Talk:Mega Mushroom

Green Mushroom
Why is that green image of that mushroom is there if it has the own article. Isn't called the Super Mega Mushroom Princess Grapes Butterfly 19:01, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Yeah you're right but umm I think they put that there because it might be related to the Super Mushroom.

Nonono, thats what it looked like in Mario Party 4. It looked different then. GreenKoopa - Comments or questions?

Split the Mario Party 4 Mega Mushroom from this Page
Currently, we have the Mario Party 4 and New Super Mario Bros. versions of the Mega Mushroom here. According to this Page, the Mega Mushroom's Japanese name is 巨大キノコ (Kyodaikinoko, Huge Mushroom). This is possibly the NSMB version, because of the Japanese name of Mega Mario on this page of the Japanese NSMB site. But according to this page of the Japanese Mario Party 4 site, it isn't the same as the Mario Party 4 version (I guess), where the MP4 version is called デカキノコ (Dekakinoko (Deka is a Japanese word to describe something large)). As the appearances of both Mushrooms are also different (NSMB version is very huge and has a even bigger yellow cap (with red spots), MP4 version is normal-sized, and green-capped (with white spots)), and we've done several splits and merges because of the Japanese names before, I think this should be split as well.

Proposer: Deadline: February 7, 2012 23:59 GMT

Support

 * 1) Per me

Oppose

 * 1) As  explained here, the effects are the same; only the appearance has changed, and I don't think that and the different names are enough to warrant a split.
 * 2) Per what I said on the other proposal

Comments
If it is split, is there enough info on the MP4 Mega Mushroom to keep it from being a stub?

Short articles do not necessarily mean a stub. A stub is simply an article with inadequate information, that is, not enough information. If we cannot expand the article anymore, yet it is a few sentences long, then it is not a stub. 19:37, 25 January 2012 (EST)


 * What I meant was, is there enough info on it to make it into an article?
 * Yes, there is. But's more logical to keep it as it is