User talk:Time Turner/Archive 6

Hello to all MarioWiki users! I'm Reversinator, and you presumably came to my talk page to talk to me. So here's the rules you must remember:

Everybody got that? Good. Now talk to me!
 * 1) Sign all of your comments so I know who left it.
 * 2) Spelling and grammar are extremely prefered.
 * 3) No vandalism, no trolling, no spamming, blah blah blah.
 * 4) I will reply to you on your talk page.
 * 5) I am fluent in French, English and Portugese, so if you wish to talk to me in any of those languages, feel free to.
 * 6) Try to be civil, but still have a sense of humor. In other words, no leet, no swearing, no threatning, blah blah blah.
 * 7) Whenver starting a new conversation, put it under a new header.
 * 8) My signature is and will always be

Archive?
Hi there, while patrolling I noticed you made a certain edit here: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Brown_Yoshi&curid=42853&diff=732169&oldid=732168 ...

This is, of course, six days late, but I must know -- why, exactly, did you remove 's vote? And why did you list it as "NO QUORUM"? Just curious. 20:37, 26 March 2010 (EDT)
 * We do technically extend proposals, but, yes, you're right, It was after the vote. And, yes, the clear majority of three was not defined. I looked back at my proposal, and that's what was passed; for some reason, it's not on the Proposal page. I'll add that there, and thanks for the clearing up. ;) 00:50, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

Discuss
Feel free to discuss it on the talk page now. ForeverDaisy09 10:19, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Be patient? I think it's been long enough for at least YOU to respond on the talk page. You are the only one who cares so far so YOU should have something to "discuss". Quit waiting for others opinions. ForeverDaisy09 11:54, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Removing shroom warning
with your permission I would like to remove your warnings of the unconstructive edits of the fake news section. I have learned my lessson and will not do it again. please post your reply on my talk page.

green power star edits
Hey Reversinator -- I appreciate your desire to keep the wiki tight. I'm wondering, though, what exactly you consider worse, in the edits I made re green power stars.

I can see an argument that the 3rd-level header with the exact location of each green star belongs on the game's main page, though to me that seems rather detailed info and there is already a link to the page about green power star details. (And, the exact same info is given on the pages in different ways -- at the very least, we should choose the clearer way and use it in both places, if it really needs to be replicated.)

I'm a bit more stumped on the reversion of the prose edits: Converting passive to active voice, getting rid of awkward constructs like 'a high quantity of', merging the exact same info presented twice in different ways (|edit history) and (on green star page) keeping the non-gameplay detail about how green stars are created out of the paragraph all about how green stars affect gameplay; that unrelated sentence sticks out like a sore thumb in the paragraph, no??

Let me know. Bon apres-midi, not-just-yeti 16:09, 28 March 2010 (EDT)


 * And I see that you undid the spoiler warning on the description of what happens in Bowser's Galaxy Reactor, even though that same info **is** considered a spoiler on the main SMG page. (It's the description of the plot that happens after the penultimate scene -- the last scene which many players will ever see.)  Why is it a spoiler in one place and not another?  Please let me know, thx.

not-just-yeti 07:36, 30 March 2010 (EDT)

RIP
EmptyStar, the main admin on KirbyWiki, wrote about it on the fron page. Apparently, Reggie canceled it due to "lack of interest". He also said it couldn't compete with MArio and Pokemon games, but Kirby and others will make small cameo appearances. It seems like an April Foold joke, but I'm not sure. Here. --


 * Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's a prank. I was quite skeptical about it too. Damn, I felt for it...--

Re:Warning
Hello, today is April Fools day, duh the proposal was a joke. couldn't someone take a joke today???

D'oh
...Damn...I thought they were complete...--
 * It's not a big deal. I'll see what I can do to compromise.--

Fun Stuff
Hey Reversinator, please remember to submit your Fun Stuff sections (Quiz and Guess Who?) to Z3r0 Tw0 (Volke on the forum). Thank you, 00:50, 2 April 2010 (EDT)

I changed my mind!
Hi.Is it possible to change your mind in proposals and featured articles?

