Talk:Hopgoon

Merge Hopgoon with Frogoon
I don't see too much of a reason to have Frogoon and Hopgoon in separate articles. The only difference between the two is their movements. Apart from that, having them in separate articles seems redundant.

Proposer: Deadline: March 7, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) - Per my proposal.
 * 2) - Similar creatures and species.

Oppose

 * 1) - Different species with different names, different looks, and different behaviour are supposed to get different articles. These pages can easily be expanded by listing the levels in which they appear, although I think they're perfectly adequate already: they're not labeled as stubs for a reason. All those other merged Donkey Kong Country Returns species should be split too.
 * 2) Two different enemies that act differently from each other. Per Walkazo.
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) Per all. What is this page going to be called, then? Frogoons and Hopgoons?
 * 5) Per Walkazo. Hopgoons are subspecies of Frogoons, but that doesn't mean they act the same. If all the DKCR sub-enemies are merged to their origin, then we should do that with all the other sub-enemies from every other DKC game. And THAT means we need to merge all other enemy articles also need to be merged, which means all other species need to be merged. That means more redirects than articles, as this wiki knows lots of subspecies.
 * 6) I am Zero! Per Walkazo. Zero signing out.
 * 7) Per first sentence of Walkazo's opose.
 * 8) Per all.
 * 9) Per all.
 * 10) Per all.
 * 11) Per all. Are Goombas and Paragoombas together? OK then...
 * 12) Per all.
 * 13) - Per all. To be honest, I haven't seen any proof that they're actually related at all. We're going by speculation, even if it does seem blatantly obvious, so these certainly deserve their own articles.
 * 14) Per all.
 * 15) - Different species, different pages.
 * 16) - Per all.
 * 17) Per Reversinator and his proposal.