User talk:Donkey Yusuf

Hello. We noticed that you have taken content directly from Wikipedia. Plagiarism is strongly discouraged in the wiki. If you want to include content, please at least make the effort to write such in your own words. Thank you. 00:32, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

Only a little part of it was from Wikipedia, easily editable, the rest was not.Donkey Yusuf (talk) 07:16, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

Stop forcing that edit back into Foreman Spike's page. 10:35, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

I don't understand what I did wrong. I did not plagiarize anything (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrecking_Crew_(video_game)), I was asked to use a different text, I used reliable sources to validate the content, so I did. My first edits here and I already get threatened of block. The topic is about Foreman Spike so I write in the Foreman Spike article. Is this personal? Donkey Yusuf (talk) 10:44, April 25, 2023 (EDT)
 * See my edit summary from when I reverted it the latest time, that had nothing to do with plagiarism but lots of other issues I found with the section. The last warning is also for edit warring (forcing the same edit back after it's been reverted multiple times). 10:49, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

It has been reverted more than once (maybe multiple is a little exaggerated) because they contradicted themselves everytime, first time they said I plagiarized from Wikipedia, and that was true only in a little part, second time I completely rewrote the text and added new sources, and even in that case I was accused of plagiarism, even after I suggested to see for themselves that it wasn't true, and the topic is about Foreman Spike and legacy, where should I edit then? Plus, even the gallery adds have been reverted and I really don't know why. That's why I think it may be personal. Donkey Yusuf (talk) 10:56, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

How do you explain this, Swallow? Donkey Yusuf (talk) 11:17, April 25, 2023 (EDT)
 * This is not a personal thing, all it is others including myself don't agree with the content of the edits and don't think it should remain on the page, that is a very common thing on this wiki. The images you added in the gallery are present in other parts of the article already. I'd also say three times is enough to say "multiple". 11:27, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

It wasn't wrong to readd the renders of Spike in the section specifically focused on the gallery and with descriptions, I find it right. Plus, Swallow, if the users or administrators contradict themselves everytime, even when the "incriminated" user is following their indications on how to or not to do that, of course said user feels personally attacked and a dose of hypocrisy and has to fear for threats of block, even when he/she's in totally good faith. Donkey Yusuf (talk) 11:36, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

Waluigi Time, would you please give me an example in the main and canon Mario series where Peach is portrayed as a skilled combatant other than Super Smash Bros. series, please? Donkey Yusuf (talk) 13:48, April 25, 2023 (EDT)
 * First of all, per Canonicity we treat all media equally and don't attempt to adhere to any sort of canon since Nintendo has never established one. Anyway, SMB2, Mario RPG, the Super Mario Adventures comic (all predating Melee), Super Paper Mario, Super Princess Peach, 3D World, and the Mario + Rabbids games are all notable examples. -- 14:22, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

And Peach was portrayed in any of these games as a martial artist, Waluigi Time? Because that was what I meant. And yes, there is a main, if not canon, series of Mario games, and most of the ones you listed (like the Mario Adventures comic and Mario + Rabbids) are spin-offs of that main series. Donkey Yusuf (talk) 15:02, April 25, 2023 (EDT)
 * I haven't played all of those games so I can't say for sure. Like I said in my edit summary, Peach being a capable fighter wouldn't be a Smash reference in itself, but her use of moves from the series (and possibly fighting style in general, if it's inspired by the games enough) would be a reference. -- 18:03, April 25, 2023 (EDT)