User talk:TheDisneyGamer

How To Tag For Deletion
is how. You can also do if the tag by itself isn't good enough. I fixed File:Mario bucket.jpg and File:Mario+ amp +Wario+Mario+Plush+with+Bucket.jpg. -- 15:49, 28 January 2016 (EST)
 * It seems as though deleted your duplicate and moved your image to File:Mario Plush with Bucket.jpg. He hopes the image gets used somewhere soon. Deletion policy states the image needs to be used within 24-hours before it is eligible for deletion. -- 16:07, 28 January 2016 (EST)
 * Actually, I meant both are duplicates of the file Marioandwarioplush.jpg, which is used here, so that file isn't actually necessary.
 * If you want to know how to change the file name, just click move. -- 16:51, 29 January 2016 (EST)

Courtesy
You probably didn't know but doing what someone else is doing is against policy without asking them first. I saw you were adding the  for files when I was doing it for Donkey Kong Land, Donkey Kong Land 2, and Donkey Kong Land III. The three pages you edited: You are not in trouble. Just a friendly reminder. -- 19:10, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 * Kuchuka Karnage
 * Whiplash Dash
 * Stalagmite Frights
 * Oh, ok. I didn't know that doing that was against policy, so thanks for letting me know!

TheDisneyGamer (talk)
 * Is this reminder deserved? I thought users were given an informal reminder for their first courtesy violation, not an official one.
 * 21:51, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 * Yeah, I just checked the courtesy page and it's true. A reminder or warning should not have been issued, since it was the first time doing it and the user didn't even know he/she was doing it. If you think you got this reminder unfairly, then you have the option to appeal it. Just follow the instructions on the page and if the admins think you don't deserve the reminder at all, it will be removed. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 * I don't even know anymore. Every time I try this, it gets tried at appeals. I thought that isn't as severe as  or . I would think that a  wouldn't cause questioning. I can understand if I gave  or  for this first time offense. To me, questioning something that should be considered something that "went easy on them" before the higher level behavioral templates get deployed just doesn't make sense to me. Keep in mind that courtesy is considered a rule and any rule breaking is subject to issuing behavioral templates at the discretion of the issuer. In my case, I chose the lowest you can go. I tried to follow the warning policy as best as I could. -- 01:05, 9 April 2017 (EDT)
 * Generally, with courtesy, it's best that an informal reminder (i.e. just telling someone they've done something wrong) is given, especially as most users don't know it off heart (even I need to check it from time to time). Reminders aren't as higher level, but they're still an official warning template. At the end of the day, I wouldn't say this is worth appealing, as technically rules were broken, and it's not our most severe warning. But in future, it's best to tell someone they're doing, or they've done something wrong, before issuing a template, and if they continue then start giving them reminders and whatnot.