Template talk:DidYouKnow

Ok, PLEASE tell me this is a joke. http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back! http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif
 * I edited it so it had real facts – I guess this can be updated once a month. 01:15, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

A lot of wikis use info from the most recently created articles. Perhaps we should adopt this policy. Every week or so someone could browse through every new mainspace article created in the week, and pick out three or fours interesting facts. -- Son of Suns
 * That sounds cool.
 * That sounds like it could work, really well.
 * That sounds like DPL can find all articles created from a certain timepoint...idea forming... 23:38, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

Bingo. Unfortunately transcluding content runs a risk of including templates on this page, which made a SUPER big mess when I tested it. A bit long to load, but more custom than Special:Newpages. 01:29, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

Moved to Main Page Maintenance

This is useful for picking out a couple new articles in the week, but I don't think we should have a list of new pages on the front page. It would simply clutter it. -- Son of Suns

Never did I want it to go on the Main Page. I was thinking it would just stay here. 17:51, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

Okay now it shows information from both old and new articles, and changes every time you look at it.

A New Style
Instead of having only did you Knows from New Articles we should use the feature and gather Random (and cool) facts from articles (maybe from Trivia Sections). If we do this we could have different DYKs almost everytime (like with Plumber did here.
 * I am with you all the way.

Glowsquid


 * I like it the way it is. Not only it makes sure that the information presented there is new on the wiki (assuming it is updated regularly), it is also a nice way to feature recent additions. / 13:08, 5 November 2007 (EST)

I'm with ya bro!

Maintenance
Is actually anyone concerned with this template? I ask because it is so rarely updated. Could I just edit myself? --Grandy02 03:54, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
 * No one is concerned with it at the moment, so please feel free to edit it! (We used to update it once a week (on Saturdays), and used facts from newly-created articles, but unless you want to update it regularly, I think it doesn't matter which articles you take the facts from.) 14:33, 20 June 2008 (EDT)

Fawfulized Yoshi?
Wait, who said it was a yoshi? No one ever confirmed that, and (yes, guidebook reference) that they were shot at one of the brothers by an offscreen monster, and I don't think they mean a Yoshi.
 * Ok, if its not official I will change it for "monster" :) -- 17:49, 4 February 2010 (EST)


 * Glamdozer's battle theme is a remix of Bugaboom, Topmaniac, and King Kaliente's themes.
 * Princess Lipid has the same laugh as Golden Diva.
 * King K. Rool reveals he has siblings in The Kongo Bonga Festival of Lights.

Ok, heres some trivia that I'll give BLOF on Saturday when its time to update. I will delete this once I memorize it.

Whats the point of this template? Its not on any articles!


 * Have you bothered checking the main page? >_> --
 * XD! Ignorance is hilarious :)

Fake info
"New Super Mario Bros. Wii is the first Mario platformer game to feature multiplayer co-op at the same time since Mario Bros.." WTF? What about NSMB??? No? There's a lot of Mario games with that feature. (I remember like 3 already)
 * NSMB has Multiplayer Co-op? -- 18:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It says Mario PLATFORMER, which are only DK, DKJ, MB, SMB, SMB2, SMBLL, SMB3, SMW, SMW2, SML, SML2, SM64, SMS, SM64DS, SMG, SMG2, NSMB, and NSMBW. Most of the sidescrollers have multiplayer rotational, Super Mario 64 DS is multiplayer vs, not co-operative, and SMG/SMG2 is not direct co-op, as normal co-op means that both players are equal, which one player lacks a character completely in the Galaxy games. * * * Super! ~ Nickno  21:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Dr. Mario
It should say "21 years", not "11 years". Flicky1991 05:10, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

curious
Im just curious, do only administrators get to write the Did You Know? column?
 * I believe that Lindsay151 is in charge of updating it but others can fix mistakes.

Users can update the template, i just do it snice no one else does.


 * Well then, can i do once? only once? ItsameMario 00:14, 7 July 2012 (EDT)

As i said, users can update the template, every Saturdays. So Yes.

Mario's age - any source ?
According to the current Did You Know, Mario is stated to be 26 in his trophy description in the Japanese version of SSBM. But do we have any source for that ? A Google search gives nothing, and even this wiki doesn't have this info stated anywhere else. Koopalmier 08:29, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Dogadon
Angry Aztec, like Fungi Forest, doesn't feature lava. This should merit the trivia's deletion or, we should mention Angry Aztec as a level that doesn't feature lava.  BNK [ E 04:23, 9 September 2012 (EDT)

Is this correct?
"In the Paper Mario series, the maximum amount of coins which can be carried at a time is 999." From my knowledge, the maximum amount of coins which can be carried at a time in Paper Mario: Sticker Star is 9999, so is this sentence correct? -
 * No, it isn't. Just a few days ago, I had 1028 coins. I don't know what the maximum is, but it's more than 999.
 * Its 9999 coins, FYI. Goomba - New Super Mario Bros U.png Goomba (talk · edits) 02:03, 19 February 2013 (EST)

SUGGESTION: A page of previous DidYouKnow entries
I know I can just go to the history and individually check these pieces of nice trivia, but why not have a page dedicated to listing down all the DidYouKnow entries from the past to the present? It would have all the entries in a convenient matter and it increases guests and users the chance to click on the article links for more info. Sort it down by user contribution, what date it was issued, etc. It would be nice to look back, and hopefully not rehash the same pieces of trivia and get away with it. I can do it if anyone else doesn't do it. -- 01:20, 10 May 2013 (EDT)


 * Why not make a proposal about it?


 * 22:02, 10 May 2013 (EDT)
 * It has been a while since I came into this wiki; even more so with making a proposal. This type of decision would be unanimous because it's a small part of the wiki and doesn't impact anything heavily, just adds stuff. I feel that making proposals are suited for drastic changes (or proposals that are sent out to due to massive opposition; controversial proposals usually have the votes neck to neck, almost 50-50). For instance, I made a proposal long ago along with Knife regarding a reform of how proposals are archived. It passed...and just like the image-replace-a-thon list of 2010, the proposal archive reform became lost in time. Check out me and Knife's work: User:RAP/test4. I'm going to have to talk to on continuing this...and I just commented on the discussion in MarioWiki_talk:Proposals and made progress without me. Regardless, I may explore on making a proposal after I'm done dumping my work in the wiki if there's no way to bypass it. -- 01:14, 11 May 2013 (EDT)