User talk:Pwwnd123/Archive 1

Warning
You have consistently changed Princess Toadstool's name to Princess Peach in the Hotel Mario article, even though it's incorrect to do so and you've been told multiple times not to do it. Alongside that, you've made derogatory remarks towards users twice, once as a general remark and once specifically towards a user. Due to your actions, you've been given a warning. Repeating these actions will lead to a final warning and potentially being blocked.
 * I said if it was successfully appealed. Right now, all you have done is made an attempt to appeal it. The admins will then decide whether or not the warning should be appealed.
 * Well Yoshi's Safari came out the year before and Princess Toadstool was refered to as Peach and technically it's right to call her Peach because of Yoshi's Safari.
 * But in Hotel Mario? 14:05, 6 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Yes. -
 * Would you like to explain how? Hotel Mario =/= Yoshi's Safari.Vommack (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Technically Yoshi's Safari came out September 1993 and the wiki generaly goes by what the charactor is called upon the game's release and the name is never shown so technically it's right to call her Peach.-

Got it
I understand and I promise I won't modernize anyting and I agree to the Wiki's rules and I am autistic

Hey
Just to let you know, you're not allowed to remove other user comments. Doing this further will result in another warning.

By the way
You're not allowed to remove your warning even if it ends up being overturned, it needs to stay for reference. Doing this further will result in another warning; do not touch it from here on out. - Turboo (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

Ok
Ok thanks for telling me that.

Appeal
We decided to deny your appeal; here's the reasons why. Please do not continue causing trouble (familiarize yourself with the warning policy and courtesy policy), since it's bad enough that you did all of this already. - Turboo (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

It got denied just like how Peach's objection was in Sunshine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2jYAis-Aq4 and I am reaaaallly extreemely sorry. It is like the trial scene in sunshine and Other M: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOOLZuEzX_I

My warning will never go away
It failed to be appealed and now I am stuck because of my bad records as a starter. This now like Peach's objection in Sunshine. How do I get it sucessfully appealed and not be like Peach in Sunshine.


 * How's about you not worry about it too much? Just take the advice and make sure not to repeat your mistakes in the future. 21:33, 17 March 2014 (EDT)

Ok I won't repeat my mistakes or do anything naughty again.

Reminder
You've already been undoing edits that were undone for a good reason, which is considered edit warring, so you have received this reminder. 18:29, 20 March 2014 (EDT)
 * Well wasn't Mario Sunshine the first game Peach ever wore her hair in a ponytail and it was noticeable and no other Mario game before it depicted her like that and Peach was a major character in that game and it is very clear. - Pwwnd123
 * It already says it was the first time she wore a ponytail. We've already been told that. We don't need it explained that the first time means she was never seen like that before.--Vommack (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2014 (EDT)

Re: Princess Peach
You may as well drop it: I added the ponytail bit here, since the trivia of an article for a game isn't really the proper place for a minor detail involving a single character who appears in that game (in my opinion, anyway). Also, keep in mind that no one's asking you to turn this into a back-and-forth, you're doing this by choice, just as I'm choosing not to feed the fire and notify you on your talk page instead. 18:30, 20 March 2014 (EDT)

Dare? Yeah, that's not the best way to reason it out. Next time, please state your mind in a much more polite manner and refrain from edit warring, rather discuss it on the user's TP.

Sorry but I am autistic and it's hard to control it when I do get so pissed off -Pwwnd123

Reminder
-- 11:20, 23 March 2014 (EDT)

Last Warning
The edit has been undo, of the reasons mention on the summary. If you continue to this matter once more you'll be blocked. -- L    151   19:16, 29 March 2014 (EDT)


 * Like it says on the appeal rules, you can't appeal a warning given to you by an administrator. - Turboo (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2014 (EDT)


 * Why not? Is it because of their greater right? - [User:Pwwnd123|Pwwnd123]]


 * Oh Shit, now I am screwed for edit warring and I was angry and I always get into trouble because other people make me do it out of anger and I don't mean it and now it's overturned like Peach's objection in Sunshine f2jYAis-Aq4 }. - Pwwnd123


 * Why am I the one who always gets into trouble and even though I am a starter user and I don't want to edit war and I don't like it even though I try to contribute and nothing works out at all and in my first days and months on this Wiki trying to edit - Pwwnd123

My anger at edit reversers
I am so pissed off at you doing this and I hate having my damn edits being reversed and it grinds my shit upto a level and every time I insert Princess Peach into an article, you revert it and remove it and it so pisses me off and don't piss me off anymore and I express it and it's all your fault that got me into all this trouble and these warnings which will never go away and will be rejected like Peach's objection in Sunshine f2jYAis-Aq4 }so don't mess with me and piss me off.-pwwnd123


 * ) I really really agree with you. People are making unneeded edit reverses, and it's not okay.

