MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 3D Land

Support

 * 1) I think Super Mario 3D Land deserves to be a FA, because it isn't too short or long, and the pictures aren't that bad.

Oppose

 * 1) I agree with the statement above and was going to say the exact same thing. And I have played the game. One image can stay on the section but the rest need to be moved into the gallery.

LightningBlue

 * 1) Now that that problem's been fixed his oppose is outdated
 * 2) Per Commander.
 * 3) Per Commander Code-8.
 * 4) Per CC-8 & MarioSmasher. Some sysop please remove this oppose.
 * 5) Per CC-8.
 * 6) – Outdated, no meaning, insignificant.

Comments
I'm not going to Oppose this but would of liked some tables in this article instead of lots of listed items like this:
 * Super Leaf
 * Fire Flower

Apart from that, the article is very good.

@Commander Code-8:

The picture make it more detailed. All of them are needed.

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Let's make this Featured! Anyone want to?

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Like Electrical Bowser jr. said, the pictures make the article much more detailed. Mainly for people who haven't played the game.


 * The amount of images in that section don't even stay next to the text they relate to, which doesn't really look good at all. Is that much detail really needed?-- 02:14, 5 August 2012 (EDT)

Alright! I deleted all of them except Bowser capturing Peach!

I think we need at least about 2 to 3 images from features to the bottom. I think there's is a lot of text and lists there but only a few images.

Are 8 images good enough?

I think at least up to 5. I can add them if you want.

Also, shouldn't we make the loooong feature list shorter? Like a table?

I think that at least two of the main story's images should be put back on the article. If we have pics of development,then we can at least have the main story a bit more visual.

There are already 8 images, so 3 need to be deleted.

Oh, by the way, does anyone like my new sig?

You're not actually supposed to put signatures on vote pages (Proposals and FA noms)--

It seems as though everyone shrugged off my last comment on the whole thing about images. So I'm gonna put one more pic on the main story section,then you guys can give me your opinion if you disagree with image. If somebody gives me a good reason,then I will glady take it down.

A reason? What do you mean? Oh, that one? Awesome image!

I was expecting the Luigi picture, but this one works too

Do you want to support this article, W10?

The only thing that disturbs me is the feature list. I mean, should we make it shorter?

Not really. That makes it more detailed.

I suppose that we could try a table to see if it looks better. I'm all for it! I'd do it myself if I knew how to.

Is LightningBlue ever going to remove his oppose?!

A sysop needs to vote to remove his vote before it gets removed. (Although I personally think that's not a very good rule.)
 * Actually it just has to be an admin which means a Patroller could vote to remove his vote then you'd have to wait 24 hours before you could remove it. Also it's a great rule it stops fans from trying to remove valid votes.

Hey since I was the guy who brought up the above discussed images in the story section I thought I'd better say that two images in that section's actually quite okay.

We need a sysop to remove LightningBlue's oppose.