Talk:Elephant

Clean up or delete this page
Another generic subject; I seriously could not have made myself any clearer. It could be a disambiguation page, though I'd like to see some comments on this.

Proposer: Deadline: November 11, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Clean up

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) - I'm for a disambiguation page if we need it. Otherwise delete.
 * 3) There's no need to include information on elephants who already have their own articles.

Do nothing

 * 1) An elephant appears as an obtainable item in Mario is Missing. That alone makes it of note. Until I know what will change about the article, my vote remains as it is.
 * 2) I'd support repurposing this to be about the Mario is Missing item specifically, but considering how vague this proposal is, I'm gonna have to oppose for now.
 * 3) per all this proposal is to vague to pass.
 * 4) How in the world is this thing generic by any means? I think we have got enough coverage on this thing, and it does make notable appearances in the Mario series. This proposal is too vague on what is generic and what is not. Is it the lack of information or is it the fact that there is not enough information on it to make for a good article? I don't know.
 * 5) Per all, especially Turner.
 * 6) - Proposal is way too short, therefore, I say do nothing.

Comments
@Time Turner Even so, the information on other elephants should be removed, as they just make this an overly detailed disambiguation page. 12:23, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * I won't argue against the article's fluff, but it shouldn't be completely deleted or disambiguated. 12:24, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * Perhaps the item can have its own page as ? 12:24, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * Hey, I never said that we were deleting everything. This is actually a similar scenario to Beehive. 12:34, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * You didn't specify anything. This proposal does not make its options clear in the slightest. What are we even voting for or against? 12:37, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * The title says it all. Clean up the article or get rid of it altogether. If that's the title, shouldn't there be two support options? At the moment, I don't find myself either opposing or supporting, but maybe later on, I might support. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * What would you be supporting? Cleaning up the article or deleting the article are two very different options, and the proposal does not make anything clear. 22:01, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
 * Split "support" into two options; therefore, everyone should more or less review their votes. 22:13, 28 October 2017 (EDT)