Talk:Banana Coin

Sorry if it isn't all true. I wasn't completely sure about the country 3 part.

Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin
I do not agree with this proposal, as the only difference between a Banana Bunch Coin and a Banana Coin is that the former has a picture of a banana bunch on it, the other has a single banana. They both share the same purpose within the DK games, giving them to the supporting Kong(s) to pay up for their offered service.

Proposer: Deadline: October 9, 2016 at 23:59 GMT

Oppose

 * 1) Per my proposal.
 * 2) – Per proposal. The function is the same, being the form of currency. Appearance alone shouldn't always justify a split. And I feel that it would make it more difficult to navigate between two articles, when the subject's appearance is so inconstant and continues to change from game to game.

Comments
Doesn't the first rule say that you need a strong argument? (rhetorical) Because this is a proposal for a split of the subjects (since they are already together) and there is no strong evidence for it, just a counterevidence. Or is the evidence somewhere else (in which case, the evidence needs to be linked to the article). 16:44, 25 September 2016 (EDT)

I'm actually really confused right now. They are currently merged, but this is a proposal to split them and your opposing your own proposal to split them? I don't mean to be rude or anything, but am I missing something here or did you just create a proposal on splitting them, only to oppose it? Again, I don't mean to be rude, I'm just confused. 16:53, 25 September 2016 (EDT)

I'm sorry if I'm confusing anyone right now. The "Split" template suggested that the two coins would be split from each other, which I opposed. Second, this is the first time I made a TPP proposal about a split, and I was confused about how to write the proposal properly. 17:13, 25 September 2016 (EDT)


 * I think I know what you're trying to say; you don't want Banana Coins and Banana Bunch Coins split, correct? If that's the case, we don't need a proposal; they're already merged as it is.

Yes, I want that. Should this entire proposal be removed then? I made this proposal because LinkTheLefty put the split template on this page and posted this in the summary for his edit he made back in January: "Might as well, given the apparent recent currency splits." 17:40, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
 * Well if you don't want them split, then yeah you can cancel the proposal. They are currently merged anyway. 18:04, 25 September 2016 (EDT)

I've cancelled this proposal, as requested by A51 Trooper. But as I said on his talk page, an established consensus is a good thing to have, especially when someone had previously raised a concern about the subject being merged. A passed TPP is a good precedent to look back on in case somebody else wants to raise the suggestion of splitting the articles in future.

20:07, 25 September 2016 (EDT)