User talk:Stonehill

(Unnamed Section)
Hi, although usually, I don't mind if somebody enacted a (talk page) proposal before I get to do it, users tend to appreciate it if you ask them first before doing anything. I've seen some other users get reprimanded for enacting proposals before the proposer can do anything, so it's just a heads-up.

Nevertheless, thanks for doing the work. 14:45, 24 May 2014 (EDT)


 * Okay, sorry, I didn't know. You're welcome, though! Stonehill (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2014 (EDT)

Signature test #1
Let's try it.  At last, the rock fell. (Tested on 08:25, 6 June 2014 (EDT)) 

Signature test #2
It should work with the timestamp.  At last, the rock fell. 15:34, 6 June 2014 (EDT)

Proposal header
Do not create an empty proposal section like Archive 40. When the time comes to archive the proposal it will be created then, there is no need for an empty archive.

Okay, I just wanted to know.  At last, the rock fell. 13:40, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

RE:About what you did to a sockpuppet's talk page
You have misread policy, as it states "Extra accounts (sockpuppets) should be blocked indefinitely and their talk pages should be deleted."
 * Oops. Sorry about that.  At last, the rock fell.

Subpage
Friendly reminder: you're not supposed to have any subpage to your userpage. If you wish to keep its content, move it to your userpage, because I think will be deleted soon. (Referring to User:Stonehill/logo)

New article
Hi. When you create an article, please make sure to place all relevant information in it. Is is unacceptable to create an incomplete articles, and there will be consequences if you do it again.

Re:Deleting section-only notice templates
Unlike the other templates, and  have different designs beyond just a straight word-swap (different size images, one has a built-in clear function, etc.) so I was just going to leave them both alone. - 18:32, 19 February 2015 (EST)