Talk:Poop

Why not have Poop as a redirect to here?


 * It seems like a good redirect guys...

Is that thing actually called "Poop" ingame? If yes, make a redirect, if no, don't. Gofer

This is... a wierd article...

....Err I think when O'Chunks says his Chunk words, he is referring to himself. Like if I'm right now punched in the face I would say "I have been Jorged!" or when I'm leaving I would say "JORGE AWAY!" Click here to see the universe. SuperLuigi821 Oh you let the hat out of the bag, Big Top!
 * Ya, should it be moved back?

Uh, I just played WarioWare: Touched!! and I went through the boss stage, like, a thousand times, and didn't see him get any poop. You may want to consider revising it...
 * Probably because you played the Western version where the poop is replaced with something else. --Grandy02 17:57, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

Somebody requested an image for this page!? 18:54, 25 March 2009 (EDT)
 * You're not the only one to have noticed. --Blitzwing 17:41, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Well, why not? --Grandy02 17:57, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 * I actually came to this page via Ragey's site. 01:16, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

Hmmm....poop.I'm supposing using the curse word 4 it as a redirect will lead to an instant ban?This article is a troll's paradise...

I agree with NY. I think this page should be protected so only autoconfirmed users can edit it due to it's likeliness to be spammed. Yoshario'''

I thought you HAD TO BE A USER to edit any pages.U mean spammer IP users?
 * I think it means all new users can't edit the article (their account has to be a few days old first). I'll protect it now. Also, pertaining to your first question, "shit" is used in Conker's Bad Fur Day, but I'm not sure if that's significant enough to warrant a redirect. Even so, not making it yourself is a smart move, as it might seem sorta shifty. - 18:32, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

I wouldn't use that expletive around the wiki due to the fact that I expect we may very young users browsing this wiki and since a proposal passed that banned swearing. Yoshario'''

"The Giant Poo Monster" (As it's called) in Bad Fur Day is made of "****" but since it's also called "poo", poo should maybe be a redirect.
 * Isn't it actually called The Great Mighty Poo? I don't remember a proposal about banning expletives, (I just remember a huge discussion about the Bob Hoskins article). Swearing at people is wrong, but so is censoring quotations on an encyclopedia. - 18:48, 26 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Exactly, on all points. --

Ur right..I remember on Wikipedia I found a random article about a way "an octopus does sexual activity on a women".I was scarred for life and know what?THERE WAS A PICTURE!!!!Worst random article.Evah.


 * Hmmm...probably related to shunga, or erotic ukiyo-e Japanese woodblock prints. That's the national artistic tradition Mario is coming out of. =P --  P.S. Off-topic, I know.

Uhm...I got an image of the POOP in Made in Wario. <---HERE User:Wolfenpilot687 03:29, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

History
Should this page cover all appearances of poop in a history section? Or would this be like covering random objects such as beds, windows and TV sets in separate articles? --Grandy02 14:09, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
 * No, it shouldn't. We really don't need yet another article that mixes objects from ten different games completely unrelated in their functions. We have enough Elephants already. A different question it would be if it was (collectively) officially named, but that isn't the case, so no. - 16:10, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
 * Are you suggesting that we shouldn't have pages like Elephant? I kind of disagree, but it's an interesting issue. Intuitionally, I'd say that the Elephants page is fine, but I'm not so sure about an article covering all appearances of poop. Don't know how to reason that though. 16:48, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
 * There are already various random references to poop in this article. Should it be trimmed then? On the other hand, would we actually create a separate article on something generic like poop just because it appears in some mini-games? Of course, the gameplay-relevant appearance of "running poop" in Wario: Master of Disguise warrants an article (which was also the reason why the article was made), but the question is if the "normal" poop deserves more than a brief mention. The same can be said about Onigiri. It is a playable character in one game and thus deserves an article, but otherwise rice balls are just common food (in Japan), yet the article also informs about completely unrelated onigiri, such as food in Smash Bros.. --Grandy02 18:01, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
 * Is this name even official?Also, it's just a minor gameplay element, they don't play any special role.
 * So, should this be merged with Arty Wario? The other feces are just generic objects that are not more important than other generic stuff. --Grandy02 10:58, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree.


 * Actually, it plays an important role in WMOD as it is used to defeat a certain boss. I think it was called Barfatronic Lavanator or something like that.--

Paintings were playing important role, I created their article and it was removed. If we create an article about this barfatronic thing it will be very small, so merging it with arty wario is better.


