User talk:104.181.85.104

Paper Mario edit
Please stop edit warring over the Paper Mario fact, if you see it's not there for a reason don't add it again okay. I'm telling you in the most polite way to please stop. Two PM games start with a book, edit warring is a Level two offense, if you continue doing this I think I will have to get an Sysop involved thanks. 04:01, 24 July 2016 (EDT)

It is there for a reason. It's there because it helps make the entire point of the article more clear for people who might be confused by it because of playing Paper Jam and making an assumption about the series that isn't applicable to the older games. This isn't edit warring. This is changing it back to how it actually is, your reason isn't an applicable reason because you're making it sound like the Paper Mario games exist within an alternate timeline or pocket dimension of sorts because of Paper Jam's existence which both isn't true but it also defeats the entire point of having a Paper Mario (Character) article and siting Paper Jam as his first appearance, but you're also making an assumption of a past game's creators intent because of something that was made 11 years later. That's against wiki policy and it also isn't even it would work if Mario had an established timeline anyway. The first three games have continuity ties to the Main series such as Luigi's Diary mentioning the sports, Party, and Kart series, as well as setting up the plot to Luigi's Mansion and having connections to Sunshine and SuperStar Saga with the Delfinos and Beanish people being in the games. And it also has Goombario and Goombella's tattles mention that the Mario in the Paper Mario games is THE Mario from Super Mario Bros. 1. That is more valid than a game that came later that doesn't even have any continuity ties to the previous games other than Sticker Star anyway.

And it was also only the second time. Edit warring is when you do it three times in a row. If there were days or weeks in between the edits it isn't an edit war. Secondly, You're making assumptions based on a book opening that is only used as a thematic and not as an actual world. The proposal was to use Paper Jam, not the Paper Mario games. Something having a stylized intro that has a traditional once upon a time book opening format does not mean the adventure itself actually happened within the book nor does it mean that the characters and world are actually made of paper. It means it's an art style choice and the characters are the same ones as the main platforming series because they are connected and exist and happen within the same world. If you get the admins involved they'll likely agree with me because they were the ones who put that into the article in the first place. I'm sorry if that came across as rude because of it being text, but I very much doubt that taking that off of the articles will be something seen as a good change.

Edit. Already resolved it seems. I should have read the other talk page first before typing all this out. I'm glad this was worked out, and I hope you have a good day. The way I was wording the article before was unneeded and was fueled by my own obsessiveness, so I understand why they were reverted then. My apologies and I hope you have a good day.