MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Princess Daisy

Support

 * 1) It's a good page,with detailed sections. It's very pretty written.I think that if Baby Daisy is featured,Daisy need to be too.

Oppose

 * 1) The first thing I see when I go onto the article is an improvement template and if an article is to be featured, no templates like that can be there. Plus just because Baby Daisy is a featured article, doesn't mean Daisy should be. It's up to the article's quality, not how other articles that related to a single one.
 * 2) Per Tails, and I also don't think any of the problems from the unfeaturing nomination have been fixed.
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) First, check this successful unfeaturing archive and figure why it got unfeatured. The article got unfeatured because one-liner sections in Mario Party. The article also lacks information from Mario Kart Arcade GP 2, Yakuman DS, and Mario Party-e. She also lacks a section the in the recently-released Mario & Sonic at the Sochi 2014 Olympic Winter Games and even the Mario & Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games section is missing. A section on Mario Golf: World Tour needs to be added. The "Relationship with other characters" section is dubious, with wacky, speculative information, especially this one: "Daisy and Waluigi have a complex relationship.". Wow. She also has a few empty sections that need to be filled in conjunction with the Empty Section policy. The Mario Party series section needs to be condensed into one; half of each section describes what happens to Daisy with little regard that all characters go through this as well. Daisy just needs to have information on her appearances that sets her apart from other Mario characters. In-depth, the article may have grammar and writing style issues, but I'll look closer into this. Here, I hope this is a better oppose to why this article shouldn't be featured.

Comments
Okay, so there's an improvement template. Before you opposers point this out, you need to figure out WHY there is an improvement template; otherwise, the improvement template's simply being there is a feeble reason to oppose.