User talk:SmartieMaxx

Kelsey Hutchinson/Nicole Mills case
I was about to see about asking you the same thing, but in regards to the Kelsey Hutchinson case. If you found any evidence if Nicole Mills and/or Kelsey Hutchinson played the respective Peach/Toad roles for Mario Party 8, let me know please. All I know is that recent installments have had Samantha Kelly being the current voice actress for Peach, Toad, and a few others. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 13:21, 29 December 2011 (EST)

Toad
I am not going to place an official reminder template here, but on the article Toad, you placed the PNG file. The PNG is being deleted due to having bad transparency. Spidey 665   20:19, 29 December 2011 (EST)
 * There are certain PNGs with bad transparency, yes. Spidey  665   20:22, 29 December 2011 (EST)

December 2011
Please stop this now. Thank you. 21:03, 29 December 2011 (EST)

Your edits on the Charles Martinet article
Stop creating unnecessary links like what you did in your previous edits to the Charles Martinet article, please. As Mario4Ever said in the summary, if you attempt this again, we on the staff may be forced to take action against you. Thanks for your cooperation. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:04, 29 December 2011 (EST)

Oops, bad review there. I didn't review that contrib. I easily fool myself. 21:04, 29 December 2011 (EST)


 * The warning you issued still counts against this person, Spidey665. What this person is doing is completely intolerable. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 21:06, 29 December 2011 (EST)

Last Warning (Edit War on the Mario Kart 7 article)
Your editing behavior on the Mario Kart 7 article is completely unacceptable; stop taking out that notice that someone placed on that page diffrentiating betweek MK7 and MP7, or you'll be encountering a block. Thanks for your cooperation. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 23:08, 16 January 2012 (EST)

Reminder
This is unacceptable. You seemingly tried to alienate this editor who has potential. Number one, you have provided no explanation for your reversion. Number two, you have changed the Chinese back to its wrong state again - Mario is 马里奥 in simplified Chinese. (Proven via I have studied Chinese for four years and via translator). You have also reverted a numerous amount of good-faith edits without explanation for a long time already. Please provide edit summaries for your reversions in the future. -- 09:17, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Super Mario Bros. Undoing
You took away my edit to the Super Mario Bros. Article. Why? There was nothing wrong with it. -- 22:16, 1/27/12

Last Warning
Your recent behavior on the wiki, your undoing of good-faith edits without explanation, your constant engaging in edit wars, and your repeated violations of Courtesy was definitely enough for me to give you a last warning for disruption. The next time you behave in such a way, you will be blocked from editing without further warning. -- 23:36, 27 January 2012 (EST)

Seriously?
I explained to you what was wrong with your reversion, and THIS is what I get? Reversion back to the wrong Chinese (without explanation) is actually considered number one, vandalism, and number two, an attempt to alienate editors who have potential. Unless you do have an understanding of the Chinese language, then don't revert ANY good-faith edits without explanation upon your return in two weeks. -- 19:51, 30 January 2012 (EST)

Eh.
My browser displayed wrong images and it made me laugh. Luckily, this didn't happen to you. How it come you were blocked and still had talkpage access? --Super Famicom 64 17:07, 25 February 2012 (EST)

Baby Mario
While you are correct in most situations the B in Baby would not be capitalized in this situation it should be capitalized since the characters name is officially Baby Mario
 * You don't have to call me sir. Also just in case you didn't know when updating the latest appearance section of an info box make sure the game is actually out first because policy requires that the game comes out first

RE: The previous block
No, we didn't put a block on your account for that reason; you got blocked because you were found to be discourteous to another user who was supposedly more experienced in making sure that specified content was accurate on a certain article, specifically in regards to how it's shown in another language. If you were a bit more civil in talking with that person before changing his edits without any reason, things might have gone better for you in the long run. Hopefully you'll make better edits attempts on this wiki from here on out. Thanks for your question. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 18:25, 25 February 2012 (EST)

Why do you keep removing valid infomation from articles?--Yoshidude99 17:56, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

That's exactly what I'm saying though.--Yoshidude99 18:01, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

Martinet and Donkey Kong
You do realize I posted irrefutable proof, right? Martinet even posted about it on Facebook a few months back. Kyubihanyou 18:26, 3 April 2012 (EDT)

Re: Martinet and Donkey Kong
Yeah, for Donkey Kong 64. Made by Rare.

