Talk:Tileoid

Should this article be deleted? It describes a purely hypothetical parent species, and I know we've deleted those in the past (though I can't think of any specific examples at the moment). -- 20:44, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
 * Another article like this is the Finley article. I think at best these articles could be converted into disambiguation pages. 20:53, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
 * Definitely delete. This is the exact same situation as Puff (species), and we all know how that went. 21:00, March 30, 2021 (EDT)

What to do with this article
See comments above. While there's indeed no point in having an article on a hypothetical parent species, this one is unique in that no one member can easily be considered the obvious parent species. (You could argue that it would be Tileoid G, but that's still a bit of a stretch.) So then, what should we do with this article?

Proposer: Deadline: April 14, 2021, 23:59 GMT

Delete

 * 1) Second choice.

Convert to disambiguation page

 * 1) Preferred option.
 * 2) Sure, why not.
 * 3) - Kind of already a disambig anyway.
 * 4) As I said above.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Per Alex95.
 * 7) Per all.
 * 8) Magiblot is already like this.
 * 9) Disambiguate with all the different Tileoid colours.

Comments
Should the same thing happen for Finley as well? 21:16, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
 * Not really, since in that case Blue Finleys are clearly meant to be the parent species, seeing as how Red Finleys are slightly less common, and Green Finleys are rather rare. 21:21, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
 * I don't know if I'd count that as sufficient proof that one variant is meant to be the parent species, though. 23:59, April 6, 2021 (EDT)