Who Deleted the Punch Out Wii page
Who deleted the Punch Out (Wii) Page? It was important,it had Donkey Kong in it and it was a cameo appearance. - Pwwnd123

Even though it was an cameo appearance, it doesn't have the enough facts to quailfies for an article page, but for references only. See Cameos.

It has been restore, there was a concencus in favour of making the page. I apologize for the deletion earlier.

I have the same problem as you
You and me have something in common, WE BOTH HATE ARE EDITS GETTING UNDONE. I get extremely pissed when i get one of my edits undone.

I am going to be a new writer for the Shroom Can I sign up, I did message Superchao so am I ready now and can I write now?
Can I write for the Shroom now I have a forum account and I will start in the upcoming issue of the shroom. - Pwwnd123

I am pissed off now
I am pissed off about being fucking banned from the Mario Wiki chatroom and I didn't meant to spam and I want it to be removed now and I got banned by Anton and I want to be back and here is my reacton x_0RwmB2Kik } and if I am not allowed back in then I am so goddamn pissed off and if the guy who's Anton is here here is my reaction. - Pwwnd123
 * It's only a 3 day ban to make sure you know that all of the warnings are serious. Stop monologuing about the same 2 or 3 things, as you've been warned about for like 2-3 weeks.  As I've said, it's fine to discuss those in moderation, but when it's literally the only thing you're talking about all day for days on end, and it's highly repetitive, it's going to be considered spam.  In addition, having a fit on the wiki is only going to get you in trouble on the wiki and make things worse for when your chat ban ends.  14:59, 18 April 2014 (EDT)
 * I was just talking about Madonna and maybe Windows XP. - Pwwnd123 15:07, 18 April 2014 (EDT)
 * I had spent 3 and a half not comparing things. - Pwwnd123
 * This is all Jen Taylor and Madonna's fault and I so am fucking pissed off like the AVGN (The Angry Video Game Nerd). - Pwwnd123
 * You sitting here ranting isn't helping your case at all.--Vommack (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2014 (EDT)

Welcoming users
Hey. When welcoming users please wait until they make one contributive edit, as per Welcoming users. Thanks.
 * Ok,thanks for letting me know about it, I didn't know. -

Alright, look.
You're already on thin ice for your Peach/Toadstool screw ups already. I'm going to ask this once: Do you actually have proof she is called Peach in that comic?--Vommack (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Actually Super Mario 64 was coming out and in the 1997 follow up she is technically called Peach because Mario 64 was already out and Mario Kart 64 was also out at that time as well so I'm going by the latest version and no I don't want to get banned. -
 * Pwwnd. This was your argument with Yoshi's Safari. Remember how that worked out? Either give some actual evidence or revert it.--Vommack (talk) 11:22, 21 April 2014 (EDT)
 * I did revert the latest revision and kept the old revision since Mario 64 and Mario Kart 64 was already out and Peach was called Peach in those games and that applies to the 1997 continuation. -
 * Alright. From now on, unless you have evidence directly from the work in question, don't go about changing the names. They're put down the way they are for a reason.--Vommack (talk) 11:34, 21 April 2014 (EDT)

RE:What's wrong with my trivia about Peach's ponytail on the Sunshine page
Because all that is needed is that it is the first time, we don't need to be told that it is seen in artworks and stuff as that is plainly visible.
 * And my edit about Peach wearing her hair untied in Sunshine at the very beginning of the game.

re:What's wrong with the Zelda II gameplay similarity
What you added wasn't especially informative or well-written. It's fine to briefly mention Zelda II to establish a point of reference, but an entire section that says "This game is vaguely similar to another game" is pushing it, especially as there are many more RPG platformers beside Adventures of Link. --Glowsquid (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2014 (EDT)
 * You mean games like Castlevania:Symphony of the Night and it's sucessors right. -
 * I was thinking more Cadash and Last Battle, but those too. --Glowsquid (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2014 (EDT)

RE: I want to Appeal my warning
I am sorry, but you can't change what you know you commited, especially after been reminded to let it go but continue to revert revison that is know to be a fact, into whats in your point of view. Also, flaming users for that, when they were not trying to revert your edits to make you upset, but to remind you what's true and what's false. That way, you will know what not to do the next, See here.