MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Pronto

Support

 * 1) Pronto passes all the requirements to be featured; lots of information, not messy, no improvement tags, you get the idea.

Oppose

 * 1) It meets requirements for all rules except rule 10 and 11, which states reasonable length and images.
 * 2) Images, images, images... Where are all the images???? We surely can have more images

Removal of Opposes
BabyLuigiOnFire
 * 1) It's impossible to get another images, and once again I point to Robo Koopa (alter ego), which is a FA and is the same size as Pronto.

Comments

 * You know what, until this gets more votes, I'm going to put off on voting.
 * Even though I said yes to this (it's not a fan vote. I HATE Mario cartoons) I think the start of the article could use a bit more expansion. Just a tiny bit would make it easier to put on the Main Page.

Maybe at least one more image could be added?
 * I've looked EVERYWHERE, and I can't find another image of Pronto.

It's a tad bit short for a FA article, but I guess it falls into the spot where no more information can be added. I don't think it's good enough to be featured.

If you don't think it's good enough, why don't you vote?

Reversinator: The length it has was enough to unfeature Gus. Plus, 7,331 bytes > 3,888 bytes, which is about double the length of the article. It is possible to get another image; you just got to find a video of the episode on the computer, print screen, and bingo!

@Rev: I highly doubt that it's impossible to get more images. If I were you, I'd go on Youtube, find the episode, take a screenshot, and upload it. Unless you can't find the episode, it's not impossible. Also, didn't we have an exact number of characters that an FA had to be?
 * We did, but this rule has been replaced to say there must be a "reasonable" amount of characters.

This article only talks about Pronto's appearances in the show. Why not have something about his personality or something?

@Time Q: Hmmm... Was that a proposal? I don't remember it at all. Maybe I was off the wiki...
 * Hm, I can't remember when and why it was changed exactly either. I believe the main reason was that 4,000 characters is just an arbitrary value and not suitable for distinguishing "good" from "bad" articles.

I wouldn't clasify this article as a "long enough" article...

You know what I find funny? The fact that this is nominated for FA status, yet the article itself fails to mention that it is a character from the Super Mario Bros. Super Show, which should be the most essential piece of information. The fact that this info is missing says a lot about the article. Take this into consideration before supporting the article. - (I'm going to fix the error now, of course, so if you want to check what I pointed out, go see the history)