User:Walkazo/Essays

Here's where I shall rant about my views on the Mario series or the Super Mario Wiki itself. I like writing these sort of spiels in the first person, so by school standards my "essays" would fail (they're supposed to be in the third person, like lab reports, and things). I also like rambling, so don't expect picture-perfect structuring either; this is for me, not English class. And because it's for me, I'm not gonna sugar-coat anything; there's not gonna be swearing or flaming or anything like that, but I'm not gonna be spending hours using a thesaurus to come up with less pejorative synonyms for "stupid", "lazy" or that sorta ilk. You've been warned.

Organization

 * Mario (Including Mario Kart, Mario Party, all Mario sports titles, Paper Mario, Mario & Luigi, and everything else with "Mario" in it's title.)
 * Yoshi
 * Wario
 * WarioWare
 * Pyoro
 * Donkey Kong
 * Donkey Konga
 * Diddy Kong Racing
 * Banjo
 * Conker
 * Crossovers:
 * Mario Hoops 3-on-3
 * Final Fantasy
 * Itadaki Street DS
 * Itadaki Street
 * Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games
 * Sonic
 * Super Smash Bros (Our Page)
 * The Legend of Zelda
 * Kirby
 * Star Fox
 * Metroid
 * Pikmin
 * Mother (Earthbound)
 * (Golden Sun, Animal Crossing trophies)
 * All else go to Wikipedia

Justification
The links between Mario, Wario (including WarioWare), Donkey Kong (and its affiliates), and Yoshi are constantly being strengthened with Sports, Party and Racing games, whereas Banjo and Conker have been disassociated with the major Mario series since their beginnings in Diddy Kong Racing. This is why I feel series pages are enough coverage of these two for the time being - there's more relevant aspects of the Mario superseries (in relation to Mario and the other "core" series) that need the attention. Perhaps in the future, Banjo and Conker could be given full coverage, but that time is not yet upon us. As for Pyoro, it is still a new series, but (as far as I know), it's branching away from WarioWare too; because of this and the fact that Pyoro is as far removed from the central focus of this Wiki ("Mario" titles) as Banjo and Conker, by that same reasoning, it should only be given general coverage as well.

Now, the reason I include WarioWare under Wario, Donkey Konga and Diddy Kong Racing under Donkey Kong, and all the "Mario" games under Mario is because I feel they are all joined at the hip. The Mario Kart, Party and sports titles all bear "Mario" in their names, and feature Mario above all the other characters, so I consider them Mario titles. The same goes for all the "mainstream" Mario games: Paper Mario is no less of a Mario game than Super Mario Bros., in my opinion. The Wario games can be grouped together by the same rule: Wario Land titles and WarioWare titles both star Wario and have his name in their titles; he is an integral part in both (sub-)series. And while he may wear different clothes in WarioWare, I consider them Wario games as much as I do Wario Land. While I can apply this logic to the relationship between Donkey Kong's starring roles in the Donkey Kong and Donkey Konga titles, Diddy Kong Racing requires a bit more weaselling. DKR does not have "Donkey Kong" in its title, nor does it feature the big ape; this would be a problem, if that wasn't already a normal occurrence in the main DK titles: Donkey Kong Country 2 also features Diddy over the eponymous DK, and Donkey Kong Country 3 goes a step further and cuts out both stars of the original Donkey Kong Country. Clearly it's not "Donkey" but "Kong" that matters in the DK Country (and DK Land) games, so why should DK Racing be treated any different? - In my defense, it's not speculation, it's interpretation.

Finally, we can just externally link to all the non-Mario series encountered in the crossover titles. I'd even like to see less Super Smash Bros. coverage here, and leave everything that doesn't deal specifically with Mario to our NIWA associate, SmashWiki. This will give us more room to talk about our own series, and we won't be competing with them for readers and writers anymore.

And that's my two-cents on the whole thing.

