Talk:Big Kyutyan

Rapheal the Raven?
It looks like Rapheal, the same size. REALLY! 98.177.160.223 19:46, 11 April 2014 (EDT)

Should it be merge?

Name
For reference, the Shogakukan guide does not give this enemy a unique name from normal Ravens, even when it's highlighted in World 5-7 on page 233. However, the game has a handful of internal filenames in G:content0.game/romfs/param/enemy - namely kyutyan_a_big.csv, kyutyan_b_big.csv, kyutyan_c_big.csv & kyutyan_s_big.csv - that suggest the name "Big Kyūchan". LinkTheLefty (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2017 (EST)
 * That sounds familiar... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 04:11, 25 December 2017 (EST)
 * Given there's only one, the internal name matches Raphael's Japanese name, there are other boss-like minor unique enemies, and the fact that in Japanese, these are less "characters" and more "generic members of the species that have been magically enlarged," I wouldn't be too opposed to merging this with Raphael's article. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2018 (EST)
 * Maybe it was described on the generic Raven's description on the manual? I asked to LinkTheLefty. 13:47, 1 September 2018 (EDT)
 * Accordingly, it doesn't describe the Giant Raven at all. LinkTheLefty told me that it didn't describe it... -- 07:43, 3 September 2018 (EDT)
 * This one acts just like a non-altered raven. It pops when you step on it. Then maybe on Raven page? -- 11:27, 26 September 2018 (EDT)
 * It may be a coincidence, Nintendo didn't intend this Raven to be Raphael. -- 06:33, 30 September 2018 (EDT)
 * You may start a proposal to give my opinion. -- 12:18, 1 October 2018 (EDT)

Merge Giant Raven with Raphael the Raven
I don't think that they're intended to be the same thing, and seem to be just coincidental.

Proposer: Deadline: November 5, 2018, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) There is only one of them in the game, internal data contains evidence of Raphael the Raven's Japanese name, and merging mitigates the use of conjecture tag. Considering it's a direct sequel, I'm sure the reference is intended.
 * 2) Literally the only information we have indicates that they're the same. Besides, as I've noted before, in Japan, the bosses aren't characters, just random schlubs Kamek embiggerationalizes. I'd have supported the second this proposal was made had I known. File name, the fact that there's one, other enemy "bosses" existing....
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) Per all.

Oppose

 * 1) Per. + Tetris Attack considered all of them as character, and it doesn't only consists of American  developpers, but also Japanese developpers. Paper Mario may be an exception, but all bosses are considered as characters in Tetris Attack.
 * 2) Clearly different enough to warrant separate articles. You sure you want to start a proposal that you oppose? There are still big enough differences, such as how Raphael can't be defeated with eggs or direct ground pounds, unlike this Raven, or how Raphael also creates star-shaped shockwaves, something also not present in this Raven.
 * 3) Per all.
 * 4) Per all.
 * 5) Per all.

Comments
If anything else, why should we merge them? It appears to be a coincidence, and it deserves it own article. -- 07:05, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * @Toadette, yes, sometimes the proposer is opposed.-- 08:05, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * @Link, for you, they're both big, and i still consider bosses as characters. The Giant Raven walks like a normal Raven, while Raphael walks much more agressively and he bounces you. And the Giant Raven seems to be already big. -- 08:23, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Boss-to-enemy having different behavior? So what? Behaviors aren't always consistent, even for within the Yoshi franchise. And your other reason requires usage of the word "seem." How about the fact that the file name literally spells out that it's Big Kyutan? Remember, Raph ain't a character in JP YI. And through this spelling out, shows that without a shadow of a doubt it cannot be "coincidence." Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * So what so what? All of the enemies you mentioned in your vote aren't even considered bosses; only the enemies faced at the ends of forts and castles are considered bosses. I don't doubt that the resemblance isn't a coincidence, but as it stands, it appears to just be a resemblance and not Raphael himself. The internal filename is a start, but is there any more evidence that can be used to determine that this Raven is indeed Raphael? 20:35, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Both Big Boo and Wiggler have been bosses in various platform games with vastly different behaviors on all accounts, hence why I linked to only them in that statement o.o . The following statement is to show that using "within series" as justification regarding behavior differences won't work either. And once again, "Raphael" is a Woolseyism; it's just a big Raven. Not an individual outside of Paper Mario. Just like how Prince Froggy isn't given a slightest hint of differentiation from Frog Pirate in Japanese. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Raphael is treated as an individual in the games he appears in. Also, under this, you're essentially saying that Frog Pirate should be merged with Prince Froggy. See where I'm going with this? 20:52, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Puttin' words in my mouth, there. When given various roles in the same game, differing articles they do indeed receive. This does not extend to differing roles in different games. And the file name is actual evidence from the game itself. And there's no substantial evidence on the contrary other than "well, I don't think so, because..." See where I'm going with this? Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * That doesn't answer anything. Keep in mind that internal filenames can't be 100% reliable as they're sometimes just random names given to assets so that the developers have a better idea of what is being referred to. They can't be treated as in-game if they appear in the code, but not in the actual game. Also, what about other cases like Boss Sumo Bro? 21:10, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Seems to be another enlarged generic, just translated more faithfully. Heck, technically, Petey Piranha's an enlarged generic, just from a bizarre off-model game of a bygone era who has since become far more distinct. Anyways, I have no problems with enlarged generics getting their own articles, it's just that if the only written evidence there is implies that the large creature is either the same enlarged generic from before or a being of the same nature, they should share an article. And remember, even though Petey's definitely a character now, Daisy Garden shows two of him at once.... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * Also, Raphael the Raven has different names from regular Ravens in all languages (maybe except German, but that's it), even Japanese. 21:14, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * And note that in the original it's just "Big Kyu-chan/Kyutan" in Japanese. Big Raven. Not a character, just an enlarged dude. You seem to be misunderstanding my goal here; I in no way want regular Ravens merged with Raphael. That's silly. Even if we were basing off of Japanese names, I'd prefer the frog to be "Gerogero (boss)," since it has a different function from the other entities of the same name within the same game. My thoughts on this plus-sized Raven situation is to do basically what the Wiggler page does regarding what's treated as the main variation of the creature of that name in each game. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2018 (EDT)
 * In Tetris Attack, they were all treated as characters, and in Paper Mario, Raphael is a character because he needs to be helped. -- 03:36, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
 * And that is an American-branded game due to being a reskin of Panel de Pon, and as such is working with the Woolseyisms, not the original intent. I mentioned Paper Mario being the exception there, but even then, his behavior is outright incompatible with the Yoshi boss, so defining them both as a singular "character" would be dubious at best. They're Big Ravens, the original of which was given the name of Raphael in translation, and further ones kept that name. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
 * For information, the creators of the game consisted of more Japanese people than American people. :O -- 03:45, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
 * And how many of those are not just the developers of the original game, Panel de Pon? It wouldn't need to be re-developed, just reskinned. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 04:21, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
 * + The Giant Raven's behavior is drastically different from Raphael's behavior in this game. -- 06:29, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
 * I've already covered that above. Don't make arguments that have already been covered. Ukiki went from a many-behaviored maniac in SMW2 to a harmless coward in YIDS. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 06:53, 25 October 2018 (EDT)

