User talk:SJ

Signing
Hi, when signing comments, don't use the "unsigned" template but just use three or four ~'s ( or ~ ). The template is only used to sign comments of other people who forgot to sign them theirselves. 15:07, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 * Oh well, never mind, looks like Cobold has told you already. 15:10, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 * I don't get how to enter the ~'s though. (I'm new here)
 * Just type four of the symbols in a row ( ~ ). They'll be converted into your signature automatically. (Try it out by using the preview button.) 14:41, 22 January 2008 (EST)
 * Ahhh...

Sorry...
Uh, Hi. I'm sorry for ticking you off... I feel bad. :( Anything I can do to make up for it?

I don't mind. You don't have to do anything to make up for it, but you should check out the Paper Mario FA nomination page, it's the other article I nominated. I'm done supporting and opposing, but check for my comments! Toadette 4evur 18:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)
 * alright. See ya later!
 * You opposed it???? HOW RUDE!!!!!!!!! Toadette 4evur 20:03, 28 January 2008 (EST)

. . .Opposed what...? The Peach article? Cuz there's enough votes on there anyway... Um... Sorry... Cobold's points were good... And I'm too lazy to fix them myself... How 'bout I remove my oppose.

No! Not that one, Paper Mario. I've been editing it so please look at it now. Toadette 4evur 22:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Ohhh... Paper Mario. I see. I'll take another look at it.

I say "How Rude!" alot so don't let it get you down, ok? Toadette 4evur 17:03, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Toad's Super Mario Galaxy section
I would add it to the Toad (species) article, but the problem is that I don't have what I wrote saved anywhere. I won't be able to write exactly what I wrote before. Btw, am I doing these comments thing right here on your page? Lules

Umm, yeah, you wanted people to know that the generic Toads were in the game, the reason the article was removed was for that. An article DOES exist on the Toad (species) so you COULD edit, and you CAN put things on here, I don't care if you do. Toadette 4evur 17:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Undoing
Would you please tell me what your problem is? We do not make all those changes to upset you or to "mess" with other people's articles; we just try our best to make the articles as correct as possible. The fact that you repeatedly claim to "know" which time is correct just because you were the one who nominated the article does not actually make the time correct - everyone can check that in the edit history. Just look here - at the bottom there is the first version of the page: The time does not say "xx:00", but "xx:03", so your claim that it was created 19:00 or 20:00 cannot be correct. I cannot exclude the possibility that I'm mistaken regarding the hour (it is confusing for me as well, with all the different time zones), but I'm definitely correct regarding the minutes. Do you get it? I have proof, you just have claims. And if someone corrects your signature - why the heck not just let him do? Are you that stubborn that you generally don't let other people correct your mistakes, even if it is obvious that they're correct? Please be more constructive, otherwise I'm sure you'll get a warning. 17:47, 31 January 2008 (EST)
 * It says the APPROXOMITE time. Also, when it comes to signature, I like to do that my self, other things I don't mind. Toadette 4evur 18:16, 31 January 2008 (EST) ps- I never ONCE said that the page was mine, I just said I made it.


 * I guess I have to apologize. I never noticed that it says "approximate time". You're not wrong then, I take back what I said about you not being correct. Still, I see no sense in most of your reverting (you were not wrong, but neither was me), and so I once again ask you to be a bit more constructive and to only revert if your "predecessor" really was wrong. A good alternative to simply reverting is to discuss the issue on the talk page of the respective article. P.S.: I cannot force you to leave this discussion on your talk page, I just want to tell you that it was in no way meant to be insulting; in fact I only wanted to improve the climate here. 09:29, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Re: Question
A sockpuppet is a second account created by a user who already has one on the wiki. Mostly, these are created by banned users in order to still be able to edit, but also regular users can have multiple accounts. This is not tolerated on the MarioWiki, as it creates problems with identifying a user. Sockpuppets are automatically blocked. Still, it is possible to register a second account, but on a similar name and as a redirect, as it is allowed on Wikipedia. Creating a user account on names very similar to yours can prevent different users having the same name (such as it happened with and ). You are also asked to create redirect accounts when your user name consists of non-Latin characters (Greek, Cyrillic, whatever comes to your mind is legal in the username ;)) to make it possible for other readers who can't read that script to distinguish you from others. In any case, these redirect accounts shouldn't be used for editing. But this never happened on the wiki, we mostly have sockpuppets, who are here for vandalizing, and they are identified by using the same IP address. (Though AOL users don't need to worry, as multiple different users can share AOL IPs). - 08:10, 1 February 2008 (EST)
 * This is a problem, we'd have to tolerate it, but it's not seen well. You can easily set an email-address in your profile which allows you to get a new password when you've lost your old. - 05:39, 2 February 2008 (EST)
 * Well, you just told me. Sockpuppets are secret and used parallel, or created when a user has been blocked. These paddword problems do happen, and if you don't find another solution, what can you do? - 05:25, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Latest Appearance
We're having the proposal if you want to vote.

SO sorry!
I guess I just assumed you were a girl without thinking about it. I wondered why you called yourself "Mr. Argue"! You're not rude. If it makes you feel better, I thought Walkazo was a boy before I read her page. I'll change it. By the way, can I delete that on my talk page? It's embarrasing.

Oh, you already changed it.

Sorry... Again.
Yeah, I'm sorry... I was angry. I'll try to be less angry from now on. Sorry again...

Ah! Thanks for the warning... So, you been to Userpedia yet?

Userpedia is a wiki for comics and crap. It's awesome. Here's a link: Linky.

It's awesome. Really, it's very good. And a link to your talk page is always good. ;) }

For you
Well, you can always ask for something. Now don't complain. - 17:34, 7 February 2008 (EST)
 * In order to talk about anything being banned, censored or tolerated, it still has to be named. That's the nature of things. - 17:43, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Your Signature
If you want to make a signature, please, use the following name: thanks for more information, look THIS!
 * User: Toadette 4evur /sig

If U read with care this section, you won't have problems about that... only follow the steps, are simple :)...

hmmmm... I dunno, sorry, however, you can't use that, maybe writing your whole name as a "template" format -your username between keys " – "- has to be tedious  better, delete that...

OK, you have to do this:
 * make your signature here User:Toadette 4evur/sig (uhm.. personally, remove that "testing", do you want?)
 * then, on te top of the page you can see your user name, your talk, etc.. go to "My Prefrences" and select this option there: "Raw signatures (without automatic link)".
 * Check on it to use your new signature when you use this.
 * Save your data on the bottom f the page and, U can use your new signature :D ta-da!

Kirby hat
Yeah, I'll do a Kirby hat of you. It will take a long time though. Sorry!

RE: Proposal
Thanks for the support! It's true though, you and I voted with the understanding that if it came down to it, we'd support the "support" side. So, to remove that changes our votes. However, I'm a little nervous about pointing that out because InfectedShroom changed the proposal partway through as well, which is technically changing people's votes. Hmm... it's tricky. Anyway, unless we all get swallowed by some policy nonsense, then we'll be fine. If it comes down to it, I think it would be fine to hunt down all of the support voters and ask them to move their votes to the support section, because the two are the same right now. 00:42, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Block?
What'd he block you for? And three days is kinda pathetic...
 * Ghost Jam's given reason is:

"Personal attacks to multiple accounts: I realize that you are trying to act better, but we need to know that you know that it's NOT ok or acceptable attack other users."

- User: Ghost Jam


 * I'm not exactly sure what's the cause, but most likely phrases like "shut up" in edit summaries on Reggie Fils-Aime and similar cases. - 10:42, 12 February 2008 (EST)