User talk:Bop1996/Archive 3

Hello, you have reached my talk page. I'm going to warn you straight up that I am a serious nerd about a lot of things and that I will reflect that in our conversation.

If you plan on having an idle conversation, you should probably read my userpage so you have some idea of who I am. I've been around these parts for roughly a year now, and am a patroller, so if you have some sort of question, I can try to answer it or I can refer you to someone who can. I also have a forums account here, so feel free to pm me there as well. I have accounts on MetroidWiki and ZeldaWiki by the same name, so I can attempt to help with any issues regarding those two wikis I suppose.

A few rules you agree to by posting on my talk page:
 * 1) I will reply on this page
 * 2) No spamming, flaming, or any type of offensive language
 * 3) Spelling and grammar should be as correct as possible
 * 4) Please sign all of your comments or I will add Template:Unsigned to them. If I haven't added the template, that doesn't mean you should add it for me, I probably had a reason.
 * 5) I can only keep up a coherent conversation in English
 * 6) For other NIWA wiki users; casual discussion can go on any wiki, wiki-based goes on the wiki it is based on.

Now that that's over with, feel free to create a new header and talk to me.

My current editing status is: Actively patrolling the recent changes

Help!

 * I need your help back on this talk page! I am not trying to revive that arguement or start a new one, I just have a question I need answered. Please use the link I provided.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 13:22, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * I saw and answered, as you seem to have seen.
 * Yeah. Anyway, thanks. You really seem to know just about everything on this wiki!M&amp;L Beware my fury! 13:34, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * I don't know everything, just most of the problems that new users seem to run into. But thank you for the compliment anyway.
 * You're welcome. I was exaggerating a bit. You seem to be famous at correcting peoples grammar and spelling, because somebody has an userbox that says he's friends with Bop1996, and wishes he would stop correcting my grammar. I didn't design it, I just saw it and though you ought to know. It doesn't mention anything about it intending to be offensive, so it may be an insult. Actually, the somebody is Mario4Ever, so it might not be offensive, but still... anyway, thanks for all the help, you've really taught me a lot.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 14:04, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * I made that intentionally, and it was just part of my quirkiness I suppose, so I'm not upset at all. I do try to correct any grammar and spelling mistakes I see though, so it does seem somewhat fitting.
 * Oh, I see now. About that article from before, though: is the In-Game description section really neccesary? The article gives all that information above, the only difference is how it is worded and it is slanted. Wait, would something like this go on the articles talk page?M&amp;L Beware my fury! 14:16, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * You can ask me or another admin if you have questions, or you can just post it on the talk page. Anyway, to answer your question: those sorts of information do get sections, unless they're redundant with something on the infobox, so the section on In-Game Description should stay.
 * Alright, thanks for the help(once again...)!:)M&amp;L Beware my fury! 14:27, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * By the way, that Lord Grammaticus guy from the talk page is going around and bad mouthing me. He posted the comments I left on GalacticPetey's and Mario4Ever's talk pages on Raven Effect's, without the updated ones showing my appologies, and is writing rude things about me on his talk page. Come to think of it, he was also a bit rude to me on the first talk page with the stub arguement. Can you go to his talk page and sort things out?(And while you're there, can you slap him upside the head for me?)M&amp;L Beware my fury! 14:55, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * He posted those links before your apologies and amended behavior, so there wasn't a link of your apology to link to at the time he wrote those comments. He didn't do anything wrong, and you're upset with him for not acknowledging something that hadn't even happened yet. And I didn't see him say anything rude with regards to the article either.
 * Fine, but Raven Effect's been pestering me too. He left a comment on my talk page, but I left a response. Since I changed my rules (as I wrote in a new header, you can vote wether to change the rules back or keep them this way) I left a few swears, but Raven Effect got what he deserved. Please don't judge me for this, and try and vote whether or not I should have rules against swearing on my talk page. Look forwards to seeing your comments!M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:12, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * Raven Effect was blunt, but he was correct. And again, he left that comment last night after you posted those comments on Mario4Ever's and GalacticPetey's talk pages, but before you apologized, so he wasn't pestering you, really. As for your talk page rules, they're up to your personal preferences (within reason), so I'm not really concerned about those.
 * So I don't need to have a vote on it?M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:24, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * Not if you don't want to.
 * Okay, I will stop it (unless someone has already voted). By the way, if we're going to continue this discussion, should we make a new header, or would making a new header be for future discussions? If we should create a new header, answer this questio under this header and I will reply under a new one.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:32, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * I don't care if you make a new header or not.
 * Okay, I was just asking. Hey, would articles like this one be considered a stub? Use the link to see which article I'm talking about before you reply.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:36, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * Bop before you say anything i would like to point out that there is no information that can be added to the article
 * You! You saw that I said defending articles like Pure Water was a waste of your time, so now you're trying to save it, huh?M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:40, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * Really so if you say something i'm just supposed to back down i'm defending an article from being called something it's not
 * It doesn't appear to have any information available to be added to the article, so it would not be classified as a stub.
 * But the talk page is longer than it!M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:43, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * It's not about length it's about content and the fact is that if no information can be added an article can not be called a stub
 * Face it, no information could have been added when it was being created.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:46, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * If an article has a valid amount of info or the maximum amount of info possible, it's not a stub. It's as simple as that.
 * OK, I'm wrong, but I still think that protecting it from being called a stub was a waste of his time.M&amp;L Beware my fury! 15:51, 18 January 2012 (EST)
 * It was just an example for comparison purposes, not starting an argument over the status of Pure Water.