MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Baby Luigi

Keep Featured Article Status

 * 1) I proof-read the article, corrected verb/informal tenses the most I can, wrote the Pitty story where Baby Luigi is involved in (which is basically the entire thing XP) though I could have created new errors, added the Super Mario Kun section, and added some information in other sections. I corrected most of the errors in the article that you mentioned, so this should stay featured.
 * 2) Per BLOF. This article looks great.
 * 3) BaboonLikesOliveFools has done everything I complained about. Now the article doesn't bother me as much anymore. I hate Baby Luigi.
 * 4) Per ElderlyWaluigiOnWater.
 * 5) Per BLOF
 * 6) The article has no errors.
 * 7) I think we should keep the article since there seems to be nothing wrong with it...
 * 8) I agree with the others. The article is very clean, and informative with very few errors (also very accurate). This article should remain featured.
 * 9) Per all.
 * 10) Way to go, BigLemonsOfFury. Per her.
 * 11) Whose idea was it to unfeature this article? It must be considered a hate crime against Baby Luigi. Per all above.
 * 12) I think that this article shall be featured! People, let this article be featured in the future!
 * 13) this article should be featured
 * 14) Baby Luigi awesome he should be featured his articale is fine i read it
 * 15) Everyone has made a good pint and I agree to all statements
 * 16) per all.

Comments
Uh-oh, you gave me work to do on this article. Time. I'll try fixing everything I can.

Just expand the informal contractions and I will be happy.
 * There's only, like, 2 nonquoted contractions in the entire article. Fix'd too.


 * Okay, don't vote to remove my vote. I will request for a deletion.
 * You're not allowed to delete it yourself?
 * Well, I'm pretty sure I cannot delete pages. I can only blank them.
 * Oh, right. I forgot about this page and was just thinking of the unfeature template on the article. :/