MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy

Support

 * 1) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
 * 2) Per Super Mario Bros.
 * 3) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
 * 4) This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
 * 5) I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still
 * 6) This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information.
 * 7) I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
 * 8) per all

Oppose
Too little information. The soundtrack section sucks (writtin by me because there was none) The enemie section is bad cause "red flying bug" sounds totally unsophisticated for a FA. Finally the prankster comet section was quite confusing to read. The main thing was I didn't know if they disappear or not if you shut down the game. Also More than one reference is used for Super Mario Bros.

Comments
Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured.
 * 1) This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.