Redirection
With the sheer magnitude of subjects relating to the Mario series, no one could possibly remember every name of every page on the wiki, and for this reason we have redirects. These pages have names that are slightly different than the actual articles, and if someone searches for that name, the redirect sends them straight to the article they were looking for. Similarly, anyone who clicks on a link to the redirect page goes to the article. When pages are moved, their former namespace becomes a redirect, so that people will automatically be able to get to the article even if the links are not updated. In both cases, the links themselves will ideally be corrected or updated before long, and any redirects leading to the new redirect of the moved pages (known as "double-redirects") should be diverted to the moved page itself immediately. When navigation templates or infoboxes are moved, the links must also be updated immediately: template redirects are not allowed, nor are category redirects. There are also limits to what mistakes actually merit redirects when it comes to mainspace articles: the wiki should be easy to use, yet not bogged down with unnecessary redirects. How to make redirects is explained on Help:Redirect, and what should or should not be made into redirects is explained here.

Possible Errors
The easiest way to communicate what redirects are acceptable and which are not is best illustrated with examples Mario Kart: Double Dash!! will be the main example, although other subjects will be used for situations that are not applicable to this game.

Punctuation
The example title includes punctuation marks, which are one the largest stumbling blocks for searchers. In this case, they can forget the colon and/or one or both of the exclamation marks. For that reason, we have the redirects "Mario Kart Double Dash", "Mario Kart Double Dash!!", "Mario Kart: Double Dash", "Mario Kart Double Dash!" and "Mario Kart: Double Dash!".

Sometimes, punctuation may be accidentally added, such as "Mario Kart: Double-Dash!! (which, by extension could lead to "Mario Kart Double-Dash", "Mario Kart Double-Dash!!" and "Mario Kart: Double-Dash" if the hyphen is added but some or all of the other punctuation marks are forgotten). However, compensating for this mistake with redirects is going too far: rather than merely forgetting something, anyone searching for these terms is actively adding erroneous punctuation, and forcing them to realize this mistake is doing them a greater service than enabling it. If someone does search for the hyphenated "Double-Dash" they will merely come to a search results page, in which the desired game article is the first match the wiki made, meaning the searcher still gets to where they wanted to go.

Another possible mistake is substituting one punctuation mark for another. Instead of using a colon, someone could search for "Mario Kart - Double Dash!!" (and any other combination of punctuation errors in addition to the dash), but like the hyphen use, this does not merit a redirect. Searching for the name with a dash instead of a colon will still bring the reader to the game page by way of the search results, and that additional click might help them remember the proper spelling in the future. However, there are exceptions to the dash rule, such as with "Yoshi no Cookie: Kuruppon Oven de Cookie". The game is very rare and was never given an English release (there is more on non-English redirect conventions in a later section), and so no known official material actually uses a colon to separate the two halves of the name (they are separated by a line break in all available screenshots). Many people who have written about the game elsewhere on the Internet use a hyphen to separate the names, but to fit with our usual naming conventions, the Super Mario Wiki now uses a colon. However, we retain the dash spelling as a redirect, as many people are likely to use it in their searches and since it is not quite a mistake that needs to be re-educated, convenience is the only factor at play.

Symbols
Like punctuation marks, symbols often get mixed up. Pluses ("+"), ampersands ("&") and "and"s are all used in Mario titles, so if someone forgets when "+"s and "&"s are used and defaults to "and", that is reasonable. For example, "Mario and Luigi" is an acceptable substitution of "Mario & Luigi". In some cases, such as other two-person duos, an ampersand can be substituted for "and", such as writing "Kat & Ana" instead of "Kat and Ana", but in most situations, it would be inappropriate. Substituting "+"s for "&"s and vice-versa is not allowed either, for the same reason as the substitution of punctuation marks.

Spelling and Other Languages
English spelling mistakes should never be turned into redirects, with the exception of commonly used and confused compounds, British vs. American spellings, and titles that contain special characters (i.e. "Pok é mon" vs. "Pok e mon").

While many common species names include non-hyphenated compound words (i.e. Koopa Paratroopa, Paragoomba and Parabuzzy), there are also a number of names like Para-Beetle or Mecha-Koopa, which can confuse people both ways: they could easily end up searching for "Parabeetle" (incorrectly joined), "Para-Buzzy" (an incorrectly hyphenated compound) or "Mecha Koopa" (incorrectly separated). Users may use their discretion to make redirects for mistakes like these if they feel they will occur on a regular basis. However, such redirects should still be kept to a bare minimum, and as discussed with the "Double-Dash" example in the Punctuation section, incorrect hyphenation or joining of words that are not compounds (such as writing Hammer Bro. as "Hammer-Bro." or "HammerBro.") should not get redirects.

