User talk:B.wilson

If you leave me a message, I will reply here. Please place this page on your watchlist to watch any reply I will make.

I will archive any post within 24-48 hours if I feel the discussion is over (in most cases, if there are no replies within a day or two).

Please feel free to give me reminders or warnings if I made a mistake (especially if it comes to civility) because I will listen to you, of course, if you are civil.

Please leave me a message by clicking here.

Template
The template you proposed in your proposal can only work with subst:, correct? Is there any way around that? I'd rather not type out subst: every time and have the raw coding splattered at the top of the page.-- 14:20, 16 January 2012 (EST)
 * For now, only subst: will work, but I'll try to change that; and subst: is not a big of a deal, because it substitutes a template with a parameter. -- 23:53, 16 January 2012 (EST)

List of Notices in Brawl article
Just out of curiosity, why did you "userfy" it?
 * In case if the opposers still want to read the article if consensus is to delete it. -- 22:14, 19 January 2012 (EST)

RE:Don't create test pages
I thought you where treating it seriously. Sorry. --New Super Yoshi 14:45, 20 January 2012 (EST)

New userbox
Hi Bryce! I'm glad to see that you are not semi-retired anymore. Thats great! anyway, I've got a new userbox. Here...

Your a fantastic contributer. Keep up the great work!


 * Thanks! -- 07:34, 21 January 2012 (EST)


 * That Super Radio... Good job in giving him a warning, but I previouly gave him a last warning, and he did mention somewhere that he doesn't care how many warnings he recieves, so I don't think it teaches him anything...
 * Given due to behavior. I'll be giving if his noted behavior continues. -- 04:36, 22 January 2012 (EST)


 * We've all had enough. I wish someone would block him.


 * If he continues...just revert his disruptive actions, warn him, don't do anything else. Deny recognition. -- 04:43, 22 January 2012 (EST)


 * is onliine! I'll ask him!


 * Go ahead, my friend. -- 04:46, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Bad-faith reversions
It's plainly seen why I reverted that edit. It added nothing to the article. Redstar 15:15, 23 January 2012 (EST)
 * As I said before, NO ONE could see why, because that edit was helpful and made in good-faith. Reverting good-faith edits without explanation can be seen as a violation of the courtesy policy. -- 20:26, 23 January 2012 (EST)

Hi!
Hey Bryce! I got the urge to say hello. Wanna go to the chat room?


 * Hi YK...I really don't go to the chatroom because I'm busy very often. Are you well? -- 20:35, 23 January 2012 (EST)