Talk:Round Goomba

Shouldn't this be merged with the Goomba article itself? They're exactly like Goombas except they're yellow and rounder.

They don't even have an official name, so I strongly agree with merging this article too Goomba.-- 15:51, 4 June 2011 (EDT)

Merge Round Goomba with Goomba
Merge 15-7

"Round Goombas" are just the same as Goombas, except that they are yellow and rounder. They attack exactly the same as normal Goombas too. The name "Round Goomba" isn't even official. So I say we should merge Round Goomba with Goomba.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|Mario jc}} Deadline: June 19, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per my proposal.
 * 2) per proposal
 * 3) – Per all.
 * 4) – Per All.
 * 5) They are the same thing.
 * 6) Per all.
 * 7) There's not much of a difference between the 2. Per All. :)
 * 8) I can't see why they are seperate. They are basicly the same, just different sizes. Per all.
 * 9) I've rethunk my vote per Knife's comment.
 * 10) Per everyone! Give it a merge!
 * 11)  They are just rounder versions of Gooombas.
 * 12) Per all.
 * 13) Per yoshidude99.
 * 14) Per all.
 * 15) Per all.

Oppose

 * 1) We have articles for all of the subspecies of Goombas. Besides, Goomba (Super Mario World) isn't merged.
 * 2) Per TMB.
 * 3) Per TMB.
 * 4) If we merge, merge with Goomba (Super Mario World). They are the same. Off-Topic ===> Get better quality images.
 * 5) They look different and are weaker.And I would agree if normal goombas didnt appear in the galaxy games,but they do.
 * 6) Per TMB and yoshiyoshiyoshi. They can be defeated with a single spin, while normal Goombas would be just stun.
 * 7) per SWF

Comments
They also look sililar to Chibibos, those small, round Goombas from Super Mario Land.

@ThirdMarioBro the difference is that the Goomba's from Super Mario World have a different Japanese name

@Opposers: Yes we have articles for sub-species, but all of those sub-species have official names. "Round Goombas" are exactly the same as regular Goombas with a few physical differences. We don't have separate articles for the different colored Shy Guys, do we? Please, rethink your votes.-- 15:59, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * Also their are no pages for Giant Shy Guys, Giant Ninjis, Mega Urchins, and Mega Fuzzies since they don't have official names so why should Round Goomba's be any different


 * We should make those pages. We have Grand Goomba, Piranhacus Giganticus, and Gargantua Koopa Troopa. UPDATE: They look like Boygeys, Stus, and Pooty-Puds.Giant Land. RAWR!

Again, those subjects deserve articles because they have official names. Not too sure about Giant Ninjis, but I believe that too is unofficial.-- 19:05, 7 June 2011 (EDT)


 * Giant Shy Guy is official. So is Mega Urchin. And Mega Fuzzy. Let's Merge!

I know this isn't related to the proposal, but... didn't we have an article about this a few years ago, when I was still an addicted-to-SMG 8 year old? It was called "Short Goomba" or something... this might just be deja vu, though.

I say in the Super Mario Galaxy section, it should go like this in one paragraph:
 * There are two types of Goombas in this game. One type is the common brown Goomba seen in many galaxies. The other type is small, round, and yellow, and are less common compared to the former.

Or something like that. --PyroGuy6 I gotta vacuum tonight. 10:38, 10 June 2011 (EDT)

@GoombaShoe15 We do need to make those pages. We have pages for Grand Goombas and Gargantua Koopa Troopas

Again those have official names the others do not

What if hammer bros didnt have official names? should we merge it with koopa?

Yes and thats irrelevant because they do have official names

}}
 * facepalm* I guess were just gonna have to wait until someone makes a proposal