User talk:Yoshi the SSM

173.28.213.81 22:15, 28 March 2017 (EDT) (actual IP)

I have some rules for this talk page. 1. Don't say anything personal. This includes saying that it is my birthday. There be a lot of those around if I didn't do this. 2. Don't use my real name. Either use you or Yoshi the Space Station Manager or Yoshi the SSM. 3. Don't make fun of me of any kind. Even if it meets the code of the wiki, don't do it. Don't break rules at all here. This includes swearing. 4. Don't say something bad about any character in video games. You can say something wrong with my changes about characters. 5. You can talk to me about the Mario Boards if there is no category for you to put it in. 6. Unless you have an actual excuse for your writing being bad (even then try to make it look nice), make your messages readable. But, don't make it too complicated or I may not understand the message. 7. All friend requests/co-worker requests go under your username. I may say no if I want to. Don't expect a response about it on this talk page. It will be on your talk page. The picture I send will be appropriate for the friend request. If co-workers, there is only one image. These don't apply to the 41st non-friend-request category as it will be on the bottom when archiving. Other than that, all is good. Fun Rules 1. Only park whatever vehicle you have in the appropriate location. 2. Don't come asking for I ride. Not only am I managing a spaceship, but also this wiki. Sorry. :( 3. If you say Pink Gold Peach is a great character, I say you're a little off, but ok. If you say she is a good character, very slightly off, but glad you think that way. If you say she is the worst character, I would let you believe that. If you say she is a bad character, that's your belief. Pink Gold Peach is an ok character, but Nintendo should of added Silver Luigi to the games she appeared in before they added her. 4. Disregard the following rule. 5. Disregard all fun rules, especially the previous one.

When this page has 41, the first 40 will be archived. When this page has 21, archive that it will go into will viewable. Friend request don't count towards the archive, but will be archived with the respected archive.
 * User's Beginning July 18, 2016 - November 8, 2016
 * Slow, but Important November 11, 2016 - April 6, 2018

Rocky Wrench
Please explain how an enemy that is essentially named "Poo that darts around" is not based off of Poo. Because that's what you're saying when you say they aren't a derivative. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2018 (EDT)

Edit reversion
...Wow, I went to hide the revisions and completely forgot to undo the actual edits. Thanks for doing that. 09:43, 16 May 2018 (EDT)
 * You're welcome. Also I waited a bit to make sure that you weren't doing that. 09:47, 16 May 2018 (EDT)

Hi
Can i help you create articles of levels from Super Mario Maker for Nintendo 3DS? 16:45, 8 June 2018 (EDT)
 * I don't know. I have an Excel table that I am using to help make the articles and I have some of that work on my uneditable-by-others sandbox (which I call Wiki Work Space). But, if you are able to edit all the levels of World 18 (not including the last level) and World 19, then you could. Just remember that I want to do some too. Also. The only thing left afterwards is to go back through the pages I already created and see if you can improve them (and they do especially after a proposal requiring the number of enemies be on the level articles). 17:10, 8 June 2018 (EDT)

Well, if you don't want, that's ok. That's why i asked. 18:31, 9 June 2018 (EDT)

Rocky Wrench
I think we should consider Monties a sub species despite the fact that they seem to be the original, while it was only predating. What do you think? For my talk page, click on Of (which is in blue) to tell me your oppinion. -- 10:17, 11 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Ps: In the comment section Talk:Rocky Wrench you call me Yoshi2, since you are called Yoshi by the others. -- 10:18, 11 September 2018 (EDT)
 * And, what do you think about my signature? Does it looks nice? -- 12:00, 11 September 2018 (EDT)

Huffin Puffin
I just started a proposal here. You can vote if you want. -- 10:54, 13 September 2018 (EDT)

Rocky Wrench Reworking Relations proposal
Since two options are both favored by more than half of the total amount of voters each, the proposal should be extended. Please do not change it back. 18:00, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Whoops. Should of actually read this before actually changing it because I saw you put something on my talk page. But, I am waiting on Alex95's word since he hasn't posted his final decision since I made a comment to him. And I mention to him another proposal that also had two options with more than majority vote. One that he was the proposer for it. 18:06, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Okay. (I was about to give you a reminder if not for the comment above.) Also, regarding the proposal you mentioned on Alex95's talk page, that's because each voter voted for only one option each, therefore the winning side had 9/16 as opposed to the losing side's 7/16. The Rocky Wrench proposal, on the other hand, has 9/15 for Option 2 and 8/15 for Option 3. Since both amounts are more than half, the proposal should be extended until only one side constitutes more than half of all voters. 18:16, 15 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Oh right. I thought I was onto something there. Oh well. Even still, if you just look at Option 2 and Option 3 as if they were the only options (it's not but just saying if the proposal was that way), it couldn't of had the 9 to 8 (which leads to 17 instead) due to four users voting for those two options. It is unknown which of the two options the two who didn't vote for either Option 2 or 3, so I won't include them. If the repeated voters aren't taken into account, it is 5 to 4 with Option 2 winning. However, I also mentioned that three (including myself) preferred Option 2 over 3, but only 1 Option 3 over 2. So, the taking the most likely case they would of done into this, this would end of 8 to 5, with Option 2 winning by three votes (the minimum). However, since it was agreed on by the admins to keep the extension, this is just me basically saying what I thought how the proposal should of ended. 18:38, 15 September 2018 (EDT)

