MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool

Remove Featured Article Status

 * 1) I know I didn't make this nomination, but the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured.
 * 2) It needs more images.

Keep Featured Article Status

 * Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, the minor problems are fixed, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
 * 1) Per MCD.
 * 2) I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
 * 3) Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
 * 4) Per MCD
 * 5) Per MCD! :D
 * 6) Per MCD
 * 7) Rewrite template GONE! I change my vote.
 * 8) Per MCD
 * 9) All templates gone. I change my vote.
 * 10) Per MrConcreteDonkey.
 * 11) Per all... I'm Pdjr9000!
 * 12) Per all
 * 13) I don't see anything wrong with this article. Per all

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
MrConcreteDonkey
 * 1) Now there is reasons.

KoopaStrikerCharged
 * 1) All of the rest of the page is written in past tense.

Dr Javelin
 * 1) All tense isn't fixed. And no, it is not good yet.

DKPetey99
 * 1) - The tenses and other problems are fixed. Also, could you explain how it is in such a "horrible" shape. And please explain what issue of Super Mario-Kun he appeared in, and confirm it, because "I think" isn't enough.

Comments
WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason.


 * That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason.

Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape.
 * No, it's not in horrible shape. It's in great shape.

I noticed that this article will be featured on August 20, 2011, and yet it's being requested to be unfeatured. Something doesn't seem right.

@Pdjr9000, Uh.. I don't know where you've been, but any article can become unfeatured..
 * Any article can be unfeatured if it doesn't maintain the requirements needed to stay featured.