MarioWiki:Proposals

http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r149/Deadringerforlove/dessert1.jpg A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code.

This page observes the No-Signature Policy.

How To
 * 1) Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument.
 * 2) Users then start to discuss on the issue. 24 hours after posting the proposal (rounding up or down to the next or previous full hour, respectively, is allowed), the voting period begins. (The proposer is allowed to support their proposal right after posting.) Each proposal ends at the end of the day one week after voting start. (All times GMT).
 * 3) Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. Agreeing or seconding a previously mentioned reason given by another user is accepted.
 * 4) Users who feel that certain votes were cast in bad faith or which truly have no merit can address the votes in the Comments section. Users can ask a voter to clarify their position, point out mistakes or flaws in their arguments, or call for the outright removal of the vote if it lacks sufficient reasoning. Users may not remove or alter the content of anyone else's votes. The voter can remove or rewrite his/her own vote at any time, but the final decision to remove another User's vote lies solely with the Administrators.
 * 5) All proposals that end up in a tie will be extended for another week.
 * 6) If a proposal has more than ten votes, it can only pass or fail by a margin of three votes. If a proposal reaches the deadline and the total number of votes for each option differ by two or less votes, the deadline will be extended for another week.
 * 7) Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
 * 8) No proposal can overturn the decision of a previous proposal that is less than 4 weeks (28 days) old.
 * 9) Proposals can only be rewritten or deleted by their proposer within the first three days of their creation. However, the proposer can request that their proposal be deleted by a Sysop at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it.
 * 10) All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a Sysop, the proposer can ask for that help.
 * 11) There shouldn't be proposals about creating articles on a underrepresented or completely absent subject, unless there is major disagreement about whether the content should be included. To organize efforts about completing articles on missing subjects, try creating a PipeProject.
 * 12) Proposals cannot be made about System Operator promotions and demotions. Sysops can only be promoted and demoted by the will of Bureaucrats.
 * 13) If the Sysops deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to remove it at any time.
 * 14) No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters, and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.

The times are in GMT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after work/school, weekend nights). If a proposal is added on Monday night at 23:59 GMT, the deadline is the night of the Tuesday of the next week at 23:59 PM. If it is posted a minute later, the deadline is 23:59 PM of the Wednesday of the next week, since midnight is considered to be part of the next day, as 00:00 AM.

Basic Proposal and Support/Oppose Format
This is an example how your proposal should look like, if you want it to be acknowledged. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the [subject] - variables with information to customize your proposal, so it says what you wish. If you insert the information, be sure to replace the whole variable including the squared brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information", not "[This is the inserted information]". - ===[insert a title for your Proposal here]=== [describe what issue this Proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the Wiki handles that issue]

Proposer: Voting start: [insert a voting start time here, f.e. "2 January, 2010, 14:00". Voting start times are 24 hours after the time at which the proposal was posted, as described in Rule 2 above.] Deadline: [insert a deadline here, 7 days after the voting start, at 23:59 GMT.]

====Support====
 * 1) [make a statement indicating that you support your proposal]

====Oppose====

====Comments==== - Users will now be able to vote on your Proposal, until the set deadline is reached. Remember, you are a user as well, so you can vote on your own Proposal just like the others.

To support, or oppose, just insert " # at the bottom of the section of your choice. Just don't forget to add a valid reason for your vote behind that tag if you are voting on another user's Proposal. If you are voting on your own Proposal, you can just say "Per my Proposal".

Talk Page Proposals
All proposals dealing with a single article or a specific group of articles are held on the talk page of one of the articles in question. Proposals dealing with massive amounts of splits, merges or deletions across the Wiki should still be held on this page.

How To

 * 1) All active talk page proposals must be listed below in chronological order (new proposals go at the bottom). All pages effected must be mentioned in the brief description, with the talk page housing the discussion linked to directly via "". If the proposal involved a page that is not yet made, use to communicate its title. The Deadline must also be included in the entry. Linking to pages not directly involved in the talk page proposal is not recommended, as it clutters the list with unnecessary links. Place  under the heading.
 * 2) All rules for talk page proposals are the same as mainspace proposals (see the "How To" section above), with the exceptions made by Rules 3 and 4 as follows:
 * 3) Voting in talk page proposals will be open for two weeks, not one. There is no 24 hour delay between the posting of a talk page proposal and the commencement of voting.
 * 4) Talk page proposals may be closed by the proposer if both the support and the oppose sides each have fewer than five votes.
 * 5) The talk page proposal must pertain to the article it is posted on.

List of Talk Page Proposals

 * Split Mario Joe and Luigi Bob (Discuss) Deadline: November 7, 2010, 23:59 GMT
 * Merge World of Trophies into Subspace Emissary (Discuss) Deadline: November 12, 2010, 21:00

New Features
None at the moment.

Removals
None at the moment

NIWA Tags
I noticed around the wiki that these new NIWA tags are randomly placed anywhere in an article, that won't be acceptable, it looks very unprofessional, so this is what we need to settle, where do we put these tags? Here are the ideas:


 * New section: Create a new section in the article called "NIWA Sources" and align the tags on the center of this new section of the article.


 * Respectful Section: place the tags in the respectful section it belongs in. example: Mario has an article on himself over at the SmashWiki so we'll put the Niwa SmashWiki tag in the Super Smash Bros. section in the SMW's Mario article.


 * Bottom of the section: Similar to Respectful Section but it is place at the end/bottom of that respectful section


 * At the beginning: Put the tag at the top of the article, before the quote and after the redirects.


 * Trivia: Place it in the Trivia section if it has it.


 * References: Place it in the Reference section if it has it.


 * External Links: Place it in the External Links section if it has it.

Proposer: Voting start: 8 November, 2010, 10:30] Deadline: 15 November, 2010, 10:30

New Section

 * 1) I am Zero! Making a new section isn't a bad idea and plus the Respectful Sections will be too confusing, At the Beginning will make it look unprofessional, and it just doesn't belong in the Trivia, Reference, or External Link, it needs its own section. Zero signing out.

Comments
I think there should also be an "in the bottom section" voting option, and you should also address what happens if an article does not have a Trivia/References/External Links section. When we decided to start using the templates, I was under the impression we were going to put them in whatever section happened to be at the bottom of the page: preferably that'd be an External Links section, but since not all articles have those, References would be the next best bet, followed by Trivia. (This would also help end the "does Trivia go above or below the 'Names in Other Languges' section?" quandary.) I also thought they'd be justified right and embedded into the text. The Admins never came to a clear consensus on the matter, however... -
 * I initially prefered them to be on the top right of the article, but then realized that they would collide with infoboxes. Therefore I agree with the alternative Walkazo just explained. -
 * Per Walkazo.

I don't see anything wrong with a NIWA sources section at the bottom of the article. Also, couldn't we just get rid of the whole box part of the template and make it like Template:Articleabout, putting it at the tops of articles?
 * Personally, I think it looks too spacious, especially if there's only one template that can go in there. On the other hand, too many NIWA wikis would make for a really cluttered "articleabout". Also, in the cases where we're the main wiki about a subject, it seems out-of-place for us to advertise the other wikis up at the top of that page (but the links at the bottom makes sense, as it'd be supplementary info, i.e. more detailed SSB coverage on SmashWiki). -

Ok, this template was still in testing. It shouldn't even be on more than the 5 articles I was testing it on because it isn't finished. This entire proposal is too early to be relevant to anything and probably should just be deleted.

Miscellaneous
None at the moment.