User talk:Henry Tucayo Clay

Welcome to my page! --http://themushroomkingdom.net/images/ani/ani_all2mariopicksmall.gif http://themushroomkingdom.net/images/ani/ani_smwberrypink.gif TUCAYO http://themushroomkingdom.net/images/ani/ani_mk64_lakitu.gif http://themushroomkingdom.net/images/ani/ani_all2spark.gif 18:15, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

Please refrain from posting lots of images. Thanks.

Questionable username
I'm not sure if this would count as an unacceptable username. Could you look into it please? Thanks. 13:06, 18 December 2015 (EST)
 * Hmmm... I'm a bit on the fence about it, I'll ask for input from the other admins. -- 14:04, 18 December 2015 (EST)

MarioWiki:Everybody is equal
I'm wondering if we can create a project page claiming that every user, whether new or long-lasting, is treated equally amongst each other, and are just as valuable as one another. Drilly  the   Elfhog  02:43, 21 December 2015 (EST)
 * Hello! That's a very good principle, but I feel creating a specific page to mention it is not entirely necessary, given it's mentioned here, here, and it would classify as common sense as well. -- 10:59, 21 December 2015 (EST)
 * I see, as long as they mention something like "Administrators are not kings and queens, and can still be penalized in the same way as normal users should they ever violate the regulations.". Drilly   the   Elfhog  12:16, 21 December 2015 (EST)

RE:Uploads
Thanks! I try to help out wherever I can! I'm also occasionally finding duplicates and end up reusing assets while tagging the inferior images to be deleted. One such instance was Rainbow Note and File:Shrinking_Tiles.PNG. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2015 (EST)

' Can you be my running mate please '

Deletion of Green Space (Mario Party 9) redirect
I remove all what's linking to this redirect. The only one remaining is from Toa 95's page, but I'm not allowed to remove it.-- 17:59, 28 December 2015 (EST)
 * Perfect, thanks! -- 18:02, 28 December 2015 (EST)

The 'Shroom Images
I noticed you and a few other admins have been untagging images for deletion if they are used for The 'Shroom. I get that this decision is made to preserve older issues of The 'Shroom but I tag them for deletion because if you look at MediaWiki Categories, they appear as duplicates because they have been categorized as such, such as Category:Super Paper Mario Images and Category:Mario Kart DS Images for examples. I was hoping an admin would make minor changes to The 'Shroom articles that used the outdated image to use the more up-to-date image. This has mostly been occurring with PNGs that used to be GIFs or JPEGs. Should I instead just remove the categorization for the outdated images so they won't be thought of as accidental duplicates? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2015 (EST)
 * There's no harm in keeping the outdated images in the older issues. Yes, the best would be to remove other categories form such images so that they don't show up twice. Thanks for all the work, it's very valuable to our wiki! -- 22:44, 28 December 2015 (EST)
 * Thanks for clarifying and adopting my idea. The only harm I see with the older image is using up server storage space. It just felt awkward to have two similar image pages be existing at the same time or even showing up in the category. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) 00:19, 29 December 2015 (EST)
 * I believe server space is not an issue at the moment (though I could be wrong), so no need to worry about that now. If there are way too many images that fall in this scenario you can tag them with the Requested for Deletion template and I'll be sure to change the 'Shroom sections before deleting, but let's go with keeping both for the time being. -- 00:24, 29 December 2015 (EST)

Your signature
You didn't change the link in your signature yet; it still leads to User:Tucayo and User talk:Tucayo instead of you-know-what-they-should-be. I know Tucayo still redirects to Henry Tucayo Clay, but I'm just pointing it out. Drilly  the   Hedgehog  18:17, 29 December 2015 (EST)
 * It's not like it made any difference, as it still followed rule #2 on Signature. -- 18:46, 29 December 2015 (EST)