Talk:Downtown

Speculation
This article is full of it. Just curious, is the name also speculation? 00:47, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * My guess is that this article is full of speculation because R.O.B 128 created it. Not R.O.B 128 02:05, 28 January 2009 (EST)

One of the stars for WDW is called "Quick Race Through Downtown". Don't know if that's a proper name or not, though.
 * I used to have a manual for the game, and it never gave an official name for the place. It just used the course's name. 01:05, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * And you all are bashing my article WHY? □R.O.B. 128□ 02:05, 28 January 2009 (EST)

This content would work better as a section of the Wet-Dry World article, after all the speculation is removed. -- P.S. Once you create an article for the wiki, it no longer belongs to you but to everyone who edits and views the wiki.
 * I'm aware of that, genius. I was just saying that you all accused this article of being "speculative" simply because I'm the one who started it. □R.O.B. 128□ 00:50, 30 January 2009 (EST)
 * Granted, I put it tactlessly, but it was not meant to be a bash against you. You're a regular contributor and the last thing any bureaucrat would want to do is isolate one of our base users.  17:36, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * O rly, Stumpers? □R.O.B. 128□ 00:50, 30 January 2009 (EST)
 * Dude - I didn't even check the history. :P 01:26, 30 January 2009 (EST)
 * wat □R.O.B. 128□ 01:33, 30 January 2009 (EST)
 * Stumpers would have said the same thing about speculation, no matter who had started this article. Sometimes when my edits have been reverted in the past, I have assumed people just hate me, but then I've thought about it and seen what they mean.