Talk:Back Space

change the game

it is mario party 9 not mario party island tour
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 47.17.228.18 (talk).

Split out the two variants of Back Space and split Advance Space from Dash Space

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

no quorum 3-0
I think it's about time that this happen. See, there are two different variants of Dash and Back Spaces in Mario Party games: the ones that move the player a fixed number of spaces, and the ones that move the player a random number of spaces as determined by a Dice Block. Sure, these two types of spaces are usually given near-identical names, but otherwise have different functions and appearances. Therefore, I propose that we split Advance Space (the fixed variety) from Dash Space, and split Back Space (fixed) from Back Space (random).

Proposer: Archivist Toadette (talk)
Deadline: November 6, 2020, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Archivist Toadette (talk) Per my proposal.
2. Waluigi Time (talk) Makes sense, there's a difference between a space that forces you to move somewhere specific and what's essentially a "roll again" space.
3. Benjaminkirsc (talk) Per both of them. Makes lots of sense (per Waluigi Time). It makes you focus on the topics better since they're two (totally) differently uses. Also, that should've been split a long time ago (like 2018 or 2019). But here we are talking about them so yeah, I agree altogether.

Comments

The "(fixed)" and "(random)" identifiers were suggested by Mario jc, so let me know if you have other suggestions in mind. ^(T|C) 13:38, October 23, 2020 (EDT)

@Archivist Toadette, we should drop Mario Party 3 references and made a new title called "Back Space (Nintendo 64)" and use the current details from this article. What do you think? Benjaminkirsc (talk) 18:58, October 27, 2020 (EDT)

Split out the two variants of Back Space and split Advance Space from Dash Space, take two

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

Split 6-0
Since the last proposal ended without the necessary quorum, I'll be reproposing this here. Same deal as the last proposal, just with a different deadline.

Proposer: Archivist Toadette (talk)
Deadline: November 22, 2020, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Archivist Toadette (talk) Per proposal.
2. Waluigi Time (talk) Per last time.
3. DarkNight (talk) Per all.
4. Benjaminkirsc (talk) Per last time and all
5. ChompworksEngineer (talk) Per all. I am surprised not enough people voted last time.
6. Ray Trace (talk) Per all.