MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/New Super Mario Bros.

Support

 * 1) - I know that the sequel was nominated too soon but this one no, is well writed, and has tons of images, sections and tons of useful information.
 * 2) - Well, I've seen better articles, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Really, I don't. That means there is no major errors in this article. I think MATEOELBACAN is right. We should feature this.

Oppose

 * 1) - Per above with the fact of only one, two, three images throughout the page! (not including the gallery). You have to have many pics throughout the page to keep interest with the article readers. Users prefer to read an article that has pictures to aid them further with whatever they are seeking to learn! Other than that, it is about good.
 * 2) Some images in this article are bad quality and the chart IMO looks a tad unappealing (but I'm not sure how to improve that.)

Baby Mario Bloops

 * 1) - BabyLuigiOnFire uploaded a lot of pictures (Thanks ;D) and the article is nice now.

LeftyGreenMario

 * 1) - I don't see that they're bad quality...

Comments
Oh and FYI, "secuel" is spelled "sequel" and it's supposed to be well written, not writed. Just want to help you out and improve.
 * Ok, a minor grammar error of my comment :P and I changed the place of the Story section.

BMB: Actually, in its current state, there are only 2 images in this entire article if one does not count the gallery section. I'd be pretty glad to help out with this thing, if I can.

Ok then, I added images I found. What else is there that needs help? I really wish someone could capture the images in the opening, because the videos I found were low quality.

LeftyPoopingGreenMario: They don't look THAT bad quality. I mean, I considered cropping out screenshots from Too Yube (Youtube) and they are even worse quality, plus with that ugly ign logo on the bottom right