View source

From the Super Mario Wiki

This page has been locked to prevent editing.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

__NOTOC__ '''Super Mario Galaxy became a featured article at 10:51, 17 July 2009.''' {{fa-archive}} ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== ==== Support ==== #{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc. #{{User|McQueenMario}} Per Super Mario Bros. #{{User|YellowYoshi127}} Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it ''millions'') # This...game...IS SO EPIC!!![[User:Stick2012|Stick2012]] 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT) # I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still {{User|Marioguy1}} #{{User|RPGCRAZIEE}} This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information. #{{User|Gamer2.1}} I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical. #{{User|SpriteYoshi}}per all #{{User|Doopliss rocks}} Great page, & love the game. ==== Oppose ==== ==== Removal of Opposes ==== ==== Comments ==== Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. [[Super Mario Galaxy]] is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and ''deserves'' to be featured. {{User|Super Mario Bros.}} # This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.{{User|SpriteYoshi}}

• Template:Fa-archive
• Template:User (protected)

Return to Main Page.