Talk:Mechakoopa

Is it Mecha Koopa or Mecha-Koopa?

It is used inter-changebly but it is called Mecha-Koopa more often. Max2

Robowser?
"Similar enemies, conjecturally called Robowsers also appear in Super Mario Galaxy. "

If it's conjecture, why aren't we calling them Mecha-Koopas? They're the same. Jellyfloater

Actually the enemy appears in Super Mario Galaxy 2 along with normal Mecha-Koopas. Those in Super Mario Galaxy are called Mecha Bowsers.

I should probably point out that the ones from SMG and SMG2 are listed on Wikipedia Japan as ミニメカクッパ (Mini Mecha Koopa). In the SMG2 Prima guide they're listed as "Mini Mecha-Bowser". So technically they're a similar but different enemy. Vent 14:57, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Art
Should we put the art for this from New Super Mario Bros. Wii on here?

SMG
I read in the SMG prima guide and it referes to the Mecha-Koopas in Galaxy as a differant enemy altogeter called Mecha-Bowsers.
 * Prima isn't official.

Except in this case it is official because there is no other English guide and the guide in question was printed after Nintendo Power stopped producing guides of their own and officially sanctioned Prima to start making their official guides. Vent (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2013 (EST)

Robot origins
This might be a waste, but I'm planning on writing a Sonic and Mario crossover. So, I want to know whether Mario has his own version of the Roboticizer. Does anyone care to explain?--Ladies-Man1 (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2014 (EDT)
 * No, there isn't a version of a Roboticizer. This comment is so random. :P If you're referring to Mecha-Koopa, it's simply an enemy that Bowser creates and unleashes on Mario. It pays to read the article. 01:53, 25 May 2014 (EDT)
 * I was just asking whether any robot in any canon piece of the continuity were literally made from organics. It didn't say on this article. There was no need to insult my intelligence.--Ladies-Man1 (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2014 (EDT)

Mega Bosses in Mario Party 10 and Star Rush are technically different
I noticed in Mario Party 10 and Mario Party: Star Rush that certain bosses are given the "Mega" title treatment like Mega Monty Mole, Mega Mechakoopa, and Mega Sledge Bro. It got me curious as to why didn't we create separate article for the Mega bosses, excluding Mega Monty Mole, Mega Blooper, Mega Goomba, and Mega Dry Bones as they already have their own articles. Should we make the articles for some of the Mega bosses?
 * I actually created Mega Blooper not too long ago. But anyway, redirecting these mega bosses to the minigame articles or piping them to link to the normal enemy article isn't good. We have to create articles for these mega bosses since they're distinct enough to get their own pages. 17:59, 7 November 2016 (EST)
 * Agreed with Bazooka Mario and TheHelper. I wouldn't be opposed to giving the large enemies their own articles. 18:13, 7 November 2016 (EST)

Super Mario Galaxy 1 and 2
So if these are "Mecha-Bowsers"/"Micro Mecha-Bowsers"/"Micro Mecha Bowsers" in those games, as well as having a differing Japanese name, appearance, and behavior in said games, should those sections be split? It's definitely a derivative.... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2018 (EST)
 * According to Mister Wu, Super Mario Pia lists Mechakoopa's appearances as follows: SMW,SMS,SMG,NSMW,SMG2,NSMU. So one source suggests that the Galaxy version is the same enemy under a name change. Is there evidence to the contrary? LinkTheLefty (talk) 03:30, 22 March 2018 (EDT)
 * In Japan, the name generally used for Mechakoopas is apparently used for Mecha-Bowser in Galaxy, and that same book apparently doesn't list SML2 as an appearance for Spiny Cheep Cheep, and is the only Japanese source to ever refer to the walking bombs in SMB2 as being the same as Bob-ombs (which otherwise seems to be a Western invention, particularly as other DDP enemies didn't start appearing in Mario games until Super Mario World). Anyways, the ones in Galaxy have different names in both English and Japanese whenever specifically brought up, and look even more different from their previous appearance than the Spiny Cheep Cheeps did, IMO. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:38, 22 March 2018 (EDT)
 * I suppose we could consider it a derivative like we do Snufit (which the same book takes as Snifit), but in that case, there was opposing evidence (namely in Super Mario 64 DS, which changed its Japanese name from the one for Snifit). Another thing is that Mechakoopas/Micro-Bowsers have never appeared in another 3D-based platformer, so it's hard to judge what their behavior ought to be when compared to the 2D-based platformers, and they apparently already breathe fire in the Mario Party series. The name change can be attributed to the presence of Heavy Metal Mecha-Bowser in the first game, particularly as it doesn't appear to be noticeably smaller than a usual-looking Mechakoopa. It's a unique case, so I'm not sure. I know neither of these books are perfect, but I still feel it would be best to wait and see how the English Encyclopedia Super Mario Bros. handles it. If the translation sides with Super Mario Pia and calls them Mechakoopas, it would make an action taken at this point premature and a waste. LinkTheLefty (talk) 04:00, 22 March 2018 (EDT)
 * I'm not entirely sure, a split sounds good, but the points you guys made also make sense. I would say if the official name (not Prima name) for the ones in the Galaxy games is Micro-Mecha Bowser, I'd say split. But if they're revealed to be called Mechakoopas, they should not be split. DarkBowserBIS.png DarkBowser777 (talk)Dreamy Bowser idle.png 14:17, 23 June 2018 (EDT)
 * Looks very similar. However, the I can see a 3D design has been established (since it is in Mario Party 7). Why does it have these tiny differences when it has been established. However, they and some others can't be defeated by a jump (in platformers), and they breathe fire (Mario Party as mentioned above and Dream Team and Paper Jam. If there wasn't a source of new information coming soon, a proposal right now wouldn't be a problem. But, since there is, then we should wait. 15:36, 23 June 2018 (EDT)