Thanks!

Proposal archiving
Thanks for attempting to help, but I fear that there will be inconsistencies when Knife and I (mostly I myself), like the one you pointed out when I saw you help add proposal archive pages. The reason is that both of actually looked at the proposals so can can verify and to our relieving minds, add it with our own decisions without any doubt. 21:41, 8 April 2010 (EDT)

HELP!
THIS Kingbillsruinthegame just erased my talk page and the eggman,frostown and star article.I don't know what I do.HELP!

Oh!Where's my manners,thanks for the other day when you got my talk page back!

Re:Nominations
And these aren't.

Agree
I agree, Video game music is better than mindless songs made by mindless people. User: Mario and Luigi Toast

Subpages
Hi!Sorry for the bother.Can you please tell me how many subpages can a user create
 * And a welcome page too,hmm...maybe there is more.I should ask an admin just to be sure.Thanks
 * Hay Rever!Steve is saying that there is no limit to subpages!Just in case you wanna create more!
 * I don't think so,Ghost Jam has one!
 * Argh,she's using my sign!Anyway,that's right,ghost jam has one!
 * the pies!User talk:Ghost Jam/PIE
 * Oh,well!I guess i'll just do my evil on my talk page.How do I delete it?

Okay!But I didn't get that last line.I still can copy the showdown to my page right?

Oh come on,baby luigi on fire has a joke proposal too in his talk page!

My evil showdown is also a pol! No!I'm not the only one to edit it!

Yeah!I already asked time q to delete it anyway!

Cause' I though you said that I can't use polls even in my talk page.Anyway,sorry.

Remider?
What was the reminder for?

Yeah I was just joking with my bro!It won't happen again,sorry!But what is 2=?

I'm already on it!

infobox
Are infoboxes not allowed in user spaces?

thank you!

Sorry
I'm sorry if I put unofficial names on Blue Toad and Yellow Toad as Yvan and Wolley I just wanted them to have names so they won't be referred to as Blue and Yellow Toads please forgive me but I still want to give them those names so can I have permission please.

Warning

 * Prime example of why you don't go shouting the words "VANDAL!" in your edit summaries. I believe I've warned you for this before. And guess what? It turns out that the user didn't even know that what he or she did was against the rules! You know, asking a user what they're doing before calling them a vandal is a better strategy... 19:55, 17 April 2010 (EDT)

Detective
Good guess,but the man was killed.Sorry,but it wasen't a suicide.And here's a hint,the bed has nothing to do.

Infobox
Hi Rever!I saw at fire baby luigi(not baby luigi on fire) that he was warned because he used an infobox(and i'm sure he used a code;reference to booletta's talk)Are you sure the infobox are allowed?

You scared me with that title!Anyway thanks!

But anyway.Someone's gotta do somthing about that.He just can't get a reminder for nothing!

FireBabyLuigi11

Thanks!I hope there isn't other users like this!Thanks again.

Yoshi's Island 1
I've not sure why you reverted my edit on Yoshi's Island 1. Since you did not leave a single explanation, I've reinstated my edit. --Ixfd64 16:57, 19 April 2010 (EDT)

FI Proposal
Remember rule no. 7: "If a proposal has more than ten votes, it can only pass or fail by a margin of three votes. If a proposal reaches the deadline and the total number of votes for each option differ by two or less votes, the deadline will be extended for another week." 19:38, 19 April 2010 (EDT)


 * It's okay. It doesn't matter if it's already been extended, though; the rule clearly says to extend it for another week if there isn't a 3-vote margin at deadline. 19:45, 19 April 2010 (EDT)


 * According to the rule, the proposal will just be extended for another week, without being archived. Currently, the only way for a proposal to be listed as "NO QUORUM" is to have 3 voters or less (though this latter rule is disputed). 19:55, 19 April 2010 (EDT)


 * Oh, everything's fine then. 20:01, 19 April 2010 (EDT)