MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/King K. Rool

Support

 * 1) King K. Rool is probably one of our best work here, along with Yoshi.--Glowsquid
 * 2) King K. Rool is really good, I say it should be an FA
 * 3) Agreed, it is filled with good information.
 * 4) 'Not the longest, but one of the best
 * 5) Fair amount of info, good enough for FA quality.----
 * 6) It's a good article and, besides having a few to many images, IMO, deserves to be the new FA.
 * 7) A very well written article. It covers a huge amount of information about King K. Rool and his various alter egos. ~ Zantok
 * 8) 'Long live K. Rool! --Taj The Genie 23:44, 4 September 2007 (EDT)
 * 9) Good length on each section, plus there's even a few references. We need more of those on here.
 * 10) Very complete but need a little more. Well it's ok...-- 18:33, 8 September 2007 (EDT)
 * 11) Of all the articles I've seen nominated, this one is one of my favorites. It covers all his aliases, appearances, and more in much detail. This one deserves being a FA. DarknessLord 10:29, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

Comments
Xterra, if you want to oppose it, give a reason. What is "Not too good" in the article? Your vote don't help us in any way. Glowsquid

So, basically, unless he fixes that opposition, it's the next Fwatured Article?


 * Read below Max2. Xterra needs to indicate to the supporters what needs to be improved so that he may remove his opposition when those improvements have been made.  Since this user did not follow the rules of opposition, as stated in the nominations section, his "oppose" has no weight unless he provides reasons.  I have contacted him about this.  -- Son of Suns
 * All opposes that have unclear/no meaning will be removed. 18:50, 5 September 2007 (EDT)

To Plumber: The article is allowed to have a reasonable amount of redlinks. One red link is reasonable, especially because it links to a subject from a game that has not been released. Also, King K. Rool does not have much artwork. Basically every piece of King K. Rool artwork is already in the article. Any more would be overkill. Not every article needs a super-huge gallery, especially when there are no images available. Also, I am upset you laughed in your edit summary, as if you don't take this seriously. -- Son of Suns
 * I thought a gallery had to have all the pictures even if it was already in the article. 21:47, 6 September 2007 (EDT)


 * It all depends on how editors want to organize an article. Regardless, galleries are completely subplemental and optional.  An article does not need a gallery to be a featured article.  An article does not need a gallery to be considered a good article.  If you feel the images should be duplicated, please make it happen.  But almost every image of King K. Rool is already in the article, and your vote should be removed. -- Son of Suns