Talk:Gummit

Umm
How do Gummits resemble Jarvis from Luigi's Mansion?
 * How don't they?
 * First of all, their heads are green, secondly, their heads are in different shapes, then Gummits are not bosses...


 * I agree with Plumber. They have similar facial expressions and similar head shapes. The color means nothing and status as enemy or boss means nothing either. Compare an Electrogoomba to King Kaliente. --

gummits are items not enemies, so you should change this article completely. (Wario mario 13:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC))
 * Proof?
 * Items are objects that can be picked up and used to your own or other's advantage. If you can do that with those things, then they are items. If not, then not. Simple. Judging from what is in the article, they are not items. - 16:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Split?
Should we split those into multiple articles? They all have a separate Japanese name and per how he handle golden enemies. -- 02:49, 17 February 2019 (EST)
 * I'd support it. Niiue (talk) 03:00, 17 February 2019 (EST)
 * If i see no objections on it at this point, they can all be split without any problem. -- 07:59, 17 February 2019 (EST)
 * See Gold Cheep Cheep, and Spiny Cheep Cheep, they are split from the normal Cheep Cheep as well. -- 07:48, 20 February 2019 (EST)
 * Also, should i make a proposal to split them, or just by consensus? -- 05:25, March 27, 2019 (EDT)

Split Golden Gummit and Spiky Gummit out of this page
The Golden Gummit and Spiky Gummit are basically respectively golden and spiky variants of the Gummit. They all worth different points. And we have plenty of golden enemies Gold Banzai Bill split from their parent article. Also, we have Spiny Cheep Cheep split from Cheep Cheep. They also all have different Japanese names.

Proposer: Deadline: April 15, 2019, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) I am in favor of this.
 * 3) This doesn't warrant a proposal.
 * 4) Per Toadette the Achiever.
 * 5) Per proposal.

Oppose

 * 1) This would just create more stubs.

Comments
Does this really need a proposal? The split would be consistent with how the wiki does things anyway, all a proposal would do is make the process take two weeks. Who has lost his tail? 08:00, April 1, 2019 (EDT)
 * This'd bring up more consensus. -- 08:55, April 1, 2019 (EDT)
 * You mean that i should cancel and put immediately into effect? -- 10:41, April 2, 2019 (EDT)
 * Yeah. Who has lost his tail? 22:44, April 2, 2019 (EDT)
 * Yes. 22:56, April 2, 2019 (EDT)

@GrainedCargo192: Stubs are articles that lack information, and therefore not all short articles are stubs. 23:52, April 4, 2019 (EDT)
 * I agree with Toadette the Achiever! Not all short articles are stubs. -- 11:42, April 6, 2019 (EDT)