Talk:Mike

Mike's Theme
Shouldn't someone who's made it far enough into WarioWare: Touched! add the Lyrics to Mike's Song to his article? I haven't gotten far enough into the game to hear the song, or else I would add it myself. Super Fuelbot 19:30, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I think I remember them all, want me to do that? ;) -- MrsCrygor 16:53, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * At least for the SSBB song these lyrics actually here are incomplete and maybe wrong ("Off-key? No, not me!" elsewhere is also "Rock me! Know what I mean?" and maybe it could be "Rock me, mon ami!". -Bernd (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
 * This is a combination of most lyrics of the WW:T version in the net; where "[A/B]" means it's either "A" or "B" and where imho "B" seems superior/more correct compared to "A" & "_" means line break.

(Go! Go! [Go go/Go! Go!/Go, go,] Mike! Go! Go! [Go go/Go! Go!/Go, go,] Mike!) My name is Mike, [and now/come on,] let's robo-karaoke! (Rock the mic[, r/! R]ock the mic!) Get up on the stage and sing a little ditty for me! (Rock the mic[, r/! R]ock the mic!) [Off-key?/All me,/Rock me!] [No, not me!/Know what I mean?] I'm a karaoke machine! (Rock the mic!) I got [the/two] mics on my head and you sing into me! (Rock the mic[, r/! R]ock the mic!) [Don't you wanna, don't you wanna/Don't you wanna,_Don't you wanna,] Don't you wanna karaoke? (Rock the mic[, r/! R]ock the mic!) [Off-key?/All me,/Rock me!] [No, not me!/Know what I mean?] I'm a karaoke machine! (Rock the mic!)
 * -Bernd (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2012 (EDT)

Seperation
Ashley's Song has it's own page. Shouldn't Mike's Song? Peanutjon 21:57, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
 * If you feel the two should be separate, you can make a proposal. Everything you need to know about doing that can be found here.

Split into Mike and
Ashley's Song is a separate page from Ashley. We didn't merge Drifting Away with Dribble and Spitz or merge Four Seasons with Kat and Ana, so does Mike's Theme share a page? It's a noteworthy song that has appeared in two games.

Proposer: Deadline: September 22, 2018, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) - Per proposal
 * 2) - For consistency reasons, sure.
 * 3) Absolutely.
 * 4) This is merged? Huh.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Definitely, per all.
 * 7) Per all.
 * 8) I thought it already had its own article
 * 9) Per all.
 * 10) In all honesty, the page can just easily be moved without needing a proposal. Per all.
 * 11) Proposal is not needed.

Comments
Upon looking at the rules of proposals, this one actually violates rule 15, which states, and I quote: "Unless there is major disagreement about whether certain content should be included, there should not be proposals about creating, expanding, rewriting or otherwise fixing up pages." Since this proposal is about creating a new page, it violates the rules. Even if it didn't, this proposal would be highly unnecessary anyway. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 10:12, 10 September 2018 (EDT)