User talk:Stonehill

(Unnamed Section)
Hi, although usually, I don't mind if somebody enacted a (talk page) proposal before I get to do it, users tend to appreciate it if you ask them first before doing anything. I've seen some other users get reprimanded for enacting proposals before the proposer can do anything, so it's just a heads-up.

Nevertheless, thanks for doing the work. 14:45, 24 May 2014 (EDT)


 * Okay, sorry, I didn't know. You're welcome, though! Stonehill (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2014 (EDT)

Signature test #1
Let's try it.  At last, the rock fell. (Tested on 08:25, 6 June 2014 (EDT)) 

Signature test #2
It should work with the timestamp.  At last, the rock fell. 15:34, 6 June 2014 (EDT)

Proposal header
Do not create an empty proposal section like Archive 40. When the time comes to archive the proposal it will be created then, there is no need for an empty archive.

Okay, I just wanted to know.  At last, the rock fell. 13:40, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

RE:About what you did to a sockpuppet's talk page
You have misread policy, as it states "Extra accounts (sockpuppets) should be blocked indefinitely and their talk pages should be deleted."
 * Oops. Sorry about that.  At last, the rock fell.

Subpage
Friendly reminder: you're not supposed to have any subpage to your userpage. If you wish to keep its content, move it to your userpage, because I think will be deleted soon. (Referring to User:Stonehill/logo)

New article
Hi. When you create an article, please make sure to place all relevant information in it. Is is unacceptable to create an incomplete articles, and there will be consequences if you do it again.

Re:Deleting section-only notice templates
Unlike the other templates, and  have different designs beyond just a straight word-swap (different size images, one has a built-in clear function, etc.) so I was just going to leave them both alone. - 18:32, 19 February 2015 (EST)

Proposal
I'm aware, but thanks anyways. On another note, I noticed that you're using the raw code for your signature (i.e. ). In the future, please refrain from doing this and instead use the subpage you already have  when signing. You can copy and paste the previous code whenever you'd like to sign, or if you'd like, you can click on the "preferences" tab at the top-right, scroll down to the signature header, fill the box that says "New signature" with, and then you can use it simply by typing three tildes.
 * I wouldn't know why that's happening, sorry to say. Try looking through Help:Signature or asking another experienced user about this.

Signature Test #3
Test signature. (Tested on 15:42, 3 March 2015 (EST))

Re:New message
No need to message me when you respond on MW:Proposals. I have it on my watchlist and check in whenever I come online. Also (and this is the real reason I'm messaging you), to get the date from showing up in the box when you sign, put the on the same line as the sig, rather than skipping a line after - I'm pretty sure that's what's making it go wonky. - 17:48, 4 March 2015 (EST)
 * Okay, got it. 18:04, 4 March 2015 (EST)

'Shroom demo
Stonehill, I need to write a demo for a 'shroom submission form, and I would like to do the interview part so can I interview you?

Reminder
It was my intention to create the articles for minigames in Mario Party 10. As per Courtesy, users should not join in another user's project without asking first. This is edit sniping. 15:34, 27 March 2015 (EDT)
 * I'm going to call unfair on this one. When a new game is released, it would be detrimental to the wiki for only one person to create the articles when there are many others who are capable. If the game has been released for a while and no effort is being made toward it, then sure, shotgun can be called on it.
 * Stonehill, if you'd like, you can try to appeal the reminder at Appeals.
 * Plus, this user never ever told anyone that he/she would plan to create pages for the minigames.
 * I said so on my userpage. 20:04, 27 March 2015 (EDT)
 * Sorry. Please disregard the last message. (Although I did change it accordingly at Appeals.)