MarioWiki talk:Maintenance

Down there where it says Special:Unusedfiles it is supposed to be Special:Unusedimages. I  am   Confused  23:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

SuperLuigi821/Archive 1
Now this is mystic. 15:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

Coding problems
In the code of the page, I found a spelling mistake. See here:

|RW || Rewrite || Poorly-written articles (e.g. ridden with grammar mistakes) that need to be fixed, or articles dumped from Wikipedia that need originality here. || Normal:

On a second thought, is it even correct to write the category name there? Shouldn't there be instead? - 14:07, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 * The coding of the page really needs a serious update. Now, my personal image was listed as unlicensed, because the new version of the Creative Commons license was not updated here. When is it going to be updated? - 16:27, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 * When someone decides to semi-protect this page (I just requested it), I'll get to it. 16:38, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 * Well, if it was, I could even handle it myself. But it would have to wait until tomorrow. - 16:39, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

SMRPG No Category?
Why does SMRPG appear in the no category section, despite being in several categories? -- Son of Suns
 * It seems to be a glitch that occasionally happens. We have experienced it before. The article has plenty of categories, but the Maintenance states it has none. Someone has to edit the page, even make a minor edit, in order for Maintenance to state that it has a Category. Don't ask me why that happens.
 * No. Probably it had instead of  . That space confuses DPL  11:22, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

Welcome Committee
Who's gonna take over the Welcome Committee since Xzelion retired?

I think the Welcoming Comittee part is useless, you can still welcome new users even if you are not a part of the comitee, all but 1 of it's member are retired/inactive, and all-around, it's rather pointless. Anyone object removing it?
 * I never understood its use. - 15:10, 27 January 2008 (EST)


 * Okay, thanks.

Change?
Did the table changed or its just my browser, if so, why? i prefered the other one
 * redesigned the table so that it would load quicker. 12:25, 6 February 2009 (EST)