Talk:♥

Why is it better to use symbols to be more exact? Geno's real name I understand, but this... :/ 12:48, 21 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Also, how do you search this with that symbol as title. Can't you a conjectural name for this at least?


 * This is the name used in the Instruction Booklet (as indicated in the references). On the heart page, I included a redirect to this page.  You can actually go to this page by putting the symbol "♥" in the search field.  Also, I am linking anything that needs to be linked to this page.  --


 * I feel we should make "Heart" a disambig page, providing links to Heart (item), HP, and this. 15:44, 21 March 2009 (EDT)


 * That's a good idea. --
 * Sweet. Any final objections from anyone? 19:00, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

Well, does Wikipedia have any rules about using symbols as Page names?


 * Remember, we're not Wikipedia. Geno's real name is a bunch of symbols, and if that was the only name given in the game, we would be obliged to use it as our title (as it's the official name).  Likewise, I am fairly certain this subject has only been referred to as via symbol.  As long as we have redirects, we should be fine.  The same thing occurs with the ? Block article.  --

I think this should be named "♥ point(s)", just "♥" doesn't says anything at all.

I think this article should be named "Heart Points". Just some kind of heart doesn't tell the title of the article.

Type
BTW, how do you type this? RPG Gamer. I HAVE RPG!! (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2013 (EDT)
 * If you have Windows 7, go to the start menu, type "character map" on the search bar, find the character, and there you go. ♦♥♪♫☻♠►▓■ 23:31, 29 March 2013 (EDT)

I'm on an iPad.RPG Gamer. I HAVE RPG!! (talk) 09:46, 31 March 2013 (EDT)
 * Well, I never use Apple's products, so I don't know how to add symbols. 00:47, 3 April 2013 (EDT)
 * You don't necessarily have to type this. Just type "heart" and it will lead you to this page 00:51, 3 April 2013 (EDT)

♥ or ❤
Super nitpicky, but someone just made a redirect for ❤, so I was wondering if the manual's usage of the heart was skinny and pointy or fat and round. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2017 (EST)
 * The manual appears to use a shorter heart that looks more like ❤. However, the manual PDF uses an image instead of the Unicode character, so there is no way to no for sure, but it definitely looks like the ❤ (U+2764) instead of the ♥ (U+2665). -- 12:20, 27 December 2017 (EST)