User talk:Aidanpercussion

Layers of Antagonism
I beg your pardon, but saying that a certain boss is the "Quinary" or "Quaternary" anagonist is far too in-depth, and more importantly, is subjective, as people could have differing opinions regarding the magnitude of each one's role. 21:13, 30 August 2017 (CT)

Thanks. Aidanpercussion (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2017 (EDT)

Warning
You are still continuing to use the terms already described above and then some on articles. If you don't stop this behaviour of yours, you will be either given one last warning or possibly even temporarily banned from editing this here wiki. Thanks! – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2017 (EDT)

Sorry. I won't use those terms again. Thanks for the reminder. Aidanpercussion (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2017 (EDT)

Final warning.
Even though you promised to not use the antagonist terms, you are still using them alongside TV Tropes lingo. It's not too late to fix your mistakes. If you don't start improving, you'll be banned from editing temporarily. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 22:30, 3 September 2017 (EDT)

I pored over your contributions and we're not going to ban anyone for merely using Big Words unless there's a constant history of using distracting or incorrect purple prose [which to be fair, the obsessive use of "quinary" or "quartenary" falls uncomfortably close to the former] but what I will say is that your entire history consist of adding "Bad guy character is a positional adjective villain", and one instance of calling Bowser a "big bad", which is cutesy TV Tropes jargon that clash badly with the enecyclopedic style the wiki aims for, and somehow manages to be an even more useless and obvious insert.

It's low-effort, useless additions. Mario plots aren't so complex and extensives that you need to grade the bad guys after the priamry and secondary antangonists. If the only thing you can think of adding to a page is "Bad guy is [adjectival order] bad guy", please don't bother. --Glowsquid (talk) 22:57, 3 September 2017 (EDT)