Talk:Puff (species)

Is this page needed, when we also have Ruff Puff already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)


 * Nope, just a wasted space. And also reac the trivia, WTF?--

Delete Puff (species)
DELETE 9-0

There's no need for this page considering Ruff Puffs are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.

Proposer: Deadline: May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) What's even the point in keeping it?
 * 3) Per Proposal.
 * 4) That is a must go for this article! Per all!
 * 5) This is a thing?
 * 6) Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not that expansive and we have the root species.
 * 7) - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about multiple species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish...
 * 8) Per Mario and Walkazo
 * 9) Per all.