Both British and American spellings are valid on this Wiki, and unusual characters don't always appear on keyboards and can be easily forgotten. The special character rule also applies to non-English languages that still use Latin characters, such as the German Club Nintendo comics, or the romanization of Japanese.

Japanese names with no English equivalent are given more leeway as they can be romanized various different ways, and many people have trouble with spelling on top of that. For example Tenderling's name 「ジューシー」 Jūshī can also be romanized as Jūshi, Jushī, Jushi, Zyūsī, Jyūshī, Zūsī, Juushii, Zyuusii, Jyuushii and Zuusii when including older transcription systems, common spelling mistakes and dropped macrons (as mentioned earlier, dropping special characters like macrons is allowed in redirects). The direct translation "Juicy" was also given a redirect in this case, although this is not recommended as translations are usually unofficial; in this case, 「ジューシー」 was known to be a transliteration of the English word "Juicy". The aforementioned "Yoshi no Cookie: Kuruppon Oven de Cookie" is an example of what should and shouldn't be translated like this: 「ヨッシーのクッキー クルッポンオーブンでクッキー」 is romanized as Yosshī no Kukkī: Kuruppon Ōbun de Kukkī but it is known that "Yosshī ", "Ōbun" and "Kukkī " were "Yoshi", "Oven" and "Cookie", respectively, and so they were written as such, however the Japanese itself was left alone (i.e. Yoshi no Cookie wasn't changed to Yoshi's Cookie).

However, unlike Yoshi no Cookie, Tenderling now has an English name. Before Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story was released in English, Jūshī was the article and the eleven other names listed redirected there, but now we can simply use "Tenderling". In these situations, once an English translation is established, the Japanese redirects become redundant (as this is an English wiki) and can slowly be phased-out - starting with the more obscure romaji. This applies to all subjects and all languages: redirects for anything besides English are unnecessary, as are the corresponding English translations, and neither should be made. Links will never be made in other languages and if anyone searches using a non-English title or its translation, they will still find the article via a search results page, since all known non-English names and their meanings are listed on the articles in the template. Therefore, in Tenderling's case, searching for "Jūshī" (or the Japanese text itself, which should never be made into redirects even for subjects with no English equivalents) will still bring readers to Tenderling's page by way of the search results page, although the other variations of romaji will not work. The only exception to this non-English redirect rule is if a major subject is popularly known by a non-English name or its translation, such as Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story, which was known as "Mario & Luigi RPG 3!!!" for months, before it was released outside of Japan. The translated Japanese title is still popular among English speakers, and so the redirect remains for now.

Abbreviations
As with all games, there are many possible abbreviations searchers may use for "Mario Kart: Double Dash!!", including "MKDD", "MKDD!", "MKDD!!", "MK:DD", "MK:DD!", "MK:DD!!", "MK DD", "MK DD!", "MK DD!!", "MK: DD!!", "MK: DD!" and "MK: DD!!". All of these are valid redirects, however many other short-forms aren't. Players may call the game "Double Dash" in conversation to save on time, but they should know better than to type that in on the search bar to look for the game. The point of the wiki is to be a user-friendly database, but redirects for "Double Dash", "Double Dash!!", ""DD", "DD!!" and even the unlikely "Kart: Double Dash!!" (as well as its derivatives, "Kart: Double Dash", "Kart Double Dash!!" and "Kart Double Dash") would be unnecessary. (Although it should be noted that Double Dash!! is an actual article about a move that can be performed in the game, and "Double Dash" is a perfectly acceptable redirect leading to that page.)

Alternative Titles and Nicknames
In addition to abbreviations are alternate titles, though this is more applicable to people, places and things, rather than games like Mario Kart: Double Dash!!. In most cases, any official name Nintendo has provided should become a redirect, which is why "Peach", "Princess Peach Toadstool", "Princess Toadstool" and "Toadstool" all redirect to Princess Peach - they're all valid names.

However, it gets difficult when nicknames are involved. "Weegie" is a famous and widely-used nickname of Luigi's and is therefore used as a redirect, but the vast majority of nicknames are obscure and used only once (such as "M" for Mario in Mario is Missing!, or "Butterball" for Bowser in Super Paper Mario) and should not get redirects. As with the obscure abbreviations, readers should know better than to search for the characters using these names.

