Talk:Whomp

Mario Galaxy Appearance?
I have not seen these at all in Mario Galaxy, and I just haven't done the final Bowser level. Unless he's there, he's not in this game. Panugget 12:49, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * I think they were seen in a trailer, maybe they got axed before the completion of the game. I don't have Galaxy, so I can't tell if they appear or not.

Blitzwing

Cmon, they do look like they do in Super Mario galaxy 2, right? I added that in and somebody deleted it!-Ultimate Gamer

Split Super Whomp from Whomp
DELETED BY THE PROPOSER

We have articles for bigger enemies (Grand Goomba, Mega Wiggler etc), so why don't we have one for Super Whomp? Sure they behave like normal Whomps, but Grand Goombas behave the same as Goombas.

Proposer: Deadline: September 24, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) I support my own proposal.
 * 2) Per Tails777.
 * 3) Per Koopa K.
 * 4) Per Tails777.

Oppose

 * 1) I'm changing my vote to oppose simply because Super Whomp is an unofficial name and we shouldn't move pages to unofficial names when they have actual official names.

Comments
They have been officially been called Big Whomps in the New Super Mario Bros. 2 Prima Guide.
 * Then they should be moved to big whomps (also I don't think this requires a proposal since they have been officially called Big Whomps.)
 * Well since they have been in the Whomp article for as long as I can remember, I just thought a proposal was necessary. And yes, it should be Big Whomp, I just thought that Super Whomp was another official name.

Can I change the proposal to Big Whomp then? Since that's the official name. It hasn't been 3 days since I made the proposal.
 * You would have to make a separate section section since the people who voted in favor of naming it Super Whomp not Big Whomp.
 * O.K., I'll do that.

Split Big Whomp from Whomp
SPLIT 4-1

I made a mistake on the other proposal (thanks Raven Effect for correcting me on that). This is basically the same proposal, but instead calling it Big Whomp since it's an official name.

Proposer: Deadline: September 26, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) I once again support my own proposal.
 * 2) Per this proposal
 * 3) Per above proposal.
 * 4) Per Tails777

Oppose

 * 1) Do we REALLY need another miniscule article that will just end up getting merged again? I don't think this is a necessary change. There's already little information on Big Whomps, and just because we've separated others (to my chagrin), doesn't mean that we need to continue this. All we need is yet another stub to add to our expanding list of tiny articles. Though it will probably be futile, I say merge them all!!

Comments
You're going to need to cancel the other one now.
 * Already done.

According to the page, they're actually called Super Whomps. Did you mean this, or were you actually referring to the Whomp King?
 * Super Whomp is the unofficial name that people gave them which is why they were merged with Whomps in the first place.
 * Okay thanks for clearing that up.

@Coooool123 Small articles aren't stubs my good man stubs are articles that lack info so for instance Banana Camera Film isn't a stub because there isn't very much info that can be put in the article. Also your not splitting these would make the wiki inconsistent because other things like Big Whomps are split like Super Thwomp which is just a big thwomp, Mask Koopa which is just a Koopa with a mask, and Goomba Tower which is nothing more then Goombas stacked on top of each other. But they are all split because they have official names just like Big Whomps do.