Given the file name says this is the same as Raphael, and unlike Bat (Super Mario Galaxy), Morty Mole, and Magmaargh, there are no sources that contradict it at all, saying that they're different is technically speculation. If this fails, the page will be moved to Big Kyu-Tan (or some variation thereof) anyways, which is Raphael's Japanese name. While I don't like file names to be sources for page names, here, this is the only source there is. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2018 (EDT)

Merge this article with Raphael the Raven (again)
Ok, so last time i opposed the proposal, which has been a mistake. We should fix a glaring mistake that has been since we found out what was the internal filename. Unlike cases, including Bat (Super Mario Galaxy), Morty Mole and Magmaargh, there are no guide that contradicts the internal filename. If this page gets merged, we'll avoid the another language template. The article could be turned into a redirect or something. Also, attacks are a moot point. Enemies always have different attacks. Its appearance in this game is a cameo, and in the original country, in Japan, the bosses are not considered as characters.

Proposer: Deadline: February, 18, 2019, 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per proposal.
 * 2) Per proposal.
 * 3) Per my thoughts last time. The only source we have insinuates they're the same, and he isn't in the guide at all. Also, he's only an individual "character" in Paper Mario. In SMW2, he's just a generic Raven that's been enlarged (same species-dependent situation as most other bosses in that game).

Oppose

 * 1) "But the two have the same Japanese names" is too weak of an argument to use by itself. Plus, there's no other solid evidence proving that they are indeed the same thing. Just state that it bears a strong resemblance to Raphael and call it a day.
 * 2) Per Toadette the Achiever.
 * 3) Per Toadette the Achiever.

Comments
It is said that the guide doesn't give an unique name, but was it mentioned, as simply "Kyutyan" or no mention at all? -- 05:43, 4 February 2019 (EST)

I think we should maybe consider emailing a Nintendo of America representative if this proposal goes nowhere, same as the one above. 11:18, 4 February 2019 (EST)
 * The internal filename is the only proof we have for this merge. -- 13:13, 4 February 2019 (EST)
 * Also, attacks always change in a return. I don't have more arguments, but i think Doc von Schmeltwick still has some. -- 13:17, 4 February 2019 (EST)
 * The internal file name acts as proof for a merge. Literally nothing acts as proof to keep split. Kamek acted as a generic enemy in both SMW2 and in YNI, and is a recurring boss in the latter. There are other enemy/boss entities in both games as well. And once again, "Raphael" being treated as a "character" in SMW2 is entirely the work of the over-the-top Woolseyisms the translators gave (for instance, "Hootie the Blue Fish" and calling the underwater Cheep Cheep "Piscatory Pete"). In the language of origin, it's just a rando Raven that's been enlarged. This is also why "Prince Froggy"'s JP name is the same as Pirate Frog's. Because that's what it is, just an enemy-boss differentiation from within the same game. Enemy-boss differentiations from between games, however, don't matter. See the Wiggler and Big Boo pages, for examples. Additionally, NoA have been known for recently using us as a source, so that would more than likely be a pointless endeavor. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2019 (EST)
 * You mean these examples? Yeah, admittedly, the English names we're recently taken from this wiki. -- 13:29, 4 February 2019 (EST)
 * Mainly these ones, as they're among the most blatant. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2019 (EST)