User talk:Time Turner/Archive 6

Hello to all MarioWiki users! I'm Reversinator, and you presumably came to my talk page to talk to me. So here's the rules you must remember:

Everybody got that? Good. Now talk to me!
 * 1) Sign all of your comments so I know who left it.
 * 2) Spelling and grammar are extremely prefered.
 * 3) No vandalism, no trolling, no spamming, blah blah blah.
 * 4) I will reply to you on your talk page.
 * 5) I am fluent in French, English and Portugese, so if you wish to talk to me in any of those languages, feel free to.
 * 6) Try to be civil, but still have a sense of humor. In other words, no leet, no swearing, no threatning, blah blah blah.
 * 7) Whenver starting a new conversation, put it under a new header.
 * 8) My signature is and will always be

Archive?
Hi there, while patrolling I noticed you made a certain edit here: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Brown_Yoshi&curid=42853&diff=732169&oldid=732168 ...

This is, of course, six days late, but I must know -- why, exactly, did you remove 's vote? And why did you list it as "NO QUORUM"? Just curious. 20:37, 26 March 2010 (EDT)
 * We do technically extend proposals, but, yes, you're right, It was after the vote. And, yes, the clear majority of three was not defined. I looked back at my proposal, and that's what was passed; for some reason, it's not on the Proposal page. I'll add that there, and thanks for the clearing up. ;) 00:50, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

Discuss
Feel free to discuss it on the talk page now. ForeverDaisy09 10:19, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Be patient? I think it's been long enough for at least YOU to respond on the talk page. You are the only one who cares so far so YOU should have something to "discuss". Quit waiting for others opinions. ForeverDaisy09 11:54, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Removing shroom warning
with your permission I would like to remove your warnings of the unconstructive edits of the fake news section. I have learned my lessson and will not do it again. please post your reply on my talk page.

green power star edits
Hey Reversinator -- I appreciate your desire to keep the wiki tight. I'm wondering, though, what exactly you consider worse, in the edits I made re green power stars.

I can see an argument that the 3rd-level header with the exact location of each green star belongs on the game's main page, though to me that seems rather detailed info and there is already a link to the page about green power star details. (And, the exact same info is given on the pages in different ways -- at the very least, we should choose the clearer way and use it in both places, if it really needs to be replicated.)

I'm a bit more stumped on the reversion of the prose edits: Converting passive to active voice, getting rid of awkward constructs like 'a high quantity of', merging the exact same info presented twice in different ways (|edit history) and (on green star page) keeping the non-gameplay detail about how green stars are created out of the paragraph all about how green stars affect gameplay; that unrelated sentence sticks out like a sore thumb in the paragraph, no??

Let me know. Bon apres-midi, not-just-yeti 16:09, 28 March 2010 (EDT)


 * And I see that you undid the spoiler warning on the description of what happens in Bowser's Galaxy Reactor, even though that same info **is** considered a spoiler on the main SMG page. (It's the description of the plot that happens after the penultimate scene -- the last scene which many players will ever see.)  Why is it a spoiler in one place and not another?  Please let me know, thx.

not-just-yeti 07:36, 30 March 2010 (EDT)