Talk:Paragoomba

I never saw one in mario 3d land. Should we delete? SuperPaperFan 14:52, 6 December 2011 (EST)


 * No they appear. I've finished the game and I've seen tons.

Oh lol i just played the game and saw some i think. Thanks. SuperPaperFan 20:33, 7 December 2011 (EST)

since we have Goomba (Super Mario World) split from Goomba, shouldn't the Paragoomba from SMW be split from here, as well? -- firebrick purplebluegoldbluegreen firebrick

Split Para-Galoomba from Paragoomba
The Paragoombas are completely different from Para-Galoombas for two reasons:
 * 1) Para-Galoombas have a behavior similar to the Para-bombs therefore are missing absolutely nothing to do with the Paragoombas.
 * 2) Ever since I came out of Super Mario World, the Galoombas were considered enemies other than Goomba, plus year now also an official name. Therefore also in this case the Para-Galoombas not centrate nothing with Paragoombas.

Proposer: Deadline: July 4, 2014, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * I agree with my own proposal.
 * 1) Just as long it's given as, it's fine with me. Besides, "Paragaloombas" don't appear in Super Mario 3D World.
 * 2) It's a different species of Paragoomba.
 * 3) Per everyone (except Stonehill, see comments). Also, can we make a Winged Galoomba?
 * 4) Enough evidence exists to support two articles. Agree with the inclusion of the Conjecture template until something more concrete is printed.
 * 5) They're different species! They should have been separated as soon as we found this out!
 * 6) Super Mario 3D World confirmed Galoombas as a separate species from normal Goombas. Para-Galoombas should get their own section, too. At the very least, they should be a part of the Galoomba article instead of the Paragoomba article.

Oppose

 * 1) – I'm not supporting this, since I feel that the information should be moved to the SMW Goomba page.

Comments
I don't think Paragaloomba is a conjectural title. They were referred to as Para-Goomba in the original Super Mario World, we're just adding the "ga". Peanutjon (talk) 10:59, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
 * Are we also splitting Winged G(al)oomba? 16:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
 * At the time they weren't called Galoombas though, so I assume it would be conjectural? -- 19:16, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
 * Right.  At last, the rock fell.

13:15, 25 June 2014 (EDT)
 * @Peanutjon: Those Galoomba not have the wings. And then similar to the Para-bombs. So I would say that Para-Galoomba would be the most appropriate name.--Sonic98 (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2014 (EDT)
 * I have no idea what that means... but we need Para-Galoomba (with parachutes) and Winged Galoomba (with wings, like Paragoombas). Peanutjon (talk) 12:04, 26 June 2014 (EDT)
 * @Lumastar: But why a simple section? The Para-Galoomba and Wing Galoomba Wheels are a subspecies of Galoomba. It would not make sense in its own section of the page Galoomba, it would be like putting all the subspecies of Goomba existing on a single page.--Sonic98 (talk) 04:33, 28 June 2014 (EDT)