The page I linked to was last updated with Baby Mario (for Mario Golf), which was before DK64. Even if the page is outdated the timing of that update couldn't have been more convenient. Kyubihanyou 18:51, 3 April 2012 (EDT)

Re: Martinet and Donkey Kong
Really? Did you even check the site yourself? It says it there in BOLD even. There are A LOT of mindless credits out there on the Internet, and those for voice acting are no exception. Marshall isn't even credited in-game for Bowser in Super Mario 64, and him being Peppy in Star Fox 64 is absolutely absurd when you realize he's simply not credited. I'm just correcting years of unchallenged belief that was never supported by a primary source in the first place by doing what those people never did: research.

This isn't my first time doing this, either: Japanese Mario Kart 64 credits? You're welcome. Eriko Ibe? You're welcome. Kyubihanyou 19:09, 3 April 2012 (EDT)

Vandal
If there is someone that is vandalizing the wiki, it's best not to leave a comment like that on his talk page. All you're doing is goading him into doing more spamming. Trolls like him want attention, and you are giving him the attention he wants. Leave him alone, and eventually he'll get bored and leave. GreenDisaster 11:29, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Again, don't bother talking to them. You're giving him bait, and he will take that bait and run with it. GreenDisaster 10:04, 27 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I've already told you twice now. Do not bother talking to the vandals. I've already explained to you twice why you shouldn't. GreenDisaster (talk) 11:23, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

I'm Confused
You undid my edits, and then you added the exact same things yourself. Why exactly did you do this?

Re: Ownage1
Don't feed the trolls - though this is hardly a troll by any definition. That said, it's unlikely they'll change their ways, so simply undo whatever "damage" he does and wait for the block. Lord Grammaticus 15:54, 19 June 2012 (EDT)


 * I've noticed that much, and I've also noticed he won't change his mind if anyone tries to tell him otherwise? If he wants to make a waste of his existence by devoting so much hatred towards something that ultimately has no bearing in the long run (getting mad over video games, in other words), then let him. Just keep undoing and wait for the inevitable. Lord Grammaticus 16:02, 19 June 2012 (EDT)


 * What I said still applies - it's pointless to try and tell him that (as I see you've been told before) when it's clear from previous behavior that he won't change. While I think it'd be nice if he did stop - especially considering anything he does takes a few minutes at most to rectify - my experience with people who exhibit this behavior says otherwise.


 * In other words, it's best not to make a big deal out of it. Lord Grammaticus 16:07, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

Warning (Inappropriate Content in Edit Summaries/Flaming)
Look, SmartieMaxx, we understand that you're frustrated with this Ownage guy who's been pestering this wiki for what seems to be almost a week now. However, you still have no right to flame the guy and this includes putting in inappropriate content in edit summaries. Just ignore the said person from here on out (we on the admin end can also see when we have to take action against this Ownage guy and his many sockpuppets). Thank you. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 12:51, 20 June 2012 (EDT)

Donkey Kong Country 3


Hello. Me and another admin decided that the story section was a little bit too lengthy and needed some work. Most of that old information isn't really important to the main story and is mentioned in other, more appropriate places in the article. I hope you won't find it a problem if I change it back.

Mario Kart 7
Was it that necessary to revert my edit? - User:YamiHoshi.nl Besides, it is relevant to the article's Trivia.
 * Then it's strange that people like Lindsay and Lakituthequick asked me for Puzzles.

Is Something Wrong
Do my edits look unconstructive? After all, Peach IS dressed very formally in SSBB. Her SSBM attire is more fit for battle. Why not explain what's wrong so I know what I did? --Alicatgirl 12:29, 8 July 2012 (EDT)

Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon
I fail to see how those aren't forum comments. Master      R.O.B.     (contribs · edits) 17:55, 15 July 2012 (EDT)
 * They have nothing to do with the article. BrawlROB.jpg   Master       R.O.B.     (contribs · edits) 18:52, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

Mario Kart 7 Daisy and Waluigi
You do revert that my edits in Mario Kart 7? This is the first time for Daisy has been playable and Waluigi is not it. and Daisy had always appeared along with Waluigi.

