User talk:LTIan

Trouble
If anyone has any trouble with me, feel free to talk to me here.

Image
If you're going of a new maps for NSMBW, upload new versions of the files in the article pages.

Hey LTIan
Hey, it's YK from the forums. I thought I'll drop by and hello. Please take my friend box!

If you ever need help with anything, just let me know.

Super Mario Bros. (pinball)
Of course I haven't forgotten. I created Super Mario Bros. (pinball) a few days ago, and it took me ages. I'm now working on Super Mario Bros. Mushroom World.


 * I'll see what I can do.


 * The side of the cabinet has been uploaded, along with other views. See below;


 * True. But it's not urgent.


 * It may take me a few weeks. Info on these pinball machines are hard to find, and most of the info in the first pinball article was collected via YouTube gameplay videos. I also have real-life duties to attend to, unfortunately ;)

05:39, 31 October 2012 (EDT)

Super Mario Bros. Mushroom World
Hey LTIan. A quick update on Mushroom World; I've started the draft and uploaded a few images I found. Also, please see this image. I think the quality is good enough to obtain some of the Koopaling artworks from it. That Bowser artwork is also unique to the game. You can edit out the artworks as soon as you can if you want to, but if not I'll be more than happy to do so.

Also, please note that there may be a fairly small amount of photographs of the playfield for Mushroom World. I can't find any high-quality pics of the features of the playfield, unlike the first pinball article. Sorry :( Did you want to help me look?


 * Okay :D But did you want to get the Koopaling artwork or not?


 * By within, you mean the backglass, yeah? I'll be able to edit it out with photoshop.


 * Some of the Koopaling artwork is unique to this machine, so I'll get all eight Koopas, including Bowser.

21:19, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Update: Hiya. I apologize for the slow progression on SMB Mushroom World. I've done a lot of research this weekend and I've found a tonne of info and images and just today I've worked on the draft. I just need to fill the "Playfield layout" and "Gameplay" sections. The playfield info shouldn't be a problem, but there is very little info I can find about the rules/scoring system. But I'll see what I can do. Also I still need to get the Koopaling artwork (I won't forget!). Hope you are well.

Your buddy, 05:29, 25 November 2012 (EST)

RE:
Merry Xmas to you too, LTIan! Look what I have as a gift to you;



Like it? The unique artwork from the pinball machine. I just finished it off today, editing out of the background in Photoshop. I'm still collecting info for the article, but it should be finished soon. Thanks for your patience :)



07:40, 29 December 2012 (EST)

Compare
The Wendy poses were similar, but not the same. Compare. Also I can get Morton on this pic if you want.

01:41, 31 December 2012 (EST)

RE: Bigger Maps from NSMB2
Not as of this time can i increase the resolution.

Sorry i can't

Koopa Artwork
Hi. Where did you find that Bowser and Koopaling artwork? Did you make it yourself?


 * Sorry, we don't allow fan reproductions of official artwork here. They will have to be deleted.

03:00, 4 June 2013 (EDT)

Warning
Proceeding to call YoshiKong a "jerk" after he told you fan content is not allowed will get you nowhere. -- 13:47, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

Warning
I'm sorry but you are not allowed to do this. User:Antasma

RE:Request for Cancellation
There's really nothing I can do about it, I'm not involved with the Super Mario Bros Mushroom World article in any way; all I did was restore removed content from your talk page. -- 12:12, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

Last warning
, along with your recent forum and behavior on the wiki has earned you a last warning. If you break anymore rules, you will be blocked.

21:34, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

Nintendo Badge Arcade
It looks like you simply copied and pasted the info from the Wikipedia page onto here and asked for improvement from others. Please do not plagiarise info from Wikipedia or anywhere else. You should create an article once you have enough info of your own. Thanks.


 * No, this and that are for completely different reasons. You should be fine as long as you don't do it again.


 * You can't create stub articles. If you don't know much about it, then just leave the article creation to other users. No point in making an article you don't have enough info for.

