User talk:SethAllen623

Reminder
Hello! Just a little reminder. Make sure not to make a duplicate edit, because it showed up on the Recent changes three times! (And wasn't minor.)

Thanks for reading. 13:16, 18 March 2013 (EDT)

Game & Watch Gallery
I see you added a bit to trivia to the Game & Watch Gallery page regarding international names for the games. But in Europe (I'm British, and own copies of all the games except Advance, so I should know!), the games have the same names as in America, except for 4, which is called Game & Watch Gallery Advance, they're not called Game Boy Gallery like in Japan. And G&WG4 doesn't even have a Japanese name, as it was never released there. Next time, do your research please. Digifiend (talk) 10:15, 15 September 2015 (EDT)

Names in Other Languages
Ah, okay- sorry about that. 02:46, 24 November 2015 (EST)

Super Mario Advance
I appreciate your attempts to trim the Super Mario Advance pages, but I'm not sure deleting the bulleted list of changes wholesale is the way to go. I feel there's value in hving an exhaustive list of changes written up, and I'm not comfortable having legitimate (ie: not obvious or repetitive) information removed because it's 2too minor". --Glowsquid (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 * For reference, I don't think there's anything wrong to have a paragraph sumarizing the most major and obvious changes, what you wrote isn't bad. But I don't think the list full of things like "The first bush in Level 2 has more fruits" should be scrapped in the same breath.
 * I saw you deleted it again... How about we make a separate page for the super-comprehensive list of changes? --Glowsquid (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2016 (EDT)

Undo Edits of Mine
Why? We can repurpose images! -- 01:18, 3 August 2016 (EDT)

Reminder
You just made almost 20 consecutive edits to Mario (franchise), please try to make fewer, larger edits when doing this in the future to avoid flooding the Recent Changes. 17:05, 6 August 2016 (EDT)
 * And if you absolutely must make consecutive edits, please mark them as minor. Failure to do so is a Level One offense. -- 17:41, 6 August 2016 (EDT)

Edit snipping
Oh hey, I really like your work on the Mario (franchise) page.

Since I don't want to steps on any toe, I was wondring if you plan to apply the same treatment to other series page (asking because I'd like to overhaul Donkey Kong's)? --Glowsquid (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2016 (EDT)
 * I'm also here to congratulate your effort in the Mario franchise article, keep up the good work! 19:33, 22 August 2016 (EDT)
 * I cannot thank you enough for transforming one of MarioWiki's whopping travesties into a featured article. If there were a barnstar system, I would've given you one in a heartbeat for such an impressive feat. Keep up the good work, we really appreciate it. :) 21:53, 2 September 2016 (EDT)

Birdo
Good job, with rewriting Birdo's summary. But just know that reception section on character or item pages aren't unneeded, especially from website writers or critics. We don't try and emulate like Wikipedia's page.

Warning
You edit here on the Bowser article wasn't necessary. Not only do you need Admin-approval before making major changes like that but some (or at least one) point of information was false. Bowser doesn't want to marry Peach, he just wants to use her to take over the Mushroom Kingdom. He did marry her in Super Paper Mario but that was a fake to create the Chaos Heart so that doesn't count. Also listing the locations and games makes it easier for non-users or kids to catch on thanks. 22:11, 2 September 2016 (EDT)

I've overturned the above warning because it's droll nonsense.

1: " Not only do you need Admin-approval before making major changes like that " <--- lmao no, minor rewrites like that don't warrant proposal what the hell are you on about?

2: While includng the bit about marying Peach is questionable since it's only been depited in two bit of media as far as I can rember (SPM and The Great Mission To Save Princess Peach), in according another user of making a factual error, you did one yourself: saying "it's fake" is irrelevant as bowser had no way of knowing the effects or the purpose of it.

Either way handing out a warning was completely out of line. --Glowsquid (talk) 22:48, 2 September 2016 (EDT)