Talk:Wing Cap

Wing Cap cameo on Rayman Legends

I was watching a video from Rayman Legends on Wii U, and when Rayman has the Mario costume on him and press "A" to glide, his head takes the form of the Wing Cap. Just thought it was noteworthy in the article.

--189.186.213.142 23:48, 4 September 2013 (EDT)John Doe
 * It's already mentioned on the references list. GBAToad (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2013 (EDT)

"Wings" as an item
So on page 18 of the English instruction booklet for 64DS, the section describing Wing Mario has "Wings" for a header and shows screenshots of both Wing Mario and the feather item. The article currently seems to treat "Wings" as the name of the feather item. However, the respective page of the Japanese manual is headed as 羽根マリオ (Hane Mario, Wing Mario), decidedly not referring to the feather. Personally, I feel the feather could be considered an iteration of Cape Feather, given the forms are fairly similar in function, the Super Mushroom in that game turns them into Mega Mario, and the Super Leaf also has two forms associated with it. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:44, May 1, 2020 (EDT)
 * Are you talking moving the Wings to a separate article or merging that information with the Cape Feather? I don't really I agree with either, since it's still just the Wing Cap. 23:51, May 1, 2020 (EDT)
 * I'm talking about moving the feather item (which itself is not called "wings" in any capacity that I can see) in SM64DS to Cape Feather. Super Leaf and Tanooki Suit can both make Tanooki Mario, after all. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:06, May 2, 2020 (EDT)
 * Actually the first line in the 羽根マリオ box is 「羽根を入手すると」 "By obtaining the wings", so "Wings" is an appropriate name. Compare to Power Flower box to the left (「パワーフラワーを入手すると」). SmokedChili (talk) 06:08, May 2, 2020 (EDT)
 * Wait a sec, 羽根 can mean both "feather" and "wings". The line actually be "By obtaining the feather". SmokedChili (talk) 06:55, May 2, 2020 (EDT)

What to do with "Wings"
I'm quite surprised that I found this by browsing around, but I think it's about time we deal with this misinterpretation.

It's considerably odd that the Wing Cap and the "Wings" from 64 DS are considered the same thing, and to me, it's just two different powerups giving the player the exact same form. So I think we should break it down like this:
 * Split into its own article. This is my preferred option, given that it's still a distinct powerup despite giving the player the same form, as was mentioned before.
 * Move the info over to Cape Feather. On the other hand, given that there's some evidence connecting the powerup to the Cape Feather, I'm going to throw in this option as well. I'm not opposed to this option either.
 * Do nothing. Literally that.

Proposer: Deadline: October 23, 2020, 23:59 GMT

Split Wings (Super Mario 64 DS) into its own article

 * 1) My preferred option.
 * 2) Although it could be a Cape Feather, I personally think it would work better as its own article.
 * 3) It doesn't work the same way as the Cape Feather and is not named as such either.
 * 4) Per all. Also see "Do nothing" option.
 * 5) Per all. It is separate from the Cape Feather, as well.
 * 6) Per all.
 * 7) I'm also fine with this option.

Move the info on Wings to Cape Feather

 * 1) Second choice.
 * 2) Per my thoughts in the above section.
 * 3) I like this option the most, since it looks like a cape feather and I think it could easily redirect to this section.

Do nothing

 * 1) It being a remake of Super Mario 64, I see it as a redone Wing Cap, and thus not really something different. Though, there are differences that are mentioned in current page in a paragraph. But with them being minor, I personally prefer this option over the just splitting it.
 * 2) I'm skeptical that the Wings are meant to be the same as the Cape Feather. It doesn't actually resemble any of the Cape Feather's in-game appearances besides being a feather, and has a different name in both Japanese and English. As for giving the Wings their own article, I agree with Yoshi the SSM and Alex95's thoughts, and also this would be consistent with the handling of Keronpa Ball.
 * 3) - It is still functionally the Wing Cap, just without the "Cap" part to make it fit the other characters in Versus Mode and to distinguish it from the basic caps. From a development view, it makes sense, as you wouldn't have to model four different caps for four characters, you could just have the one item work for all of them. Moving the information to the Cape Feather doesn't make sense to me as, while functionally similar, the Wing Feather is clearly meant to be the Wing Cap.
 * 4) Per Yoshi the SSM and Alex95. While the power-up does take on a different form in the remake, it still gives the same effect. I feel how the article covers any slight changes is fine.
 * 5) My prefered option, per myself from almost eight years ago, but anything that doesn't re-merge this with Cape Feather is fine.
 * 6) Per Yoshi the SMM and Alex95. It seems unnecessary to split it when the Wings item is the same thing as the Wing Cap except for design.