Please Fix AboutFile for File:Castle bleck by acrossthedimensions-d6ui8z9.png
Please Insert the EXACT link of where you got the file from. I will go set the copyright for you. If you plan on using this file on your user page, add. If you need any more help, contact me or an admin. Have a good day -  20:06, 17 February 2016 (EST)


 * Per Personal images, tagged File:Castle bleck by acrossthedimensions-d6ui8z9.png with . If you don't want it, you can just add  to the tag . -- 22:03, 17 February 2016 (EST)


 * If you want to know where I found it, here, take a look: http://acrossthedimensions.deviantart.com/art/Castle-Bleck-414036981

Article discussion
Please don't make discussion on article talk pages, that doesn't involve improving the page. If you need to talk about topics like this, go the Mario Boards instead.

Reminder
Even though I made a small expansion to the Mario encyclopedia book page, creating new stub articles alone is still a level one offence, and you were already reminded about this before. When creating an article, it should generally be at least 350 bytes (The size can be checked on the History page). And while we're happy to add to it, some effort should still at least be put into the first edit; Don't have one sentence worth of info. Thanks.


 * I can find a picture of the cover of the book, if it helps. :) --LTIan (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2016 (EDT)

Koopalings
Why did you do the same exact edit after you knew it was removed before? If you saw my summary, the reason I removed it was because even though it's been implied the Koopalings will appear, we don't know if all of them will appear in the game, let alone as bosses (Take Mario & Sonic Rio 2016 and Paper Jam, for example). It's better to just wait for more info to come out, so unless you have a source, please don't do it again.
 * If the Koopalings are really going to be in this game, I feel we should add all of their names. Source or no source, I think we should keep their names listed just in case.--LTIan (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2016 (EDT)


 * Sorry, but info shouldn't be added "just in case" they're true. They never directly mentioned anyone besides Morton, so why list the names of the Koopalings that haven't even been shown yet? All Nintendo said was that "the Koopalings" will appear, so to be on the safer side, it should appropriately be left as "Koopalings". I'm sorry if the listing bothers you, but that's how it should be for now. Again, wait for more announcements on them, then they can be added.


 * No, that's not what I meant. I said they never mentioned anyone "besides Morton", so when I meant it should be "left as Koopalings", I also meant in addition to Morton, because he was confirmed. Sorry if that wasn't clear (I made another post regarding this on Colour Splash's talk page).


 * Well, it doesn't matter now. The other Koopaling names are now placed in the "Others" section until further notice of any more bosses.--LTIan (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2016 (EDT)


 * Yeah, I know. Just wanted to clear up any misunderstanding.

Bowser
Again, however likely it may be, please stop adding info on the off chance it's true; only add if it is true. Unlike the Koopalings, which were confirmed, there is no source stating or mentioning Bowser's involvement in the game, so don't list his name as it counts as false info and speculation. The "Others" section is not there for that kind of info; it's for characters that have been confirmed, but with currently unspecified roles. Add any more speculative or unsourced information and you will receive a warning.
 * Fine. I won't even add B.J. (Bowser Junior) in the others section. But in the event if I'm right about Bowser or BJ, I want my account blocked until the game's official release date.--LTIan (talk) 00:53, 24 June 2016 (EDT)

Reminder
Please stop adding all the Koopalings into the page, so far only Morton Koopa Jr. has been confirmed so let's just leave it at that also please source the edit if you really did see it thanks. 04:38, 22 July 2016 (EDT)
 * I wanted to put the rest of the Koopalings names in the "others" section", just in case if any of their names are mentioned. MarioJC said I could. Ask him/her! He'll/she'll vouch for me! --LTIan (talk) 09:37, 24 July 2016 (EDT)


 * Please read carefully what's been said to you; I never said you should add the other six names, just those that have been explicity confirmed (that is, the "Koopalings" and Morton). Nintendo confirmed the Koopalings would appear as bosses (but never stated their names), and Morton was shown in some gameplay footage, so I don't see anything wrong with having the listing be just "Koopalings" and Morton's name. Considering we're dealing with upcoming content, that's how it should be for now; the rest will be added once we have a source that 100% confirms their appearance, by name or otherwise, so please stop adding their names "just in case" (as I've stated twice before already) or remove Morton's name. We're not going to restructure something just because it "aggravates" someone or doesn't meet that person's expectations.


