File talk:MP9 4-Player Speeding Bullets.png

What was wrong with the high-resolution revisions?

07:03, 25 May 2013 (EDT)


 * Nothing was wrong, but we don't need to be making new revisions with different characters, we can improve the old version easily. -- 07:52, 25 May 2013 (EDT)


 * But, the revision was improved. Sacrificing the quality of this, to have this was not a good way to go. If you really want to, upload the low quality version as a separate file to show the different positions of the characters.


 * 08:01, 25 May 2013 (EDT)


 * Nothing is wrong with the oldest revision, it looks better than the latest two. -- 08:12, 25 May 2013 (EDT)
 * No it doesn't 19:14, 15 July 2013 (EDT)
 * Oh yeah? Then why does everyone care about HQ and compressed images? We only need 1 revision and the first version was good, unlike the latest versions. -- 09:36, 16 July 2013 (EDT)
 * Don't you want higher quality stuff? Would you rather use the super-old computers that use vacuum tubes to work and weigh over one ton or would you rather use your quad-core computer with ridiculous GPU and other great stuff today? No, you wouldn't!? Okay then, tell me, exactly HOW was the lower resolution screenshot with a blurrier quality ANY BETTER than an emulated screenshot where the quality is crisp because the quality is considered "ripped" and can't get any better? You tell me. 14:37, 16 July 2013 (EDT)