MarioWiki:BJAODN/Proposals

This is the subpage containing all the dumb proposals made. (Well, not all, just funny ones.)

BJAODN
Well, I was looking at the BJAODN page and I got to thinking, what if we included the BJAODN page in the BJAODN page (with all of the content put on)? All of the content on the page is nonsense, anyway, and would qualify to be on the BJAODN page.

Proposer: Deadline: 20:00, 2 May 2009

Include BJAODN Page in the BJAODN Page

 * 1) Per my wonderful ideas above.

Don't Include BJAODN Page in the BJAODN Page

 * 1) - What? No offense, but this seems pretty pointless. I don't get how putting the page in itself is going to improve it.

Comments
I think the "Pie For Everyone" proposal would have been a great idea, too...

("So we're going to duplicate the page on the page... Great idea.")

("I only made this proposal as a joke, with a reference to the "Pie For Everyone" proposal" - )

("Recursion is always funny. :P" - )

Block Mariowiki
Because his name is similar to you-know-what. We could also just make him change his name to something else.

Proposer: Deadline: December 8, 2013, 23:59 GMT

Move the page "Moogle" to "Moofle"
Just come on guys. For far too long this grave inaccuracy has been pressed upon us. If I may gain the support of this community, I propose we move the page "Moogle" to the more accurate "". This will clearly not just be a boost to our website's accuracy and traffic ratings, with this measure in place we stand to have a whopping 25% increase in revenue and and the decreased overhead and operating costs will likely be so good as to increase our profit margin as much as 40%! It seems unbelievable but it is true. We could make thousands more than we currently do, and all for such a simple page. MarioWiki, I implore you. Save our Moofle! Save our money!

Proposer: Snack 19:17, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Deadline: November 4th, 17:00

Support (By doing so you will uphold profit, humor, community values, and pie.)

 * 1) Snack 19:17, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 * 2) TCY 19:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 * 3) Per Snack. This will be a great advancement.
 * 4) Wtf I founded Moofle, I deserve credit :(
 * 5) Um per all?
 * 6) - It's about time we start thinking about how to make this site more financially profitable.

Oppose (By doing this you are a commanist fool. And a Moofle hater.)

 * 1) Aren't joke proposals OUTLAWED?
 * 2) 1337: Well if they are not then they HAVE to be.
 * 3) Just send it to the BJAODN.

Comments
AWESOME IDEA.

btw let's change this to the GI JOE EXTREME wiki. and make Pirate Goomba a fa. --Blitzwing 19:36, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Might I suggest moving Snack to, Luigi to , and Mario to ?
 * hey everyone lets move User:Moogle and User:WikiGuest both to Moofle because I feel like it.
 * No u. 21:00, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

("Oh, sure, that's great. Snack makes a joke proposal and everyone plays along. I make a joke proposal and an argument breaks out with two users leaving the site." - Ghost Jam)

Pie for Everyone
By request of the creator, the infamous proposal is linked to rather than archived.

(It should be noted that a "Pie Button" did manage to exist, although only very briefly.)

''Almost seven years after the original attempt to bring pie to the wiki, the proposal was revisited, and passed by an even greater margin. Sadly, despite the victory, there was still no pie forthcoming from the administrative bakery.''

One year after the second proposal, the matter was revisited again, but there was still no pie, mainly because the proposal didn't pass by a large enough margin to satisfy the administrators.

''Another attempt was made three years later. It received overwhelming support with absolutely no opposition, but alas, no pie was given out.''

Remove Circuit City ads
I propose that we remove the Circuit City ads and replace them with Best Buy ads, because my uncle is the manager of a Best Buy location, and it kind of offends me that there are Curcuit City ads (this ISthe nephew of a Best Buy manager you're talking to).-

(This proposal was later removed by with the following statement: "Proposals like that are a NO. Talk to Porplemontage about them.")

Snufit Ball
A few times ago, some user created an article about the Snufit Ball, a projectile thrown by the Snufit enemy in Super Mario 64, it was deleted on the ground that it was "too minor", however I think it should be recreated.