 * Can I at least rename the 'Koopalings' in the Bosses section to 'Koopaling' since only Morton's name is shown? It can still be linked to the Koopaling's article. It's just that I don't like having a plural word like 'Koopalings' paired with only one singular name like Morton's. It's that kind of grammar that really gets me mad. --LTIan (talk) 11:36, 25 July 2016 (EDT)


 * As Mario jc just told you we cannot change something just because it aggravates you (or any user for that matter). Morton Jr. was confirmed so he stays. If another Koopaling gets confirmed I assure you we'll add him/her in thanks. 20:01, 25 July 2016 (EDT)


 * It's not a matter of incorrect grammar. The 's' isn't there because one Koopaling (Morton) is listed. As Mister Wu stated, the Koopalings as a group were confirmed. That's why it is in plural form. Morton is just listed there because he is part of that group, and the reason he stays is because he is the only one shown, mentioned by name, and confirmed, by Nintendo.

Last Warning
No more false information okay this is not acceptable. If you are certain you saw it source the site you found it on I don't have to tell you this a zillion times. You've done this many times before meaning you deserved something stronger than a warning, don't continue this further or you will be blocked thanks for you cooperation. 22:19, 1 August 2016 (EDT)


 * ARRRGHH!!!!! BLOCK ME UNTIL PAPER MARIO: COLOR SPLASH'S OFFICIAL RELEASE DATE!!! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! --LTIan (talk) 23:11, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

Hello please don't alter or remove warnings or comments again, if you do I will get a Sysop involved thanks for your cooperation. 23:58, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
 * Didn't you read my comment on your page or on this page? --LTIan (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2016 (EDT)

Warning
With your recent stub article Holo-Peach, it doesn't appear to me that you're improving, considering that you've already been reminded in the past about creating new stubs. Please allocate more effort in your articles rather than simply writing one or two lines, along with very poor and careless formatting, and then expecting other editors to fill in the holes. Review our manual of style. If you do not have access to resources that can provide you with adequate information, work on something else. Given that you're already blocked, you are already on your way to another ban (likely a perma-ban) from the staff if you do not show improvement immediately. 00:31, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * What the HECK is wrong with creating stub articles? I thought they would be good for users to further edit them?! Where in your Rules does it say that Stub Articles are not f'ing allowed?! --LTIan (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * Here. 00:37, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * You know what? I am not a researcher, ok?! I am a speculator! I speculate a lot of things! It's what I do! I am not researcher who spends all his time researching these things! I make speculation articles because I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THEY DO EXIST! If you think spectulators should be allowed on this wiki, then why not make a rule of it?!--LTIan (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * Stub articles aren't encouraged because they are so scant in content that they convey virtually no useful information to our readers. They are better off as a red link to show immediately that we have no information on the subject. Our own policy, the Manual of Style states the following:
 * "Please do NOT create tiny articles just for the sake of filling in red links. Even if the article you are making is about a minor subject, try to put a decent amount of effort into it rather than a rush job.
 * "Newly created stubs will be deleted automatically so try to add a decent amount of information to the page you are creating."
 * While judgement on what's a stub or not varies from person to person, I concluded that your article is a low effort stub because it is poorly formatted (no categories, game isn't italicized, no navigational template), has only a few sentences and has deliberately empty sections. If you want to create an article, but cannot do so in a single sitting, create your own sandbox page in your userspace, edit from there, and once it looks acceptable for a standalone page, then create the page and copy-paste the content. Or, you can put a decent amount of effort with proper formatting (like categorizing and adding a navigation template) and writing adequate information for at least one or two of the locations of the article subject and then tagging it with and  if you are unable to obtain an image. What's not acceptable is creating an article that has barely any useful information to convey and expecting editors to fill it in. That's not how article creation is intended to work. Please stop operating on that mindset as it will not take you very far in this wiki. Focus on making an honest effort contributing substantial and useful content if you intend to create articles. We don't need your help "kickstarting" articles since anyone can create an article.
 * Even if there isn't a rule on stub creation, saying that "there isn't a rule on it" is not a good counter to Don't shoot your foot off, especially if several users, including a MarioWiki patroller, has called your action into question. Instead, listen to our advice and warnings and you'll avoid scenes like you're creating right now and you'll avoid getting banned here. 00:54, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * May I just jump in here and say speculation isn't allowed, sorry dude. We need to research this stuff to earn more information on it. Take Lindsay151's interview with Kenny James for example. (The best voice actor too btw). You need to either research the information or e-mail the subject not just guessing like "Oh hey my predictions are right." But you have so very little info to go off of. I mean yeah I'm not trying to be rude but this site needs proof, all the info here needs to be fully accurate. Also stubs are allowed on certain cases when very little info is known about the subject like here but I may interview this particular subject someday to expand the page. Either way, please don't speculate here again unless it's true. Thanks. 00:56, 19 November 2016 (EST)

