Talk:Bell Kritter

Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters?
 * Nope, they shouldn't have an article.

They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.-- 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge this article with Kritter
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.

Proposer: Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per policy.
 * 2) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
 * 3) Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?
 * 4) Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged?

Comments?
@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.
 * Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created many different item articles currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense