User talk:Redstar

Re: Yo'ster Isle Article
My comment was in response to you adding a break to the bottom of the article. I dunno why you did that (hense I said, "?") and I removed it; but don't worry, the rest of your changes were perfectly fine. Keep up the good work! - 18:57, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Peach/Daisy in Film
Maybe the information you were adding to the article was correct...I don't know but I do know that Princess Peach is not Princess Daisy in any case at all. Also if a user undoes your edit take it up with the user; don't continue the edit war
 * If that's the case then please do not add the information using the code  as that results in Princess Daisy (click the link).
 * Yes, making a note would be good. However no matter what we cannot make believe that Peach is Daisy.
 * Also, it sort of is Daisy considering her connection with Luigi. User:ForeverDaisy09

Can you continue this conversation with someone who has watched the movie? I don't think I am properly informed to provide information on this subject. If what you are suggesting is that they are similar then yes, they are but they are not the same.

I've seen the movie and she was a dirty blonde, not very feminine (she was a paleontologist), and also Daisy isn't even a brunette she's a redhead. Clearly you don't know enough facts. Sorry. FD09

The Line
You just crossed it. Insult me again and you'll regret it. 1. I'm not a fangirl 2. I'm not a girl 3. Daisy is a redhead. Her official hair color is stated to be orange. I could write a whole paragraph about how she is a redhead, because I have, just go to Daisy's page; which has sources. 4. You should try not to insult other users as it will result in you being punished. 5. Regardless of the traits she has in the film she still has traits of Daisy's as well, regardless of your opinion. It is still Daisy so just get over it.FD09

You called me a fangirl, suggesting I am a girl. You called me a fangirl, which is a personal insult. I said you didn't know the facts because you obviously don't. If you did, you would know, like I already said Daisy is a redhead. If you knew anything, you would know most redheads have orangey-brown hair. Also, in recent years her hair has become more orange, just look at her art for M&SATOWG. AND to finish this off, regardless of the fact the film character has many many traits of Peach's, she still has some of Daisy's, the big one being her name. Therefore it is Daisy. It doesn't matter what your opinion is, because the fact is that it is Daisy. FD09

The real connection to Daisy is her relationship with Luigi. It is not my opinion, as it is a fact in the movie itself. Do you have anything where someone who made or worked on the movie says it is Peach? I doubt it. FD09

I also don't give a care about what real-life connections you have to redheads or your family members. And guess what I"M a redhead. Congratulations trying your real life example on a redhead. Also, while at times her hair has brown tints, it is STATED to be orange: FD09

I'm pretty sure it was around the time the movie came out that Daisy was Luigi's caddy in golf so nice try there. And seriously, I don't need to argue about this with you anymore because even if you try to link the names back to Peach again I'll just get a patroller/sysop/anyone else to ban you for tampering with factual information. Good-bye. FD09

The thing is, I don't NEED to provide you anything. I'm only still talking to you because I've got some free time at the moment. Like I said, the facts are the facts. If you really feel sore about it, you should be smart and go to the proposals page and make a proposal to change the fact the wiki looks at the character as Daisy. I think if anything you should create a proposal that says the information should not apply to either character. If you think applying the character to Daisy now is bad, imagine how stupid it will look when you try to put information on Peach's page that says she appeared in the film as Daisy. So do what you will but just so you know you could get banned for repeating offenses. In my opinion, the film information doesn't even belong on this site, but w/e. FD09

Ok, now you're just being unreasonable. You don't seem to get this isn't just about what I think, it's about what this whole wiki has set. And also, now you're arguing with me about one little thing basically irrelevant to what we were talking about. I thought I might be getting to something with you, but now I realize you're just a waste of my time. I'm basically done talking to you. Oh look, there's your warning right there. FD09


 * When you make an edit after someone reverts it - that is edit warring. Don't do it.
 * First off she's a girl and secondly, she did? I suppose she should be warned too...FD09 - I know you can see this. Don't do it again or I will use right off the bat. Contact the user in question if he/she re-adds the information with a warning and then wait for another user to revert it.

