Talk:Goom

Goombas?
Both the English AND Japanese names indicate they're a sub-species of Goomba (and they look pretty similar to Galoombas), so should these be considered a relative? Binarystep (talk) 14:55, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
 * No, there's a difference between related names and related enemies. It's in the same boat as Stu: the Japanese name is also derived from kuri, and they're another Goomba equivalent, but they're not a type of Goomba. In both cases, saying their related would be misleading: the articles simply noting the similarities in name, role and/or appearance are good enough. - 15:08, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
 * There's technically no proof Galoombas are related to Goombas, then. Binarystep (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
 * To be honest, my opinion on all this is that Goombas/Galoombas/Gooms/possibly Stus aren't directly related, but are all derivatives of some unnamed parent species, sort of like how Buzzy Beetles are a type of Koopa, but not considered a direct relative of Koopa Troopas specifically. Binarystep (talk) 15:19, 29 April 2015 (EDT)

Delete Goom
DELETE 8-0

Just like Puff before it, Wanderin' Gooms are clearly the parent species, making this article hypothetical at best.

Proposer: Deadline: July 31, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per.
 * 2) Considering there's no "plain" or "default" Goom, this page is pointless. Per proposal.
 * 3) Puff seems like a good precedent to use in this case.
 * 4) Per Puff deletion.
 * 5) Per all
 * 6) Per all, I actually planned to make this but never got around to it because of computer issues.
 * 7) Per all. We don't even have to do much in terms of moving information to other pages.
 * 8) Per.