Talk:Climbing Koopa

Official name?
Is Fence Koopa an official name? I don't remember that they appeared separately in the ending of Super Mario World. --Grandy02 15:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. I believe they are just regular Koopas that are climbing fences. Mario doesn't become Fence Mario when climbing fences.
 * In that case, can we add the conjecture template?
 * But would we want articles on all enemy variants that do different activities while there are no separate names? --Grandy02 15:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete
They are just Koopas on fences. There is no "Fence Mario" article, am I wrong? Nothing is different about them other than that.

Proposer: Deadline: April 4, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Delete

 * 1) Per my proposal.

Don't Delete

 * 1) They have a different function, though, and they are defeated differently. They don't even change when the game is 100%. I think they are still the same species, but I don't think their article needs to be deleted. I think a merge is more appropriate.
 * 2) Per LGM. This article should at least be merged with the Koopa Troopa article then be deleted all together.
 * 3) Per both! That is a stay on this one!
 * 4) They have a different attack pattern, located in different places, and are defeated differently. And why delete? They are an enemy in their own right. The least that could be proposed is to merge them with Koopa Troopa.
 * 5) - No don't delete it! Per all.
 * 6) Per LeftyGreenMario.
 * 7) Per LeftyGreenMario and BabyLuigiOnFire.
 * 8) - Per all.
 * 9) I think this should be merged with Koopa Troopa, talking about them climbing fences in those games.
 * 10) Per BLOF and LGM.
 * 11) Per the Luigi sisters (that means BLOF and LGM).
 * 12) per all
 * 13) I am the one who created this article.  The name comes from Nintendo Power Advance 4 pg.24.  I'm sorry that I forgot to add it to the discussion page (I only mentioned it in the page history).
 * 14) I agree with LeftyGreenMario.

Comments
I may be mistaken, but if this proposal is about possibly deleting this article, shouldn't we use since it is pending deletion? 16:07, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
 * No, we use since it is pending deletion.