Comments
By the way, it shouldn't be "Wing (Super Mario 64 DS)," it should be "Wings (Super Mario 64 DS item)." The manual always refers to it in plural even when singular would make more sense, though it also calls the form "wings." Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:55, October 9, 2020 (EDT)
 * No, that's a descriptive name. The fact that the manual also calls Balloon Mario "Floating Power" is a testament to that. That said, yeah, plural "Wings" is correct. 19:58, October 9, 2020 (EDT)
 * It's still a name that is used for multiple contexts, descriptive or otherwise. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:18, October 9, 2020 (EDT)

@Keyblade Master Not necessarily. The feathers float down in the same way, and aside from Cape Mario having the earthquake thing, Cape Mario and Wing Mario work almost exactly the same. Also, note my point on the Super Leaf being used for Raccoon Mario and Tanooki Mario yet being the same item. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:20, October 9, 2020 (EDT)

Regarding the Keronpa Ball argument, it appears "Kuromame" stemmed from an unofficial guide. As such, until we get word of what an official, SM64-centered guide calls them, I would advise against using it as basis for other arguments. For all we know, it could be Keronpa just like SM64DS. After all, as many people seem to forget, Fire Chomp in SMB3 appears as a faceless black orb except when spitting fire, and considering SM64's graphic system, enlarging it seems a more economical alternative. But I digress. The point is, it's currently shaky to use for an argument for another subject. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 01:57, October 11, 2020 (EDT)
 * Interesting - I was under the impression that it was initially an entirely different subject before explicitly being changed into a Flame Chomp for the remake. Assuming we can't find a source for that it might be better to merge it with Flame Chomp outright. -- 12:51, October 11, 2020 (EDT)
 * My thoughts exactly. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:49, October 11, 2020 (EDT)

FWIW, some people seem to be treating Wings as a manual-only name, but it appears in-game as well. When first getting Wings as Mario, the tutorial text that pops up starts with "With Wings on his cap, Mario can take to the skies!" -- 1337star (Mailbox SP) 17:09, October 12, 2020 (EDT)
 * Thanks for the info. Will note accordingly depending on the outcome of the proposal. 17:12, October 12, 2020 (EDT)

Regarding the "same thing except for design" argument, this also isn't true. Aside from the different names, the cap falls to the ground and moves like a mushroom, the feather floats down just like the cape feather. This is like saying the Tanooki Suit in SMB3 and the Statue Leaf in SM3DW are the same except for design. Also, in that case, you might as well consider character-specific Power Flowers to be the same as SM64 caps. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:37, October 13, 2020 (EDT)
 * That example isn't 100% comparable, though. The Statue Leaf never outright replaced the Tanooki Suit in an SMB3 remake. Had the Wings appeared in a completely different game and provided the Wing Mario form rather than just replacing the Wing Cap for a 64 remake, I would be fine with splitting it. The Power Flower is a completely different matter altogether as it's very clearly one item that just has different effects depending on the character who happens to pick it up. Using the arguments here to merge the Power Flower simply can't work at all, since to make it work it would have to be merged with the Metal Cap and Vanish Cap at the same time, while still retaining its own article for Mario and Yoshi's powers, which would be a clear violation of once and only once and do nothing but confuse readers. -- 14:01, October 13, 2020 (EDT)
 * (I forgot to mention the Super Mushroom for Mega Mario, but your argument works to counter that already.) I still feel the fact that it's treated as separate from the "main" character abilities and can still only be used by Mario outside of the multiplayer shouldn't be understated. Given its limited use, it still easily could have been a Wing Cap, but the fact they used a feather (which isn't the same thing as a wing; one is avian hair, the other is an avian arm) leads me to not see any benefit in keeping them merged. At least mentioning the fact that outside of multiplayer, Wings boxes give Power Flowers is enough of a difference to not be redundant to have its own article. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 14:10, October 13, 2020 (EDT)