Talk:? Block


 * cough* ?'s an searching. It has to do with how the search is coded. Anything starting with a non-alphanumeric character will cause it to send you back to the main page. -- Ghost Jam 22:42, 3 Apr 2006 (EDT)

? Panel
I feel that should get it's own page. Superchao 17:16, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * I don't know what exactly a ? Panel is in this game. Which game(s) do they appear in? Wayoshi ( T&middot;C&middot;@ ) 17:18, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Paper Mario at least... and others... Superchao 17:21, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Paper Mario has ? blocks, so I still don't understand. Wayoshi ( T&middot;C&middot;@ ) 17:25, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * There are a few ? paels. The onl one I remeber is in the great tree, and it lowers the switch that drains he water, so you have to jump on it, shoot Koops and hold him, and hit the switch, but the panel is still there. Superchao 17:27, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * It's also in Mario Hoops 3 on 3. Monty Mole 17:29, 20 September 2006 (EDT)

And the MH3o3 comment is coming from the guy who made the redirects? Since it appears as a major element in a title, a page should be made, knock yourselves out. :) Wayoshi ( T&middot;C&middot;@ ) 17:33, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Yes, well, I do what I feel needs to be done. Though I still don't recall ? Panels in either Paper Mario. Monty Mole 17:36, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Play PM: TTYD until the Great Tree. Superchao 17:38, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Oh yeah, I remember now. But that's an ! Panel. Monty Mole 17:42, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 * Oh...

Don't forget they also appear in super mario kart.--Spike

They should get thier own page.In this case I agree with superchao.--Peanutbutter-girl 19:32, 16 March 2011 (EDT)peanutbutter-girl

What are the blocks that rotate through powerups in NSMB called?
I couldn't find them on here. Basically, they rotate through Mushroom, Fire Flower, Blue Shell and Starman, and occasionally Mini Mushroom replaces one of the other options. I remember there being one in World 5's castle and another somewhere in world 6 (the level with the rising and lowering water level and all the Spinies). With good timing, you should be able to get what you want from them. What are these called, and is there a page for them?

"Block" Article
Currently, Block redirects to this article, which is good, because searching for "? Block" doesn't work (it just takes the user to the main page). On the other hand, I think an article about Blocks in general would be good too. What do you think, would a "Block" article make sense? And if so, how will one find the "? Block" article, if not by typing "block" in the search field? :P 17:09, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Agree, we have a "Blocks" category, but no article that explains what Blocks in general actually are. --Grandy02 10:07, 2 December 2008 (EST)


 * Yeah, we should have a general article about blocks, then possibly listing types of blocks in the article. At the top of the block page, we could add the  tag to redirect users to ? Block if that's what they were looking for, as it is the most common type of block (besides maybe Brick Block, but they're boring...haha).  We should also make sure Question Block and Question Mark Block redirect to ? Block. --


 * Seems like a nice idea to me

Item Block?
Is the name "Item Block" official or was it just changed to that to get rid of the question mark?--vellidragon 11:22, 30 December 2009 (EST)
 * I think we have as little proof that "? Block" is an official name. We should check games, manuals and guides as references. - 11:25, 30 December 2009 (EST)
 * If it helps, I've looked up text file versions of the English language Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario Bros. 3 manuals on the net; the former simply calls all the blocks in general "bricks", the latter refers to this type of block as "Question Block". Seeing how they don't appear in Super Mario Bros. 2 (not Lost Levels) and didn't appear before Super Mario Bros. either, the name stated in the SMB3 manual is probably the earliest official English name given to them.--vellidragon 11:45, 30 December 2009 (EST)

So should this be moved to "Question Block" then? - 12:02, 8 February 2010 (EST)

Yep.

Merge Used Block
NO MERGE 3-7

Currently, Used Block is a stub that could use more content and Item Block is filling with information. I propose that we merge the two together, since Used Block in most cases is just an Item Block, just used up. There are some exceptions, and that includes the times that the P-Switch changes coins into Used Blocks or that the Used Blocks as moving platforms for Mario. Still, I propose this mainly that because Used Blocks have usually nothing to write about, since most in particular serve no function besides that they contain nothing more inside them.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Deadline: 17 January 2010, 15:00 Merge
 * 1) {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per comment below
 * 2) {{User|Lemmy Koopa Fan}} Per BabyLuigiOnFire.
 * 3) {{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! We are a wiki not a wikia who put in unnecasserry articles, that article should be merged. Plus generic enemies are one thing but for some reason generic items are completely different. Zero signing out.

