Talk:Subspace Army

PETEY?
WTW is that about??? I don't think he was part of the army.
 * Maybe A Petey, not THE Petey, is. Notice that the size compared to Peach, Sheik & Kirby is exceptionally big for this Petey. 12:19, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
 * Well, Bowser's Size changes often, so why not Petey's?
 * Yeah, to this date, only one Petey Piranha has been seen at one time, so we don't know whether it's a species. And Wayo, it's Zelda, not Sheik. - 12:43, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
 * XD I suck at identifying any character not in the Mario series. Sorry. 00:49, 22 August 2007 (EDT)

Technically there were two peteys in Mario hoops 3 on 3. Peachycakes 3.14


 * That's not Petey. It's a trophy...based on Petey... http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back! http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif

What's with the caps?
Why are the names of the enemies in caps? That's meaningless. It should be caps and lower case. Mack the Knife 17:11, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 * When they were introduced on the Webiste their names were in all caps.
 * That doesn't mean that is the official spelling. I think it's for emphasis. Mack the Knife 17:17, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 * But the theres "The R.O.B Squad" If it was for emphasis wouldn't that be in all caps too?


 * The official names right now are all caps. Other headers like that, such as "The R.O.B. Squad" and special moves, do not have all caps. -- Son of Suns
 * Yes, they have been officially named in Caps. Maybe they named them in Caps as a joke on Codenames :P. Regardless, the enemies official names are all in Caps, even The R.O.B. Squad (R.O.B. is all in Caps, that is the name of the species, the "The" and "Squad" are basically calling them an army, so, that doesn't have to be Caps).

New enemies
Huh, the new enemies (the last reverted edition in the article) can be found in the new E for All videos, here.--Caith Sith 08:32, 20 October 2007 (EDT)

What has happened to trust around here? Why must people always demand proof before they can accept it?
 * That was an incredibly stupid remark, Peachcakes. Sorry to say that, but, we cannot accept any false information. THAT is why we need proof.
 * But this isn't false information, it's true information. And people keep deleting it just because they havn't seen it for themselves.
 * That's not what I meant. Sure, THIS info was true, but what if someone places false information, and we simply leave a fake article as it is. You see, if you give us the source of the information, we'll accept it, as everyone can see the source, and know that the information is true. Understand?.