User talk:LinkTheLefty/Archive 1

Nice edits.

Reminder
We understand where you're coming from, but the main purpose is to combine existing information about the gals (specifically Princess Peach, Princess Daisy, and their baby counterparts). So the existing info that was there prior to your edits do count, and should stay there. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:36, 17 November 2009 (EST)
 * Well Merit, I dont disagree with you, but you should try to use the Undo button instead of the Rollback one to explain why was it reverted, otehrwise, things like this happen -- 21:40, 17 November 2009 (EST)
 * Isn't this reminder a little rash? ôo - 21:42, 17 November 2009 (EST)
 * Per Tucayo and Edofenrir. This user had no way of knowing where you are coming from if you didn't have an edit summary, and you should have told them why first before giving them an official reminder.
 * Actually I did when he tried to "restore" his edits that I reverted in regards to the Baby Peach article. When he did the same thing again on the Baby Daisy article, that's where the "reminder" came in. This doesn't call for a warning... yet. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:49, 17 November 2009 (EST)
 * Of course it's your decision how you react at the end and I have to respect that, but I have to say I don't agree with the reminder. You both had your opinions and you both reverted each others edits. I can only see two persons engaging in an edit war. Sorry for the blunt speak. - 21:58, 17 November 2009 (EST)

On Baby Mario, Baby Luigi and Baby DK's page it says their full names are Mario, Luigi and Donkey Kong. So the same should be done to Baby Peach and Baby Daisy's.

Canon
This is the Wiki's policy on Canon http://www.mariowiki.com/Canon

Okay, I see where you're coming from. The problem is that everything official and licensed cannot possibly coexist as absolute canon. While the Wiki may say it virtually considers everything canon, The Super Mario Bros. Super Show, the Super Mario Bros. film, and Yoshi's Island, for example, all clearly show different origins to the Mario Bros. I believe the Wiki makes an exception to the film, as it is clearly a widely different universe. I notice that film-exclusive elements are usually kept separate from everything else. Though even if you can tie the cartoon and the games together, this still unfortunately involves some unofficial fanon (the most common theory being that the brothers where inexplicably either orphaned or moved away). To a certain extent, the wiki still keeps some amount of distance between alternate media.

But that's besides the point. I don't really wish to go against Mario Wiki's policy - by saying every licensed bit of information is every bit as canon as the last, they are maintaining a needed, unbiased point of view. I'm not saying that Princess Toadstool is a non-canon name, however. I'm simply saying that Nintendo has yet to state "Peach Toadstool" is her full name. The only thing the fans go by is the way the letter is presented in Super Mario 64, but that can be interpreted a number of ways. After all, we do not see the comma after Toadstool. There's also a strange pause after the voice reads Toadstool. Some people might hear Princess Toadstool, Peach - others might hear Princess "Toadstool" Peach or even Princess Toadstool Peach. See what I mean?

The point is, I'm not trying to denounce Toadstool as her name. It's an unremovable part of her history. I'm just saying that there is no other official word on what was said or how it should be read. As far as I can tell, no other official sources tried to explain the line reading, and she was often called Princess Toadstool in supplemental materials even around that time until the next game. That's why I consider Peach Toadstool, as a full name, to be rather dubious - not necessarily invalid, but not altogether official. LinkTheLefty 01:39, 4 May 2011 (EDT)

BS Super Mario USA is Super Mario Bros. 2's direct sequel
Look at this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvJrEIlFujI --Prince Ludwig 12:22, 20 February 2012 (EST)

