Talk:Durmite

Damaging Bowser
If I understand the article correctly, this enemy is fought inside Bowser and she can take away Bowser's HP to replenish her own, correct? However, I came across another article of an enemy from this game, which trivia-section stated that it is the only enemy that can damage Bowser from inside. Which article is correct now? - 02:19, 19 September 2009 (EDT)
 * Bowser isn't involved with the battle with Durmite. He is, however, involved with the Sea Pip Statue battle. I think that Sea Pipe Statue is the only one that can, but I may be wrong.
 * So I think the main question is: Does Bowser lose HP when Durmite executes that absorption attack? - 02:29, 19 September 2009 (EDT)

I just wrote this as far as I know. I'm not really sure if Durmite reduces Bowser's HP when sucks health, making damage to him. With the statue, the blooper hurts bowser by using a drill-based attack to the plumbers inside him by burrowing through the King Koopa's tissues. However I don't know either if Bowser loses HP caused by the Blooper's attacks inside like Durmite's

Yes, Durmite can hurt Bowser
I remember fighting Durmite. When you allow Durmite to use the straw, she will suck HP away from Bowser to cure her own. Her "X" version doesn't hurt Bowser though.
 * Ok, then I think it is necessary to adjust that information. - 15:07, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
 * Adjustment done. - 15:11, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Birdo
Can I mention her in this article?: http://www.mariowiki.com/Birdo_%28species%29
 * As Trivia for sure. It's clear that she's based on a Birdo's facial design, but it would be difficult to actually incorporate her into the article, since a caterpillar is a far cry from a dinosaur. Maybe in the future, integration will be possible. - 23:54, 29 September 2009 (EDT)
 * I think it might be ok if the article doesn't state that Durmite is based on Birdo or is a direct reference to her (because that's not officially confirmed yet), but instead only says that their facial design looks somehow similar (so there's no false statement). - 11:33, 30 September 2009 (EDT)