MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/List of Tayce T. recipes

Support

 * 1) - Complete, informative, has all the possible images, this is an article I am really proud of.

Oppose

 * 1) - It has been 3/4 days, and a different reason. If it is a list, we should have all the ways it can, not just one or two. Also the ingredient part should have in it as it makes it look better.

Removal of Oppose Votes
Baby Mario Bloops
 * 1) Not needed, and that is nearly impossible to do since theres so many ways of them.

Comments
- Also, you need a strong intro paragraph and a picture to use on the front page if it will be featured.
 * OK, I will get to those. About the selling prices, they vary strongly, which should I use?
 * Pretty much do Toad Town, since those are the main stores found in the game.
 * Ok, I will get to do research on the weekend.

@Opposers: INstead of just saying that the intro paragraph needs fixing, why don't you fix it? After all, that is the purpose of nominations, to fix the errors in an article.

I just put the construction back because of the prices. I can't fix it however because I dont have this game. (so far)

All done.

KS3: How is it not the same?

Booderdash: This article is the same thing as the other; it's just items arranged in a different way. Mario Super Sluggers and Mario Superstar Baseball are two different games!
 * Well, List of Shops to me are irrelevant, but its still featured
 * It's not about relevancy; it's just that this article looks way too identical to the list by ingredients.
 * Not really, I use the by ingredient page to find what items I can make with a certian object, while I use the by recipes page to find out how to finish my recipes.
 * Doesn't mean both of these articles have to be featured.
 * Apparently, as they are both meeting of the FA standards.
 * No, they are different articles, or we will have to merge them for being clones of each other.
 * @LGM: GO make a TPP merging those two together because they are the same, and see what is the outcome...
 * Yes, they may be different articles, but the items represented here are just arranged in a different way.

And I guess it would be more convenient for Booderdash if it is merged.
 * So? Still has every right to be featured right? And what do I have to do with this?
 * It might has every right, but the problem is, it is way too similar to the one by ingredients. And if it was merged, then we wouldn't have to click back and forth the see the ingredients and that other crap.
 * No it was ok. I used the by ingredient one when I was just going through the game, but I used the by recipe when I've already finished the game and going 100%. That was Ttyd and Spm though since I don't have this game.
 * If you really want to see what item can do what, just press ctrl f and type in the item. :P
 * I've actually just found that out a week ago after I've beaten Super Paper Mario, but I've been doing that for Ttyd. But not many people know about the "find" feature though.
 * And most people would go to GameFAQs or something like that if they want to see the recipes, not MarioWiki. Of course, there are some exceptions... But still, my complaint: this article is too similar to the one by ingredient.
 * Gamefaqs has about 3000 guides by 3000 users and they're all different:I mean the information meaning some of them have false information, at least on Mariowiki, you can edit it if its false.
 * Usually, the FAQs for the game you are looking for is correct; the people on the board will say something if stated otherwise.

Guys, stop it. They are different. We are 3 vs 1. No need to discuss. If both meet FA standards, then both can be FA's.
 * Wait a second, can I re-oppose? I mean, I did everything I could do to tell everyone that I was unable to be on from the 25th-31th of July. During that period, my vote was removed before I could change it. I am just saying this because last time I re-added my vote, I got a reminder/warning (whichever it was). Please can someone answer soon? Thank you.
 * I think its after 3-4 days after it was removed, and as long as the reason is different, then you may oppose again. That's what I think. I don't know elsewise however.