When I created List of Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam pre-release and unused content, I just took the information from Paper Jam and moved it to the article with no changes and created a link to the page. The only difference between the article I created and the article you created is the amount of information collected before the creation. Under different circumstances and users, articles created just to fill red links may or may not warrant a warning to a user (I looked at the rules). The end doesn't always justify the means. It is how the means are used. Please don't add articles that have little to no information that you know about them. One last thing, do you have the game, or are you just interested in it? In the formal case, you can easily work on expanding the article. In the latter case, try finding a YouTube Video. If you want to be lazy and not do it, tell me here. 01:30, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * I need help with the Holo-Peach article. I only just got started on it and I didn't have enough time to finish it, ok? That's why I left it a stub. I do not have the game because I do not have the Wii U. I don't even know if it will be playable on the new Nintendo Switch.--LTIan (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * I mean you could've just said that instead of speculating, we're here to help. I've actually played the game so I may be able to expand the page and maybe add an image. :) 01:46, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * I didn't think to use the Summary Option. :( The rules didn't say anything about using the Summary Option to ask for help, did it?--LTIan (talk) 01:49, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * I may rewatch some YouTube Videos to find out about the Holo-Peach starting when I get my college homework done, but if you just need help researching, the YouTube videos I watched were uploaded by Packattack04082. (note that I don't watch all of his videos.) They should help you out. 01:51, 19 November 2016 (EST)

As I said, if you don't have time to finish an article you're working on, you're always welcome to create a userspace sandbox page and work on it as much as you want. Once it looks like a solid article, then you can create the page and copy-paste from there. I don't think anyone's going to take your work, but if they do, just accept it and move on. And if you don't have the necessary information to create a substantial article, don't feel obligated to create it. Nothing is in a rush here. 01:54, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * But I don't have a user sandobx. :( --LTIan (talk) 01:58, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * Well, it's easy. Just create it as if you're creating an article, but it's a userspace subpage. Like this: User:LTIan/sandbox. 02:01, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * @LTIan To your question about summaries. Yes you can use the summary. It isn't required but it helps other users understand the changes I.e why some info was removed. I discussed this with the owner of this site here.  02:02, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * Will a tab at the top of my userpage with the same sandbox link?
 * Tap LeftyGreenMario's link she displayed for you. 02:05, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * What link?--LTIan (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * LTIan: There won't be an additional tab at the top of your userpage, but you can give yourself easy access to your userspace sandbox by linking it in your userpage or typing the name User:LTIan/sandbox (once it is created) in the search bar. 02:07, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * I see your sandbox. I know you're afraid of losing access to it, but it's going to be always there. Just type User:LTIan/sandbox in the search bar and hit enter OR link it in your userpace so it's just a click or two away. 02:15, 19 November 2016 (EST)
 * Okay 1 LTIan, put your comments at the bottom of the section and 2 the link in her message this one User:LTIan/Sandbox < click on this one (the one where my arrow is pointing. Click on that link and create the page; I hope this helps. :) 04:05, 19 November 2016 (EST)


 * I have a better idea. :) I'm gonna go make a "Sandbox Land" of my own. I call it "Sandbox Land" to make it fit with the theme of both Mario Series and the Wiki Sandbox. That way, if I ever need to go to make stub articles, My Sandbox Land will be the place to go. --LTIan (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2017 (EST)

Done. :) My Sandbox is all set up and ready. I added a link to my Sand Box on my user page. --LTIan (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2017 (EST)

Last warning
It has become clear to me (and many other users) that your conduct is unacceptable by posting comments intended for disruption in this wiki. Normally, we don't expect all users to love this wiki or agree with how our discipline works, but you have a dubious history that makes you unreliable and untrustworthy. As I see your past conduct, which has included posting disruptive, inflammatory remarks to other users, you have not improved from it at any sort. You have used up all your chances. As I warned, make a single mistake one more time, and you will be banned, likely perma-banned. 14:16, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 * What have I done wrong? :( --LTIan (talk) 14:20, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 * see User talk:Shokora.
 * My main user page? That's the problem that led to this? I'll fix it. :( --LTIan (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2016 (EST)

If I get perma-banned...
In the event that if I should ever get perma-banned, I want one of the following messages to be shown:

-"GO AWAY AND DON'T COME BACK!"

