User talk:YoshiFlutterJump

RE:Mini Spec Article
Actually, that was that removed the you's. I changed amiibo Tokens to amiibo Tokens as the plurals need to be out of the links, unless the specific article is plural itself. Both are some good advice to keep in mind. :) 18:16, 24 March 2017 (EDT)

Mini Spec
When does is the name spelled as "Mini Spec" in-game? According to this video, this video, and Nintendo.com, they are called "Mini Speks".-- 20:03, 22 April 2017 (EDT)
 * Ok, thanks! I won't revert your edits unless I know for a fact that they have never been called "Mini Specs". It is also possible that it is a typo or a regional difference. -- 20:27, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

Prima
I have reiterated this more than once now, but the Prima guides are official. Barring a handful of early guides released around the time of Super Mario 64, the Prima guides are official. They have been consistently used throughout the wiki as official sources, and both old and new guides are being used. I am directly sending this message to you because despite being told this multiple times, you still insist that the Prima guides are unofficial sources. Also, while I'm here, may I ask why you say that "We can't have two King Bills", despite all of the other pages on the wiki that share names? If you're going to say it's because they're from the same game, look at Chap (blue), Chap (green), Ghost (Wario Land II boss), and Ghost (Wario Land II enemy). 10:39, 2 July 2017 (EDT)
 * It's impolite to not reply to someone. If you want to drop this discussion, then I'm perfectly fine with that, but at the very least, I want an acknowledgement that you've read this message. 23:42, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
 * Frankly, you have not replied to all of my concerns, notably the direct question that I asked you about pages sharing names, but I am willing to drop this discussion. However, I just want you to understand one thing: Prima is a valid source, has been used as a valid source, and will be a valid source in the foreseeable future. This is not my personal opinion; this has been put into effect on plenty of articles by multiple users. Even if you do not care for Prima as a source, the fact of the matter is that, as it stands, it is a valid source as far as the wiki is concerned, and that is not going to change without a proposal. 14:28, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

RE: The 'Shroom Spotlight
Thank you for bringing that to my attention, unless it's made before the next release, I'm sure it can be the wanted article focus.