Re: London 2012 Olympic Games Wii
Hi, thanks for offering to help! Yeah, once you've finished off those Super Mario Maker levels (Great work on those by the way), if you're interested, the evet articles are the things I'd like to get done first- they all need creating or a rewrite. Some of the article names may need double checking first too. I think it's best to base it off the 100m one (Canoe Sprint 1000m is done in the same way), as I think it covers everything except the London Party information, but that's a different problem. There's also a lot of images in the gallery that can be used at least as a start, and it may be worth checking the title-sharing articles too if more are needed. Thank you though, and there's no need to worry about how fast it gets done, as I probably wouldn't get through it any quicker. :) BBQ Turtle (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Good question, I'm not really sure. If you don't mind the wait, I can do a bit of investigation on Wednesday and double check the names from all of the games for those events, and we can see where to go from there. If the correct name for Badminton is Badminton - Doubles, it can go there with an aboutfile clearing it up and we'll change the current Badminton article to a disambiguation. Singles is going to be split into at least two anyway, but I think that the 2012 Wii article would be OK to go to Table Tennis - Singles anyway, but I think we need to leave fencing for now to get a full clear up of all names before we cause a bit of a mess, but that shouldn't be too much of a problem. Nice work on the articles you've done so far though! :) BBQ Turtle (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2018 (EDT)
 * It doesn't need one, as long as that's the name of the event used in-game, the other two are referred to in-game as "Synchronized Swimming (Doubles)" and "Synchronized Swimming (Team)", so what seem like identifiers are part of the event's name. Just add an about at the top and everything'll be fine, it'd be adding unnecessary identifiers otherwise. BBQ Turtle (talk) 12:05, 25 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Hi, sorry for late response, I just had a huge ton of homework, but I've looked the stuff up. OK, so from what I can piece together, we may have to shuffle things around a bit, as I think we need to go for the second, longer name as opposed to one on the screen, which kind of acts like a class. It's a really confusing way of doing things, but it happens in Rio 2016 too, an example being Swimming and 100m Freestyle Swimming. So things like Equestrian would be a class page, like Canoeing, while the event information would go onto Equestrian - Show Jumping. 100m seems to be the random exception from this rule, as a 100m class is more than illogical, so we'll leave that one as it is. And regarding the stuff about the songs, I don't think you need to go into huge depth about what each song is composed of, though all of the songs need to have their names mentioned, and the separate moves need to be covered (i.e. What a red circle does, what a star does), but we don't need the order- we'd be there forever if we did that. But anything's fine to be moved around if needs be, a redirect or disambiguation page would probably need to have been created there anyway, so it's only a minor inconvenience. BBQ Turtle (talk) 15:55, 27 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Great work on the articles, and you don't need to worry about how long any of it takes, there's no rush. And yeah, if you're still interested, then working on London Party would be great! I think it's probably best to start by making the minigame articles. I personally don't know anything about the online thing with the character list (I'm really not the right person to ask about that, sorry) but I think the list at the bottom of the navigation template probably has most of the games listed, and I think the in-game mission list might help fill in a few gaps. We can always come back later if we need to figure out which characters to talk to for which events. BBQ Turtle (talk) 16:12, 19 October 2018 (EDT)

Theories
Look at this one: Bowser, when he was a child was a kind guy, but it was actually Kamek who made him evil. So, what do you think about mine? Do you agree, or are you neutral? -- 13:14, 19 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Yeah... No. Especially not to the Yoshis. Then later (almost) kidnapped Baby Peach in Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. So, this leaves an unknown small amount of time we don't know about. However, it is unlikely he was kind before the games. 13:33, 19 September 2018 (EDT)
 * In Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island, he implies that Yoshi looks like fun, and wants to ride him. But its true that in Yoshi's Story he was not nice at all. He was maybe jealous of their happiness. You maybe right. -- 13:55, 19 September 2018 (EDT)

Proposal archive
Hi, just letting you know that the color brown is currently not used for proposals that end in no consensus. I once proposed that this be the case (yeah, I messed up the link in one of my edit summaries), but it was met with overwhelming opposition. Please discuss this with another admin before trying to change it back again. Thanks! 11:41, 21 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Working on it. 11:43, 21 September 2018 (EDT)

Hello!
Hey, my name is WeirdDave13. I just wanted to say hello and to say Yoshi rules!

21:13, October 7, 2018 (EDT)