Template talk:Better source

Shouldn't this have its own associated category instead of just using the same one refneeded uses? Binarystep (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
 * It needs a(nother) citation, might as well put it in the citation needed category. Same with . Plus, then everything's kept in one place, nice and simple. Believe it or not, I did think this through. - 22:04, 11 May 2015 (EDT)