User talk:Prince Ludwig

Signature
Everytime you post something on talk page, put "~&#126;" at the end. I'm tired on signing your comments.

"Latest Game Appearance" clarification
Hey there, Prince Ludwig -- about the edit you did on the Birdo article -- the "Latest Game Appearance" part of the character infobox was meant to give folks information on what recent major Mario series (or branched, under Nintendo, of course) installment he or she appeared in (when the game itself in question has just been released). The Super Mario All-Stars - 25th Anniversary Edition installment is considered to be minor because it's a compilation of remakes from previous installments of the Mario series (SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMB: LLz) hence why that "appearance" doesn't count in this case. Thanks for understanding. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 15:48, 4 May 2011 (EDT)

Reminder
there is no official source that has Yoshi's and Wart meeting so unless you have one don't put it in

Warning
The information that you added to the Wart article is unfounded, and is therefore speculative. You need to stop putting it back in after it has been removed.

13:08, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

Re:Speculation?
"He may have knowledge on the Yoshis." But see, that's just it right there; anytime there is a situation where you have to use words like "may," "maybe," "might," "possibly," etc., that implies speculative information, which is not appropriate to add to articles under any circumstances. However, the legitimacy of the information that you added to the article was not the main concern. You were involved in an edit war, and the next time a situation like that arises (if information you add to an article is called into question by other users), you should bring your concerns up on the talk page of an administrator, as opposed to continually reverting others' edits, as doing so is counterproductive to the wiki.

04:21, 7 May 2011 (EDT)

Mega Mole
Official artwork cause it look to blurry to be official artwork

Also where did you get that picture from

your gonna want to talk to this guy about images http://www.mariowiki.com/User:Coincollector

your edits
where are you getting your info cause a lot appears to be speculation like calling Birdo, Warts favorite minion where did you get that or is that your own opinion


 * It's still speculation and they all risked their lives for Wart also the 8-bit club only applies to the Shy Guys, Snifits, and Beezo


 * I think the 8-bits are like mercenaries and i think it's mentioned somewhere in the original manual that the 8 bit club consists of shy guys, snifits, and beezos, and about birdo your probably right but it's not official so it's prolly best not to mention it in the article

Let's discuss
I've added some of my reasons here

on the one hand you are right with the images, on the other hand the info placed here is unnecessary. It makes inconsistensy respect to the other articles, the other artciles I've seen has a Cameos section on their histories that only talk their appearances and a brief description of their role in the other series. This one goes too far...

Your comment has no explanation. How can you know he moved from Subcon to another Dream, has Wart ever said he lived in another place? No, you can't because you invented it. That's a point of view and speculation of yours, so stop undoing what I've done there because you're wrong.

Even so you're wrong... In your text it says he was exiled and went to koholint yadda-yadda... where have you taken that? even the Mamu's page of Zeldawiki doesn't tell something like this. And last, the rest of your info after this was taken from the zeldawiki... that's stealing. Now leave me alone...

Last Warning

 * For edit warring.

Answer
First off i hope Xzelion doesnt mind but i'll take a crack at answering this one, it's because you keep inserting edits from unconfirmed soucres despite being told not to do that no one is targeting you just listend to the admins and don't put any more speculative info in articles
 * Because you undid a good faith by an admin, one you swiftly undid. Coincollector had his reasons, reason which followed MarioWiki protocol and policy, you undid it with no real reason other than speculation. Goomba's Shoe15 was only doing what any good users would've done in reverting your edits, and don't pretend you're innocent. This isn't the first time we've had to warn you for edit warring and adding speculative information. I had hoped you would have learned your lesson after last time, but no, you remain unreformed in this department. And that is why you were warned, not because I'm "picking on you" or because I don't like you, it's because you remain hard-headed in this matter. If someone undoes your edit, talk it to the talk page instead of starting an edit war. The part of it that's worst is in an edit summary you said "Let's not make edit war" so you knew what you were doing was wrong, and you did it anyway.
 * I don't give a crap who started it, it's ending, one way or another. You weren't "targeted" I gave you the warning per the reason I stated above, and ignorance doesn't excuse your actions. Did I say you were "evil"? No. I said that what Goomba's Shoe did a handful of other users would've done in this case, heck I would've undone your edits if he hadn't already. And just because you were right on one subject, does not make you right on every matter. Also if you're not hard-headed, if you have learned your lesson, then why do you continue this path of action? You can say you've learned your lesson, but until you put those words in action, you're not fooling anyone.
 * Do you just stay up at night hunting for articles with speculation in it? And not do anything about? Just so you can hanging over our heads when we warn you about adding speculation? If you find speculation about a subject, bring it up on the blasted talk page or if it's outright speculation remove it. "So now I'm fooling anyone?" What the hell are you talking about? You claimed that you had learned your lesson about edit warring, yet you still continue to do it, and until you stop your constant edit warring... and I said "You're not fooling anyone", as in no-one is going to believe that you've reformed. And Goomba's Shoe15, did nothing wrong. If a troll vandalizes an article and an user reverts that edit, and they go on and on and on, is that user edit warring? The same standard applies here, your edit is in conflict with our policies, Goomba's Shoe15 did his best to keep the Wiki inline with our policies.
 * Look, this is the last time I'm going to respond to you on this subject, we're not getting any where and you just don't seem to understand what I'm saying half the time. "And you know what it means vandalisme?" I'm going to assume that you were trying to ask if I knew what vandalism meant, I hope you know I've been a frequent member of this Wiki Admin team. And that I've block my share of vandals and reverted my share of vandalism in my day. Second of all, did you even read what I said? I never said you were a vandal or that you were vandalizing the wiki, I used that as an example of why Goomba's Shoe15 shouldn't and will not receive a warning for his actions, because he was acting on behalf of the Wiki's policies. When I saw the edit war happen, I decided to warn you because of the reasons I've listed above, and I decided not to warn Goomba's Soe15, once again, because of my reasons above. I stand by those decisions, and it will not change.
 * And stop saying you've "changed" or "learned your lesson", I don't care how many times you say it, you still edit warred again, that itself says enough by your claims. Stop saying you learned your lesson, and show me by your actions that you've changed.

Proof
the opening cut scene shows Mario being thanked for saving the land of subcon by the king of subcon with the golden statues of mario that is proof that is proof enough that the game took place after Super Mario Bros. 2