User talk:Alternis

Hi Snc98 I thought you wasn't here! See you soooon!SuperMarioThree,talk with me! 08:36, 26 October 2012 (EDT)

Wanna be friends?
Want to be friends? Kind regards,

Razzoom &#34;MarioKart&#34; Johnson, Senior. (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2012 (EST)

You can add this to your UserBox tower

Friendz Shop!
Hey-hey-hey! A new Shop has opened! And as my friend, you get 50 Friendz Coins! Please visit it! Razzoom &#34;MarioKart&#34; Johnson, Senior. (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2012 (EST)

O HAI
I have a new Quiz... with Cool Prizes!!!

Please check it out!

Razzoom &#34;MarioKart&#34; Johnson, Senior (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2012 (EST)

RE: Blooper Super Mario Sunshine
Hi, I don't really understand what you want. Could you please re-phrase it?


 * I see. Do each of those Blooper types have official names?


 * Well if they are shown to have a significant role in the game, then they should warrant their own article. Plus the fact that they are different colors shows that they are different from the generic Blooper. By the way, what was the non-English official name?


 * You should make a Talk Page Proposal before creating the page. Also the article should be given a conjectural title if created.

Yes, that would be best. But you will have to start the proposal again. Also, you must move the old proposal to the Archive. If you need help, then please let me know.


 * Okay, so I archived your proposal. Now you may wish to re-propose it on Talk:Blooper, and organize it like this, except don't include the green writing and use (not ). If you are having trouble, let me know.

I just made some minor corrections. But you should change the bit where you said Template:Anotherlanguage and make it Template:Conjecture, because that is the correct template to use when we don't know the official name.


 * Yes, it successfully passed. You may split the pages. What were you thinking of calling the colored Bloopers?

15:51, 11 February 2013 (EST)

Re: Knights and Mummies
I'm not too familiar with the game, but if the subjects are notable enough to have their own articles, rather than be merged with the respective areas that they appear in, then yes they should.

10:39, 4 May 2013 (EDT)

Re: Greenie
It sure did. You are welcome to create the proposed article.

10:22, 19 May 2013 (EDT)