MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bramble Scramble

Support

 * 1) This article is of good length, no redlinks, to my knowledge there are no errors, many images, everything needed for an FA.

Comments
Just shorten the paragraphs a little bit.

Oh... this wasn't ready to become a FA...

LeftyGreenMario:I was trying to find some grammar errors but I coudn't. Could you just point one out for me?

I don't know if there were any grammar errors either, but I'm sure there were tense errors. That was my fault, I wrote pretty much the whole article :p I don't have the ability to keep everything in present-tense.

EDIT: I fixed all the errors I could find. I think the article is just about fine now, but I can't think of any way to shorten the paragraphs. I want the layout of the levels to be specific, so people know what obstacles and stuff are in the stage.

There are a lot of future tenses in this article. It should be written in present tense.

Didn't I fix them? It should be in present tense now.

It humored me that several users were trying to remove mine and KS3's votes, but there wasn't even a Removal heading. (I've added it in now)
 * Someone deleted it by accident. But really, what's wrong with the article now?


 * Lacks any form of references. Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances." Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed. - NARCE 03:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Where could I put a reference? All the references are right in the game.

Fawfulfury, youtube is a very bad source. I would just go with no sources since we don't any.
 * Well, for in-game stuff, it is very good. But anyways, everything in this article, as stated above, is seen in the game, so we don't need references.
 * exactly we don't need references. This has the potential for featured article without the references plus its not needed.