Royal Title
Is Master a royal title or is it just King K. Rool who is royalty or all the former masters

This article is useless. I don't wanna set up a talk page proposal this time. There's no need to go through two weeks to see this page nuked. I'm going to remove all the links to this page. All I'm hoping is if people agree with my actions. 3...2...1... delete. 15:56, 11 June 2014 (EDT)
 * I'm uncomfortable with deleting an article based on "I don't like it". Removing deletion tag, get a TPP going. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]]Chris[[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 14:57, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

Delete "Master"
I've wanted this article to be deleted (reasons now clarified below), but since it has garnered no attention, I guess I have just have to set up a 2-week long talk page proposal. Oh boy, here it goes.


 * 1) The writing is pretty bad, with even some speculation about it. By itself, it's not a great reason, but it's not a good sign when the bulk of the article is composed of this trite "it's unknown if" phrase.
 * 2) The other Master articles have much more use than this.
 * 3) This article is just overall pointless. Princess, Doctor, King(disambig), all these don't have standalone articles and for a good reason. They're pointless.
 * 4) See Super Star (Mario Party winner's title) and "Super star" terminology from SuperStar saga. I can't find the particular revision of these articles for context, unfortunately.

Proposer: Deadline: August 7, 2014 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) It's a pointless title that serves no purpose other than doing a negligible job at preventing orphan pages, I guess.
 * 2) This article lacks masterful writing and masterful reasons to stay here. Delete it. Per Mario.
 * 3) Pointless page, just remove the links and the orphan problem is solved.
 * 4) Per all. I'd suggest making sure that all information here is present in the host articles they were culled from, then expanding the disambiguation page to reflect the change.
 * 5) Well, I was about to say no, because there are some informations here, but an article for this is really pointless. We can delete it but the infos should go to the intrested articles (King K. Rool and others).
 * 6) Per all
 * 7) Per all.
 * 8) Per all.
 * 9) There's no point in this article, really...

Oppose

 * 1) It's an article' and i want it to stay.

Comments
@Joseph: What-the...I don't think I can express my reaction in words 15:55, 26 July 2014 (EDT)
 * This should be self-explanatory, but...It should be removed.--Vommack (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2014 (EDT)
 * Marioshock.png My reaction exactly. Some people are just hard to work out. - 17:19, 26 July 2014 (EDT)
 * PMSS - Red Toad Thinking Artwork.png Meanwhile, this is mine (I think). Maybe he don't knows that the quantity of articles is secondary to the QUALITY... it is because we delete new one-liners, right, and issue the stub and newstub templates, right? Without me, Mario Maker would be deleted (when I finished to write, I find out that someone else did a one-liner of it)... Sometimes, such minor things, that appear in not so much games and rarely, or are not affected by the player, are just to put into the articles od which they speak. This article is the prove, because it has some infos, but are not affected by the player and is a minor thing.
 * A bit like |this as opposed to this at the moment since I edited it? This article is basically a Disambiguation with fluffy writing over the top of it. It's not needed. - 03:31, 28 July 2014 (EDT)