MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Boo

Boo was nominated for FA at 18:45, 26 December 2008, and failed at 00:00, 31 March 2010.

Support

 * 1) Boo is a good article will lots of information and not to long.

Oppose

 * 1) In its current state, the article is not fit to be featured. Almost every section needs some help with grammar, size, and formatting. Also, the "The Appearance of a Boo" section either needs deletion or improvement. The lead at the beginning of the article also needs major improvement.
 * 2) Urm, isn't Yoshi's Island DS supposed to be near the beginning? Also Super Mario World2:Yoshi's Island doesn't say ALL the boos that appear in the game. Also NSMB section needs more work.
 * 3) The History section needs a lot of work
 * 4) I agree with Bloc Partier. This article has a TON of errors. Just look around. DON'T SUPPORT IT JUST BECAUSE IT LOOKS LONG OR YOU JUST LIKE BOO We might end up with a featured article with too many spelling errors...
 * 5) Oh. My. God. WWWWWHHHHHYYYYYYYYYY TTTHHHHEEEEEE HEEEEEELLLLL ARE THERE SO MANY FAN VOTES?!?!?! This is a very erroneous article with many mistakes that need to be fixed before it gets even close to being a featured article.
 * 6) Some parts of the history section needs a lot of work.
 * 7) There are tons of mistakes. The Yoshi Island artical has two sections!
 * 8) There are a lot of grammar mistakes in this article. Second, the appearances aren't listed chronologically. Actually, a lot of sections needs to be improved. Sorry, but this article has a long way before becoming featured.
 * 9) Currently, I oppose. I, myself, am cleaning up some grammar, and trying to fix a few of the articles, but it's taking me a while as I have other work to do. The grammar is atrocious, and some sections need to be rewritten for better effect.
 * 10) Numerous sections need a lot more information.
 * 11) Needs more work in the History Section, but I like boos. --Boo89 18:55, 18 February 2010 (EST)Dawnandusk
 * 12) - Boos scare me. Just kidding... Lots of game sections are missing information.
 * 13) It's mixed up, very similar to the Peach article. So... No.

Comments
I want the Boo article to be featured! Boo is so cute! How could you not come to like and agree to publishing this article for featuring? All I have to state is,PUBLISH THE BOO ARTICLE AS FEATURED! WHO'S WITH ME?!

You aren't supposed to feature an article just because it's character is cute -_- I like Boo, too, but this article could still get some improvement.

Ok THERE ARE TOO MANY FAN VOTES!!! Why can't we vote to remove support votes? Half of them are fan votes that should go.
 * Can you prove they are fan-votes?
 * Actually I just realized that only two were fan votes o_0. The last two supports are both fan votes. They don't mention why this is a great article, but in seems like they say that just because they like Boo. Also, g.narron's vote simply calls this a "wonderful article" but doesn't state the reason on why. Dry Paratroopa's vote just says "Deserves to be featured", but why does it deserve to be featured? I really think those votes should be removed.

Well, as those 2 last votes you mentioned DO mention the article, and they say the article is great, they cant be removed. BTW, are sigs allowed here?
 * @Tucayo: Then why did you remove them? No they are not as per my proposal. @Fawfulfury65: I agree with you, many of these are fan votes, why don't you make a proposal allowing users to propose support votes be removed if' an admin agrees with them (E.g. Two user votes, at least 1 admin vote).

My vote still had a good reason even if it was partially a fan vote so..... don't delete it!

I've spent the last couple hours updating this page and I am now the top cotibutator of this page. While this article is not perfect I have updated to what I believe is a least bottom of the barrel Featured Article material.

KS3: Um, these votes were placed BEFORE the new rule was initiated.