Category talk:New levels

Delete this category
What a bizarre category. It's oddly specific, only being used for levels that are unique for the remake of an older game. At the same time, though, it's overly broad, lumping together levels from different games solely because they're "new" (by some technical definition of the word) without any consideration for the levels' role within their games (as an in-game bonus, as a required stage, as something obtained through outside means, etc.). I sincerely doubt that anyone cares solely about the remake-exclusive levels of every game to the point that a category would help them. Besides, the remake-exclusive levels are more than obvious: in Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble!, they're the levels under Pacifica, in Yoshi's Island: Super Mario Advance 3, they're the extra levels, in Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3, they're under World-e, and it follows for the rest. This doesn't help anyone navigate in the slightest, and we shouldn't need to cater to every single remote detail.

Proposer: Deadline: November 22, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) lol category
 * 3) This category doesn't really help navigation at all so per all.
 * 4) The Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 e-Reader levels are better served under something like Category:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 e-Reader Levels. Hopefully you can see where I'm going with this.
 * 5) Per all.
 * 6) Ridiculous category, per all.
 * 7) .............No luck comprehending the logical purpose of this category. What does "new" mean? Who cares what levels are considered "new"? How does this help navigation? What is the purpose of life? (Oh, wait, that last one I can answer: Waffles)
 * 8) - Per all. Seems pointless. @Ultimate Mr. L: The correct answer is 42
 * 9) Per all.
 * 10) this is filler. per all.