MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Geno

Support

 * 1) - I read the article, and it's Brilliant. Awesomely written. I think some people might note about the short lead, but as I read the article, I could tell that they were an experienced writer. Great, informative article right here.
 * 2) - ditto. It is so good. Iwish there was more to wright!
 * 3) - The article is adequate. However, I would like the red link to Super Star Shot to be blue.
 * 4) - The article was very well written and compiled virtually every known thing about Geno! Well done.
 * 5) - Geno needs to be the Featured Article. I am as my user name says,I'm a BIG fan of Geno.Ignore the thing about the green Geno pic, I resovled it.
 * 6) Per all

Oppose

 * 1) I really feel the History section could be a tad bit longer, also the other apperance section needs to be greatly inproved apon.

Comments
Stooby: Yeah, I noticed Super Star Shot as well; but I do not have the game, unfortunately, and could not write the article. But since 1 seems like a "reasonable" number of red links, I don't think it'll affect the status that much.
 * Thus why I didn't oppose. ;) I just wanted to point out that the article would look almost perfect if there weren't any red links. I haven't played it either, so I couldn't create it though.
 * Okay :). Also, is there any reason why you keep changing signatures into the User template in the comments section? I don't see how they would interfere here. (Although in the Supports/Opposes they can screw up the numbering at times).
 * I mainly do it because it can take some computers too long to load, particularly if the sigs have massive coding or animations in them. (Mine takes quite a while to load.)
 * Ah, yes. But it must take a heck of a long time to load your talk page as well, then :P.
 * I just took the link parts off of it. It's technically not a real attack.

Being a fan of them is not the issue. I am a fan of Luigi and Bandits but I am not saying they need to be featured because I'm a fan of them.--Luigibros2 17:00, 24 November 2008 (EST)
 * Agreed. We support the article beause we think it's well-written; not because it's a character we like. One crit for the article, is that we might want a couple SMRPG screens in there. user:Leirin 12:44, 30 November 2008 (EST)

I'm thinking that the history section can't really be much longer. I mean, a bit of word-splicing here and there may increase it by a line or two, but not much. Do you have any more specific criteria? Also, The other appearances section is pretty much complete. That's really all there is. :O