MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Luigi's Mansion

Necessary?
Is this page really necessary, seeing as most of the stuff on here is just regular old flowery writing? 16:04, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
 * But it's laughable flowery writing :P It's really just an archive of how poorly things were taken care of back then. Some pages still need work. 16:06, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
 * Then why don't we archive every page that has had large amounts of flowery writing in the past into BJAODN? The page histories work perfectly well as archives, we don't need to put garden-variety fluff into an archive specifically meant for funny writing. 16:10, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
 * Just the fact that it was nearly every Luigi's Mansion room article that had this problem is what makes it worth keeping, I think. I don't know what led to keeping it all, but the theme was probably the reason. Level articles for Mario games, for example, don't have this problem (I know because I wrote a majority of them). 16:13, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
 * And it was because almost all of the room and Portrait Ghost articles were written by a single user (, if I'm remembering correctly), back in 2006-ish, when writing guidelines weren't as strict (Good writing didn't even exist back then) that they were all atrocious. It's not like the entire userbase made them atrocious well after creation, which would be good BJAODN material. 16:21, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
 * May I also note that most if not all of the Mario RPG enemies' articles were written just as poorly, if not worse, than the LM room articles, and yet they're not archived here and this is. 12:34, October 22, 2019 (EDT)
 * I'd say keep the BJAODN. I love the Luigi's Mansion archive of bjaodn Results May Vary (talk) 13:15, October 22, 2019 (EDT)