Talk:Super Mario RPG 2

I don't think this deserves its own article. It is simply about a change made to Paper Mario's name. Agreed? 20:57, 27 February 2007 (EST)

I think it should be a redirect to Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door.

I think it deserves its own article because it was a game partly in production, when Nintendo and Square split. It's not as simple as a name change. Red.Tide 17:31, 28 February 2007 (EST)

I partly agree with you. However, I still think Super Mario FX should be turned into a redirect. SM64 has had many name changes and that was just one of them. The concept of "Paper Mario" was invented after they scrapped the original Super Mario RPG idea. In Super Mario FX's case, the project's name change and they moved it to another system. 20:24, 28 February 2007 (EST)

I think it should just be a section in the Paper Mario article.

Should this page really be a stub? It doesn't seem like much more could be added to it. Hisak 11:38, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

Merge
This article is very short and redundant. It should be merged to Paper Mario/Beta elements. --Grandy02 09:05, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
 * "Short and redundant"? It's about as short and redundant as the other canceled games.
 * I guess you could say that. But it would be best if this were merged with the beta elements page.
 * The difference is that exactly the same game, which isn't really a cancelled one, is already covered in another article - and there the description is more detailed, too. --Grandy02 10:00, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
 * Good point. If I were you, I'd wait for another oppinion before taking action.
 * So why do we have this page? I can see from above that everyone wants to merge it to the Beta Elements, and no doubt in my opinion it should. This is beta, and we need to have it there. It doesn't need a page for itself!