Talk:Mushroom

I think the picture at the top should be in Super Mushroom, because it's actually a super mushroom. Also this page should cover more about mushrooms in general, instead of just items in the RPGs that are called only mushrooms.

Merge M&L series mushrooms together
MERGE ON MAIN ARTICLE 1-5-0

As stated above, I propose to merge Mushroom, Super Mushroom (just M&L info), Ultra Mushroom, and Max Mushroom (just M&L info) into a seperate page or on the main mushroom page. We already have the Nuts ajoined, so we should also ajoin these stated above together to get rid of the small articles they are.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Deadline: 11 February 2010, 17:00

Merge Mushrooms together on a Seperate article

 * 1) - Good idea. It gets rid of stubs and it will join more of the mushroom family together.

Merge Mushrooms together on main Mushroom article

 * 1) - Per all I said above and the logic of how the other sections would have to be seperated and cause the mess.
 * 2) We did it with the Nuts article and we will be doing it with the Syrup page, so we need to be consistent. Here is the syrup talk page: syrup talk
 * 3) - Per the shell that reflects the wavelength light of red and consistency.
 * 4) - Per all: consistency and streamlined navigation are always to be striven for.
 * 5) Consistency!

Comments
I want to know how you could name the page for the mushrooms that appear in the Mario & Luigi series in case this proposal succeeds, please.
 * Well, possibly Mushroom (Mario & Luigi) or any similar name. Don't worry, that is not the only name I thought of.
 * "Mushroom (Mario & Luigi series)" perhaps? You need to decide on the name before the proposal passes so the voters know exactly what we'll be getting. - 23:35, 30 January 2010 (EST)
 * Yeah, that is a better name, so if my side wins, than we will call it what Walkazo said. Also, just in case like the syrups, the page won't be a sentence or two long, as you can see by the fact of the paragraghs they are right now.
 * You see, Red Shell 68066vr, the Nuts article needs to be expanded, the syrups do to! The mushroom info is not to little, so it can be a seperate article! The Nuts are a seperate page BTW, just that there was no other nuts. Do you see what I'm trying to say? Also, Nuts and Syrups only appeared in two games, Mushrooms all three! Do you understand what I'm saying? - Baby Mario Bloops
 * Regardless of that, he (or she?) has a point. A strong one in fact. Consistency is just as important as expanding articles, if not more important. - 17:19, 4 February 2010 (EST)
 * Now what makes you say that putting it on another page say that it won't be consistent? Just because RS ####vr (sorry, got lazy) said that it will be consistent doesn't mean it won't be either way. Leaving them alone as seperate articles will break the consistenty, though.

I assume that is why he/she didn't vote to "leave them alone". - 17:32, 4 February 2010 (EST)

Consistency is important. When we look in the syrup page, for example, we see all the syrups names and all of this stuff. When we look in the Mushroom article, however, we see that there is barely/no information on the mushroom items! It's on a separate article!

The Mushroom article has more info, yes, but wouldn't hurt to expand more. Besides, placing all the Mushrooms in another article will probably create a stub since they look exactly like mushrooms, except that they restore different amounts of HP.

(Separate is spelled like this, FYI. Sorry for being a spelling nut. :


 * STOP USING THE SYRUP PAGE AS A REFERENCE!!!! We need to expand it like the Nuts page. Also, like above, Mushrooms won't be a stub as a seperate article because they been in all the games!!! (3 games, Nuts/syrups - 2 games) Personally, I think it would be more consistent if it was seperate because it would help users find it easier instead of looking throughout the Mushroom Page. And, we bring it to this page, lot of stuff is going to be added that could have been a complete non-stub article!!!! Please, everyone, get that in your head if you don't already!

Err... calm down. The opposers do have valid reasons to oppose after all. They are correct, splitting it into a separate page for the M&L series isn't very consistent. We would also have to create an article for, and so on for consistency.-- 19:45, 5 February 2010 (EST)
 * I'm not angry at all. Also, that is a very good valid point, but also we have articles that have stuff that is seperated that the other stuff should be seperated too for consistentity but isn't.

}}

Split Mushroom (Super Mario RPG info) into Mushroom and Mushroom (status effect)
SPLIT 6-0

I tried deleting the notice in the Super Mario RPG section but Knife reverted the change, so I decided to create this proposal. As Knife says, it explains its status effect too. It simply can't do it. So I propose that we split them.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|Red Shell 68066vr}} Deadline: 20 February 2010, 20:00

Split them

 * 1) per proposal
 * 2) - Per proposal
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) - They aren't the same, then they shouldn't be under the same header name...
 * 5) - Per all.
 * 6) Per all.

Comments
}}

Merge SMRPG Mushrooms onto one page....
MERGE 0-3-0

Yes, another Mushroom one, like we don't have enough, but, for the consistent info, we should have Mushroom (SMRPG info), Bad Mushroom, Mid Mushroom, and Max Mushroom merged together. Just like the Mushroom one I did above, and the Syrup one, they are too small to be better off and since we already merged one thing, we need to be consistent.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Deadline: 25 February 2010, 20:00

Merge SMRPG Mushrooms onto main Mushroom Page

 * 1) - Many reasons: Proposal maker, consistent, etc etc etc...
 * 2) Max Mushroom is a stub now.
 * 3) - Seeing as the M&L Mushrooms have all been merged, the only consistent thing to do would be to merge Bad Mushroom, Mid Mushroom, and Max Mushroom into the SMRPG section of the Mushroom page as well. Saving space, scrapping stubs and speeding up navigation are also pluses.

Comments
Just noting, you spelled separate wrong again (seperate) }}