Talk:Poison fog

The Pokemon Trainer highly resembles Ash, I know he wasn't the Pokemon trainer, but I thought it was a necessary Redirect in case Ash was mistaken as the trainer.


 * Highly resembles? I'm sorry, but I don't see much of a resemblance, aside from the standard traits shared by most Pokemon protagonists. GreenDisaster 13:04, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

ALL my friends took him for Ash so I see this as necessary. Otherwise, I'd scold all the few (but there aren't only a few) that take him as Ash.


 * I could see someone getting confused and thinking it was Ash but I don't think very many people would.
 * The hair color is different, the eye color is different, and both the style and color of clothing are different. This isn't Ash. Therefore, there's no reason to have a redirect to the trainer called such.

Hey, could I start a proposal? To keep or to not?


 * Go ahead. GreenDisaster 16:38, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Keep or Delete Ash
There is a disagreement between whether to keep Ash as a redirect to the Pokemon or to not.

Proposer: Deadline: June 3, 2012 23:59 GMT

Keep

 * 1) I think Ash looks close enough to the Pokemon Trainer to be a necessary redirect. I want to keep it because of the resemblance to Ash that the Pokemon trainer has to Ash and the fact all my friends thought he was Ash.
 * 2) Ash looks almost like the Pokemon Trainer so it should be a redirect.

Delete

 * 1) They aren't similar at all now that I think about it other then being pokemon trainers.
 * 2) There are few points of resemblance between Ash and Red.
 * 3) Per my comment above.
 * 4) Although Ash may look kind of similar to Pokémon Trainer, they're separate people. Per M4E.
 * 5) The pokemon trainer is never referred to as Ash in Brawl at all.

Comments
This is not how you properly format a proposal. All the coding is on the main proposals page. Also, add to the top of your proposal. GreenDisaster 17:06, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
 * It's not just adding the template. Under the rules section, there is the format that should be followed for a proposal. GreenDisaster 17:41, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
 * And you also need a reason as to why you want to keep this article. GreenDisaster 20:12, 21 May 2012 (EDT)