Pluralization
Pluralizations are much more clear-cut than nicknames: they should be allowed for species and items (except for one-of-a-kind objects), as they are proper spellings in their own rights, and people may often link and/or search for them instead of for the singular names.

Capitalization
Errors in capitalization should never be given redirects since the wiki's search function can still recognize "mario kart: double dash!!" as meaning "Mario Kart: Double Dash!! and go straight to the desired page without a redirect being necessary. Incorrectly capitalized links will not function, however the links themselves should be fixed, as with any other errors occurring within the articles of the Super Mario Wiki.

Summarizing List
The following chart summarizes should and shouldn't be redirects for Mario Kart: Double Dash!!.

Most subjects will not have as many possible redirects as Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, although it is a good example of why a line must be drawn against the extensive creation of redirects. This list is not even complete: if every single combination of punctuation, spacing and capitalization was shown, including for the "Double Dash" and "Kart: Double Dash" short forms, as well as all the non-English versions of the name, there would be well over 100 redirects leading to Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, and it is almost guaranteed that most of those will never be used.

Categorizing Merged Levels
If all the levels were merged into their parent world pages, it would cut down on stubs, red links, navigation time, template space and organizational hassles when it comes to the many forms of "Level 1-1" and its ilk. The only thing it would cut back on that isn't so great are categories. For example, if single level in a world is underwater while the rest is a forest, an impasse is reached: the level must be acknowledged on a navigational level as an underwater area, but the entire world cannot be categorized as such. The solution: adding the links to the individual sections to the "summary" of the category page itself. I don't think this has ever been done before, and new things are very scary, but hear me out: with a little work, this could be a very good thing instead.

Firstly, not all categories are gonna get tripped up by a merge. The categories that apply to individual games or series will still work: they'll merely go on the world pages instead of on each level page (and complaining that the world itself isn't a level is sorta splitting hairs at this point - all the info in the page is about the levels, after-all).

On the other and, some categories will be rendered completely unfeasible: fir example, if all the Ghost Houses are part of the Super Mario World world pages, there hardly needs to be a category for them. However this isn't a problem in this case, since the Ghost House page itself sports a directory of Ghost House locations - the category is hardly needed when all the pages are already linked to in one place.

And between the two extremes we have the categories that will need to be rewritten to include the introductory list. Merely using the links will probably mess us some of the fancier aspects of how the Wiki works (like DPL and other things I don't even try to understand), but at a basic level, it'll ensure that the readers still get all the applicable links when they search using a category. It could even make navigation easier: right now, all the levels from all the various games are mixed together, often with worlds and miscellaneous areas thrown in as well; a list gives us the option to organize the raw data. We could subdivide the lists into the parent games, sparing people the task of having to comb through all the pages if they're looking for things like the subterranean areas of Yoshi's Island DS, for example. Some games will even allow for the levels to be clustered together into their worlds in the lists. Take the Subterranean Areas of Super Mario World for example (with all the unmade section-links left as raw coding; also, the ";" header coder doesn't work in quoteblocks):

;Super Mario World
 * Donut Plains 2 and Donut Secret.
 * All basic levels of Vanilla Dome, including Vanilla Ghost House and Lemmy's Castle, as well as Vanilla Secrets 1 and 3, and the Red Switch Palace.
 * Chocolate Island 4 and Chocolate Secret.
 * All the levels in the Valley of Bowser, including Larry's Castle and Bowser's Castle, and the Valley Ghost House.

Which would look like:

Super Mario World
 * and.
 * All basic levels of Vanilla Dome, including and, as well as Vanilla Secrets  and , and the Red Switch Palace.
 * and.
 * All the levels in the Valley of Bowser, including and Bowser's Castle, and the.

It could even be simpler: when an entire world fits the category, linking to the individual sections seems redundant. However, when only a couple levels in the world fit the bill, they should both get their own section-links, since linking to the page as a whole would be wrong. With these changes, it would be written like this:

;Super Mario World
 * Donut Plains 2 and Donut Secret.
 * All basic levels of Vanilla Dome, including Vanilla Ghost House and Lemmy's Castle, as well as Vanilla Secrets 1 and 3, and the Red Switch Palace.
 * Chocolate Island 4 and Chocolate Secret.
 * All the levels in the Valley of Bowser, including Larry's Castle and Bowser's Castles, and the Valley Ghost House]].

