User talk:Time Q/Archive 7

Well, that's my talk page (surprise, surprise), and if you wanna talk, please do so! Just a few rules.
 * Please always add a header if you start a new topic.
 * If you feel the need of doing so, you may send me pointless messages such as "Hi!", but don't expect me to answer.
 * Freedom of speech, so say what you want. (I don't care about flaming and such, but the community does, so better refrain from doing so :P)
 * If you want to put images on this page, please make sure they're small enough. Or even better, just put a link to it rather than the image itself.
 * Generally I'll answer on this page (in order to make the discussion traceable), but sometimes I'll also answer on your page (in order to make sure you read the message). So please check this page if you don't get a message on your page.
 * Remember to sign with (~), don't remove anything from this page, and the other usual blabla.
 * That's it.

New User
Come on, just ban him. I mean, look at his name!
 * And do you think he can be renamed to "NoNameX"? His name is too big and breaks many things. -- 20:30, 11 January 2010 (EST)
 * I mean GayLuigiControlledByCacatellaPSFakeFictionalInMarioGangFutureAfterTheEndOfTheWorldAt2012HaHaHaOnTheFictionalSNDS. Sorry if you werent talkinga bout him, looked like you were. -- 21:14, 11 January 2010 (EST)

HI TIME Q!
Would you want to be friends? Here's my userbox:


 * Well, I don't even know you, but if you want, why not. I don't use userboxes, though. 10:00, 16 January 2010 (EST)

Mario
Hey Time Q, I'm rewriting the History section of Mario, but do the games necessarily have to be in strict chronological order, or can it be divided into series? (i.e. Mario & Luigi series, Paper Mario series) The series' sub-sections would be chronologically ordered by release date of the first game in the series. --
 * Yes, they should be ordered by and divided into series, I think it's all described here. Please adhere to those guidelines, and remember to include each appearance there, that is such in "other media" as well. I know this is a lot of work :( 15:51, 17 January 2010 (EST)

Red Links
Real quick, can you go into the user page of this banned user and get rid of the red links?
 * Thanks. By the way, there's also other useless red links that are unable to be removed by me. I would really appreciate it if you could remove those red links.

Re: Wii
Oh. Sorry about that; I didn't see a rule about using EST time and the wiki's default clock is GMT, so I had assumed it would be ok. Why Eastern time and not GMT though? -- (Also, should I change everything back?)
 * I guess. IMO, I think GMT is better as a sort of "universal" time (somewhat like how we name articles based on the first English name, not necessarily the American, i.e. Mario Smash Football). Would I have to propose a proposal, or just mention it on the MW:FA talk page, if I were to want to change(or establish, seeing that there's no clear indication at the moment) the time zone system? --
 * OK. Thanks for the advice. --

So the proposal has passed, but how should I change the "localtime" thing that appears on the proposal page to GMT? Is it possible? --
 * Sorry, I have no idea... 01:25, 11 February 2010 (EST)

Hm
Why can't I remove that if their reasoning is not valid. Also, why aren't you addressing the fact I already resolved the things you voted to remove the article from featured status for? All of them? They're telling me the article has problems, but they're not even clarifying where the problems are, I already dealt with the things they brought up. ForeverDaisy09 19:08, 7 February 2010 (EST)
 * If you think that a proposal to remove a vote is invalid than you should discuss it with the proposer rather than just removing it when you think it's invalid. It might be considered valid by others. I need to have a closer look at the article before I can tell whether I think it has more problems. 19:16, 7 February 2010 (EST)

Edo is ignoring my messages
Just like I said to Reversinator, I told him to him to Edo to reply for me. Can you tell him to reply to me?
 * Have you even tried contacting him on his talk page lately? I fear I can't do anything you can't do. 08:47, 9 February 2010 (EST)

I tried to but he just ignored me then so i'm so depressed.
 * I think you should try it again. Perhaps he just missed your message. I don't think he would simply ignore you. 08:55, 9 February 2010 (EST)

I contacted him again but he continued to ignore after the friend request for him. I think he's offline right now. If he doesn't talk to me I will strongly be depressed.
 * Yes, he is currently offline. Seriously, there's no need to be depressed. I'm sure he will reply to your message as soon as he's online. 09:06, 9 February 2010 (EST)
 * Okay. Thanks.:D
 * I apologize, I didn't intend to ignore you. I think I missed your message, when I was checking my talk page. Maybe I mistook your signature for my own in affect. I left a message at your talk page. Sorry, It won't happen again. - 16:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)

Red Link
Since you didn't know, I'm trying to get rid of useless broken links. I've been doing it for quite a while, and Knife doesn't mind at all.
 * But I do, since you altered the content of my comment. Stop that please. And as already said, this red link does no harm at all. 13:07, 14 February 2010 (EST)
 * But if Knife and Edofenrir approve of what I'm doing, then why can't you?
 * Because it was my comment whose content you altered. Altering other people's comments is an absolute no-no on this wiki. Why don't you use ? I would accept that. 10:26, 15 February 2010 (EST)
 * I also suggested using fakelink or removing the link, rather than editing the actual words of the comment. :-/

RE: Sig
Very Many thanks!, I wanted to do it a long time before but I didn't know how :/, thank you again :D.-- 13:31, 14 February 2010 (EST)

Time Display on Proposals page
It seems to work just fine to me; did you say that it displays a time 18 hours earlier than it actually is? --
 * I just checked again, now it displays the correct time. Very strange, I'm sure it was 18 hours slow when I checked yesterday. Anyway, I put it back on the page. 09:13, 16 February 2010 (EST)
 * Strange indeed. oô (I might ask some other users if the time's displaying correctly for them just to check) --