User talk:Mario54671

lol who are you Mnimyfi

Nintendo DSi vs Nintendo 3DS
Mario54671, please stop edit warring with UltraMario and talk about it before making the edit. If we can come to a resolution then the edit can be made, but right now you two are just undoing eachother's edits.

Now, what I would like to point out about the DSi is that it uses the exact same cartridges as the DS, meanwhile the 3DS has new cartridges for the 3D games (at least that's what I heard). The DSi is basically a big DS with a camera; it uses the same cartridges, has the same functions, etc. I would personally say that the DSi is definitely a sequel to the DS.


 * It isn't, though, and you basically explained it for me. Nintendo themselves came out not long after it came out and clarified it wasn't a successor to the DS, and their REAL successor was still in development.  If the company themselves say it, I say it's not worth debating, and the whole idea should be definitely rejected.  If we were to go by this ridiculous idea, then you should at least keep it consistent by also including it in the 3DS section.  Since after all, it SHOULD say "successor to the DSi" based on what you guys think (even though Nintendo came out and said that it's the successor to the DS AND the DSi, as in, they're the same thing, as in, the whole idea is flat out wrong)
 * -Mario54671 (I don't use this site really at all, I just simply come to edit things that are just flat-out wrong or very inconsistent)

Source?
"Calling the DS Lite, DSi, or the DSi XL a successor to the DS is unquestionably incorrect. Nintendo made it clear that the 3DS is the successor. But if it's somehow essential to include them, then this is the best way to do so." Do you have a source for that quote?

There's the E3 2010 press conference where Iwata discusses how they've given a lot of thought to the screen, "...because of course, Nintendo 3DS is a successor to Nintendo DS."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzDf5IGNyBg&t=15m48s

There's also common sense. Why would they make a big deal about introducing the 3DS and NOT the DS Lite, or the DSi? Calling the DS Lite a successor to the DS is like calling Gameboy Micro or Gameboy Advance SP a successor to Gameboy Advance, OR like calling the slimmer Wii from the Wii Family Edition a "successor" to the Wii when in actuality, the Wii U is the successor. They're the same thing, they do the same things, they just redesigned them! It's common sense, Nintendo doesn't need to tell you that.

Hi
wanna be friends user:meeper :0 =)