Talk:Fire Nipper Plant

Name
So, considering the precedent set by the Nipper Dandelion situation, should this be moved to Fire Nipper Plant? 01:13, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * I'm not too sure... Pretty sure that's citogenesis, but i'm not sure wether to move it or not, even when we moved Watage Pakkun back to Nipper Dandelion. -- 02:22, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * Did the name appear in the relevant Palutena's Guidance? That, of course, would be the ticket to renaming. 03:14, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * That it did. 03:22, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * Is it me, or it doesn't figure out in the english version? -- 03:24, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * It appeared in translation subtitles when set to other languages. Which is still in-game. Anyways, calling a perfectly logical and rational name "citogenesis" (which is a word you should expunge from your vocabulary according to Glowsquid) is just ridiculous. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:39, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * I don't think this is citogenesis. I doubt Piranha Plant, much less the accompanying Palutena's Guidance, was planned in 2016. So yes, agreed. 10:53, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
 * Although not fully on board with the usage of Nipper Dandelion, I completely agree with renaming the article to Fire Nipper Plant. LinkTheLefty (talk) 11:00, April 22, 2019 (EDT)
 * Fiery Walking Piranha was a name that pretty much needed to be renamed anyways, as its name is overly descriptive and does not say if it is a Nipper Plant. Als,o Fire Nipper Plant is an extremely logical name, and we should not prohibit Nintendo from using obvious names just because it was once a conjectural name here. It would be like if when Super Mario Maker 2 releases Bell Trees are called well, Bell Trees. We would still use the Bell Tree name as it would then be official, and a name that anyone could of made up on their own. Regardless, fan-made names can become official too. I support the move. 11:08, April 22, 2019 (EDT)