-"GET OUT AND STAY OUT!"

-"WE DON'T WANT YOU AROUND HERE ANYMORE!"

-"STAY OFF OF THIS WIKI AND NEVER COME BACK! EVER!"

The reason I am suggesting this is because no matter what I do or where I go on this wiki, I am always somehow breaking the wiki's strict rules. I thought that this wiki was a fun wiki where we could create our own articles. :( But now I see that I have been wrong all this time.

I am sorry for everything I've done and I know what you're all thinking: "None of this would have ever happened if I had never registered onto this wiki". :(

And truthfully, you're right. :(

So should if I get perma-banned, then I would like one of those messages to be set up for the Perma-Ban Message if it happens. --LTIan (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2016 (EST)

First of all, I highly doubt any of those four messages will be placed by the admins. It looks rude, it's unnecessary and doesn't explain why your were banned. Second, don't just give up and decide you are the worst user ever when you make a mistake. Learn form your mistakes and strive to be better. There have been far worse users than you. Trust me, I know. This wiki does allow you to make your own articles. But there's no point in making an article with barely any information. Either get more information or ask someone else if they have any. If those fail, there probably isn't enough info for the subject to have its own article. The rules are there for good reasons. Yes, they're strict. Yes, they can be hard to follow. But they are necessary if we want to have the best quality wiki possible. If you disagree, you need to look at the opposing arguments. I'm sure all the wiki staff (admins, patrollers and such) and the majority of users understand and agree with the rules. I completely understand if the rules are too complex and strict for you, but there's no point in having an account here if you don't like the way we do things. Don't openly say that you hate the Super Mario Wiki or compare us to the wikia. That's like walking into a fancy restaurant and shouting to the heavens that McDonalds is better. Even if it's true, it's mean and you shouldn't do it. If you like the wikia better, fine, use that one instead. But don't come here and say this wiki is bad. It's just impolite. As for speculation, that's not what wikis are for. Out job is to stat cold, hard facts, not personal opinions because anyone can have their own opinion. I'm not saying you can't have opions, I'm saying you can't put them on articles. If you want to state your opinions, that's what the forums are for. I'm not interested in them, but that might be just the place for you. Please think on this. Stop beating yourself up. 16:45, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 * You know, you keep complaining about strict rules, but our "strict" rules is how we got far in this wiki and why we're more searched for than the other Mario Wikia, since it has less quality control (every time you search for a Mario-related game, this wiki always shows up first above the Mario Wikia). We put up these rules mostly for satisfying our audience's purpose for being here: searching for quality information related to the Mario series. Also this should be common to ANY community if it isn't MarioWiki: you've been banned mostly because you've been throwing temper tantrums over disputed edits from other users who also think they are doing the wiki a favor, rather than standing your ground and affirming why your edits are valid instead of complaining about how we run here. How you react to anyone disputing your information is generally considered to be inappropriate and immature.


 * Furthermore, you're digging yourself deeper in the hole by attempting to make a scene of your recent Last Warning because of your inappropriate user page and history, rather than accepting your Last Warning, learning from it, and moving on. None of the administrators will accept any of your "requests" should you get permabanned, because what you're requesting is inappropriate conduct of the administration.


 * I'd like to clarify here that none of us here want to beat you down. None of us here want to see you banned. But if you continue acting like this, we have no choice but to reprimand you for inappropriate conduct because you're still breaking established rules that we've put up for, again, quality control. 17:21, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 * Thank you, Baby Luigi. That's partly what I was trying to say. Nobody here wishes you had never joined, nobody is issuing warnings because they're trying to be mean, and the rules have been there for many, many years and the wiki is doing quite well. It's your behavior that needs to improve, not the wiki's.
 * 17:32, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 * I don't like being blunt like this, especially towards users who have genuine intentions of being a helpful user; I don't care as much compared to vandals and morons who think it's funny to blank out pages with bad words. We gave you chances because we care about you, and we want you to become a better user; we can't be all kind and nice if you break rules that need to be enforced though. 17:40, 2 December 2016 (EST)