MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Princess Daisy

Support

 * 1) It's a good page,with detailed sections. It's very pretty written.I think that if Baby Daisy is featured,Daisy need to be too.

Oppose

 * 1) Per Tails, and I also don't think any of the problems from the unfeaturing nomination have been fixed.
 * 2) The article still has a decent amount of errors such as italics errors, but I will correct them. The enemies section is also dubious and needs slight expansion (maybe regarding Tatanga and Bowser?).
 * 3) Per All.

Removal of Opposes
Yoshi876, LeftyGreenMario and Randombob-omb4761
 * 1) The improvement tag has been dealt with legitimately and all brought up problems with this article have been dealt with.
 * 2) Per above. Further, even though it's now been changed, LeftyGreenMario's comment on the new olympic game as well as a game yet to be released and with little to no information on the game itself let alone Daisy being known yet is utterly ridiculous and holds no merit against the quality of her page as a whole and its worthiness of being featured.

Comments
Okay, so there's an improvement template. Before you opposers point this out, you need to figure out WHY there is an improvement template; otherwise, the improvement template's simply being there is a feeble reason to oppose.

I've dealt with the Mario Party series section and attempted the Relationships section, so that's some progress.

Yakuman DS, Mario Kart Arcade GP 2 and Mario Party-e have been inserted into the article. Additionally, the Mario & Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games has been given its own section, although it might need some condensing. Finally, the Gallery section has been filled. I'd like to think all that's left now is the Mario Golf: World Tour and Mario & Sonic at the Sochi 2014 Olympic Winter Games sections to be added, and then the article just requires a thorough proofread to rid it of possible spelling and grammar mistakes.

The Mario Golf: World Tour and Mario & Sonic at the Sochi 2014 Olympic Winter Games sections have been added, and I've given the article a thorough read, fixing everything I found wrong. So I'm inclined to support now.

@UhHuhAlrightDaisy The thing is, one of the requirements for featured articles is for it to have a reasonable amount of information from all sources and appearances. So lacking both sections would have a lethal effect on its worthiness of being featured as it fails to meet that requirement.
 * I didn't mention that the sections needed to be fleshed out with information. All I said is that Daisy needs a simple section on her appearance in those games. If she lacks even one sentence of that section, the article is incomplete, and we don't want that. Basically, what Icemario11 said.


 * Now, I may do a proofread of the article and see if the spelling and grammar is good enough.