And look like this:

Super Mario World
 * Donut Plains 2 and Donut Secret.
 * All basic levels of Vanilla Dome, including Vanilla Ghost House and Lemmy's Castle, as well as Vanilla Secrets 1 and 3, and the Red Switch Palace.
 * Chocolate Island 4 and Chocolate Secret.
 * All the levels in the Valley of Bowser, including Larry's Castle and Bowser's Castles, and the Valley Ghost House]].

Both versions make it much easier to see what levels are from SMW if you didn't know to look for "Donut Plains" and whatnot. Proving additional tidbits of info, like how the Red Switch Palace is underground because it's in Vanilla Dome is also a plus - though the reader would have learned this the moment they clicked on any of the related links. While games like Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island - and its evenly distributed subterranean levels - couldn't be grouped like this (it'd have to be traditional one-by-one lists), seeing the different organizational methods would be another bonus heads-up to the nature of the games. It may not be a direct goal of this innovation, but it's certainly not a detractor.

Also, while I've organized my example by sequential order, the actual lists should be alphabetical (by world, if they're like SMW) - to match the category entries below. This is a given for the one-by-one lists, but as you can see in my example, the "compound" lists lend themselves to the sequential order quite nicely. I organized my example like that to make sure I got all the levels (I haven't played SMW in a while), and I was too lazy to change it back; also, I personally prefer it this way, though I know it would look too inconsistent to actually employ.

Koopa Taxonomy
There are many kinds of Koopa: some are like Koopa Troopas, some are like Bowser, some are like Lakitu, some are like Hammer Bros., and if I had my way, Buzzy Beetles and Clubbas would be Koopas too. Are these different species? Are Red Magikoopas and Yellow Magikoopas different species, or do they just wear different clothes? And what are sub-species? Koopatrols? KP Koopas? What's the relationship between Dark Koopas in Paper Mario and Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door and Dark Koopas in Super Paper Mario? What is Bowser? And what the heck is a Koopa anyway? Since Nintendo didn't give us any sort of Koopa taxonomy, evolutionary chart, fossil record or family tree, it's totally up to us to answer those questions.

This is not impossible: mother nature didn't share her blueprints either, and yet we still know that spiders and crabs are cousins, and that tapeworms and earthworms aren't. We can't tell if Koopas evolved from turtles or dinosaurs, but we can tell that Bowser is not a Koopa Troopa based on the fact that they look nothing alike, besides their shells and overall skin colour. It's just like how tapeworms and earthworms look nothing alike beyond the fact that they're long and limbless and don't make for pleasant dinner conversations. By analyzing the facts, we can make reasonable deductions, enabling us to organize these enemy pages logically with minimal speculation involved, if we do it right. For example, we can associate Fire Bros. and Boomerang Bros. in because they are nearly identical except for colouration and some physical capabilities (fire or boomerang), just as we can say Ruby-crowned Kinglets and Golden-crowned Kinglets are closely related based on the fact that their body makeup is virtually the same, but their facial feathers and songs are different. But unlike the cute little birdies, we can't speculate on how the Fire and Boomerang Bros. are related: we can't assign them genera or place them in phylogenetic trees, but I think we can say they're different species. True, Nintendo never said they are, but, I mean, one breathes fire and one doesn't: any biologist will tell you that's enough to separate them.

Unfortunately, the "species" vs. "sub-species" debate is where things get really sticky; if you bring race into it too, all the stickier. It's easier just to say they're different "types" of a larger "group" of Koopas which are "related" to one-another, but our nature is to stick "species" in there as well - since it sounds more professional, and more importantly, way more posh. We can justify "species" when there's no doubt to the biology (if it quacks like a duck, it's a duck; if it's pitch black and throws hammers, it's a Dark Hammer Bro.), but when you have really similar enemies, the arguments start to waver. A no-brainer example: KP Koopas are basic Koopa Troopas who merely dyed their shells a different colour; they're "different", but not different species or even a different race or sub-species, just like how punk rockers who dyed their hair blue are still humans - very cool humans. A more difficult example: Dark Koopas in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door and Paper Mario are more Koopa Troopas of a different colour, but they also have unique skills and live in a specific habitat, so are they a sub-species, or a race, or what? In cases like these, to label them is to make an assumption out of uncertainty, which we have to avoid as much we can: no more of this "sub-species" nonsense - therein lies the face of speculation.

