User talk:Redstar

Re: Yo'ster Isle Article
My comment was in response to you adding a break to the bottom of the article. I dunno why you did that (hense I said, "?") and I removed it; but don't worry, the rest of your changes were perfectly fine. Keep up the good work! - 18:57, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Peach/Daisy in Film
Maybe the information you were adding to the article was correct...I don't know but I do know that Princess Peach is not Princess Daisy in any case at all. Also if a user undoes your edit take it up with the user; don't continue the edit war
 * If that's the case then please do not add the information using the code  as that results in Princess Daisy (click the link).
 * Yes, making a note would be good. However no matter what we cannot make believe that Peach is Daisy.
 * Also, it sort of is Daisy considering her connection with Luigi. User:ForeverDaisy09

Can you continue this conversation with someone who has watched the movie? I don't think I am properly informed to provide information on this subject. If what you are suggesting is that they are similar then yes, they are but they are not the same.

I've seen the movie and she was a dirty blonde, not very feminine (she was a paleontologist), and also Daisy isn't even a brunette she's a redhead. Clearly you don't know enough facts. Sorry. FD09

The Line
You just crossed it. Insult me again and you'll regret it. 1. I'm not a fangirl 2. I'm not a girl 3. Daisy is a redhead. Her official hair color is stated to be orange. I could write a whole paragraph about how she is a redhead, because I have, just go to Daisy's page; which has sources. 4. You should try not to insult other users as it will result in you being punished. 5. Regardless of the traits she has in the film she still has traits of Daisy's as well, regardless of your opinion. It is still Daisy so just get over it.FD09

You called me a fangirl, suggesting I am a girl. You called me a fangirl, which is a personal insult. I said you didn't know the facts because you obviously don't. If you did, you would know, like I already said Daisy is a redhead. If you knew anything, you would know most redheads have orangey-brown hair. Also, in recent years her hair has become more orange, just look at her art for M&SATOWG. AND to finish this off, regardless of the fact the film character has many many traits of Peach's, she still has some of Daisy's, the big one being her name. Therefore it is Daisy. It doesn't matter what your opinion is, because the fact is that it is Daisy. FD09

The real connection to Daisy is her relationship with Luigi. It is not my opinion, as it is a fact in the movie itself. Do you have anything where someone who made or worked on the movie says it is Peach? I doubt it. FD09

I also don't give a care about what real-life connections you have to redheads or your family members. And guess what I"M a redhead. Congratulations trying your real life example on a redhead. Also, while at times her hair has brown tints, it is STATED to be orange: FD09

I'm pretty sure it was around the time the movie came out that Daisy was Luigi's caddy in golf so nice try there. And seriously, I don't need to argue about this with you anymore because even if you try to link the names back to Peach again I'll just get a patroller/sysop/anyone else to ban you for tampering with factual information. Good-bye. FD09

The thing is, I don't NEED to provide you anything. I'm only still talking to you because I've got some free time at the moment. Like I said, the facts are the facts. If you really feel sore about it, you should be smart and go to the proposals page and make a proposal to change the fact the wiki looks at the character as Daisy. I think if anything you should create a proposal that says the information should not apply to either character. If you think applying the character to Daisy now is bad, imagine how stupid it will look when you try to put information on Peach's page that says she appeared in the film as Daisy. So do what you will but just so you know you could get banned for repeating offenses. In my opinion, the film information doesn't even belong on this site, but w/e. FD09

Ok, now you're just being unreasonable. You don't seem to get this isn't just about what I think, it's about what this whole wiki has set. And also, now you're arguing with me about one little thing basically irrelevant to what we were talking about. I thought I might be getting to something with you, but now I realize you're just a waste of my time. I'm basically done talking to you. Oh look, there's your warning right there. FD09


 * When you make an edit after someone reverts it - that is edit warring. Don't do it.
 * First off she's a girl and secondly, she did? I suppose she should be warned too...FD09 - I know you can see this. Don't do it again or I will use right off the bat. Contact the user in question if he/she re-adds the information with a warning and then wait for another user to revert it.

OK, he's a boy (srry) and edit warring is the action of adding content to an article repeatedly after someone reverts it. I see that FD09 was just following the suite of two other users (srry again) so she had the right to do this. You added the content to the article a total of four times after it was reverted. That is edit warring. If you think the content should be in the article then talk with someone about it to see why your content is being removed. ForeverDaisy is obviously ready to talk so why don't you talk to him?