Alright. I looked at this (it's in the gallery), and...it's entirely insufficient. You can't just look at the illustrations and assume what was narrated. This is pretty much just baseless conjecture based on limited western observation, and until the full thing has been properly rediscovered the pseudo-sequel explanation should be considered unofficial. All other indications suggest that it wasn't something Nintendo particularly took too seriously, just a fun competition along the lines of the International Donkey Kong Country and Star Fox Competitions, but with Japanese radio voices providing a commentary. Let me refer you to http://www.romhacking.net/forum/index.php?topic=13502.0 - these are people who are willing to take anything uncovered and properly document the vocal speech that came with it. Even still, the only piece of dialog considered major that they uncovered was the ending, and that is lackluster and doesn't tell us anything we didn't know from the original game (other than the promise of Birdo recurring in the series, which was a given at that point). If they find something supporting the wiki or you can give more conclusive evidence that BS Super Mario USA is meant to take place after Super Mario Bros. 2 and is more than a variation of said game, of course every right should be taken to revoke these edits. Until then, this line of thought is fan-constructed and shouldn't have a place on the wiki. LinkTheLefty 13:49, 20 February 2012 (EST)


 * None of the players like you except others such as myself have found out that the game itself actually reveals to take place right after the events of Super Mario Bros. 2. So, yes it is the direct sequel, even though it was sometime implied to be the semi-remake or simply a remake by Nintendo, but it never weren't. Even if it was sometime claimed to be remake, the game actually shown to be the direct follow-up to Super Mario Bros. 2. You can't just call it a mere competition or special remake, if it were, the game itself wouldn't show the game was after Super Mario Bros. 2 but just a spin-off (but if it was a spin-off, it's 100% the follow-up of Super Mario Bros. 2) And I checked the wiki, none of the articles told that Wart was exiled to Koholint Island until you came over since Link's Awakening seems to take place several years after being defeated by Mario the second time.


 * The introduction have already shown the ending of Super Mario Bros. 2 and the beginning of BS Super Mario USA, Wart and the 8-bits have been defeated, Mario got his Plumber's Laments, Wart and the 8-bits returned for revenge and still them, despite the voice actors said at the end (we don't know what they said at the beginning). If you play the game in the computer, you can't even hear a voice.--Prince Ludwig 14:18, 20 February 2012 (EST)


 * Personally, even calling the statues "Plumber's Laments" is tenuous, given that it was a personal title for a fake work of art. The whole "Wart was banished to another dream world" is - according to the translators - 100% fake. The only ending is that Subcon vanishes without so much as a mention of Wart. Whoever put that there either tried to connect it to Link's Awakening or had a faulty source. As for the "players would know it takes place afterward" - again, for one thing you're basing that on loading illustrations whose spoken words - if any - are largely lost (if you can find videos of the raw Japanese broadcast, post them and we'll get it verified). Second, I'd like to see all the other people who've played BS Super Mario USA and state that it's common knowledge to be a sequel; the person translating could not find the original opening and is at a loss. Third, it is only a fan-theory to suggest that Link's Awakening takes place after it since that game itself takes place in an entirely separate universe (one of three known continuities) and mostly made references and cameos of other Nintendo properties to reflect the relatively lighthearted tone of the dream world. Fourth, I don't believe Nintendo has really acknowledged the existence of BS Super Mario USA, so we don't technically know what they consider it.


 * Either way, this is all a mass assumption since we no longer have the spoken words at hand. That was a part of the broadcast and not the ROM - film of the broadcast itself is obscure. For all we know, there COULD be a different story, and the statues COULD be a (if silly) plot point, but we will not officially know until the video in original form has been found and a translation is provided. Again, the general dialog that was translated doesn't seem to hint at a second adventure thus far, nor do we know if the illustrations are supposed to be storyline or if they were a unique loading screen that often came with the Satellaview. At this point in time, there's nothing strong enough to go on. LinkTheLefty 14:36, 20 February 2012 (EST)


