Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 1

PeteyPiranhaLover 21:45, 25 July 2006 (EDT) Who hopes that the rumours are true about Hammer Bro. appearing in Super Smash Bros. Brawl?

Not me, I don't want any generic enemies (Koopas, Goombas, Shy Guys) to be playable. Being in the background of stages or being trophies would be fine thought. -- Sir Grodus

I don't think a Hammer Brother has the potential to be a traditional character, but if there was some knid of new thingy for characters without a lot of moves, it'd be great. The main things I'm hoping for are Wario with pre-Wario Ware costume (Yellow shirt and purple overalls) and Geno. CrossEyed7 00:43, 3 August 2006 (EDT)

Ahem. H K

Mr. Game & Watch
Mr. Game & Watch is not really a true Marioverse character. He was in his own franchise long before anyone even heard of Mario. The recent Game & Watch series are more like cross-overs or updates of the classic Game & Watch games. Mario characters and Mr. Game & Watch don't even interact in the new games. As such, I think Mr. Game & Watch should be treated as a non-Mario first party character. -- Son of Suns

Okay, makes sense. H K

I hate to be mean, but you're wrong on two counts. First, Mario and Game & Watch run the secrets section in Game & Watch Gallery 4 together. Secondly, just because he's not a Mario character doesn't make him a 3rd party character. It would make him like a character from the Kid Icarus series. I would argue that since the only games he's actually appeared in have been Super Smash Bros. Melee and Game & Watch Gallery 4]], he is actually a Mario character anyway, but that's a different arguement. 18:00, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Smash Bros Wiki
* removed*

Advertising, I beleive. I'll have a warning issued. H K
 * sorry --It's-a me, Smeedel. / Talk - Contribs - You 19:12, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

Rumoured Characters
I think that the section on rumoured characters should be removed because it's not very encyclopedia-like. Half of the characters there don't even have a good chance of getting in, like Gooper Blooper. The whole thing is too fanboyish. 13-Volt 15:09, 17 December 2006 (EST)


 * I agree. Remove at will. -- Son of Suns

Graphics
Why do you think the graphics are so all-stiffed up in the SSB games, but not in the other? 08:25, 23 February 2007 (EST)

please use the Forum for that. I don't know. Max2
 * Whoa. Did I just use the word "stiffed"? 14:46, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

Returning Characters
Should we really have this, its not much better than rumoured characters as its still very opinionated. I mean, it even has speculation in the title. -- Sir Grodus

Release Date Unreliable and Highly Unlikely
Super Smash Bros. Brawl is not coming out on June 1, 2007. GameStop is a highly unreliable source, and they needed a date to put in their database. No announcement concerning release has been made. -- hisak

Thanks for the info. :)

Update
They say the update's today! But it's not! I'm having a meltdown!!!


 * Obviously, it's referring to Japanese Time, as it is written just on the site. A new day has just started in Japan, and it's May 22nd there. You will still have to wait... - Cobold

Regarding Stage Design
Do the stages look a little simplistic to anyone? They don't seem to be anything more than a couple of platforms on a backdrop inspired by a game to me. I mean, Yoshi's Island looks good, but it's just a couple of platforms, too. So, the question I have is, are these the final stages? I hope they know what they're doing. 13:51, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

2 stages do. What about Delphino Plaza and Lylat Cruise?

I would say take it to teh forums, but...

I'm, pretty sure the stages will be changed in production. They haven't thought out the full design of the stage yet and they're just feeding to the press and fans to keep them quiet. But like the dramatic change that happened to SMRPG2 (now known as Paper Mario), I'm sure stages will go under dramatic changes too (for the better or the worse). 14:01, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, it would have probably been better on the forums. Oops. Heh, well, that's good to know. Thank you! 17:14, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Looking at Bridge of Eldin and Smashville now, the action seems to be in the background of the stage. Most stages are simplistic. I hope there's still some stage like Onett in Brawl, with actual gameplay characteristics. - 17:37, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Release Date?
Is this Release Date accurate? I haven't seen any date for SSBB's release yet. So, did you just make it up, or is it official? Same thing with Super Mario Galaxy

I've only seen confirmation for 2007, I don't know where this came from.

Frum LANKY KONG!

I fixed it anyway, so never mind.

Zelda?
Since Zelda is comin back doesn't that meen the Sheik will to some 1 please anser this cause i really wanna kno. King Mario

Not exactly. Zelda might get a new attack, and Sheik has not made another appearance since Super Smash Bros. Melee, which was in 2001. So, it is sort of a 50-50% Chance.
 * Yeah. Zelda has taken on a new, revised look from newer games, and Sheik would need to be reinvented to fit the style. - 04:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Not really. Just because Zelda got a new design, doesn't mean Sheik has to get one. After all, Sheik hasn't made another appearance since Melee, so what design are they going to base her new appearace on? So, if she appears, she will most likely look the exact same.
 * And Zelda having a different hair color than Sheik then? No way, this doesn't make sense. They cannot update half a character. I guess in this case we have to wait and see, no point arguing about possibilities. - 05:11, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Good point.
 * Sheik will not be coming back. Remember the Zelda in Melee was the one from Ocarina of Time. The one in Brawl will be the one from Twilight Princess. And since Sheik was not in Twilight Princess he won't be in SSBB.
 * Apart from that Sheik is female, that are my thoughts. But what's the point in arguing? - 13:57, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

Hold on, Sheik is male, isn't he? 13:58, 29 June 2007 (EDT) "Despite Sheik's male appearance, Sheik is indeed a female."Taken from the Sheik article. Also check the trophy descriptions. - 14:05, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

Sorry that was a typo. But technically Zelda is taking form of a male Sheikah so Sheik would a male.
 * Not to sound harsh, but I didn't decide. Blame Nintendo. - 14:18, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

What's a typo? 14:24, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 * A typo is a spelling error, and please, let us stop arguing over this. First, we argue about wether or not she is in the game, then we argue about wether or not she in Male, this whole argument is pointless. Let's just wait until the game is released, which will be this year.

Just Curious...
Does anyone know what stage is in the background of the image I posted? Could it possibly be the Hyrule Castle/Temple? 13:34, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 * It's that what's listed as "castle of unknown origin" in the stages list. Because there is so little information about it yet, I decided not to create an article already. Hyrule Castle would be possible, though it didn't look exactly like that in Zelda TP. - 13:37, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

It looks more Fire Emblemish to me. 13:51, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 * We don't know what series it is from, so we are leaving it.

Gallery / Images
This page has way too much images at the bottom. The galleries have an incredible size, which will only increase when the game comes nearer. The SSBM article has the characters' gallery implemented into the character section. Of course, it's hard to create something like a character bios right now, but at least the items, stages and Others need some fixing. Images should be either removed or placed into the actual article.

At a thought, he will also have to remove a lot of unuseful galleries at minor SSBB topics. - 17:11, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Also, why do each stage/item article have 3-5 image each? Maybe we should cut it at one, maybe two images per article. 22:20, 14 July 2007 (EDT)