User talk:Britannic124

Your "restoration" attempts...
Please don't restore anything that was taken out by sysops like myself. Plus, the quotes area for the Rosalina article are reserved for the more meaningful lines representing Rosalina's character. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 03:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

RE:Codes
You really can't it not part of the wiki's policy to add in hacking codes in the game main article. Sorry

Just a heads-up...
On the Princess Daisy article, you attempted to place some unofficial stuff on it the other day (which was taken out upon noticing it). Only official stuff about the Mario series is allowed around these parts. Thanks again for your cooperation with this. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 22:29, 28 December 2010 (EST)

Preview Button
Man, please, it is completely unnecessary to make 4 edits in each page you edit, all those edits could have been easily made in just one edit. Edit the page as a whole, not by sections. -- 17:33, 30 December 2010 (EST)

RE:Yoshi
You see this there no really to overflow his article with other page to his name.

Reminder
The point of redirects is to have easier ways, common ways to type names to help users find them. All those japanese names don't classify as that. Thanks. -- 18:36, 11 January 2011 (EST)
 * Yeah, phonetics is ok -- 18:43, 11 January 2011 (EST)
 * No they're not: see the new policy (it was actually first drafted over a year ago, but I only just got around to making it official, which is a little shameful and embarrassing). Specifically it says "redirects for anything besides the English titles are unnecessary, as are their corresponding English translations, and neither should be made." As explained on the page, people can still find the pages by searching for the non-English names, but this is an English database, and we have to draw the line at making actual redirects: they'll eat up way too much server space and aren't going to be used enough to make that worth our while (if they're even used at all). - 12:15, 17 January 2011 (EST)

*sighs*
This means that you're making weird disambiguation pages (and also unecessary redirects) like this. PD: Every time you make a disambiguation page please, tag'em with the template.

Preview button
Read 4 comments above. No, seriously, you can just press that button to don't make a lot of trash on history page.

Was This You?
Were you the one who made all of the redirects Walkazo deleted here? 15:20, 17 January 2011 (EST)

Please take another look at the policy. Tucayo said you could, but the admins discussed it and decided it is not allowed.

Re:Unneccesary proposals
No, I'm not out to get you. There were many users who created unneccesary redirects in the past, and with these new rules they can be stopped, as users in the future who do this will be. I'm happy to hear you'll stop, but there'll always be an unneccesary redirect here-and-there, made by who-knows-who. 13:28, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Re:List of Mario game Guidlines
What you're doing is fine. We go by first release date, I believe, so it's OK. 13:28, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Re:Latest Appearance
I'm not bothered at all by these questions, I'm happy to help and answer them. The Latest Appearance section is for the latest released game that enemy/character/whatever appears in. 13:48, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Re:"The" Names in the Glossaries/Categories
We are supposed to order them like that anyway, with articles beginning with "T" in the "T" section.

However, I'll tell you how to change the place where an article appears in a category.

13:58, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Re:Different Toads, Copyright Type
The different Toads have different articles because they are all major characters and, as far as we know, all different.

As for the copyright issue, I think it would go under the video game screenshot liscencing, but I don't know. Maybe you could ask a sysop; is an active sysop who is currently online.

Sorry I haven't been able to get back, I've had tonnes of homework. 18:03, 18 January 2011 (EST)

Re:Image
Umm... What problem about it you ask?