User talk:SJ

Signing
Hi, when signing comments, don't use the "unsigned" template but just use three or four ~'s ( or ~ ). The template is only used to sign comments of other people who forgot to sign them theirselves. 15:07, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 * Oh well, never mind, looks like Cobold has told you already. 15:10, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 * I don't get how to enter the ~'s though. (I'm new here)
 * Just type four of the symbols in a row ( ~ ). They'll be converted into your signature automatically. (Try it out by using the preview button.) 14:41, 22 January 2008 (EST)
 * Ahhh...

Sorry...
Uh, Hi. I'm sorry for ticking you off... I feel bad. :( Anything I can do to make up for it?

I don't mind. You don't have to do anything to make up for it, but you should check out the Paper Mario FA nomination page, it's the other article I nominated. I'm done supporting and opposing, but check for my comments! Toadette 4evur 18:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)
 * alright. See ya later!
 * You opposed it???? HOW RUDE!!!!!!!!! Toadette 4evur 20:03, 28 January 2008 (EST)

. . .Opposed what...? The Peach article? Cuz there's enough votes on there anyway... Um... Sorry... Cobold's points were good... And I'm too lazy to fix them myself... How 'bout I remove my oppose.

No! Not that one, Paper Mario. I've been editing it so please look at it now. Toadette 4evur 22:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Ohhh... Paper Mario. I see. I'll take another look at it.

I say "How Rude!" alot so don't let it get you down, ok? Toadette 4evur 17:03, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Toad's Super Mario Galaxy section
I would add it to the Toad (species) article, but the problem is that I don't have what I wrote saved anywhere. I won't be able to write exactly what I wrote before. Btw, am I doing these comments thing right here on your page? Lules

Umm, yeah, you wanted people to know that the generic Toads were in the game, the reason the article was removed was for that. An article DOES exist on the Toad (species) so you COULD edit, and you CAN put things on here, I don't care if you do. Toadette 4evur 17:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Undoing
Would you please tell me what your problem is? We do not make all those changes to upset you or to "mess" with other people's articles; we just try our best to make the articles as correct as possible. The fact that you repeatedly claim to "know" which time is correct just because you were the one who nominated the article does not actually make the time correct - everyone can check that in the edit history. Just look here - at the bottom there is the first version of the page: The time does not say "xx:00", but "xx:03", so your claim that it was created 19:00 or 20:00 cannot be correct. I cannot exclude the possibility that I'm mistaken regarding the hour (it is confusing for me as well, with all the different time zones), but I'm definitely correct regarding the minutes. Do you get it? I have proof, you just have claims. And if someone corrects your signature - why the heck not just let him do? Are you that stubborn that you generally don't let other people correct your mistakes, even if it is obvious that they're correct? Please be more constructive, otherwise I'm sure you'll get a warning. 17:47, 31 January 2008 (EST)
 * It says the APPROXOMITE time. Also, when it comes to signature, I like to do that my self, other things I don't mind. Toadette 4evur 18:16, 31 January 2008 (EST) ps- I never ONCE said that the page was mine, I just said I made it.


 * I guess I have to apologize. I never noticed that it says "approximate time". You're not wrong then, I take back what I said about you not being correct. Still, I see no sense in most of your reverting (you were not wrong, but neither was me), and so I once again ask you to be a bit more constructive and to only revert if your "predecessor" really was wrong. A good alternative to simply reverting is to discuss the issue on the talk page of the respective article. P.S.: I cannot force you to leave this discussion on your talk page, I just want to tell you that it was in no way meant to be insulting; in fact I only wanted to improve the climate here. 09:29, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Re: Question
A sockpuppet is a second account created by a user who already has one on the wiki. Mostly, these are created by banned users in order to still be able to edit, but also regular users can have multiple accounts. This is not tolerated on the MarioWiki, as it creates problems with identifying a user. Sockpuppets are automatically blocked. Still, it is possible to register a second account, but on a similar name and as a redirect, as it is allowed on Wikipedia. Creating a user account on names very similar to yours can prevent different users having the same name (such as it happened with and ). You are also asked to create redirect accounts when your user name consists of non-Latin characters (Greek, Cyrillic, whatever comes to your mind is legal in the username ;)) to make it possible for other readers who can't read that script to distinguish you from others. In any case, these redirect accounts shouldn't be used for editing. But this never happened on the wiki, we mostly have sockpuppets, who are here for vandalizing, and they are identified by using the same IP address. (Though AOL users don't need to worry, as multiple different users can share AOL IPs). - 08:10, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Latest Appearance
We're having the proposal if you want to vote.