Talk:Thorny flower

Official name?-- 16:17, 22 October 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, I don't know if that's the official name. That's just the name that appeared on the enemies list on the Super Mario Galaxy page.  I should probably add that conjecture template. - Smashgoom202 14:28, 23 October 2009 (EDT)
 * Same with thefake Block

Decide on a name for this article
This doesn't need to be a proposal. As mentioned in the comments, "thorny flower" is the in-game name, which takes priority over the guides.

Seeing the tag on this page, I think we should decide on the name of this page. I have no preference either way, but I think we should probably look into this.


 * The in-game description for the Mario Party: Island Tour calls these things "thorny flowers". The selling points are that the name is in-game and is the most recent, but the drawback is that it's more of a descriptor term than an actual name, though at least it's not a lengthy descriptor unlike, say, "flowers with sharp spikes".
 * Page 187 of the Super Mario 3D Land Prima guide calls them "thistles". While it's less of a lengthy descriptor, it has the disadvantage of being a name from a guide, and also is less recent.

I'm fine with either decision that's made.

Proposer: Deadline: March 13, 2019, 23:59 GMT

Stick with "Thorny flower"

 * 1) If it's not capitalized, we should search for a name in the Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2 Prima guides. I wonder what are both Japanese names for both normal and big.
 * 2) I think "thorny flower" describes their appearance in more recent games better than "thistle."
 * 3) Current name is perfectly fine. Inline tag isn't necessary, we require it when the source is like the wildly inaccurate Prima guides or Smash Bros. trophy descriptions.
 * 4) Per Bazooka Mario.
 * 5) Per Bazooka Mario.
 * 6) I removed the better source needed tag because the source is already convenient enough

Comments
Given that Mario Party: Island Tour is a more recent source, Prima guides are unreliable, and that ingame names almost always take precedence, it doesn't matter what the Prima guides say what these obstacles are, it'll still keep the "thorny flower" name. 16:35, 27 February 2019 (EST)

Since the Prima guide can still be used as a source, I added the "thristle" name in the Mario 3D Land section, but it needs a page number. 20:00, 27 February 2019 (EST)
 * Toadette the Achiever mentioned the page number in the proposal, so I added the page number. 20:08, 27 February 2019 (EST)
 * I didn't see, sorry. 20:13, 27 February 2019 (EST)

Um...
Naming says, "Please note that regardless of the source, the official North American name takes priority, followed by the first international English name if no North American name is available, and finally the first international non-English name if no English name is known. For example, if a subject is given a name in-game in the Japanese version only, and not in the English localization of the game, but an English strategy guide names it, that English name is used, rather than the Japanese." So even though thorny flower is an in-game name, thistle should be the name. This is because thorny flower is PAL exclusive and Prima is North American. 22:21, 27 February 2019 (EST)
 * Yes, but in the order of naming list, in game name overrules the guide name. 22:25, 27 February 2019 (EST)
 * "Regardless of the source". The way I am interrupting it, the guide should take priority over in-game name in this case since it is "the official North American name". Another proof that helps me believe this is the what should be done is that this comes immediately after the list of acceptable names and it says "Please note" at the beginning. 22:47, 27 February 2019 (EST)
 * You're correct, I didn't notice it's from the PAL version, my mistake. This seems to be a rare case, however, being a subject given a name in the PAL version of the game and not in the NTSC version, but named in a North American guide. I've brought this up in admin discussion, as I feel having a perfectly valid in-game English name disregarded in favour of a name from a guide (especially if it's less accurate and specific) doesn't seem right. 08:33, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * We should find the name in the Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2 if it's the case, but i think it is good as-is. I kinda feel that Fire Cannon should have the internal filename source removed and add an another language template should have the same treatment, given that its internal filename is a romanization of its Japanese name. -- 08:40, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * We're not supporting Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia mistaking our generic name for the proper one, and the internal template idea was handled poorly. At any rate, we've used proposals to override policy before, and "thistle" is honestly a better match for bulb. Though "Needle Plant" may even be a third possible option, as the internal name is not the Japanese ones and it seems to be the most proper designation, since thistle and thorny flower are both generic descriptors. LinkTheLefty (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * Except generic descriptors as article names are allowed as long as they aren't overly long (i.e., not "flowers with sharp thorns"). Also, I don't think the internal filename is specific enough either. 09:41, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * "NeedlePlant" is consistent between the Super Mario Galaxy games and Super Mario 3D Land, so that has it going for it. We tend to only use a generic, lowercase name as an article title if it at least as a consistent quality. There's also the fact that each guide/game uses different descriptors (Super Mario Galaxy uses "prickly plants" and Super Mario Galaxy 2 uses "spikes"), so using one of those names in a broad sense will not necessarily be applicable to every appearance. LinkTheLefty (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * It is fine as-is. Honestly, i feel that the Beamer enemies should have the same treatment as Karikari and Kamikami, given that their internal filename is a romanization of their Japanese names like the Fire Cannon . -- 10:55, 28 February 2019 (EST)
 * I really don't think it is since the descriptors are completely inconsistent. LinkTheLefty (talk) 11:04, 28 February 2019 (EST)