OK, he's a boy (srry) and edit warring is the action of adding content to an article repeatedly after someone reverts it. I see that FD09 was just following the suite of two other users (srry again) so she had the right to do this. You added the content to the article a total of four times after it was reverted. That is edit warring. If you think the content should be in the article then talk with someone about it to see why your content is being removed. ForeverDaisy is obviously ready to talk so why don't you talk to him?

The Peach article edits you're doing
I just responded to your message on the talk page for Peach's article -- as I said, so far so good -- can't overrule what you're doing. I checked the edit history and yeah, I see no complaints from my end. I'd only go after folks that try to "ruin" the page mainly. As you can tell, I take every article of the Mario females very personally. :P --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 02:29, 27 November 2009 (EST)

Userspace
Well, I'm simply working on a task to look over userspace and such since around a few weeks ago. A couple of months ago, the main page yelled out this line (or an expression of it): "Content which does not follow the userspace guidelines should be backed up because such subpages will be deleted." We patiently waited until stuff happened and lost some of our track. We finally acted after waiting for an unusually long period of time that they started taking action, believing that users have more than enough time to clean up their userapges. Your comment of concern and suggestions seems to be interesting though. I'll add that to my composition book for later. 04:42, 27 November 2009 (EST)


 * Very tasty rewritten info indeed. Good job actually. :o As for the sysops' eyes, I'm using a program called F.lux. It's actually a good tool to make your eyes feel better at night. It simply makes the screen warm. A simple but great effect, since it changes it's color automatically. :P Here: http://www.stereopsis.com/flux/ 04:50, 27 November 2009 (EST) When did history began...? You? Me? Wiki? That program? I guess everything has a certain "history" in their lifespans.

Wait... let me get this straight...
Am I to conclude from your recent edits that the Princess Peach article had a mess of problems...? Even though I'm a sysop and monitor this page very closely, I can see why you have an issue with this. As I said in my last message to you, I can't overrule what you're doing so far because even though I'm a sysop, I couldn't detect any red flags in the article itself before your edits. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 20:42, 27 November 2009 (EST)

Here
Are those links, as promised: www.tricotronic.de www.intheattic.co.uk www.gameandwatch.com http://www.geocities.com/nintendogandw/ http://mpanayiotakis.proboards19.com/index.cgi http://www.dsfanboy.com/photos/game-and ... -2/863705/ http://www.dsfanboy.com/2008/07/01/coll ... and-watch/ Hopefully, we can do some work together in the future.

This is about the M&L articles...
Redstar, I don't care what you keep on thinking, but you are overreacting on the littest mistakes!!! BiS is absolutely fine, we don't need a bestiary for it or SS (we made a proposal, but you might not agree with us). The article doesn't need to be rewritten to were you claim it and pretty much in your opinion!!! Please stop trying to change everything that is on their, all the true stuff!! You didn't even play the game!!! I have played the game, I even have a guidebook to the game!!! I know what I am doing since I been here longer you have, maybe not as a user which I started looking at Mario Wiki a year ago, and I can tell that you hate grammar and spelling, and shorten text. Please, just stop trying to change every single word in the articles, because it doesn't have to be in your image!
 * Sorry about that Redstar, saying the stuff that probably offended you (I don't know you enough to say that). Seriously, that was horrible!!! I guess the fact that you would say that the article I spend days on just to tell users like me that the story needs to be written, have bestiaries, and some other stuff like the way you say about grammar and very minor things that can stay as they are. Truly, forgive me, but please don't come into a chat on a article, and trash talk about it, because some users really have paid time in those articles. Hope I didn't get on your bad side. - Baby Mario Bloops
 * No, I get your point, but to rewrite the whole story part my be a little too much on the stuff, and yes (in one of your comments on something), we do have random stuff in the story since no one has changed it since we had japan information. Thanks for accepting the aplologe I gave. = ) - Baby Mario Bloops
 * I know I didn't mean it like that, I was saying that meaning parts of it all the way through it. Anyways, I think your a great user, being a perfectionist user that has only in mind of the articles benefit and how to make that better. See you later!!! - Baby Mario Bloops

Worse than before?
How is that worst than before? I fixed spelling errors and added a word to make one sentence make sense. What do you have against the Mario and Luigi series? If its worse than before you have to make a reason.