 * Isn't this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5wetcPTBQM#t=4m0s the opening speaking part? I checked a version of the actual first episode on Nico Nico Douga too, and the narration is the same - the episode 4 one is missing one line, but it's not important to the plot. I'm still working on translating it (I'm still very beginner at Japanese), but so far, it does sound like a sequel. It talks about how Mario & Co. beat Wart but thought it was a dream, and it then explains that Wart & Co. escaped to another dream. Wart stirs up trouble and the King has to call Mario & Co. and they become active again (or as the narration says, mata mata). They find the King and his company gone, and while I still need to work on this part, I think it said Wart and Co. were also underground plotting, or something along those lines, but I'm not sure if Wart kidnapped the King or if he ran off on his own accord: hopefully when I finish translating a couple mystery words, it'll be clearer. As far as I can tell, it doesn't mention or name the statues, but as I said before, I'm still working on it, so you never know. As for "the separate dream" Wart went to, while it's doesn't name Link's Awakening explicitly, I don't think it's an unreasonable inference at all: he looks the same and has the same (Japanese) name, after all. - 17:38, 21 February 2012 (EST)
 * That would indeed appear to be the legit opening. Neat to see it was found on YouTube after all. Seems that some of what was on the wiki may be accurate, though a little still seemed a bit presumptuous before and I'm glad that it's getting cleared up. I'll also check it out later and see if I can pick up on anything else (though I'm pretty basic with my knowledge). If Nintendo indeed marketed it as a pseudo-sequel, then I wonder how they handled BS Super Mario Collection (I think info on that one is doubly obscure). LinkTheLefty 19:53, 21 February 2012 (EST)

Kong Family
According to Donkey Kong Country Returns Cranky Kong is Donkey Kong's grandfather because that's the latest official source (and I believe most sources call Cranky Kong DK's grandfather) the wiki accepts Cranky Kong's role as Donkey Kong's grandfather. Also I don't think we care about the opinions of fans and I think Rare's opinion has been rendered invalid since they no longer make the games.
 * Also i'd like to point out that the manual of Donkey Kong Country actually calls Cranky Kong DK's granddad here's the quote Actually that's incorrect the manual refers to Cranky Kong as DK's grandfather here's the quote "He groggily rolled over to see the familiar wrinkled, white bearded, grouchy face of his old granddad
 * Perhaps. The link I referred to makes a good point if you read it, though - basically, Rare has always made conflicting mistakes during the Donkey Kong Country trilogy the entire time and the original Cranky Kong creators went on record during Donkey Kong 64... However, it was Rare's last Kong game, and other teams that touched on the relationship merely looked at the SNES games since they were an easier source, so they perpetuate the mistake. There's also the possibility that Retro's Cranky Kong is Rare's Donkey Kong - or, at least, one of Retro's quotes suggested that, but there's another Cranky line that contradicts that (possibly to keep in spirit of his senility). So this is a case of Rare representatives versus Nintendo representatives - whether you believe that Cranky's original character designers are right in saying to ignore grandfather sources, or that Nintendo's word overrides those of their final intent (these people incidentally tend to dismiss Rare Scribes, ignoring that their style of writing is totally in line with the universe they created). I'm not saying that Nintendo is wrong - I think the case is more up to the reader to decide, and I think it'd be better for the wiki if we presented both sides of the argument.
 * At any rate, if we're going with the latest word for this wiki, then at the very least the Diddy Kong relation is an outdated source; Nintendo has since elaborated that the old nephew statement is akin to "nephew wannabe". And I agree - that sudden blood relation never made sense in any context. LinkTheLefty (talk) 14:54, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
 * It does make a good read filled with confusing and conflicting sources (also the the manual of Donkey Kong Country also refers to Cranky Kong as being Donkey Kongs dad on a later page) but what i'm saying is that most sources (especially in game) call Cranky Kong DK's grandfather so it makes the most sense the call him DK's granddad.
 * Alright. Though I do think Cranky's Identity Confusion section should be expanded to include some of this conflicting information, since as it stands now it essentially boils down to "Donkey Kong 64 vs. everything else" (which isn't quite the case). And I still think Diddy Kong should be listed as nephew wannabe, since I believe only one source stated nephew. LinkTheLefty (talk) 15:21, 1 August 2012 (EDT)