Talk:Mario Bros.-e

Merge
As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with Mario Bros.. We also merged the Classic NES Series with the respective original games. --Grandy02 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't Merge it with the NES version.
 * this article is a stub so it should be merged into it
 * Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know.
 * This game is the same as the NES version, though, just on a different platform. There is no reason for a separate article. --Grandy02 09:36, 18 February 2010 (EST)

it should merge because it is considered as a remake of the game
 * I wouldn't even consider it a remake. It is just an emulation of the NES game. --Grandy02 12:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree to merge it. It is the EXACT SAME as the NES version, only on a GameBoy Advance E-Reader. Indeed, there is no reason for the E-Reader version to have it's own article. --Killer Axe

Merge
As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and not a remake. I propose that we should merge them.

Proposer: Deadline: 23:59, 27 November 2010 GMT

Merge

 * 1) Per Proposal.
 * 2) I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out.
 * 3) Per proposal.
 * 4) Per proposal
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Per all.
 * 7) - Article should be merged. Emulated games don't require separate articles.
 * 8) No differences
 * 9) - Per M&SG.
 * 10) Per all.

Comments
Remember this is an emulation. Its an exact port from the NES version. I can see why SMAS+SMW was split, but I can't see why this was split if its the same game on a different port.--

We have an Article for Mario Party-e so we should keep this one.

@ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for Mario Party-e because it is its own game. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-

I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games.