Talk:Crystal King

Merge to Crystal King article
Note: This discussion was moved here from the former "Crystal Bit" talk page.

MERGE TO Crystal King 0-9-2

This enemy is merely an extension of the Crystal King rather than individual enemies. This is outright stated by the Tattle information. Merging results in a more comprehensive article, as well as cutting down on division of information. Redstar 20:58, 15 December 2009 (EST)

Merge to Crystal King

 * 1) - Per proposal.
 * 2) -- Ughhh... As much as I don't want to merge this, I'll vote yes on this one. The tattle says explicitly that it's a piece of the King, so OK.
 * 3) I am Zero! It will make the Crystal King article look better because the crystal bits are in the picture and referenced also. Zero signing out.
 * 4) - Tattle description says they're pieces of the King. Settles it for me.
 * 5) User:Yoshionfire Basically they are only found with him nowhere else so they should have a section on the Crystal king page
 * 6) - Per Zero
 * 7) - Agreed with all of thee above. Can we start merging this yet, since it have no opposers and 7 supporters now?
 * 8) - Per all.
 * 9) Per all.

Leave un-merged

 * 1) - Per the reasons I have gave a zillion of times.
 * 2) Per Tucayo.

Comments
@Baby Mario Bloops: It's been five days since the proposal was put up. Give it two more to make a full week and allow for any opposition to come up, then I think enough time will have passed for me to go ahead and merge. Redstar 01:16, 21 December 2009 (EST)

The proposal has been up since December 16th of 2009 (8 days). SevenEight Nine votes in favor, one against. It appears to be a clear majority-rule in favor of merging, and with enough time passed I feel I could finish it up and complete the actual merge. With a sysop's assent, I'll go ahead and do so. Redstar 01:24, 24 December 2009 (EST)
 * Ok, according to the new rules you have to wait 2 weeks, even if there is a clear margin. -- 10:43, 24 December 2009 (EST)
 * What new rules? Bloc's proposal has one more day until the deadline, and this and many other proposals began quite awhile ago, some even before that proposal was created. It's a grandfather-clause, I should think. Redstar 14:44, 24 December 2009 (EST)
 * Well, then we wait until tomorrow, and then, you have to wait 2 weeks. -- 16:14, 24 December 2009 (EST)
 * @Tucayo: What reasons did you give a zillion of times?
 * Talk:Tubba_Blubba's_Heart -- 16:34, 24 December 2009 (EST)

Umm... I don't see any problem with extending the deadline two weeks... Still, it's a really long time. How about we extend the deadline until the 1st? It's only one week, and is much more preferable...

It's January 1st. Should I merge this now?

'The end of the discussion moved here from the former "Crystal Bit" talk page. Please do not edit or continue discussion.'

Tips
Should the bit about how to beat the Crystal King be included?

Split Crystal King and Crystal Bit
These should be split, because they're separate enemies, and both Lava Bud and Petit Piranha get articles too, so this should be done for consistency.

Proposer: Deadline: August 21, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) Per proposal.
 * 3) Per proposal.
 * 4) Crystals is separate from Culex, and that's in the same boat as Crystal Bits, so I support this proposal.
 * 5) Per Magikrazy.

Oppose

 * 1) Per the proposal above, one of the supporter say the tattle implied they are piece from the king. So since a tattle from in-game say they are piece from the Crystal King and they are not appear as singular enemy they need to stay merge.

Comments
Wait, any reason Lava Bud isn't merged with Lava Piranha? I'm seeing a successful talk page proposal on merging it, but I don't see either history on the respective articles reflecting this proposal decision. 20:05, 7 August 2015 (EDT)
 * I look on the talk page history and it appear that this proposal was made on december 2009, pretty long time have passed. I bet I will make a another proposal about it.-- 20:12, 7 August 2015 (EDT)