MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party 8

Support

 * 1) No errors, no redlinks, many images, no expansion needed, and well detailed.

Oppose

 * 1) Actually, there's only one image that is not in a table, and that's the character selection screen. We could probably use a (READ: non-stolen!) gameplay image, but the problem is, my capture card eats those square-shaped batteries like cheese in a single day (and it's supposed to last for 6 months), so acquiring screenshots that are NOT stolen could be a major issue, if one relies on me for a screenshot. Plus, no one has read over the article and checked for grammar errors, so we don't know how grammatically correct it is. Besides, these problems, I support this article because I have been working pretty hard on it ^_^
 * 2) Per BLOF and there are TONS of grammar errors. The team names section could be placed into a table and the recall section and the critical reception section could be one section.
 * 3) The pictures of the spaces and candies look really bad.
 * 4) Where are all the images? I tried putting the  template on and someone reverted my edit.
 * 5) I don't like that massive list of team combinations. It looks bad.

Removal of Opposes
Commander Code-8
 * 1) She and I tried to make it into a table, and we failed. So, it has to be that way, whether you like it or not. Invalid.

LeftyGreenMario
 * 1) Those are the best quality images we can find.

Reversinator
 * 1) Grammar errors were all fixed (by me :/ ), and as BLOF said, no table for the team names.

Comments
Reversinator: Er, some people before me and myself tried to add the team names in the table, but it was too wide and long, so it had to be kept in a list. For the grammar errors, could someone (perhaps you?) please correct them?
 * I'll do it.

@BLOF: I can take pictures with my camcorder and upload them.
 * @Everyone:I will get many images ASAP.

I'm still drawing a blank in regards to why the article itself needs help. I seriously don't think that more images are really needed for the article, but it still shouldn't stop someone if he or she thinks that a section needs help. However, I still am going to place my vote for opposing this nomination, for I don't see "featured article" status on this just yet.