Ownage
Everyone is talking about some Ownage guy, so could you tell me how he's being annoying?

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Thanks, but could you give me a link to his page? I might be able to see a few examples of how he's been antagonizing the wiki.

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

That is SCARY!

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Two things:

1. Which of his antagonisms do you think is the worst?

2. Want to be friends?

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Movie names
Because of a recent proposals the wiki no longer considers the characters from the movie to be the same as the ones from the games.

User page
Don't you think you should create your user page?

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

I'm not giving you peer pressure! I'm just informing you that you can. And you'll be more interesting.

Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.

Warning
Stop edit warring on the Baby Bowser page if you have a reason as to why you think the info should be the way you want it try talking to the person who you are warring with.

External links for Samantha Kelly
Hey there, SmartieMaxx; I just noticed you added external links on the Samantha Kelly article. Are you very sure that this is the Samantha Kelly that we're looking for who's portrayed Princess Peach? Making sure of this before I proceed with any further action. Let me know as soon as you can; thanks in advance. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 22:04, 31 August 2012 (EDT)

dont you see how much mickey is important to the wiki? They should create mickey articles!!!! CROCKS (talk) 16:19, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

Stop
Stop undoing the edits I make to the Koopalings article. They are NOT Bowser's kids and it was even proven. Stop undoing the edits or else I will make sure you will get banned. Mario3D64 (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

Reverting edits
Hello. I've noticed your frequency in reverting edits where you see the change as unnecessary. While we appreciate your assistance, it may be best to add a quick note in the edit summary box before saving the revision. This will make it clear why you believe that edit should be reverted, and in turn users will understand where they went wrong and perhaps how they can improve. You have been warned and reminded about this matter multiple times. Please consider your conduct, or this situation may escalate. Thanks.

23:11, 26 September 2012 (EDT)

You are undoing my edits on the Super Mario 3D Land article. While I'm not mad at you or anything, please at least give a reason.

Please stop redoing my edits, I am part of the cleaning the trivia collab team and we are trying to reduce the size of oversized trivia sections.


 * Hi. Uh... what's wrong with the trivia being incorporated here? And please reply this time.


 * Thanks for the reply. But according to the Trivia policy and this forum thread, info in a trivia should be incorporatied into the relevant sections within an article so as to avoid overly-long trivia sections. Trivia sections are viewed as unnecessary, and in most cases are a bad look for the wiki. Thanks for your understanding.


 * 17:16, 23 October 2012 (EDT)

Warning
Edit summaries like this  It was never released on those systems, dummy! and this More like you're a mummy. are not acceptable they are rude and completely uncalled for and while this might be the first time you've done this in a while you have a history of doing it and have been warned for it in the past for it.

Super Happy Tree
Conventionally, items are given links when they are first mentioned in an article, and it is not necessary to state that the theft of the Super Happy Tree occurs in Yoshi's Story because that is implied by the content of the previous three sentences.

About your work on Mario Tennis Open
Dear SmartieMaxx,

I saw that you deleted something I wrote on the article about Mario Tennis Open in the section Trivia. (About Mario Tennis Open.) I understand that you might have thought it is nonsense. But I tell you that Bowsers old voice is really used in the game. Since 2008 Bowser has a new voice similar to the old one. It is a little deeper. Though, the old one is used in Mario Tennis Open. Please don't delete it again.

Blocked for three months
Despite all of the formal and informal warnings you have received, including your previous block, you continue to revert large amounts of legitimate "good faith" edits, many of them made by well-known and trusted members of the community. The admins are in agreement: if you do not improve this behaviour when you get back from this new block, the next block will be permanent. Please do not make it come to that, and try to be less trigger-happy when reverting edits in the future. - 00:10, 10 December 2012 (EST)