User talk:Smasher345

Bowser attacking Kamek
You just edited the Kamed and the Bowser articles because you say Bowser only attacked once Kamek. But in New Super Mario Bros. Wii, in the last level of the game, Bowser knocked Kamed out when he become giant.

What I mean is that Bowser has only ever attacked Kamek on purpose once when he was a baby. Bowser accidentally knocks Kamek out of his broom in New Super Mario Bros. Wii. That wasn't intentional.


 * Yes, I agree. We maybe should say this (by saying it wasn't intentionnal) in the article, what do you think about it ? 12:57, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Well it's already mentioned in Bowser's article, so I guess we should edit the Kamek article into mentioning it. As a matter of fact, I think I'll do it now. Smasher345


 * I think that's good like this :) 17:11, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Actually you know what, now that I think about it, we should also mention that Bowser did the same thing to the Koopalings in New Super Mario Bros. 2.

RE: Boom Boom
Hi. I've read the discussion that took place on the talk. I don't think the whole page should be moved to, but it should be mentioned in the relevant sections on the page when there is a hint of multiple Boom Booms. The reason for this is that Nintendo has not officially gone and said that Boom Boom is a species (unlike what they did with the Koopalings), so moving the article entirely could lead to a whole lot of speculation about how we could explain the Super Mario Bros. 3 appearance. Because of this, I discourage moving the entire page unless there is some solid (official) evidence in the future. But I'm sure it would be okay to rewrite the relevant sections on the article. Also I don't believe in that clone stuff. There's nothing to back it up.

23:58, 30 December 2012 (EST)