Talk:Plane Mode

Reason for merge?


 * I think it's being merged because it isn't "worthy" of it's own article... which I don't think. It's a form, and it is a fine article, if that's the reason. --YellowYoshi398 17:07, 16 February 2007 (EST)

Might you work some of your magic on it, YellowYoshi? :)


 * I suppose I could try... Oh, and thanks. --YellowYoshi398

Delete Plane Mario
Make New 3-9

Everything about this is already covered elsewhere, such as Paper Mario:The Thousand-Year Door and other places like Black Chest Demons. Its not really noteworthy either; just its a plane that flies. Thats about it, nothing too special about it. Either do that or make new articles for the other modes because they don't have articles.

{{scroll box|content= Proposer: {{User|Booderdash}} Deadline: August 14, 2010 24:00 GMT

Delete/merge into PM:TTYD

 * 1) not really noteworthy per proposal.
 * 2) Per proposal.
 * 3) I am Zero! If this is already part of other articles then it should be deleted. Zero signing out.

Make new

 * 1) - It's our policies to make an article for all of Mario's "form", correct? The transformations in TTYD are forms in their own right.
 * 2) - They each are found in different places, have different uses, different minigames associated to them, they're very different.
 * 3) Per All!
 * 4) - Per all. However, I think the information pertaining to the panels should merely be included into the form articles, rather than getting their own pages, seeing as they do nothing on their own.
 * 5) Per all. If 'make new' means 'don't delete'. Anyway, the two articles you say it is covered in elsewhere give the smallest amount of information on this that they can.
 * 6) Per MrConcreteDonkey.
 * 7) - Per Glowsquid.
 * 8) - Per all.
 * 9) - Per Glowsquid.

Comments
If this is deleted, Plane Panel should also go; if the other forms get pages, corresponding panel pages should also be made (or Plane Panel must be merged with Plane Mario). - 02:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Per Walkazo. Plane panel should be merged (which would make a great article that shouldn't be deleted), or delete it. In my opinion neither deserve to be deleted). 22:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, in case the article is kept and others are created they should have their correspondent panels in the article. A redirect should be created, too.

}}