Leave un-merged
 * 1) -- It's not a direct state of an Item Block, specifically, as Coincollector says below. Also, as Time Q and vellidragon said, there are some Used Blocks that were never Item Blocks at all, so why should we merge it here?
 * 2) {{user|Coincollector}} - I have to say no because the used block doesnt refer to the ? Block/Item Block only. Other types of blocks can become used blocks, for example, some ! Blocks turn used blocks after hit like those seen in SMW and in the M&L series.
 * 3) -- Per Coincollector. Most of the varieties of blocks in M&L: SS do turn into used blocks, as well as M blocks from the Yoshi series.
 * 4) {{User|Reversinator}} Per all.
 * 5) {{User|Gamefreak75}} Per all
 * 6) Per All.
 * 7) {{User|Time Q}}: Per all.

Comments Used Block is just an item block, but used up. I propose we merge them together since one article (Item Block} contains a lot of information while the other (Used Block) is a stub and can't really be expanded, due to the lack of information concerning used blocks.


 * I'm not quite sure but aren't there Used Blocks that have not been Item Blocks before? 18:30, 3 January 2010 (EST)
 * Uh, give me an example?
 * There's a lot of Used Blocks that haven't been Question Blocks before in various levels of Super Mario World because they turn into coins when you step on a P-Switch in that game, and vice versa.--vellidragon 19:22, 3 January 2010 (EST)
 * I can still see it as this: Types of Item Blocks: Used Blocks: Used blocks are a type of item block. They generally are the item block's state after the player hits it and receives an item from it. Not all used item blocks are associated with item blocks; some are in effect of the P-Switch from coins in the area and a group of them sometimes act as moving platforms for Mario, but most come from item blocks.

This needs to be formatted more like a proper Proposal: there needs to be a clear description of the changes that will be made, as well as the deadline and the name of the proposer. (In particular, it needs to be stated that Used Block will be merged into this page; right now that's merely implied.) - 19:56, 3 January 2010 (EST)


 * I'm new when it comes to talk page proposals. Sorry if I formatted completely wrong. :(

What's the difference between an Item Block and a ? Block? I seen both the articles, and the images AND THE TEXT in the article are basically the same! That's because ? Block redirects to Item Block. Sorry, Bloc Partier, but I don't understand what you are trying to say in your first and second sentence.

23:59, 4 January 2010 (EST)
 * Ah, my bad. My vote has been edited.

Just wondering, but have Item blocks ever been officially refered to as "Item Block" or "? Block" ?

How about an alternative? Merge to the general Block article rather than any specific block article. Redstar 23:50, 5 January 2010 (EST)


 * Nah, I don't think so and also, some Brick Blocks in NSMB and NSMBW become Used Blocks.--

Couldn't we just merge Used Block into the general Block article. Some of them don't come from Item blocks.
 * That sounds better -- 20:57, 10 January 2010 (EST)

Can you make another choice called "Merge with General Block Article"???

I have a question. It's already 17:13 on January 17 and it still doesn't say passed and it is supposed to be passd like 2 hours ago.

It doesn't pass automatically. Somebody has to edit it to say that it passed. }}

Title
Why is this article titled "Question Block" and not "?" or "Question Mark Block"? Please explain, as it makes no sense. I didn't want to move it without asking about it first.  BNK [ E 06:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * They are officially called Question Blocks, at least in the SMB3 manual; look at the "Item Block?" section above, which deals with the article name.--vellidragon 13:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

In every recent Mario game the blocks are called ? Blocks, which is the same as Question Mark Block, so why is it titled just Question Block? -IGGY7735

Block Research Room
Should we list the comments about the retro blocks in Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga?

Split Flying Question Block from Question Block
I am making this proposal because I feel that Flying Question Block deserves its own article. In the games it appears in, the Flying Question Block is different from the non-flying version. Take the ones in New Super Mario Bros., for example. Question Blocks in this game are preset and appear in every level just like in all of the other Mario sidescrollers. However, the flying version are red and appear on the world map, where they fly above a randomly chosen level and appear in the actual level if Mario plays it. Clearly, Flying Question Blocks are different from Question Blocks and affect gameplay differently.

Proposer: Deadline: July 15, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) Per all.
 * 3) per proposal
 * 4) Flying Question Block is going to be split? Yes! That is definitely a per all! I love this proposal! I'm Reddragon19k, and I support this message!
 * 5) – I was thinking about this for a while, and this really makes sense; I don't know why this wasn't already split. Per proposal.
 * 6) Per proposal
 * 7) Per the proposal :)