Coingrats
You can make the articles for the film characters now. As well as remove the information from the actual character's pages. I'll help with removing info when you're ready. FD09

Finally!
Finally!,now you must support in the Superstar Saga one, and then we must work with Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story one and it's all finished!-- 19:13, 1 December 2009 (EST)

Okay, if you want some help only tell me =D!-- 19:22, 1 December 2009 (EST)

So...in what I can help?, Uploading Images?, Information?-- 19:29, 1 December 2009 (EST)

But when are you going to Support?!,I'm Waiting!!-- 17:31, 2 December 2009 (EST)

Checked and Supported ;D,now please vote in M &L: SS.-- 17:57, 2 December 2009 (EST)

Also, now that you are fine with SS, now you can help me with BiS =D-- 18:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)

Supported ;D!, but hey, in the BiS article in the Enemies Table shouldn't be the images of before the table was maked?-- 16:12, 3 December 2009 (EST)

Uh-oh...He's a Administrator (I'm 100% Sure) so we can't do anything but I'll try to tell him about this..., and don't worry for the Proposal I'll tell all the people about it ;D-- 16:34, 3 December 2009 (EST)

Don't worry, I'll tell them to support =D, now if you want, you can help me and Fawful with the work in the Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time page to have it soon to be featured!-- 16:43, 3 December 2009 (EST)

Okay, tell me when you'll get free.-- 16:52, 3 December 2009 (EST)

You can help me!!!
I saw that you were talking about recipes for PM:TTYD, and I need help on a certain article. If you don't mind, could you help me with this one? (Look at this or that article for help if you accept.) So, do you think you could help out with that?

A little but important note...
Every time you upload an image, remember to add the appropriate licensing for the file please. I've seen you were uploading many images but without licensing, so it will be nice to recall you this from now.

Proposal
Your proposal is going well - I honestly thought that it was doomed after I voted for it but now it is tie game :)
 * Hey, I hate don't do pity votes. I saw the articles were stubs and that all this would combine the information into one, easy to get at, place and voted based on that.

Regarding your recent behavior on the wiki
Hello, Redstar. Before I actually start talking about this, I feel it would be appropriate for me to introduce myself. My name is Stooben. I've been monitoring your edits recently to make sure that you don't break any rules, or to see if there is something I feel you may need help with. I am not coming here as an enemy; I am not coming here to yell at you. I'm coming here as someone who wants to keep you from getting into trouble.

I've noticed many of your recent discussions with users (be it on their talk pages, article talk pages, or the proposals page) have been rather aggressive. While I don't expect you to be an angel all of the time, you need to make sure that what you are saying will not offend somebody, or will not come off in an unpleasant manner. I was also told that you had said that you intend to come off rude. This kind of behavior is not acceptable on this wiki, and is generally a punishable offense. Purposely being rude to others is what is called "trolling". Trolling is a big no-no around here, and don't think for a second that your account will not be blocked for it. We do not care who you are, what type of edits you make, or anything like that. If you troll, you will have to face the consequences.

I am willing to give you a chance, because I believe you have something good to contribute to this site; I just don't think you quite know how to do it properly. (Or you don't want to; I don't make any harsh assumptions here, though, so I'll leave it at that.) Right about now, I would give you a warning, but I'm not going to this time. If you continue to troll, please know that I (or any other Admin) will warn/block you.

In short, I want you to change your attitude to be less unpleasant. If you can become a kinder member, we can put all of this behind us and move on. If not, then you know the consequences. I hope you'll be able to see the point behind what I'm saying. 03:23, 5 December 2009 (EST)
 * Regardless, you need to make sure that you don't come off offensive to people. 19:59, 5 December 2009 (EST)

Thanks
You really did make me feel better. I really hate that I have to make miis again and do everything else over again. It will take forever.

