User talk:A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros./Archive 6

Archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Rules

 * Please don't swear, flame, insultor abuse me.
 * Don't remove all the info with rude info.
 * Don't spam my talk with floods of short things (like LOL).
 * Use your signature so I know it is you.
 * And Last! No REMOVING!

Re: Tucayo
Hi! Please send me a PM with the application form found in here. -- 12:09, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
 * Then I'm sorry to say you can't apply until you get unblocked. -- 12:16, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
 * From The 'Shroom:Sign Up: "The Core Staff will have a week to review your application, and you will receive your results within a couple of days after the week passes." -- 16:20, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

RE:Fine...
You're still blocked there, but sure. 15:27, 1 June 2013 (EDT)

RE: FYI
As far as I know, images should only be put in the middle of the page if it's showing a controller button. --  Super Yoshi  Bros   14:25, 22 June 2013 (EDT)

Reminder
As per Warning policy.. it should be a last warning not a reminder.-- 11:58, 6 July 2013 (EDT)

Screenshot Revisions

 * I'd like to point out that higher quality images typically have higher priority over the lower quality images. Try not to replace high quality images, unless you have an image whose quality is better than what the Super Mario Wiki has.  Be advised, however, that you should not upload images that have poor transparency implemented onto them.  13:48, 16 July 2013 (EDT)

RE: Edit-warring
Who are you to give a reminder to anyway? I've stated this on the talkpage:

"Don't you want higher quality stuff? Would you rather use the super-old computers that use vacuum tubes to work and weigh over one ton or would you rather use your quad-core computer with ridiculous GPU and other great stuff today? No, you wouldn't!? Okay then, tell me, exactly HOW was the lower resolution screenshot with a blurrier quality ANY BETTER than an emulated screenshot where the quality is crisp because the quality is considered "ripped" and can't get any better? You tell me."

You haven't responded to that at all.

And I've reasoned in my edit summary that the image is completely unnecessary and redundant, from an unbiased point of view. There's absolutely NO reason to add another screenshot, but of lower quality in the wiki, especially when the said image doesn't serve any purpose at all other than being there.

15:30, 16 July 2013 (EDT)


 * Sigh, it's MY quote. I said that.
 * 15:35, 16 July 2013 (EDT)