 * Iemember, it was called the Barfatronic Lavachomper. The poop is needed to defeat the boss because it was the only thing small enough to be able to touch its uvila. I think it deserves to stay, and what paintings were you talking about? --

So it's the boss that was named like that...I was talking about the paintings in SM64. I still think it's should be merged with Arty Wario(just the WMOD one) and remove the usless unimportant gameplay elements.

Delete
I say we delete this article because it is not a specific topic, item, ect. If unneeded objects are getting articles then we should have an article on air since that actually plays a role in some games, sort of works like an item, it allows Mario to be underwater without drowning of lack of air since it replenishes his air intake.

Proposer: Deadline: March 5, 2011, 22:45 GMT

Support

 * 1) I am Zero! Per proposal. Zero signing out.
 * 2) Per Zero. I think this article is a bit unnecessary and inappropriate. Plus it doesn't have a real purpose in the games.
 * 3) An article about poop ? Seriously ? Sure, it has an use in Wario: Master of Disguise, but the stone blocks Arty Wario draws have a role too. Should they get their own article ? Hell, AIR has more uses in 3D Mario games, and I'm pretty sure nobody wants an article about air.
 * 4) Per Tails. No real purpose.

Oppose

 * 1) - A bunch if the WarioWare stuff seems vague and on it own, unnecessary, but the reject-drawing poop in Wario: Master of Disguise sounds like it has a perfectly valid function in the game (it destroys enemies, to name one function).
 * 2) - Read above discussion. Why do we even have such a proposal? :/
 * 3) - Your reasoning is flimsy. Your comparison with air, while making no coherent sense whatsoever, doesn't even begin to overturn any of the points made in the previous discussions that kept this article from being deleted.
 * 4) - Per all.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Per all. Poop is used in lots of WarioWare games and its funny!
 * 7) Per Walkazo, Gamefreak75 and Edofenir.
 * 8) It isn't a vandalism page and besides it is a funny article LOL.
 * 9) It's a surprisingly quality and necessary article, despitte the subject matter.
 * 10) I think "Poop is a great article, keep it. (per all)
 * 11) - Per all.
 * 12) Usually, Poop is disgusting, but this is the one in a WarioWare video game. Per all.

Comments
I am Zero! That's true but that can easily be mentioned in the gameplay part of Wario: Master of Disguise article. Zero signing out.

I am Zero! That discussion was unresolved and never came to a conclusion. Zero signing out.


 * @Tails777: Plus it doesn't have a real purpose in the games.
 * It's obvious somebody doesn't bother to read the article, specifically the WMoD section.

I read the article just now and I still don't see the real purpose. It's just an object used in some Warioware microgames.


 * Doopliss101: LOL I love the funny name, despite its name, it isn't a vandalism page and is relevant to the Mario series.

Air has more of a role in Mario games than... this. It heals back Mario in Super Mario 64, and the lack of air in Hazy Mazy Cave's poisoned maze makes him lose health too (same goes for when he's underwater). Air blows Mario away in SM64 (again) and makes him lose his hat, making him weaker. It does more things than poop. If Poop deserves an article, Air deserves one too. Koopalmier 04:37, 23 February 2011 (EST)
 * But that's a thing of nature, bound to be there. We need an article on air because of the lack of it in some places? Okay... We don't have an article on earth or water, and they play as much a role as air does, so we don't need one there. Poop plays more of a role than these things, as it is a solid object in the game, useful for something, and it's like some kind of ally to Wario. 05:53, 23 February 2011 (EST)
 * Grass or earth doesn't change anything, aside from the sound Mario's shoes make when he walks on it. Air deserves an article because it plays a role in gameplay (although "oxygen" would make more sense, even if there's oxygen underwater, but whatever). Even if I see what you mean, I still have to say than an article about poop is going a bit too far. Heck, half the article is about its appearance in WarioWare games. The only role it plays is hurting enemies and being able to destroy a few things in Master of Disguise, but then we should have a Stone Block article too. Or just put it in the Artsy Wario article. Koopalmier 17:13, 23 February 2011 (EST)
 * It's not going too far, it's a creature drawn by Wario, and, bychance, has other direct appearances too. Air appears indirectly. We're not even on the subject of an article about air in this talk page. Oh, and without earth, where would Mario be? 17:31, 23 February 2011 (EST)
 * This is getting BJAODNy real fast. Poop appears specifically in WarioWare while air, earth, etc. are just things that are there. It should be added to the poop article all this poopy poop of discussion that is unnecessary because the article is poop.