User talk:Marioguy1/Archive 6

Re: Cream
Yeah, that's what I meant. But avoid the "one word" quotes. ;) Also, I'll be happy to protect said pages; just let me know when you're ready for me to do said job. :) --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 01:25, 5 November 2009 (EST)

HIYA
There's a new version of my proposal and if you were okay with the other one you should definitely not have a problem with this one! ;) FD09

Yeah, I appreciate it a lot! Thank you! FD09

Block against PrincessPeach16
Not to worry; I did see recent evidence on the Princess Daisy article -- I placed a 1 week block on PrincessPeach16. Hopefully this person will make REAL edits to said article next time. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 19:13, 8 November 2009 (EST)

Proposal
Hi, I'd just like to comment on your vote on FD09's proposal about the organization of history articles. You're right in that the change FD09 proposes would allow users to narrow down their search to a certain category. The question is whether we want that. 'cause this only makes sense if there are crucial differences between those categories. But what differences would that be? There is no crucial difference between video games and comics, between TV shows and games. All of them are equal when it comes to "canon". Just like you can argue that the change would allow us to narrow down our search to certain categories, one could as well say that our current way of organizing articles allows us to search by series (which, moreover, are ordered chronologically). It would be cool if you could reconsider your vote. At the moment it looks like the proposal is going to pass, but the deadline is today at 17:00 EST today; and since there are many different opinions, it'd be great if we managed to at least extend the deadline to be able to discuss the matter further. Thanks in advance! 06:42, 9 November 2009 (EST)

RE: M.S.O.G.
...?! Hmm... weird... must have been when I was reverting an edit by another sysop. Sorry about that; you can post said link again. Also, I check the quotes pages for M.S.O.G. -- you're still putting in quotes that are not necessary (i.e., the "one worders", and some stuff needs to be clarified, like some of the lines from Team Mario have been borrowed from other installments). When I see about editing said pages, I'll make a note of that. ;) --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:18, 13 November 2009 (EST)


 * It's in the plans, I'm dealing with other stuff here at the moment. Also, I have an idea about said articles which I'll place on the talk page. :) --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:35, 13 November 2009 (EST)

Yo
"We are an encyclopedia and encyclopedias are about giving full knowledge on a subject. What if someone is looking for Bowser's actor in SMB? If we list only the most recent then that person will not get the information that they are looking for." You don't seem to get the fact that is what the portrayals sections on pages are for. A person can look in the ACTUAL ARTICLE of our ENCYCLOPEDIA and see who portrayed him. The point of the infobox is so users see the vital information. The point isn't getting rid of information at all. You seem to state that making it changed will take away information. There is nothing the user won't be able to find out about in terms of portrayals, it is just that the infobox needs to be simpler and having all that is useless when you can look on the page. The user still has access to all information. FD09


 * Is the Super Mario Sunshine article better?--

...
DO you have a phone ? Can YOU can Nintendo ?! Are you deaf or never played SM64 and heard mario's voice ?!

--a LOLLER

Peach/Daisy in Film
I never meant to imply that Princess Peach and Princess Daisy are the same character, but the fact remains that the "Daisy" in the film is meant to be Princess Peach. The character King Bowser is Daisy's father and a hero, but no one suggests his name as the basis for assuming he is the game-counterpart King Bowser Koopa. The names are merely an aesthetic choice. Redstar 00:06, 22 November 2009 (EST)
 * Why not? Her name is Princess Daisy, but her corresponding video game character is Princess Peach. I suppose we can make a note about it, like I did with King Bowser as the Mushroom King. Redstar 00:17, 22 November 2009 (EST)
 * It doesn't seem to be "make believe" to me... Add her character traits up and see where it gets you. Daisy is blonde, feminine, and the princess of the Mushroom Kingdom. All of those indicate the game-Peach, whereas if she was brunette, a tomboy, and the Princess of a flowery kingdom, people would be more prone to believe her to be the film counterpart to the game Daisy. Redstar 00:25, 22 November 2009 (EST)
 * The film versions of Mario, Luigi, and Koopa aren't exactly the same as their video game-counterparts in terms of personality and appearance, but they most assuredly are the same characters. The same is true for Princess Daisy being the film counterpart of the video game Princess Peach, even if they don't have all the same qualities (such as the same name). Redstar 00:31, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Edit Warring
I haven't reverted or changed any Super Mario Bros. (film)-related articles since I began talking with that person. I have removed some information from the Baby Daisy page, if that's what you mean, but I provided a legitimate reason why. That person has not. He reverted me first, which makes that person just as guilty of "edit warring" as me. Redstar
 * He did the same exact thing. Redstar 01:38, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Marioguy, this person was already having their edits reverted by other people. I think you already know what's up here, but I'm leaving my input. lol FD09

Marioguy don't let this person confuse you, but yeah I'm a he. Also, just look at the edits to the Baby Daisy article, merit and lindsayoris already reverted them so I was simply following their actions. Are you going to leave them warnings too? I doubt it. You were right in giving redstar a warning. FD09


 * Well, he/she told me he/she's male... So, dunno there.


 * I've looked at the edits myself. MeritC made an edit before I ever went to the Baby Daisy page, and Lindsayoris15 made no reversion of any of my edits. ForeverDaisy09 is obfuscating the facts, which you can confirm for yourself by checking the edit history. Redstar 01:49, 22 November 2009 (EST)

http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Baby_Daisy&diff=670114&oldid=670109 If you look there linsayoris did. I was mistaken about merit apparently, however. FD09
 * I will respond here from now on - FD09 has shown the Lindsayoris revision and was mistaken about MC. Please talk the information over with another user before re-adding it to an article.