MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/White Mage

Support

 * 1) Is a great article, and describes the character (White Mage) perfectly, with no.need of huge sections, tables, etc. Also, I don't see flowery writing, spelling issues or things like that.

Oppose

 * 1) This article is way too short, comparable to Baby Donkey Kong, a successfully unfeatured article, and without sufficient padding, it's difficult to expand beyond this.
 * 2) Per Mario, the article is just too small. We failed Shigeru Miyamoto on size, and the article is smaller than that. The starting section is also too short.
 * 3) Per Mario and Yoshi876.

Removal of Opposes
Mario, Yoshi876


 * 1) I have expanded the article a lot. It looks good now.

Comments
I can expand it by doing sections like clothing, phisical description, powers and abilities section. What do you think?
 * Most of it is already covered in the Mario Sports Mix section, so I think it's mostly restating what the article already offers. The biggest problem with White Mage is her appearances relating to the Mario series is extremely limited, and they're in only sports games. That's not enough to make the article substantial. 23:45, 26 April 2014 (EDT)
 * Hoe is the article looking now? Suggestions for expanding/fixibg issues?

@Ashley, you do know that DasiyLuigi's oppose also deals with the article's size not just the starting section's size?
 * Sorry. I didn't payed attention. However, jow is the article looking? Suggestions for expanding/fixing issues?

After rewriting the article, I'm afraid it's still too short, and I get the feeling that any expansion would just be padding.
 * Uhm, in someway, yes. Can I at least move her clothing/ appearance info from the MSM section tothe actual respective section?
 * Yeah, that'd be fine, but it won't have an effect on the size.
 * Ok. How it looks now? Better (doesn't talking about size)?
 * It looks good, but it's still not great. There's no good way to really exceed Baby Donkey Kong and Shigeru Miyamoto article sizes, so no matter what you do, in the end, it's still a short article. Don't take it as a discouragement, though, since we still like a good article. 15:58, 3 May 2014 (EDT)