If we have an article on Cheese, we must also allow an article on Snufit Ball. Cheese affect gameplay by boosting the chances of seeing a rare enemy in Luigi's Mansion, Snufit Ball hurt Mario. They both affect Gameplay, they both exist in the Marioverse, they both must have an article.

Proposer:Blitzwing Deadline: January 24nd 17:00(EDT)

LET'S RECREATE SNUFIT BALL AGRESIVELLY

 * 1) --Blitzwing 17:58, 17 January 2008 (EST) Me is proposer, me gave reasons.
 * 2) True, this is a very minor proposal and is a minor projectile, Blitzwing does have a point.
 * 3) lolz. evan teh chezorz iz mur signifcant den dis, lulz.  Blitzwing: you have good integrity. :)

Comments
Can we somehow get that Snifit Ball in the same article? 00:42, 18 January 2008 (EST)
 * Actuaally, the Snifit Ball came before the Snufit Ball, so it would make sense to have Snufit Ball in the Snifit Ball article, but whatever. ALL HAIL SNUFIT BALL ALL HAIL SNUFIT BALL. --Blitzwing 06:50, 18 January 2008 (EST)
 * Now wait. Projecticles are still different from objects that can be activated, so the comparison with the Cheese article is quite unfitting. I vote for "Only when it gets over two lines of text". - 15:36, 18 January 2008 (EST)
 * Do Snifit Balls even have official names? 16:08, 18 January 2008 (EST)
 * No, but then again, Cheese wasn't named in it's Luigi Mansion appearance except in those unofficial player guide with dubious info. --Blitzwing 16:39, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Is this a serious proposal or a jab at the people who opposed deleting Cheese? >_>
 * Both. --Blitzwing 17:07, 18 January 2008 (EST)
 * The cheese article has a good length. Something that only consists of:

"A Snufit Ball is a small black orb that Snufits spit out of their tubular mouths at Mario in Super Mario 64 and Super Mario 64 DS. They can easily be avoided, but will hurt Mario by one damage point if he touches them."
 * does not qualify for an article. Not "affecting gameplay" is the ticket to an article, but rather whether the article can actually provide content. And as of now, you don't seem to get past the above version of it. - 17:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)

(Blitzwing later withdrew the proposal when Cobold modificated "the awesome vote headers".)

(Also note that after this proposal was archived here, someone voted for it again. "Oh no" indeed)

Someone help!
I need help with my comic project: comics N Gang and Club Nintendo.

(This was on the proposals page.)

Unboringfy MarioWiki:Userboxes
I am appalled at the destruction of creativity there. Appalled.

Proposer: Deadline: 18 May 2011

Support

 * D:
 * D:
 * D:
 * D: Makes me wanna make.
 * D:

Comments
D: 03:48, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
 * D:
 * D:
 * D:

Remove removals
Removing stuff is bad. As a wiki we should be adding MORE stuff so I propose that we remove removals, therefore from now on we can only make proposals to add more things but no proposals to get rid of things.

Proposer: Deadline: April 8, 2021, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) MORE STUFF
 * 2) That proposal to remove Smash coverage will be the last of its kind.
 * 3) All worlds begin in darkness, and all so end. M****Wiki is no different.
 * 4) - more
 * 5) Matter can only be shifted into a different state, thus the concept of removal is false.
 * 6) The Super Wiki is perfect and therefore nothing should ever be removed from it

Oppose

 * 1) - Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
 * Waluigi Time is the Sithest of Siths. 20:15, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
 * 1) This proposal is counterproductive as long as this article exists. Not to mention this one.
 * 2) – Opposing so I have grounds to remove Waluigi Time

Comments
Is this an April Fools proposal or an actual one? 12:03, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
 * What do you think? 12:04, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
 * Well excuse me, someone had to make that kind of comment right? 12:06, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
 * It's real, getting rid of stuff is bad -- 12:10, April 1, 2021 (EDT)

Delete the wiki. Then we'd no longer have anything to remove. 12:09, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
 * NO that's the opposite of what I'm trying to do, read the proposal again please -- 12:10, April 1, 2021 (EDT)

Wouldn't the removal of removal proposals imply that this proposal would also get removed and thus cause a contradiction? BMfan08 (talk) 15:57, April 1, 2021 (EDT)