So there is no possible way to get my lost data back?

Thanks again, I will try calling nintendo tomorrow.

Mario Sports
Yeah that's what I thought it was.... They should be called things like "Mario Tennis Series" or "Mario Baseball Series" like the rest of the articles, though. Do you happen to have any games in the Mario and Luigi series? If you do, you should stop by and help the | Mario and Luigi Wiki. Its a new wiki, and it needs help.

I finished the Superstar Saga article! Does it look gooooood?!!

Merge
Hello. I saw you stated to be specialized in merges and such on your userpage. If so, could you see Talk:Collect the Trophies! and share your thoughts? - 19:49, 12 December 2009 (EST)


 * Sweet, thanks! I'll check up on those here and there.

Tell me what you want me to do
Leave on my talk page every article I need to go to and what to do and I will do it User:Yoshionfire

If I haven't voted in any talk page proposals, I'm probably just neutral. But I assure you that I read all the talk pages.-- 22:54, 18 December 2009 (EST)

Implied Charcters
I really hate to do this, but creating a category for these characters is pointless. Categories are meant to ease organization, but all the Implied Characters' information is already located on a single page - you can't get any easier than that. (Any implied characters that aren't on this page should be moved to the page.) To save on space and cut back on redundancy, I'm afraid I'm going to have to remove all the categories you have painstakingly added to the redirect pages. I'm very sorry. - 17:50, 19 December 2009 (EST)
 * Redirect pages do not need to be categorized (and in most cases, they shouldn't be categorized because that results in a single page - the one being redirected to - being present in a category twice). The organization of this wiki is not necessarily the same as other wikis - one size does not fit all, and so far, our categorization works fine... except for the fact that we have too many for our own good. Coincidentally, the Admins are currently discussing ways of streamlining categories as well as navigation templates; I can bring this up with them as part of the discussion, but I can almost guarantee that they will agree with me on this issue, and in the meantime, I'd hate to see you keep adding categories in vain. I can empathize with you about losing your work - I've seen quite a few of my Template projects deleted in the past couple months - and if I could, I would leave your edits. As for the actual undoing process, I really don't mind - this kind of gnomework is my favorite type of maintenance, and it only takes a single click of the mouse per page with my Administrative Rollback ability. So, will you take my word on this, or do you still want me to ask for a second opinion before doing anything more? - 18:12, 19 December 2009 (EST)
 * I was thinking of a situation in which something like King Bowser Koopa (a redirect) was categorized as, for example, Royalty, and then so was the regular Bowser page - if I'm not mistaken, both "King Bowser Koopa" and "Bowser" would then show up in the category listings. Can you show me where Time Q said that; as far as I know, we don't have any sort of official policy regarding redirect categorization, and I will certainly ask more Sysops' for their input before changing that. Regardless, I do feel that this particular case of categorization has no merit because there already is a list that shows the individual subjects in the page - the Table of Contents. I actually compared the ToC and your category's list when I noticed what you were doing, and when I saw that they were identical, that's when I decided to stop you. (Full disclosure: there were some minor differences - the ToC had more entries, except it lacked Queen Croacus II, whom I'm not sure how to deal with anyway: there are pictures of Croacus I through III in Super Paper Mario, but I'm not sure if that's enough grounds to place them a step above "Implied"; they should probably be merged in some way, however.) - 20:05, 19 December 2009 (EST)
 * Yeah, but if we start categorizing some redirects, people might think all redirects should be categorized and things will snowball from there. I see what you're trying to do by expanding on the Implied categories, but there really is no point seeing as there already are lists of implied X on the "List of Implied X" pages. Rather than create a sub-category for the redirects of each type of implied thing, just send people directly to the actual list pages, because that's where they'll have to go anyway to read about the subjects they would find in the categorical list. Cobold's proposal will take care of getting other Admins' opinions; however it also means I can't undo your edits for a week even if you agree to it now... - 21:37, 19 December 2009 (EST)