Talk:Axem Rangers

Each Axem Ranger, as an individual character, deserves an article. They do act independently - each has their own stats and attacks. The articles will not be merged, and it's not a big deal that they are seperate but shorter. -- Son of Suns


 * I agreee they should be kept seperate. Great Gonzo
 * You know what's funny? It actually IS a big deal that they are short and will never be more than a stub. If you can't make the articles larger without adding guide content, then how are you going to validate them having an article? On top of that, I did indeed consult with Wayoshi, who appears to be of importance in the community of the Super Mario Wiki. - A Link to the Past 14:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)


 * Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. Great Gonzo
 * Question is, will you bother to exercise that potential? On top of that, focus on forming some criteria for inclusion. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Guide content is fine as long as it is official. Those articles have potential. And Wayoshi does not speak for the entire wiki - he is one member of a greater community. -- Son of Suns
 * Why is it fine? This isn't a guide. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)


 * The Mariowiki is a knowlege base contain all sorts of iinformation as long as its true. Great Gonzo
 * So would it be appropriate to assess the difficulty of the Axem Rangers? - A Link to the Past 14:24, 7 May 2007 (EDT)


 * Only if an official guide did. -- Son of Suns
 * Not even then. If someone feels that it's not difficult, what should be done? A guide is only good as a source for certain facts - any mention of difficulty is the opinion of one writer. - A Link to the Past 14:27, 7 May 2007 (EDT)


 * Nintendo did not have to release such opinions or information, but they did. It is the opinon of Nintendo as a whole, not one writer. -- Son of Suns
 * It is not as if Iwata looks over the guides NoA makes. It's no different from one staff member's review in NP. - A Link to the Past 14:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 * It still is officially created by Nintendo, regardless of who approves it. If Nintendo wanted to control such information, they would. -- Son of Suns
 * That's "if". They don't. - A Link to the Past 14:34, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 * They don't want to, but they could. They want to be affiliated with the opinions of these writers. -- Son of Suns
 * So does this mean that we should say that Super Mario Strikers is merely a seven in quality because that's what it scored in NP? - A Link to the Past 14:40, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

We could include it in the article somewhere. "Nintendo Power gave this game a seven". -- Son of Suns
 * But if it was NP, it would be official, so we would have to address it as the official opinion of Nintendo. - A Link to the Past 14:45, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Note that NP is not the only official Nintendo magazine, duh. Gofer

I apologize for incorrectly giving the "go-ahead" light to a Link to the Past when I knew little about the game. Consensus says they'll be separate, and so they shall be. 16:15, 7 May 2007 (EDT)