MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy

Support

 * 1) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
 * 2) Per Super Mario Bros.
 * 3) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
 * 4) This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
 * 5) I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still
 * 6) This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information.
 * 7) I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
 * 8) per all

Oppose

 * 1) Sigh... the only thing is that the enemies section looks awkward with stuff like "little red bug" I guess we just have to make a new article with conjecture names. Oh, and I vaguely also remember a picture in one of the Bowser Galaxies, with an smb sprite. Not the user but the game;) Add that and I will remove my oppose, though supporting it still needs a couple of thoughts.

Removal of Opposes

 * 1) I think we should remove the only oppose vote because: I rewrote the soundtrack section. You don't have to know everything about Prankster Comets in that section, that's why we included the link to the Prankster Comet article (so you could find more information). And I don't remember there being more references to Super Mario Bros., unless you mean some of the music, which is quite obvious and doesn't really need to be in the article.

Comments
Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured.
 * 1) This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.