Talk:Nintendo DSi

Merge?
I don't understant why should Nintendo DSi have it's own page, since it's in the DS series. I suggest you to merge it with the Nintendo DS article.--Internetakias 09:30, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
 * If you think so, then make a proposal. Red_Yoshi_TTYD.png‎‎ Yoshi  waker  Orange_Yoshi_TTYD.PNG 09:46, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
 * If you did this then we would have to merge the 3DS into the DS page aswell. And does that make sense? No. It's an entirely different system. --SuperYoshiBros 09:59, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
 * The DSi/DSiXL is a member in the DS series, the 3DS isn't.--Internetakias 10:08, 11 April 2011 (EDT)

Merge Nintendo DSi with Nintendo DS
The Nintendo DSi article should be merged with the Nintendo DS article because A. It's a member of the DS series, B. The other redesign of the Nintendo DS, Nintendo DS lite doesn't have a page. So, why should this redesign have a page?

Proposer: Deadline: April 25, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per my proposal.

Oppose

 * 1) - NO! This is a different system that has the DS features, but yet still has a lot more stuff to do on it than the plain DS.
 * 2) - Per KKR.
 * 3) - Per both.
 * 4) Two cameras and DSiWare are pretty important distinctions.
 * 5) Would you also like to merge all the Game Boys together? Nope, did'nt think so. Per all.
 * 6) There was a proposal that slitted them. I don't want them merged again.
 * 7) Different systems! That's like merging Wii with GameCube! (Well maybe a little different)
 * 8) Per all. Per Arend's comment on Talk:Nintendo 3DS.
 * 9) Per all.
 * 10) The DSi has internet, a camera, and even DSi games. It is kind of like Gameboy and Gameboy Color and Gameboy Advance. You wouldn't merge those three systems into "Gameboy", no? I guess not.
 * 11) Per all, especially LeftyGreenMario.
 * 12) DS and DSi are totally different systems, with totally different features. There is absolutely no reason to merge them.

Comments
I fixed the formatting: new sections (including TPPs) go on the bottom of a page, and TPPs run for two weeks, not one, without an initial 24-hour voting start delay. This was proposed on the 11th, so it ends on the 25th. - 13:06, 11 April 2011 (EDT)