MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Koopa Paratroopa

Support

 * 1) A great article with a lot of pictures, minimal amount of errors, and everything needed for a great FA.

Oppose

 * 1) Some of the sections are one-liners, and there are some grammatical errors as well.
 * 2) Why is there a messed-up looking Paper Mario statistics section? Some sections are very short and others can use a little more images.
 * 3) Even though I like Paratroopa, I don't think this should be featured. Some info is missing. One example is New Super Mario Bros. Wii (and some others, but I added some too).
 * 4) How can you say it has lots of images?

Removal of Opposes
Commander Code-8
 * 1) It has a lot of images, unlike what you said.
 * 2) This article has a bucket load of images compared to Geno and the Shadow Queen, which are also featured articles.
 * 3) - Per all.

Comments
@Commander Code-8: Well, it actually does have a good amount of images.

TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it.
 * I don't think it's fixed. I think the idea is to put the two right next to each other, so the page isn't so long. I didn't see it before, though, so I could be wrong.
 * I attempted to do that, but I couldn't. At least it's better than the last one; that's a real mess.
 * Yeah, it would be even better if they were all next to each other, but thanks anyway. Removing my vote.
 * Hmmm... We got it fixed on the Dry Bones article, if I remember correctly. I'll try to fix it.
 * Alrighty, the template issue is resolved. Please tell me if it doesn't work for you.
 * Well, I believe that the Super Paper Mario stats should get placed next to the Paper Mario, so that it doesn't look like a mess but I'm also not sure what comes first, neatness or chronological order.

Everyone, the PM stats are fixed.

@BLOF: I don't think it looks messy at all... And I think chronology always comes first.
 * He said missing, not messy.
 * I was actually just referring to his statement roughly 5 lines above this one.