User talk:LUIGIRULES71

LUIGIROCKS7
Hi, is the account yours? If so, and if you still have access to it, please use that account instead as having multiple accounts is prohibited. If you've forgotten your password or anything, please let me know. 22:12, 16 November 2016 (EST)

From Luigirules71/Luigirocks7. Sorry I did forget my password Because sometimes i'm forgetful, if you must delete this account, I Will hold no grudges.


 * Sorry to butt in but the best way to remember a password is by writing it down either on paper on on your device's notes. Then when you re-log in check "Keep Me Logged In", I hope this information is useful. :) 22:26, 16 November 2016 (EST)


 * Thanks for letting me know. Please note that any records from your old account are carried over as well. 22:36, 16 November 2016 (EST)

Luigirules71: Thanks The RPG Gamer.

Reminder
Please do not restore content after someone has removed it without first having a discussion with that user. Not doing so can easily cause the situation to spiral into an edit war.

03:24, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

LuigiRules: :(

Please stop calling out for his edits to the Super Mario Odyssey page in your edit summaries and in his talk page; it's impolite. 04:04, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

LuigiRules: Ok... :(

LuigiRules: Question? Why can't i Put The information on Peach almost Getting Married To Bowser From Those Titles? i Hate having good information Removed.
 * It's being removed because it's not adding particularly useful information to the page. If multiple users keep removing your edits, it would be best to not consistently put it back, as there's more than likely a problem with your changes and it could easily turn into an edit war. 04:12, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

LuigiRules: Oh Ok Thanks For Telling me. :) LuigiRules: But, i've seen multiple ones similar to the point i made in the Trivia Soooo What makes those Different? :|
 * Your edits were in good faith, but they didn't serve much purpose to the article. You can review the policy on trivia sections if you want more info. 04:29, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

LuigiRules: K Thanks.
 * To be more specific, there were too many points to the list. If the wedding only showed once or twice in official media, then it might be noteworthy, but five times is a bit excessive and not really anything worth noting anymore. 11:35, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

LuigiRules: Ohhhhhhhhhh.....

Stage 1-6
Hi, if you can't find or obtain an image for an article, just tag it with and someone will add an image there as soon as they can. Thanks! 00:58, 11 September 2017 (EDT)

Category
Even if it's one appearance, it still warrants the category. A character that's only been playable in one game, for example, would still use the category "Category:Playable Characters". The point of categories is ease of navigation; it'd be better to include it than to not have it at all. Also I don't see why "Category:Married" needed to be removed; she was married to Cranky, and as I've already stated, the category can still be used even if it refers to one or two games. 02:35, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

Well i didn't mean to remove married. if i did, OOPS!

But my question is why is she under Deceased While she is still in the Living Realm Which makes her Undead Too? i'm not trying to start a agurement or Be Rude But Why is she Both undead and deceased? She is more Likely a Undead Character Than a Deceased Character. also since You've added Wrinkly Kong To Deceased Can i add each individual Luigi's Mansion Portrait Ghost (Except Chauncey, Bogmire, Boolossus, Possibly The Clockwork Soilders, Jarvis and King Boo) under Deceased since Some are implied and outright stated to have died at some point? Like Mr. Luggs Who ate himself to death and Sue Pea Who Died in Her Sleep. Can i?


 * They're not mutually exclusive. While she does appear as a ghost in most games, she's still a deceased character. That's not to say every "Undead" category entry should be listed under "Deceased Characters"; there'd have to be evidence of their being alive at some point to be, well, deceased, rather than just being a regular ghost character that was never intended to have such a backstory (e.g. King Boo). That being said, yes, the Portrait Ghosts you mentioned can be categorised as such. 07:40, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

Ok Thanks.

DK94 levels
Thanks for your work on the Donkey Kong 94 levels, but just letting you know that there's no need to add multiple line breaks at the end of the article. 05:28, 22 October 2017 (EDT)

About the levels, good job so far! However, I propose we merge the levels into their respective world articles (Stage 2-11 be merged into the Forest article etc.). This way, we avoid inconsistency with Mario vs. Donkey Kong world articles, like Mystic Forest or Spooky Attic, which contain info on all of their levels without them having separate articles. Yes, I am aware I began this project a long time ago (and didn't have the decency to finish it) but I wasn't paying attention at my surroundings at the time. --

Well Thank You Both, it really means Something. also about What You Said Super Radio, i'm not against it But i'm not sure What To Do. i Don't Know if We Should merge it or Leave it Be.. So i'll do something i Guess? P.S. it's my Dad's Birthday. --
 * Mario jc told me that, since all levels should have their separate pages (that's policy), there's no solution but to simply split the MvsDK world articles. This sadly means compromising the featured status of Mystic Forest since there will not be much substance left in there. So keep doing what you do... Happy birthday to your father! --

OK i'll Do My Best and Finish it. also Thanks For The Birthday Wishes For My Dad. --

Signature
Your signature is just leaving a redlink to your signature page, which doesn't exist. First, you should create User:LUIGIRULES71/sig (click the redlink), put a signature on it (make sure to include links to your userpage and talk page), then past the following code into the signature box in your preferences:  Anything on your signature page will then show up when type four tildes. Thanks. 20:03, 22 October 2017 (EDT)

Oh Ok Thanks.

Bloody overuse of the word "bloody"
Just curious, what is it with your obsession with that word in your edit summaries? Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2017 (EDT)