User talk:I'manumber1

Magic Garbage
Hello, thanks for contributing with this new article, though for future articles, please remember to follow the Manual of Style, specifically:
 * Bolding the name of the subject in the sentence, not as a heading (e.g. "Magic Garbage is...")
 * Italicising titles for games, TV shows etc. (The Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3 should be formatted as The Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3)
 * Navigation templates and categories

You can look at the article again to see what fixes were made. If you need guides for specific code like for images, templates etc. be sure to look at Help:Contents or ask around. 22:27, September 14, 2021 (EDT)

I Am Sorry
I accidentally edited an article in the wrong spot and messed it up. I'm very sorry. I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 16:28, September 17, 2021 (EDT)

New article
I'm not sure what this is referring to but I don't recall such an item being in Overlook Tower or even in its restaurant. Either way, you did not follow the Manual of Style as explained at the top. Please make sure you do so for future articles or a reminder will be issued. 21:04, October 10, 2021 (EDT)
 * This is probably referring to the food Mario can eat in the restaurant which fully recovers his HP (possibly only available before destroying the red streamer), but the only name I saw for it was "Chef's TRULY WILD Special". 21:38, October 10, 2021 (EDT)
 * The name actually is mentioned on the "Chef's Special" sign outside the restaurant, so it is valid. I'd say it's too minor of an object to get a page, since it doesn't play a role in the plot nor do we know whether the dish Mario eats is the Omelet or Special. 21:44, October 10, 2021 (EDT)
 * The one Mario eats is a collectible treasure with the "special" name at least, although I agree it's not significant enough to warrant a page. 21:57, October 10, 2021 (EDT)

Unused catch card descriptions
Where did you find out about these? This isn't mentioned at all on List of Super Paper Mario pre-release and unused content, so a reliable source is needed for this sort of thing. 17:43, October 19, 2021 (EDT)

I found it on the cutting room floor. Here check it out. https://tcrf.net/Super_Paper_Mario I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 14:34, October 20, 2021 (EDT)

Now that I told you can I restore my edits? I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 16:43, October 20, 2021 (EDT)
 * As long as it's cited in each page, then yes. 17:11, October 20, 2021 (EDT)

New talk pages
Hey, please avoid creating talk pages to articles that don't exist as it can be easy to lose track of them when there isn't a corresponding article for them. Instead, just make your post on the most relevant existing talk page. 02:26, October 26, 2021 (EDT)

RE: Mario Bowl
We do not have a lost media page - the closest would be the List of unreleased media. Regardless, the reason of to why I deleted the article was due to a simple lack of evidence. There was only a single citation used - this citation only included two images without much in terms of proof. A rarely documented game have a high bar of proof needed for it to be confirmed, and these two images, which don't show an actual "game" and which could have been easily edited, are not enough. There is no footage, documentation, etc, to show that these images are an actual game that released. A singular + dubious source = a lack of quality. The chance of the information being false is too high for me to let it pass in good conscience.

Also, some portions of the already-small article were copy-pasted from the blog poste. This is a large no-no and should be avoided in the future. 22:00, November 15, 2021 (EST)

Ok, ok ok. I'm Sorry. I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 15:00, November 16, 2021 (EST)

Old offenses
Following what happened here, there is absoloutely no point of notifying a user for an offense which happened so long ago that they wouldn't be around anymore. Even if was five minutes ago, there's still no point telling vandals to stop since they will just ignore the messages. I'm not sure if normal users can see the block log as easily as staff members can, but that often shows why there haven't been any messages towards that user at the time, not to mention spreading false information like that anon did would warrant an automatic block without a message anyway. 16:18, November 19, 2021 (EST)

Oh. Sorry. I didn't know that they got blocked. I'm so stupid. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again. I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 19:26, November 19, 2021 (EST)

It's just it didn't say the user was blocked on the user page so I got confused. I&#39;manumber1 (talk) 20:31, November 21, 2021 (EST)
 * The block only lasted two weeks (anonymous users are never blocked permenantly), but they would get blocked again if they kept spreading false information. 06:27, November 22, 2021 (EST)