Talk:Blaze

She's pyrokinetic, right? Doesn't that mean the Category Fire Creatures needs to be tagged here?

Nope. She's more like Mario or Luigi. They can also manipulate fire, but they certainly are not fire creatures.-- 12:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

I think it should. The category says it lists characters who are either made of fire or can compose fire (or both), so it includes characters and species like the Snifit Zeus Guy and Vivian. Moreover, it includes transformations of characters who usually don't produce fire, are made of fire, or both of them (Like Fire Mario or Flaming Wario). Subcategory is called Dragons (who are usually not made of fire, but produce fire instead). Blaze can produce fire, so, believed to me, she is a "fire creature", as I found out.

Ah, I see. Still, it seems very strange to lump in characters with creatures. Why not split the category into something like Category: Characters that can manipulate fire? Might be a little long, but at least it is accurate.-- 15:49, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed.

Why Fire-manipulating creatures are merged together with creatures made of fire? I think because there was a navigation template which lists all the Fire Creatures. Fire-Related creatures were in as well. To make it more simple, and less hard, even the pyrokinetic creatures who are NOT made of fire were tagged in the category Fire Creatures as well, since that was included in the template. This is the reason why characters like the Snifit Zeus Guy, Vivian, Fire Mario and Flaming Wario are included. This template was deleted, however. The template has been replaced by the category it had. This same happened to the Ice Creatures and the Ice-Related Creatures. I think it's fine myself that they're merged together. But if you really want to, I suggest to call the category of the Fire-manipulating creatures either Pyrokinetic Creatures or Fire-Related Creatures.