From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| All past proposals are archived here. This page is protected to maintain the discussion as was.
|
Automatically Removing Fan Votes from FA Nominations
AUTOMATICALLY REMOVE FAN VOTES 7-0
There have been far too many times where I have seen someone support or oppose the nomination or denomination of a featured article simply because of the fact that they like the character or enjoy the game or whatever. These kinds of votes have no place here, where articles are featured based on their ability to represent the best that the wiki has to offer, not on any personal preference. However, we still have to go through the process of getting three people, at least one of which has to be an admin, to vote to remove his vote and then waiting 24 hours before finally being able to remove it. Enough of these votes can stall either kind of nomination until they have no way of passing when they shouldn't even be there in the first place. So, what I propose is to outright disallow these kinds of votes from being used. If they are used, they're to be removed without going through the longer removal process (for unfeature nominations) or deleting the reasons and leaving the vote (for feature nominations).
Proposer: GreenDisaster (talk)
Deadline: March 30, 2013, 23:59 GMT
Support
- GreenDisaster (talk) Supporting.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per proposal,
this should hopefully get rid of the fanvote stopping Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time getting unfeatured. EDIT: Articles should be featured/unfeatured on (lack of) quality, not I like this
- Goomba (talk)
but i liek dat game hav it feachured rite nao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Support; that example is not a vote, just pure bias.
- King Pikante (talk) Per proposal.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) This proposal is made by my favorite color! It should pass! But really, those types of votes do nothing other than unnecessarily slow the FA process. We should remove them on site. Per proposal.
- BowserJunior (talk) Per all.
- newSMBU (talk) — Here's what it is up to today (no user cited is real, just examples):
- "mariofan3718429 (talk) Plz feature this game cuz i liek it!!!!! PLZ!!!!!!"
- "wiiu4ever (talk) its an awsome charcter so it shuld be fetured"
- "koopaling (talk) i hate gombas so it must be unfetured"
- "yoshi2001 (talk) yoshi is so cute he must be fetured he is sooooo cute!!!"
- Things like these should definitely be cleared out. Per all.
Oppose
Make an iPhone/iPad app
DO NOT CREATE APP 1-14
My idea is to make an app for the iPhone or iPad that links you straight to the wiki. Since not entirely nessecary, it should be free. I got this idea because Khan Academy has the exact same thing as I'm suggesting. What's more, we'll be the FIRST wiki to do this!
Proposer: Electrical Bowser jr. (talk)
Deadline: April 1, 2013, 23:59 GMT
Make an app
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per proposal.
Don't make an app
- RandomYoshi (talk) — You yourself state that creating an app is unnecessary. Why would the Wiki garner from a completely unnecessary addition that isn't even provided by the Wiki itself, but some other second-party or alternatively third-party management getting in the way? I just don't see it improving the Wiki at all.
- GreenDisaster (talk) It's impractical, it'll be annoying to create in the first place, and it's simply unnecessary for both the average wiki visitor and the average wiki editor.
- BowserJunior (talk) Per all, completely unneccesary.
- Wintermelon43 (talk) Like what the other's said
- King Pikante (talk) That is just useless.
- YoshiKong (talk) Like Phoenix said somewhere other than here, why would we need an app when a home screen shortcut does the job?
- Walkazo (talk) - Per all.
- Turboo (talk) - Per all.
- ThePremiumYoshi (talk) - Per all.
- Blue CosmicToad (talk) Per all.
- Prince Bowser Junior (talk) Per all.
- Goomba (talk) Unnecessary, waste of money. Per all.
- newSMBU (talk) — "…What's more, we'll be the FIRST wiki to do this!". …You probably ignored that Wikipedia has an indipendent iOS app, too. And there's Wikipanion, still for iOS, that did the already done job: you can have more than one wiki in the same app, you can jump to a specific section without going up the page, and several more features… Per all.
- Mariotime11 (talk)Like RandomYoshi said, the proposer himself stated that an app is unnecessary. Per all.
@MortonBoo99--You can view and edit the wiki from those devices. In fact, I'm writing this from my iPod.--BowserJunior (talk)
Even though I oppose the app, I think a mobile site might have some use (makes it easier to edit from mobile devices). I don't know though, you'll have to bring up anything like that with Porplemontage (talk).--Mariotime11 (talk)
I agree with Mariotime11 Kamek the magikoopa (talk)
|
