Talk:Giant Kirby

Are pages like this actually needed? What's the big difference between Giant Kirby and a giant Kirby? - 14:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

I guess we should merge it. Just write down on Kirby's page: "after beating all of the Kirby's, a Giant Kirby will appear to battle the player". So, yeah, merge it.

Merge Giant Kirby to Kirby
I don't really see the point of separate articles like these when this character is simply a bigger version of Kirby with no distinct abilities other than size. We can mention a giant Kirby gets battled as a boss in Super Smash Bros. Melee in the Kirby article and things will still be fine.

If this proposal goes well, I'll suggest merging other characters that will warrant this, namely Giant Donkey Kong and Giant Bowser. We should also do this for consistent sake, since Giant Baby Bowser is a redirect, unlike the other giant characters.


 * Proposer:
 * Deadline: 10 March 2011 24:00 (GMT)

Merge it

 * 1) I am Zero! Per BLOF and per my reasoning in the Ridley, Meta Ridley proposal, leave it to the WiKirby or Smash Wiki. Zero signing out.
 * 2) I think it will be good. It is basically just Kirby in a giant form.
 * 3) It's just Kirby but bigger.
 * 4) Per Zero.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) I now will call this factor the Ridley Rule. Per all.
 * 7) Per all.
 * 8) I can easily hack Mario to be huge, but how come he still does not deserve an article called "Giant Mario"? We might need an article on Giant Mario for the event match. No. There is no point. Merge.
 * 1) I can easily hack Mario to be huge, but how come he still does not deserve an article called "Giant Mario"? We might need an article on Giant Mario for the event match. No. There is no point. Merge.

Leave it

 * 1) Then you should merge Giant Donkey Kong and many others to subject articles.
 * 2) Giant Kirby is not a big version of Kirby. Why would someone merge them?
 * 3) Per Pokemon Trainer Mario. They are not the same person!

Comments
SWFlash: Did you even read my proposal statement?