MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio

Remove Featured Article Status

 * 1) If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written.
 * 2) It is kind of short :/
 * 3) Some of the images are in bad quality.
 * 4) There isn't enough information, and other featured articles have been at least twice as long as this one.

Keep Featured Article Status

 * As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.
 * This article has good quality.
 * Per New Super Mario and SolarBlaze.
 * Per New Super Mario.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
New Super Mario
 * 1) Extremely vague vote. How does it have good quality?
 * 2) No reason stated on why it is good quality.
 * 3) The vote is too vague to be valid.

Pokemon Trainer Mario
 * 1) Again, vague vote. And this article is not short in my opinion, it's huge.
 * 2) It's long enough for featured article standards. What more can be said about him? He appeared in only one game.
 * 3) You have to be more specific.

Comments
In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though.

I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems.

The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons?

The present/past-tense errors have been corrected.


 * Really? I still see some past tense verbs.

BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read.
 * But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar.

@BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them.

I hardly found anything with grammar.