Template talk:SPM enemy

Quality

 * Alright, no offense to the maker, but this template REALLY needs some cleaning up or something. I don't know what anybody else thinks of it, but it is making some very nice articles suddenly ugly, such as the Underchomp article.  And it doesn't compensate for some Catch Cards, such as Merluvlee.  Since it is very hard to acquire a quality screenshot of a game such as Super Paper Mario, I'd at least like to propose that some of the card shots be replaced with official art for some of them.  It at least removes the trouble of it getting in the way of official artwork, and makes it look a little nicer.  But really, this template just seems to get in the way and bother me.  That is sorta opinionated, I know, but...it just doesn't look right.  I hope I'm sounding clear on the matter.--Dreyfus2006 15:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)


 * Ya offical art is better, do it. Great Gonzo

Pissed me off

 * Congratulations, you have officially pissed me off! Thank you so much for ruining the 100+ pages I've been working on! Change it back to the Catch Card template. Not only that, but you've made Merluvlee an enemy! Good job! Hisak


 * WTF?!? Why do you insist on making Merluvlee an enemy?! Hisak

Now wait, just wait a minute here. At Talk:Main Page this change was asked for. Specifically, in that section, it was said that the enemy box should be different from the character box. In fact, I don't think a character box is needed, because the only stats are the rarity & the description, which can be included in the article.

Can we work out some type of compromise? 20:13, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
 * OK, I changed a variable back. Pages with this template like Gawbus are fixed, but I must point out that the card description & Tippi's tattle are different. When I get the game I'll be sure to add Tippi's tattle into the article.
 * Now, I hope that this hasn't ruined your work. 20:16, 6 May 2007 (EDT)