Now, the reason for this spiel (aside from my love of taxonomy) is the confusion over "Koopa" vs. "Koopa Troopa", and what to do with their respective articles. As I said before, to the best of my understanding, the "Koopa Troopa" is a specific species (with many similar species and races attached to it, though the actual relationships between the organisms are ambiguous), and "Koopa" is a general term for all the vaguely turtle/dragonish creatures (I'd call it an Order, but that would be speculation to the max). Therefore, I believe it is a very good thing to have separate Koopa and Koopa Troopa pages: one for the species, one for all the shelled enemies. Currently, Koopa is just a partial list of all the major species and some of the minor species, and that should be changed: it should be an annotated list of all the species. Note the "annotated" part: that's what will set the page apart from a mere category or a list in Koopa (disambiguation): it will give context to the Koopas, allowing us to present them in an organized and logical manner, and as long as we watch ourselves, it can be one that is virtually free of speculation. An example of what the Lakitu section could look like is at the end of this essay.

Of course, some level of speculation is unavoidable. Like tapeworms and earthworms, things like Sumo Bro. and Hammer 'Bro. may not be related at all, but if names are good enough reasons to cram everything else on the Wiki together (A Pirate Goomba is a Goomba? Who knew!), why not here too? No matter what we do, we will have to make some assumptions, but none wil be as large and misguided as saying "Koopa" = "Koopa Troopa" = all Koopas and merging the pages. Bowser is not a Koopa Troopa: any biologist could tell you that even if they never played a videogame in their life (like my Animal Diversity teacher: instead, he spends all his free time studying tapeworms). Therefore, we can't write about Bowser's species in Koopa Troopa, and if we merge Koopa, we lose the only logical place to put it - we'd have to make a nameless stub about them, which would be against various Super Mario Wiki policies. For this specific reason, and for the organizational benefits I stated above, in the name of taxonomy and in the spirit of organization, I say we leave the pages separate.

Lakitu
Lakitus are bespectacled Koopas who ride clouds through the skies, and which can occasionally be found snorkeling in water and hiding in walls or pipes. Unlike most Koopa species, they do not have snouts or beaks, but flat faces; their shells are also unique in their circular patterning. To attack, Lakitus typically throw unlimited numbers of Spiny Eggs at their opponents, and some will also dangle 1-Up Mushrooms from fishing poles to lure their targets closer.


 * Lakitus
 * Aqua Lakitu - A race of Lakitu that lives underwater with the aid of scuba gear, coming to the surface to breathe and throw Spiny Eggs.
 * Calm Lakitu - Lakitus that inhabit Vibe Island, where they are associated with the Calm Vibe, incarnating the power by sleeping most of the time.
 * Dark Lakitu - Lakitus that are darker in colour with red shells and that throw Sky-Blue Spinies.
 * Fishin' Lakitu - Lakitus that use Fishing Rods baited with a 1-Up Mushroom to lure enemies near their clouds. Once the bait is taken the rod is withdrawn and Spinies are thrown. The Fishing Rod can also be used to hook enemies, support various objects, or to simply fish.
 * Lakipea - The Beanish Lakitus. Lakipea have a leaf-like appendage growing from their head, inhabit vine-covered clouds, and throw the Beanish variation of Spiny, Sharpea.
 * Lakitufo - Red-shelled Lakitus bioengineered by the Shroobs to possess strange extraterrestrial features, including antennae in place of hair. They ride UFOs instead of clouds and beam down Spiny Shroopas in lieu of Spinies. They can also jump off their UFOs and assault their enemies themselves with a screw attack.
 * Pipe Lakitu - Lakitus that hide in Warp Pipes to ambush enemies (still attacking with Spiny Eggs).
 * Roketon - A species of Lakitu that flies in airplanes through the skies of Sarasaland. Instead of throwing Spinies, Roketons fire large amounts of Giras from their aircraft to attack their enemies.
 * Thunder Lakitu - This species of Lakitu has a red shell (like Dark Lakitus) and tanned skin. Instead of throwing Spinies it shoots fire generated by a device in its cloud that harnesses the energy from the sun.
 * Wall Lakitu - Lakitus that hide behind hills and other objects in order to throw Spiny Eggs in surprise-attacks.