MarioWiki:Proposals

List of Talk Page Proposals

 * Split Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS / Wii U into and  (Discuss) Passed.
 * Merge Imajin, Mama, Lina, Papa, and Poki and Piki with Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic (Discuss) Passed.
 * Split the Kodama Easter Egg from Shiverburn Galaxy (Discuss) Deadline: January 20, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Merge Grinder with Ukiki (Discuss) Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Merge Little Mouser with Mowz (Discuss) Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Merge Big Bertha, Boss Bass, and Bubba with Cheep Chomp (Discuss) Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Move Huge Paragoomba to (Discuss) Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Split Master Core forms into different pages (Discuss) Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Separate Wii U audio files from the ones on the GBA (Discuss) Deadline: January 23, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
 * Add an image of a Pickaxe to the Construction template and remove a contraction (Discuss) Deadline: January 25, 2015, 23:59 GMT.

Writing Guidelines
None at the moment.

New features
None at the moment.

Removals
None at the moment.

Have the talk pages of old accounts of users who created another account due to forgetting their password moves to archived talk pages for the new account.
Proposer: Deadline: January 23, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) it makes for easier browsing of that users talk pages and they are the same person anyways.
 * 2) Great idea; per Kart Player 2011.

Comments
I thought it's required to do this anyhow? Carrying accounts over carries the track records and stuff. 17:56, 16 January 2015 (EST)
 * Yeah, it is: any cases where it hasn't been done are simply oversights. This proposal's unnecessary, and should be deleted (without archiving), but I'll give the proposer a chance to check back and do it themself before yanking it out from under them. -
 * There has been cases where entire talk pages have been outright deleted instead, mostly at the request of the moved account holder. We probably shouldn't allow that, but the few times it was asked of me, no one said anything for or against. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]]Ghost Jam[[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 03:27, 17 January 2015 (EST)

Protect the Proposal Archive Pages
We rely on our users to not edit the archive pages, but guess what? I learned that the hard way on a Talk Page archive. I did edit it, and the person said I couldn't do that. Oh well...

But we aren't here to talk about Talk Page Proposals.

We're talking about the Proposal Archive Pages. Why don't we just protect the ones we don't use anymore? 1-40 aren't being used, and we still haven't protected them from being edited. We do this on User pages, so why not on the archive pages, where nobody is supposed to edit? It's better to be safe than sorry from vandalism.

Proposer: Deadline: January 24th, 2015 23:59 GMT.

Support

 * 1) Per my proposal

Comments
I'm almost certain that they're already protected. The only one that hasn't, from what I can tell, is #40, which I assume just slipped through the cracks. Besides, all archives are protected anyways; all you had to do is ask an admin to protect the page(s).
 * Yes, they're always protected (it even says so in the header templates); yes, 40 was an oversight (which I just fixed); so yes, the proposal is unnecessary, and yes, simply asking is enough for these sorts of things. The proposal can be removed (without archiving). - 11:01, 17 January 2015 (EST)

Miscellaneous
None at the moment.